‘Still here!’: X’s Grok AI tool accessible in Malaysia and Indonesia despite ban
Days after Malaysia made global headlines by announcing it would temporarily ban Grok over its ability to generate “grossly offensive and nonconsensual manipulated images”, the generative AI tool was conversing breezily with accounts registered in the country,“Still here! That DNS block in Malaysia is pretty lightweight – easy to bypass with a VPN or DNS tweak,” Grok’s account on X said in response to a question from a user,Grok’s ability to allow users to create sexually explicit images, including images of children, has created a global outcry over recent weeks, with regulators and politicians around the world launching investigations,Indonesia and Malaysia became the first two countries to announce blocks on the technology, with Malaysia’s regulatory body saying last Sunday it had “directed a temporary restriction” on access to Grok, effective as of 11 January 2026,Officials in the Philippines have said they too plan to ban the technology.
Blocking access to Grok is not straightforward, however.The technology not only exists across multiple platforms, including a standalone app and website, but is also integrated across X, which, along with Grok, is owned by Elon Musk’s xAI.Over the past week, X users, and even Grok itself, have advised people on how to bypass restrictions.This includes using a VPN – many of which are available for free – or changing domain name system (DNS), the protocol on the internet that turns address names into IP addresses that load websites.When the Guardian tried to use Grok in Indonesia, its website was working even without a VPN, though the Grok app did not work.
Grok was also still responding to Indonesian accounts on X, where it functions as an integrated chatbot,X has not been subject to a ban,Even if governments could completely restrict Grok, though, this is not a real solution, said Nana Nwachukwu, an AI governance expert and PhD researcher at Trinity College Dublin,“Blocking Grok is like slapping a Band-Aid on a weeping wound that you haven’t cleaned,” she said,“You block Grok, and then you go around shouting you’ve done something.
Meanwhile, people can use VPNs to access the same platforms,” Or, they could simply turn to one of the many other platforms that offer the same functions, including “smaller, general purpose AI systems that are largely unknown”, Nwachukwu added,Governments should instead focus on law enforcement and investigating individuals who use such tools to break the law, she added,“Platforms are required by law to provide information to law enforcement when a crime has been committed,” Nwachukwu said,“If we see people being arrested, people being tried in courts, people being jailed for these offences, that’s a sign that this is a real crime.
”X should build accountability into its platform – and clean itself up, said Nwachukwu: “All of those offending images should be removed from the platform.”On Wednesday, X announced additional safeguards in response to continued public anger, saying it would stop the @Grok account on X from “allowing the editing of images of real people in revealing clothing such as bikinis”, including paid subscribers.However, the Guardian found that it was possible to get around such restrictions by using the standalone version of Grok, easily accessible through a web browser, to create short videos in which clothes are removed from images of real women.This could then be posted to X’s public platform, where it could be viewed by users around the world within seconds.Musk’s company also said that, in jurisdictions where such content is illegal, it will geoblock the ability of all users in those locations to generate images of real people in bikinis, or similar attire, in Grok on X, adding that “xAI is implementing similar geoblocking measures for the Grok app”.
Experts warn users may still be able to get around such “geoblocks” through a VPN.It is also not clear in which countries such restrictions will be implemented.In Malaysia, the communications minister, Fahmi Fadzil, has said restrictions on Grok would only be lifted once the ability to produce harmful content had been disabled, according to local media reports.Dr Nuurrianti Jalli, a visiting fellow at the media, technology and society programme at ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute in Singapore, said the threat of blocking Grok could be a useful way to apply pressure to companies to respond quickly, adding that it “shifts the debate from ‘individual bad actors’ to questions of platform responsibility, safety by design, and accountability when safeguards fail”.It could also “slow the spread of abuse, reduce casual misuse and create a clear boundary around what authorities consider unacceptable”, she said.
In Indonesia, Grok has been used to create nonconsensual sexualised images of singers and celebrities, including one of the country’s most popular girl groups, JKT48, while in Malaysia, women report similar abuses, including cases where the tool has been used to remove their hijabs, according to Malaysian media.Some women resorted to publicly telling Grok on X that they do not authorise it to “crawl, take, process or edit” any of their photos.Jalli said governments should push for greater transparency “about how safety measures are implemented, how abuse reports are handled and what enforcement steps are taken when harmful content is generated or circulated”.The Malaysian communications and multimedia commission and the ministry of communications did not respond to a request for comment.Indonesia’s ministry of communication and digital affairs also did not respond.
Nwachukwu said safeguards should be built into the AI system, rather than “gates” built around it.“Both the [geographic] restriction from X, [and] the restriction from the government is gated access, and gates can be broken down,” she said.Additional reporting by Hidayatullah
Civilised but casual, often hilarious, Adelaide writers’ week is everything a festival should be – except this year | Tory Shepherd
The sun almost always shines on Adelaide writers’ week, held on Kaurna land each year at the tail end of summer.For those who start looking forward to it as soon as soon as the Christmas tree is packed away (or earlier, frankly) there’s a sense of loss, of betrayal, at the omnishambles that has led to its cancellation this year.We’re bereft, and angry – not least because some of the most vocal critics seem to have no idea what writers’ week actually is.During Adelaide’s Mad March, the city’s parklands are home to the festival fringe’s sprawling performance spaces, bars and restaurants. On a Sunday you might leave behind the carnival chaos of the Garden of Unearthly Delights
‘Soon I will die. And I will go with a great orgasm’: the last rites of Alejandro Jodorowsky
The Chilean film-maker’s psychedelic work earned him the title ‘king of the midnight movie’, and a fan in John Lennon. Now the 96-year-old is ready for the end – but first there is more living to doThe Guardian’s journalism is independent. We will earn a commission if you buy something through an affiliate link. Learn more.There is an apocryphal story of an ageing Orson Welles introducing himself to the guests at a half-empty town hall
Call this social cohesion? The war of words that laid waste to the 2026 Adelaide writers’ festival
How a boardroom flare-up sparked an international boycott – and a looming defamation battleIt began as a quiet programming dispute in the genteel city of churches.But by Wednesday morning, a frantic, six-day war of words had culminated in the end of the 2026 Adelaide writers’ week and total institutional collapse.What started with the discreet exit of a business titan and arts board veteran spiralled into boardroom carnage last weekend, with mass resignations, lawyers’ letters of demands and allegations of racism and hypocrisy flung by all sides.By the time the writers’ week director, Louise Adler, walked, the boycott of writers, commentators and academics had gone global and the state’s premier cultural event had become a hollowed-out shell.The cancellation of AWW may only be the opening act
Seth Meyers on ICE: ‘An army of out-of-shape uncles’
Late-night hosts talked cratering public opinion on the Trump administration’s deployment of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in US communities and the president’s apparent preference for whole milk.Seth Meyers opened Wednesday’s Late Night with a reminder to viewers about how Trump “sold his mass deportation program to voters during the campaign”.That would be by declaring some version of “We are going to start with violent criminals” again and again.“If you say you’re going to get violent criminals off the streets, of course people are going to be into that. But that was a lie,” Meyers noted
Ian McKellen to star as LS Lowry in documentary revealing trove of unheard tapes
Fifteen years ago, Sir Ian McKellen was among the leading arts figures who criticised the Tate for not showing its collection of paintings by LS Lowry in its London galleries and questioned whether the “matchstick men painter” had been sidelined as too northern and provincial.Now, 50 years after Lowry’s death, McKellen is to star in a BBC documentary that will reveal a trove of previously unheard audio tapes recorded with Lowry in the 1970s during his final four years of life.The interview is the longest the artist ever gave and was recorded in his living room, his “private sanctuary”. The tapes are said to reveal Lowry’s authentic voice, which McKellen will lip-sync on screen.The Lancashire-born actor described the role as a “unique privilege”
Has Joe Rogan fully soured on Trump’s presidency?
Joe Rogan’s comparison of US immigration raids to Gestapo operations, made during a podcast episode earlier this week, has sparked speculation about whether the wildly popular podcaster, who endorsed Donald Trump in 2024, has fully soured on Trump’s presidency – and what that might say of the millions of mainly young men who listen to Rogan’s show.The Guardian’s journalism is independent. We will earn a commission if you buy something through an affiliate link. Learn more.Rogan’s views, as expressed in the podcast discussion, were more complicated than the Gestapo remark taken alone might make them seem
Trump tariff threats are bad, but the uncertainty they instil is much worse
Why Rachel Reeves should give bankers more of the cold shoulder at Davos 2026 | Heather Stewart
‘We could hit a wall’: why trillions of dollars of risk is no guarantee of AI reward
He called himself an ‘untouchable hacker god’. But who was behind the biggest crime Finland has ever known?
Bielle-Biarrey hat-trick fires holders Bordeaux to Champions Cup victory at Bristol
Australian Open 2026: Sabalenka, Alcaraz and Raducanu in action on day one – as it happened