Vergil Ortiz Jr sues Golden Boy in dispute tied to stalled Jaron Ennis talks

A picture


Vergil Ortiz Jr has filed a federal lawsuit against Golden Boy Promotions, seeking to end his relationship with Oscar De La Hoya’s company amid stalled negotiations for what he views as a career-defining fight against Jaron ‘Boots’ Ennis,Ortiz, the unbeaten World Boxing Council interim junior middleweight champion, filed the complaint on Thursday in US district court in Nevada, asking a judge to confirm that his promotional agreement with Golden Boy has been terminated and alleging that the promoter breached the contract and interfered with his earning potential,Golden Boy has promoted the Texan since his professional debut in 2016 and signed him to a new three-year deal in May 2024,Ortiz’s lawsuit, a copy of which has been obtained by the Guardian, argues that the agreement allowed him to walk away if Golden Boy’s broadcast partnership with Dazn ended – a condition he says was triggered when the promoter’s deal with the streamer expired on 31 December,According to the complaint, Ortiz formally exercised his right to terminate the agreement on 8 January.

Golden Boy has acknowledged that its Dazn deal concluded at the end of the year but maintains that Ortiz remains under contract because the promoter has been actively negotiating a renewal with Dazn covering 2026 and 2027.Ortiz disputes that position, arguing that ongoing negotiations and exchanged drafts do not constitute a binding agreement and that the contract language requires a completed deal, not “an agreement to agree”.The lawsuit seeks declaratory relief to clarify the 27-year-old Ortiz’s contractual status, with his attorneys arguing that uncertainty is harming the prime years of his career as he looks to secure high-profile fights.Ortiz’s filing goes beyond the termination clause, alleging that Golden Boy breached the agreement well before the split.Central to those claims are negotiations – or lack thereof – for a bout with Ennis, one of the most hotly anticipated matchups in boxing.

Ortiz and Ennis both hold interim championships at 154lb, and the fight is widely viewed as a natural step toward a unification bout for the undisputed title,Ortiz alleges he instructed Golden Boy to work with Ennis’s promoter, Eddie Hearn of Matchroom Boxing, but that Golden Boy failed to act in good faith,The complaint claims De La Hoya’s strained relationships with rival promoters and Saudi boxing power broker Turki al-Sheikh undercut opportunities to stage the fight, particularly given Saudi Arabia’s recent role in financing marquee events,The lawsuit also alleges Golden Boy violated a contractual requirement to present Ortiz with at least three opponent options for each bout, instead offering a single Ennis proposal and threatening to sideline him if he declined,Ortiz further claims Golden Boy failed to disclose written documents generated during meetings involving Golden Boy, Matchroom and Dazn that related to the Ennis fight.

Following Ortiz’s attempt to terminate the agreement, the complaint alleges Golden Boy continued to publicly assert control over his career, setting negotiation terms and deadlines without authorization.Ortiz argues that those actions wrought confusion within the industry and interfered with his ability to negotiate independently with other promoters.Golden Boy disputed Ortiz’s claims in a statement, saying it intends to fight the lawsuit.“We are aware of the lawsuit,” a spokesperson said.“Unfortunately, Vergil is getting bad advice from his lawyer and manager who have repeatedly violated the contract.

We will aggressively defend this lawsuit and enforce our rights.We are confident a judge will agree that our contract is valid and Vergil and his team are in breach.”Ortiz is seeking unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, alleging that Golden Boy’s conduct cost him millions in fight purses, sponsorships and related earnings.The lawsuit adds Ortiz to a growing list of elite fighters who have taken Golden Boy to court over contractual disputes, including Canelo Álvarez, whom Ortiz’s attorney Gregory Smith previously represented in his successful effort to exit a promotional deal with De La Hoya’s company.
technologySee all
A picture

Sacked TikTok workers in UK launch legal action over ‘union busting’

TikTok moderators have accused the social media company of “oppressive and intimidating” union busting after it fired hundreds of workers in the UK, beginning the process just before they were due to vote on forming a union.The moderators wanted to establish a collective bargaining unit to protect themselves from the personal costs of checking extreme and violent content, and have claimed TikTok is guilty of unfair dismissal and breaching trade union laws.About 400 moderators in London were fired before Christmas in a process initiated a week before the vote was due to take place.TikTok, which has about 30m monthly users in Britain, strongly denies a legal claim that has been lodged with an employment tribunal on behalf of three former workers, describing it as “baseless”.It said the sackings were part of a global restructuring involving roles in the UK, and south and south-east Asia amid the increasing use of AI to automate the removal of posts that violate content rules, with 91% of transgressive content now removed automatically

A picture

TikTok to strengthen age-verification technology across EU

TikTok will begin to roll out new age-verification technology across the EU in the coming weeks, as calls grow for an Australia-style social media ban for under-16s in countries including the UK.ByteDance-owned TikTok, and other major platforms popular with young people such as YouTube, are coming under increasing pressure to better identify and remove accounts belonging to children.The system, which has been quietly piloted in the EU over the past year, analyses profile information, posted videos and behavioural signals to predict whether an account may be belong to a user under the age of 13.As well as analysing information the account holder provides about themselves, the technology looks at behaviour such as the videos a user publishes, and “other on-platform behaviour”.TikTok said accounts flagged by the system would be reviewed by specialist moderators rather than face an automatic ban, and may then be removed

A picture

X still allowing users to post sexualised images generated by Grok AI tool

X has continued to allow users to post highly sexualised videos of women in bikinis generated by its AI tool Grok, despite the company’s claim to have cracked down on misuse.The Guardian was able to create short videos of people stripping to bikinis from photographs of fully clothed, real women. It was also possible to post this adult content on to X’s public platform without any sign of it being moderated, meaning the clip could be viewed within seconds by anyone with an account.It appeared to offer a straightforward workaround to restrictions announced by Elon Musk’s social network this week. These had been welcomed by the prime minister, Keir Starmer, who had described the photographs generated by Grok as “disgusting” and “shameful”

A picture

AI will transform the ‘human job’ and enhance skills, says science minister

Advances in AI and robotics will transform human jobs, starting with roles in warehouses and factories, the UK science minister has said, as the government announced plans to reduce red tape for robot and defence tech companies.Patrick Vallance said technological progress was creating a “whole new area” for robots to work in. “What’s really changing now is the combination of AI and robotics. It is opening up a whole new area, particularly in the sorts of things like humanoid robotics. And that will increase productivity, it will change the human job,” he told the Guardian

A picture

Elon Musk’s xAI datacenter generating extra electricity illegally, regulator rules

A US regulator ruled on Thursday that Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence company had acted illegally by using dozens of methane gas turbines to power huge datacenters in Tennessee.xAI has been fighting for a year and a half over truck-sized gas turbines the company had parked near its Colossus 1 and 2 facilities, arguing to local authorities that the electricity-generating turbines were exempt from requirements for air quality permits.The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) declared on Thursday that the generators were not exempt. In its ruling, the agency revised the policies around gas turbines, saying that operating the machines still requires air permits even if they are used on a portable or temporary basis, as had been the case.When xAI first installed the portable turbines at Colossus 1, it took advantage of a local county loophole allowing the operation of generators without permits so long as the machines did not sit in one place for more than 364 days

A picture

Mother of one of Elon Musk’s sons sues over Grok-generated explicit images

The mother of one of Elon Musk’s children is suing his company – alleging explicit images were generated of her by his Grok AI tool, including one in which she was underage.Ashley St Clair has filed a lawsuit with the supreme court of the state of New York against xAI, alleging that Grok, which is used on the social media platform X, promised to stop generating explicit images but continued to do so.She is seeking punitive and compensatory damages, claiming dozens of sexually explicit and degrading deepfake images were created by Grok.After two weeks of public outcry at the tool being used to create sexualised images of women and children, the company said on Wednesday it would “geoblock” the ability of users “to generate images of real people in bikinis, underwear, and similar attire via the Grok account and in Grok in X” in countries where it was illegal.St Clair, 27, who is estranged from Musk, is a rightwing influencer, author and political commentator