‘Hockey’s not hockey any more’: did three-on-three overtime ruin Canada’s Olympics?
Two Olympic finals between Canada and the US were settled by sudden death,The format made the showpieces feel more like a coin toss than a climaxTwo Olympic finals against the US, two strong performances, two sudden-death losses,Canada is so over overtime,While all good things must come to an end, it’s hard to fathom why hockey’s international rule-makers think that the very best things – huge clashes that were some of the hottest tickets of the entire Olympics – should be ended using three-on-three golden-goal overtime, a concept beloved only by people with a train to catch or firm dinner reservations,Forty-six years after the Miracle on Ice, the US men and women celebrated with a pair of huge assists from the Misrule on Ice.
Following an overtime winner by Megan Keller that saw the Americans break stubborn Canadian resistance in the women’s final on Thursday, another 2-1 win for the US against their neighbours in Milan on Sunday handed the men their first gold since the famous triumph over the Soviet Union at Lake Placid in 1980.At the end of regulation during two mesmerizing knife-edge finals, the rules decreed: OK, that’s enough high-quality five-on-five hockey.Let’s put an end to all this drama as quickly as possible by forcing the teams to play a different format to decide the outcome of the most important contests in international hockey.On the one hand – the odd dubious refereeing call and a magnificent goaltending display from USA’s Connor Hellebuyck aside – Canada’s men have only themselves to blame for failing to make the most of their dominance on Sunday.They outshot the US 42-28 and nerves appeared to sneak in, most obviously when Nathan MacKinnon pushed the puck wide of an open net in the third period, missing a chance so easy that the pitiless Canadian curling assassin, Brad Jacobs, no doubt could have scored it with a flick of his broom.
And overtime gave to Canada – Mitch Marner scored an extra-frame winner against Czechia in the quarter-finals – before it took away,But it’s not only about them: three of the men’s quarter-finals went to overtime, including the US’s victory over Sweden,Switzerland’s women took bronze with an overtime win over Sweden,In the sense that impatience, derangement and ripping up tradition to facilitate the cruel and arbitrary sorting of groups of humans into winners and losers in a frenzied made-for-screens spectacle defines this cultural and political era, then the format is perfectly suited to our times,Savagely abrupt endings make for great TV: cut to overjoyed winners, cut to stunned losers, cut back and forth again and again, gorging on the contrasting emotional overloads, stillness and shock, hugs and bliss.
It forces everyone to wait 15 or so minutes for a passage of play that’s likely to be over within a few seconds.Or, as it turned out on Sunday, 101 seconds, with Jack Hughes crashing the puck past Jordan Binnington as a weary Canada were caught out of shape on the counter.From a ratings-hungry television executive’s perspective, this helpfully means viewers can’t take their eyes off the action because it could end at any second.Canada coach Jon Cooper did not blame the overtime regulations for his team’s loss – he said his players “knew the rules coming in” – but he did think they affected the spectacle.“You take four players off the ice, now hockey’s not hockey any more.
There’s a reason overtime and shootouts are in play – it’s all TV-driven to end games, so it’s not a long time.There’s a reason why it’s not in the Stanley Cup Final or playoffs,” Cooper told reporters after Sunday’s game.That’s not sour grapes.It’s just plain-speaking: Olympic extra-time inspires strong feelings.“Whoever dreamed up playing three-on-three in overtime to decide a gold medal hockey game in the Olympics should be stacked into a bobsleigh and pushed down a ski jump,” frothed one Edmonton Journal writer after the women’s final.
It doesn’t really divide opinion, however, because virtually no one thinks it’s a good idea.It’s hard to discern any logic behind a rule that so fundamentally changes the dynamics, debasing the contest into quasi-random pinball, or as if the players have stepped into a video game.It introduces what ordinarily is the consequence for infringements – reducing the numbers on the ice – into the structure of the match, like you’re punishing everyone for failing to get the job done in 60 minutes.Unlike soccer, it’s not as if hockey is a sport known for defensive play and few chances in which teams sometimes need to be incentivized to attack.It’s inherently exciting and no one is playing for a tie.
The risk of an interminable match is much lower than in, say, baseball and tennis, two sports that have tinkered with the rules to produce winners sooner.Maybe there is a case for three-on-three over a guaranteed period of time, say, five or 10 minutes.Or sudden death with the full complement of players.But both at the same time? You avoid a shootout – a strong motivation for the NHL and the IIHF, hockey’s worldwide governing body, which eliminated them for the gold medal game in favour of playing on until a winning goal is scored.But are five-on-five shootouts really any less pressurized or capricious? “I guess, 50-50 battle there,” Binnington ruefully told reporters when asked about the additional period.
When overtime is settled by a single shot, likely after no more than a couple of minutes of end-to-end play in which both teams have had chances, there probably isn’t enough useful context or data from that period to conclude that the outcome is fair, that one team has deserved it more,The goal is just something that happened, like a lightning bolt out of the blue,It leaves the neutral numb and feeling cheated by a format divorced from the deadlocked hour that’s gone before,By rebooting the match so radically, the truth that Canada were much the better team in regulation was rendered irrelevant,The rhythm was all-new; the prolongation was a rebirth of the final, not a continuation.
It ransacked the match of meaning.“You be the judge of who was the better team today,” MacKinnon told reporters, seemingly treating the result with as much disdain as he did the stuffed toy he received with his silver medal.Three-on-three is much more defensible in round-robin games or 82-fixture NHL regular seasons, when there’s less at stake.The Americans and Canadians are highly familiar with the format as it’s been used to settle NHL regular-season overtimes since 2015-16.For the biggest single match in the sport, however, it feels extreme.
Notably, when it matters most in the NHL – during the playoffs – overtime is five-on-five.When Canada beat the US in the 2010 final in Vancouver with an overtime Sidney Crosby goal the format was four-on-four.That is clearly a more reasonable compromise.Another way to settle tied games would be five or ten minutes of five-on-five, then if necessary a switch to four-on-four, then three-on-three for as long as it takes.Regardless, it’s all an unwelcome distraction from what the aftermath of a massive hockey match should really be about: complaining about the officiating.
Having a stoma bag isn’t usually so bad as it’s been for Tracey Emin | Letters
In your interview with Tracey Emin about A Second Life, her forthcoming major exhibition at Tate Modern, and other matters (‘Regrets? Number one: smoking. Number two: taking it up the wrong hole’: Tracey Emin on reputation, radical honesty – and Reform, 14 February), she comments on the difficulties in her life now that she is living without a bladder.While data is patchy, about 100 people a week undergo this surgery in the UK, commonly known as a urostomy. For all those people waiting to have this surgery it is a traumatic time, and I think it’s important to point out that this often life-saving surgery usually has much a much better outcome than Tracey has had.People get back to living full and active lives, doing whatever they did before surgery
UK migrant families face giving up vital in-work benefits to avoid being ‘punished’
Families claiming in-work benefits face giving them up and enduring hardship to avoid being “punished” under a planned government migration crackdown, experts have said.More than 200,000 people living legally in the UK are on the 10-year route to settled status, which requires legal migrants to renew 30-month visas four times – at a cost of £3,908.50 including healthcare costs per renewal – before they can apply for indefinite leave to remain (ILR).Under proposals by the home secretary, Shabana Mahmood, if people have used public funds, even in work, the wait would double to 20 years.The migration charity Ramfel has spoken to families who would be affected by the change and say they would have “no choice” but to stop using public funds – such as child benefit, universal credit, tax credits and disability benefits – if the government proposals go ahead
‘Very dangerous’: a Mind mental health expert on Google’s AI Overviews
A year-long commission has been launched by Mind to examine AI and mental health after a Guardian investigation exposed how Google’s AI Overviews, which are shown to 2 billion people each month, gave people “very dangerous” mental health advice.Here, Rosie Weatherley, information content manager at the largest mental health charity in England and Wales, describes the risks posed to people by the AI-generated summaries, which appear above search results on the world’s most visited website.“Over three decades, Google designed and delivered a search engine where credible and accessible health content could rise to the top of the results.“Searching online for information wasn’t perfect, but it usually worked well. Users had a good chance of clicking through to a credible health website that answered their query
Local reporter ‘shocked’ over picture of his face on punchbag at UK town hall
A local newspaper journalist has said he was “shocked” after a picture of his face was printed out and attached to a punchbag at a town hall.Joe McCann, who has worked for the Melksham News for 10 years, was tipped off by a contact that a print-out of his face had been attached to a freestanding punchbag inside the building.As first reported by the Melksham News, McCann raised the issue at a full council meeting on Monday, where councillors “appeared shocked”.“It has recently come to my knowledge that within this council building, there is a punchbag with my face cut out and stuck to it, with the word ‘punch me’ written at the bottom of the punchbag,” McCann told the meeting in the Wiltshire town. “I have a photo of it
Tech firms must remove ‘revenge porn’ in 48 hours or risk being blocked, says Starmer
Deepfake nudes and “revenge porn” must be removed from the internet within 48 hours or technology firms risk being blocked in the UK, Keir Starmer has said, calling it a “national emergency” that the government must confront.Companies could be fined millions or even blocked altogether if they allow the images to spread or be reposted after victims give notice.Amendments will be made to the crime and policing bill to also regulate AI chatbots such as X’s Grok, which generated nonconsensual images of women in bikinis or in compromising positions until the government threatened action against Elon Musk’s company.Writing for the Guardian, Starmer said: “The burden of tackling abuse must no longer fall on victims. It must fall on perpetrators and on the companies that enable harm
NHS to spend more to settle lawsuits over negligence during childbirth after court ruling
The NHS will have to spend more money settling lawsuits involving negligence during childbirth after a supreme court ruling that lawyers said puts right a “historic injustice”.The court ruled on Wednesday that children in England who suffer catastrophic injuries while they are being born can claim damages for future earnings they would otherwise have had.The ruling on “lost years damages” means that children whose life expectancy is shortened can recover compensation for being unable to work.It comes amid mounting concern at the rising cost of medical negligence to the NHS in England – its liabilities have hit £60bn – much of which is due to errors made during childbirth.“The supreme court today has put right an historic injustice which set injured children’s rights in negligence cases at a lesser level than those of an adult,” said James Drydale, the lawyer for a girl known only as CCC
Stephen Colbert on Andrew’s arrest: ‘Let’s hear it for British justice’
From patriotic parody to threat: Flanders and Swann, the Likely Lads and Reform | Letter
Goodies galore in a Clued-up crossword tribute to Graeme Garden | Brief letters
Salman Rushdie among 170 figures to sign open letter over Barbican arts lead departure
Colbert on RFK Jr’s Maha workout video: ‘Senior softcore that feels like dropping acid’
Colbert on Trump’s Epstein ties: ‘Apparently he does not know the meaning of exonerated’