NFL draft questions: what should the Jets do at No 2, is Love worth it and will the Cowboys trade up?

A picture


Fernando Mendoza is a lock to go No 1, but what happens after is less certain,From a difference-making running back to a polarizing QB, we look at the biggest questions entering draft nightThe draft begins with the second pick this year,We know Fernando Mendoza will be the Las Vegas Raiders’ selection at No 1 overall,With the second pick, the Jets have a decision to make: edge-rusher David Bailey from Texas Tech or the hybrid defender Arvell Reese from Ohio State,Bailey is widely viewed as the top pure edge-rusher in the class.

He has a similar profile to Denver’s Nik Bonitto, a speed-bend-burst edge-rusher who relies on his unteachable first-step speed.The only problem: Bailey is a liability against the run.The Jets already have Will McDonald, a dip-and-rip style pass-rusher similar to Bailey.But after trading Jermaine Johnson to the Titans, they are lacking some sizzle off the snap.Bailey has the potential to be a game-breaker, but the Jets must weigh up whether he is good enough against the run to be an every-down player or whether he is a pass-rush specialist.

Reese is the best player in the class.At Ohio State, he played as an off-the-ball linebacker and part-time edge-rusher.He is an explosive, physical, smart defender who can play around the defensive front.Most teams are projecting Reese to play full-time on the edge in the NFL, but there is a limited sample size of him playing that role in college.There have been some comparisons to Micah Parsons, who transitioned from linebacker to edge-rusher after the Cowboys drafted him in 2021.

But Parsons had been an edge-rusher in high school, and he was not the same caliber of linebacker prospect that Reese is.Drafting Reese to be purely an edge-rusher would be a gamble.He recently told ESPN’s Ben Solak that he didn’t know what he was doing when released to rush the passer and that he was making his moves on instinct.The Jets desperately need defensive playmakers, and they’ve made noises about becoming a more versatile defense.Reese fits that mindset.

He is the kind of player you structure a defense around rather than force into a box.He can play off-the-ball on early downs and line up anywhere along the front in pass-obvious situations.Passing on him would be a mistake.Beyond Mendoza to the Raiders, the chalkiest pick of mock draft season has been the Notre Dame running back to the Tennessee Titans.There are incessant arguments about the value of selecting running backs high in the first round.

But if you look back over recent history, the hit-rate on backs taken at the top of the first round is pretty impressive.Since the 2016 draft, seven running backs have been selected in the top 15, and it’s a who’s who of All-Pros: Ezekiel Elliott, Leonard Fournette, Christian McCaffrey, Saquon Barkley, Bijan Robinson, Jahmyr Gibbs and Ashton Jeanty.Sure, you can argue about how much those individual players have affected a team’s success, but it’s undeniable that five of the seven were hits.Only Fournette was a disappointment.With Jeanty, it’s too early to tell.

Things run haywire when you look at the history of late first-round picks at the position.But at the top of the board, teams have done a solid job of distinguishing which running backs are worthy of high selection.What distinguishes all those backs is the value they bring in the passing game, as receiving threats or blockers.Love is no different.He is a walking big-play threat as a runner and receiver.

Around 48.5% of his career rushing yards have come on explosive runs of at least 15 yards, one of the highest marks in the history of college football.As a receiver, he averaged 10.4 yards per reception in his final year in college.Love does most of his damage by making tacklers miss and turning solid gains into chunk plays.

New head coach Robert Saleh may pound the table for another defensive difference-maker, and there will be plenty of them available on the board,But the goal for the Titans is to find another offensive anchor they can pair with second-year quarterback Cam Ward,Value-wise, adding Ohio State receiver Carnell Tate makes more sense,But Love may simply be too tempting to pass up,Simpson is this year’s most polarizing prospect.

To some, he is the most polished, ready-to-go quarterback in the class.To others, he’s a fragile, short, inaccurate passer who should have stayed in college for another year.There is no dispute, however, that he will be the second quarterback selected.Simpson started for only one year in college, playing in a hyper-aggressive, pro-style offense at Alabama under the tutelage of former Seahawks offensive coordinator Ryan Grubb.Over the first eight weeks of the season, he was lights-out.

He is a small, agile quarterback with a similar skillset to Brock Purdy.Like Purdy, Simpson is a distributor more than a playmaker.Everything about his game is fearless: he is tough in the pocket, challenges defenses vertically and rips throws to the middle of the field with good anticipation.He isn’t going to wow you with his athletic traits, but he has just enough juice to threaten the edge on rollouts and is a talented thrower on the move.For the first half of last season at Alabama, Simpson’s smarts and feel for the position leapt off the screen.

Everything he did was fast,But over the second half of the year, he crumbled,He battled injuries,His accuracy eroded,His decision-making was erratic.

As opposing defensive coordinators gathered more film on Simpson, he struggled to adjust.NFL teams are evaluating Simpson on a small sample size.Will they be getting the Simpson of the first half of the year or the second half?The history of quarterbacks who play at Simpson’s size and weight makes for grim reading.In the last 20 years, there have been only six quarterbacks who were 6ft, 1inch or shorter and weighed 215lbs or less who have started more than 40 games in the NFL: Drew Brees, Russell Wilson, Baker Mayfield, Michael Vick, Kyler Murray and Bryce Young.All of those players had an easy-to-define super-skill, be it their athleticism, intellect or accuracy.

And while Wilson, Mayfield and Brees were small, they had the necessary body armor to survive the down-to-down punishment in the NFL.Simpson falls short on those measurements.Add to that, only 13 of the 118 quarterbacks in the last decade have started 21 games or fewer: Mitch Trubisky, Kyler Murray, Trey Lance, Mac Jones, Dwayne Haskins and Anthony Richardson.The bulk of those quarterbacks were blessed with either electric feet or a high-wattage arm.Teams were betting on their upside.

Simpson is more in line with Jones and Haskins.Three teams make sense for Simpson: the Jets, Cardinals and Steelers.All have a quarterback need.Simpson doesn’t profile as a traditional Mike McCarthy quarterback, so that probably takes the Steelers out of the mix.The ideal fit for Simpson would be with the Cardinals, probably at the top of the second round.

When you have a class light on blue-chip prospects at premium positions, it means one thing: trades!The consensus sure-fire prospects in the 2026 class are linebackers, safeties and interior offensive linemen.There is a sharp drop-off from those highly regarded prospects to the meat of the class, with little then separating the 12th-best player from the 45th one.Finding value – both the position selected and the range the player is taken in – is the name of the game.And teams have long been queasy about taking the positions deemed less valuable with the highest picks.Almost every team in the top 10 will be making the same calculation: do we take an outstanding prospect at a non-premium position, reach for a lesser prospect at a deluxe position, or trade down to add more picks and select a player in a range that better represents their talent?Most likely, the rebuilding teams at the top of the order will try to shuffle back from their spot to gather more picks without those traditional, foundational players on the board.

Added to the mix is the fact that six teams picking in the top 14 will enter next season believing they can be Super Bowl contenders: the Commanders (No 7), Chiefs (No 9), Bengals (No 10), Cowboys (No 12), Rams (No 13) and Ravens (No 14).Save for an injury to their quarterback, none of those teams will expect to pick in this range again next year.And all are just a couple of spots away from being able to move up and select one of the premium players in the class.According to draft insiders, the league’s general view of the class means that trading up will be cheaper than in recent years, which should fuel a lot of movement in the first round.Arizona, picking at No 3, and Cleveland, picking at No 6, are two prime candidates to move down.

Most of the pre-draft speculation about who will move up centers on the Rams and Cowboys.After picking up an extra first-round pick from a trade last year, the Rams could move from No 13 into the top six on draft night to secure the top wide receiver on their board.The Cowboys have their eyes on a defensive difference-maker.If they don’t believe one of their top targets will slide to No 12, they could leap as high as No 3 to secure a player they feel is the best in the draft.
politicsSee all
A picture

Ed Miliband says he and Lammy feared Mandelson appointment could ‘blow up’

Ed Miliband and David Lammy discussed concerns that the appointment of Peter Mandelson as the UK’s ambassador to Washington could “blow up”, the energy secretary has revealed.Miliband said he spoke to Lammy, who was foreign secretary at the time Mandelson was given the Washington post, and both expressed reservations.Mandelson was sacked after nine months in the job after new disclosures about his relationship with the late financier and child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.The Guardian revealed last week that Mandelson had failed his initial security vetting, which had then been overruled by the Foreign Office, leading to the sacking of the department’s permanent secretary, Oliver Robbins.Robbins will give evidence to a select committee of MPs on Tuesday morning

A picture

Will Olly Robbins’ testimony jeopardise Keir Starmer’s defence?

On Monday, Keir Starmer testified in front of the Commons about what he knew about the vetting process behind Peter Mandelson’s appointment as ambassador to Washington.On Tuesday, Olly Robbins – whom Starmer sacked as head of the Foreign Office last week – will give his side of the story under questioning by MPs on the foreign affairs select committee.Robbins is said by friends to be upset by the claims ministers are making. But what are the questions he will be asked, and what might they mean for the prime minister’s future?Robbins is very unlikely to give details of the vetting process or what exactly officials discovered, given this is supposed to be strictly confidential. But MPs are likely to press him on whether anything new was found during the vetting process or whether it only flagged previously known concerns

A picture

Peter Mandelson: a timeline of his appointment as UK ambassador to US

In a pivotal Commons statement to MPs on Monday, Keir Starmer laid out the most detailed timeline of Peter Mandelson’s appointment as the UK ambassador to the US, the vetting process that ended with the Foreign Office overruling the UK Security Vetting (UKSV) and what he said were chances to tell him that civil servants had failed to take.Cabinet Office conducts a due diligence exercise on how suitable Mandelson was for the role. Starmer told the Commons his No 10 staff put questions to Mandelson on the department’s behalf.Mandelson responded to questions from the Cabinet Office’s due diligence exercise, posed to him by Downing Street staff, Starmer told MPs in the Commons.“I made the decision to appoint him,” Starmer told MPs, after receiving final advice on the due diligence process on 11 December 2024

A picture

Starmer accuses Robbins of obstructing truth about Mandelson vetting

Keir Starmer has accused Olly Robbins of deliberately and repeatedly obstructing the truth about the Mandelson vetting scandal before a high-jeopardy appearance of the sacked top official before MPs on Tuesday.Six days after the prime minister said he had learned that his pick for Washington ambassador had failed security vetting, Starmer admitted his decision to appoint him had been a fundamental mistake.But in a sombre address to parliament, he insisted the Foreign Office was to blame for a “staggering” and “incredible” decision not to brief him, or anybody else in Downing Street, about the vetting advice.Starmer told MPs that the vetting information had now been handed to the trusted Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC), which is expected to assess it before returning it to the government within days for public release.The Guardian understands this includes a short summary document including details of Mandelson’s personal life, and financial and business dealings – which the prime minister is also believed to have now seen – as well as the recommendation that Mandelson had failed vetting

A picture

Mobile phones to be banned in schools in England under new plans

A ban on mobile phones in schools in England is to be introduced by the government to ensure that “critical safeguarding legislation” is passed.The government will table an amendment to the children’s wellbeing and schools bill in the House of Lords after the bill was held up by peers on opposition benches.It will make existing guidance on mobile phone bans in schools statutory, a move that ministers have resisted until now.The government had consistently argued that the vast majority of schools had already banned mobile phones, and that there was no need to add a legal requirement. They finally capitulated, however, describing it as “a pragmatic measure” to get the bill through

A picture

How safe is Starmer’s premiership after his Mandelson vetting statement to MPs?

Labour MPs frustrated with the lack of a clear mission from Keir Starmer’s No 10 have often urged the prime minister to be more forceful in his arguments, to prosecute his values, to find an enemy to define himself against.The prime minister has found one: Olly Robbins. Starmer prosecuted his case against the former Foreign Office chief on Monday with the vigour of his former life at the bar.He came armed with timelines and letters and the promise of a new inquiry. He insisted that, had he known Peter Mandelson had failed the vetting, his original sin of appointing him as US ambassador would not have been committed