Can Congress stop the ‘straight greed’ of US sports teams leaving their cities?

A picture


WWE star CM Punk called it “straight greed”.Illinois governor JB Pritzker called it a “slap in the face”.An overwhelming majority of fans say they will hold a grudge.This cacophony of disgust has been prompted by the real possibility that the Chicago Bears could relocate to Hammond, Indiana.The Bears’ owners bought a site in Arlington Heights, Illinois, for a new stadium, but negotiations over property taxes have stalled construction.

Meanwhile, Indiana has thrown its hat into the ring, passing a state bill on 26 February authorizing funding in Hammond,Chicago’s current home, Soldier Field, is a rental, open-air venue with the smallest seating capacity in the NFL,Still, it is not only in Illinois; it is in Chicago proper along Lake Michigan,Arlington Heights, while about 25 miles north of the city, is at least within state lines,If US senators Bernie Sanders and Greg Casar have their way, the Bears’ ownership – or any major professional sports ownership group considering relocation – may think twice.

Last week, Casar and Sanders introduced the Home Team Act, which would require owners of professional sports teams to give local communities a one-year opportunity to buy the team before relocating it.“Sports in America should be about more than just making billionaire owners even richer,” Casar said.“Far too many Americans know the pain of losing a team, and far too many communities have had to fork over billions in subsidies just to keep an already profitable team home.Our bill is about creating a level playing field so leagues work for fans and taxpayers, not just owners.”One of those Americans is Sanders, a Brooklyn native and a childhood fan of the Brooklyn Dodgers.

In 1957, the team announced it would move to Los Angeles.“There was a joke in my Flatbush neighborhood that the three worst people in modern history were Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin and [former Dodgers owner] Walter O’Malley, and not necessarily in that order,” he said on the Flagrant podcast earlier this year.Though Sanders was just 16 at the time, the Dodgers’ move helped shape the anti-corporate politics for which he later became known.The Home Team Act would aim to protect fans from losing teams and taxpayers from being pressured into funding large subsidies by requiring franchise owners to provide a year’s notice before relocating.Relocation would be defined as crossing state lines or moving to a different metropolitan area.

During that year, members of the community would have the opportunity to buy the franchise at fair market value.The bill allows for buyers ranging from private individuals to government entities, companies or community ownership models such as that used by the Green Bay Packers.The Packers are owned by more than 500,000 shareholders.No individual is allowed to own more than 200,000 shares, a structure that has helped ensure the team remains in Green Bay.That model is, however, an outlier.

For most teams in the NFL and other leagues, relocation remains a recurring threat, typically driven by the pursuit of future profits rather than present revenues – and with little regard for the losses left behind,The California congresswoman Lateefah Simon, a co-sponsor of the bill, represents Oakland, a city that has lost all of its major professional teams in the space of seven years,The Golden State Warriors moved across the Bay to San Francisco and the Raiders left for Nevada, with the Athletics set to follow in 2028,The impact has extended beyond sport,Small businesses have been affected, jobs have been lost, and the city has forfeited a significant part of its cultural identity.

Had legislation like the Home Team Act been in place, Oakland might still have a team.Consider the Bears.The franchise is valued at roughly $8.9bn.Even with contributions from wealthy backers, the burden on residents would be enormous.

The idea of community ownership is appealing – equitable, even – but, at least for now, largely theoretical.The bill would also face steep political obstacles.It would need to pass both chambers of Congress before being signed by a president who counts several billionaire sports owners among his closest allies.There are practical questions, too: how to determine when a relocation process officially begins, and who would set a fair market valuation.Even so, the intent is clear.

If more ownership groups placed similar value on their communities, such legislation may not be necessary at all.
politicsSee all
A picture

Karl Turner has Labour whip suspended after criticism of Starmer and No 10

The MP Karl Turner has lost the Labour whip after making a series of interventions criticising Keir Starmer and No 10, especially on changes to jury trials.A Labour source said Turner had been informed by the chief whip, Jonathan Reynolds, that he had had the whip suspended because of his conduct. Turner denied he had been informed by the whips and said he had learned about his suspension from journalists.The decision is understood to have been prompted in part by an interview given by Turner, the MP for Hull East, to Jody McIntyre, a campaigner who stood at the 2024 elections against Labour’s Jess Phillips.Turner wrote on X: “I am being told that I have had the whip suspended but I have not had any notification from the whips about this

A picture

Opaque party funding affects all of British politics | Letters

While I agree with much of Polly Toynbee’s opinion piece (How will we know Labour is really cleaning up party funding? When Reform and the Tories fight like hell to stop it, 26 March), I was left a little concerned about the tone, which seemingly presented this as uniquely a Tory/Reform UK matter.Dirty money (or just opaque funding) in British politics is not really such a sectarian issue. The proposals would appear to do nothing to prevent a party from accepting, for example, £4m from a hedge fund in the run-up to an election, and not declaring it until afterwards (Labour/Quadrature). Nor would they prevent a party engaging a thinktank that had itself accepted £200m from a rightwing American tech oligarch, bringing them into government, and installing staff in the heart of the policymaking process (Labour/Tony Blair Institute/Larry Ellison of Oracle).But it was heartening to see Toynbee begin to address the way that disparities in funding distort the democratic process

A picture

Nigel Farage to snub US conservative conference brought to UK by Liz Truss

Nigel Farage will snub a major conference of US conservatives that is being brought to the UK by Liz Truss.The short-lived former prime minister, who was accused of crashing the economy, was chosen by the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) to lead a version of the event in the UK in July.She announced this on stage in Texas on Monday while next to Matt Schlapp, commentator and chair of the event, which in the US has hosted major figures including Donald Trump, Ron DeSantis, Tulsi Gabbard and Hungary’s Viktor Orbán.However, mainstream conservative figures in the UK seem wary to be associated with the Truss-led event.“We will be steering well clear of it,” a Reform UK source said, dashing any hopes that Farage would attend

A picture

Zack Polanski meets unions in attempt to get them to switch party funding to Greens

Zack Polanski has kicked off a charm offensive designed to convince trade unions to stop funding Labour and throw their weight behind the Green party, as he delivered the first in a series of speeches to union conferences.The Green leader has had “good conversations” with 10 trade unions, including some affiliated to Labour, according to party sources, and is due to address the University and College Union and the Bakers, Food and Allied Workers Union, not affiliated with Labour, in the coming months.The UK’s largest unions – Unite and Unison – were among those that denied negotiating with Polanski and said they remained affiliated to the Labour party. However, Unite is holding internal discussions about its future relationship with Labour before a special conference in 2027 at which it could potentially decide to disaffiliate.While Green party sources admitted that discussions Polanski had held with individual unions varied in formality, some union insiders were adamant that supporting the Greens would be a no-go area, and that such discussions were “much ado about nothing”

A picture

Kemi the attention seeker somehow always makes two plus two equal five | John Crace

Losing sleep over the war in Iran? Worried sick about the cost of living? Can’t pay your energy bills? Then relax. Because Kemi Badenoch has a displacement activity for you.It’s becoming increasingly easy to understand the Conservative leader by viewing her as a hyperactive five-year-old at the back of the class who is constantly disruptive. Who can’t get through a lesson without some kind of attention-seeking behaviour. Who has a constant desire to be indulged even though her first reactions are invariably wrong

A picture

Zack Polanski tells NEU teachers’ union that Greens would abolish ‘toxic’ Ofsted – as it happened

The Green party would abolish Ofsted because they view it as a “failed institution”, Zack Polanski, its leader, has told a teaching union conference.Polanski also said that the Greens were opposed to the academisation of schools and that they believe that Labour is not fixing the “failings” in the system by the Tories, but embedding them.In a speech to the National Education Union’s annual conference, Polanski said:double quotation markOfsted is a toxic, failed institution which is harming teachers and children – and it’s time to end it.Talking about school structures more generally, he said:double quotation markThis government’s reforms are simply tinkering around the edges.We need to end the Ofsted era entirely and move towards a genuinely collaborative model