‘A cruel penalty’: disabled people face lower benefit payments if conditions not deemed lifelong
Hundreds of thousands of severely ill and disabled people making new claims will have their benefits cut if the government assesses that their condition might improve, charities have said.In April, the health element of universal credit – an extra payment for people assessed as too unwell to work or prepare for work – will be halved to £50 a week and frozen for new claimants unless their condition is found to be terminal or severe and lifelong with no prospect of improvement.Ministers had pledged last summer that the “severe and lifelong” clause – known as the severe conditions criteria – would shield the most severely disabled and ill people from the new lower benefit rate.But charities and disabled people’s organisations (DPOs) have told the Guardian that a wide range of debilitating conditions may not meet the strict eligibility criteria, despite them often leaving someone unable to work.This includes multiple sclerosis, learning disabilities, bipolar, Parkinson’s, ME and long Covid.
Samuel Thomas, a senior policy adviser at the anti-poverty charity Z2K, said: “Cuts to universal credit’s health element threaten to push some of the most seriously ill and disabled people in the country to the brink.The higher rate of support will only be available to [new claimants] whose condition is lifelong and shows no prospect of improvement.“That rigid test could exclude people who have had strokes or heart attacks, or people with conditions like cancer or schizophrenia.Seriously ill and disabled people facing years of significant difficulty are at risk of being left on a lower rate simply because recovery, however partial or distant, cannot be ruled out.”Ella Smith, the welfare rights policy lead for the ME Association, said: “The government says it’s protecting people with the most severe conditions, but in reality, this actively excludes swathes of severely ill and disabled people.
“The fact someone might improve at some point in the future should not be used to reduce essential support today.Reassessment already exists if someone’s condition genuinely improves.Awarding people a lower rate just because they may hypothetically recover later turns the constant struggle with unpredictable conditions into an additional cruel penalty.”Government data estimates that by 2029-30, 730,000 future recipients of universal credit will miss out on the higher rate, with an average loss of £3,000 per year.While a Labour backbench rebellion last summer paused the proposed personal independence payment reforms, MPs voted to go ahead with changes to universal credit.
Under the changes, existing claimants will continue to receive £97 a week whether their disability is judged to be lifelong or not.James Taylor, the director of strategy at Scope, said: “Essentially, we’ll have a two-tier universal credit system.Two people with a similar condition and similar extra costs will get different amounts.Creating the severe conditions criteria is designed to protect some new claimants but it could add another level of jeopardy for disabled people.There’s a risk that certain conditions might not be judged as ‘severe’ and assessors inconsistently interpret and apply new criteria for a new category.
”There is further concern among charities that to qualify for the higher “severe” payment, new claimants must provide extensive medical evidence from the NHS.This can be harder for certain conditions, particularly at a time when waiting lists are still long.Hannah Nicholls-Harrison, a policy manager at Mencap, said the rule could mean a significant number of new universal credit claimants with a learning disability would lose out on support.“Many people struggle to achieve a formal diagnosis of learning disability due to the lack of a clear pathway in the NHS,” she said.“For people with a learning disability who do not have that level of documentation, or who do not have the support to navigate a complex system and advocate for themselves, this will mean missing out on [thousands of pounds] a year.
”Several charities and DPOs said they were concerned the lower benefit rate would push already struggling disabled people into deeper poverty, and in some cases, “destitution”,Thomas said: “The human cost is stark,Families losing out on this vital income could face eviction, go without food and heating, and lose access to the care they depend on,”Tom Pollard, the head of policy at Mind, said: “[Government] protecting a higher rate of payment for people meeting the severe conditions criteria is recognition that the reduced rate is not sufficient for people who are out of work for longer periods of time,“Many people with severe and long-term mental health diagnoses, such as bipolar disorder or schizophrenia, may not meet these criteria, despite impairments and barriers that will often keep them out of work for long stretches of their lives.
”A DWP spokesperson said the government was committed to supporting vulnerable people.They added: “Under the severe conditions criteria, claimants are assessed not on their condition itself but on how it affects them, with the criteria intended to protect those who are not expected ever to be able to work due to a severe lifelong health condition or disability that is unlikely to improve.“Those with the most severe, lifelong conditions, those nearing end of life, and all existing universal credit health claimants will continue to receive the higher rate.”
Sony to hike PS5 prices by $100 as AI and Iran war push up memory chip costs
Sony is raising global prices of its PlayStation 5 consoles, including a $100 increase in the US, marking its second hike in less than a year as the entertainment giant grapples with rising costs of key components such as memory chips.The tech industry’s race to build out artificial intelligence infrastructure has pushed memory makers to favor higher-margin datacenter chips, tightening supply for consumer devices like the ones Sony sells.The updated US prices, effective 2 April, will put the standard PS5 at $649.99, up from $549.99
Wikipedia bans AI-generated content in its online encyclopedia
Wikipedia has banned the use of artificial intelligence in the generation or rewriting of content for its voluminous online encyclopedia.In a recent policy change, Wikipedia said that the use of large language models (or LLMs) “often violates” its core principles and will not be allowed. The English language version of Wikipedia has more than 7.1m articles.The use of AI has been a contentious issue among Wikipedia’s community of volunteer editors but a vote among the site’s editors supported the ban, according to 404 Media
Number of AI chatbots ignoring human instructions increasing, study says
AI models that lie and cheat appear to be growing in number with reports of deceptive scheming surging in the last six months, a study into the technology has found.AI chatbots and agents disregarded direct instructions, evaded safeguards and deceived humans and other AI, according to research funded by the UK government-funded AI Security Institute (AISI). The study, shared with the Guardian, identified nearly 700 real-world cases of AI scheming and charted a five-fold rise in misbehaviour between October and March, with some AI models destroying emails and other files without permission.The snapshot of scheming by AI agents “in the wild”, as opposed to in laboratory conditions, has sparked fresh calls for international monitoring of the increasingly capable models and come as Silicon Valley companies aggressively promote the technology as a economically transformative. Last week the UK chancellor also launched a drive to get millions more Britons using AI
‘Accountability has arrived’: dual US court losses show shifting tide against Meta and co
In the span of just two days, the most powerful social media company in the world faced a more severe public reckoning than it has in years.Jurors in California and New Mexico gave back-to-back verdicts this week that for the first time ever found Meta liable for products that inflict harm on young people. For years, lawmakers, parents and advocates have raised red flags over how social media can hurt children, but now the tech firms are being held to account via court rulings that could set long-lasting precedents.A jury in New Mexico ordered Meta to pay $375m in damages on Tuesday over claims that its products led to child sexual exploitation, among other harms. The following day, a jury in California ordered Meta and YouTube to pay $6m over claims that both companies deliberately designed addictive products to hook young users
New York City hospitals drop Palantir as controversial AI firm expands in UK
New York City’s public hospital system announced that it would not be renewing its contract with Palantir as controversy mounts in the UK over the data analytics and AI firm’s government contract.The president of the US’s largest municipal public healthcare system, Dr Mitchell Katz, testified last week before the New York city council that the agreement with Palantir would expire in October.He said at the hearing that the contract, which focused on recovering money for insurance claims, was always meant to be short-term, and that there was an “absolute firewall” preventing Palantir from sharing information with US Immigration and Customs Enforcement. He said that the agency had “not had any incidents”.The contract and related payment documents shared with the Guardian by the American Friends Service Committee and first reported by the Intercept, show that NYC Health + Hospitals has paid Palantir nearly $4m since November 2023
Human rights groups cheer ‘watershed’ verdict in social media addiction trial
The verdict in a landmark social media trial that Meta and YouTube deliberately designed addictive products has sparked calls for reform across borders. International human rights and tech freedom groups issued statements after the decision, praising jurors for holding social media companies accountable for harms to children and urging tech giants to change their design features to ensure children are safe.Amnesty International said in a statement on Thursday that “this court decision is clear: these platforms are unsafe by design and meaningful change is urgently needed”.The day prior, a Los Angeles jury found both Meta and YouTube liable for intentionally creating platforms that hooked a young user and led to her being harmed. The six-week trial was one of more than 20 “bellwether” trials that are expected to go to court in the next few years
Jimmy Kimmel on Mike Johnson’s new award for Trump: ‘You can almost feel his spine exiting his body’
Dark Mofo: 2026 festival to show Willem Dafoe film that can only be watched by one person at a time
Seth Meyers on Donald Trump’s ‘present’ from Iran: ‘Is the president getting catfished?’
Will this ‘Doritos-inspired’ hot cross bun cause some spicy full-scale anarchy – or is it merely weird-smelling clickbait?
Ministers consider charging tourists to enter national museums in England
Jimmy Kimmel on Trump’s election integrity push: ‘Like Bill Cosby telling you he’ll watch your drink for you’