The leader of Epping Forest district council has called for calm after the court of appeal ruled asylum seekers can stay at the Bell hotel in Essex.Councillor Chris Whitbread told Times Radio:I call for calm.There’s been peaceful protests and there’s been non peaceful protests outside the hotel.He added:We saw yesterday the government say that asylum seekers have more rights than my residents.I’m really cross with this ruling.

Obviously we’ll now reflect on where we are.Obviously we’re still going to court in October to go for a final injunction and we will be pushing hard to make sure that’s successful, but we will do everything we can still.This is an awful position for the town … I’m really concerned for the future of the town at the moment.Speaking outside the London court after the ruling, Ken Williamson, member of cabinet for Epping Forest district council said:We understand government faces a dilemma, but that should not be at the expense of local communities.Planning law may seem dull, it might seem boring, but it goes to the heart of the relationship between local communities and good government.

It enshrines the rights of local people to have a say within their own communities, and it should not be set aside lightly.The government can still listen.It needs to understand and take responsibility for the events that have taken place in Epping over the past six weeks, for the trauma and disruption brought upon our community.The council could still be granted an injunction after a full hearing of the legal claim, which is due to be heard in October.The Home Office won its appeal against the closure of the Bell hotel in Epping for asylum seekers.

This means asylum seekers will stay in the lodgings in Essex past 12 September.In its successful appeal, the Home Office argued removing the men could damage the asylum accommodation system but the government said it still plans to stop using the hotels by the end of this parliament.The council could still be granted another injunction at the full hearing in mid-October.Epping Forest District council has said “this is not the end of the matter” and they will “continue to fight”.Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch responded to the court decision by saying Keir Starmer “puts the rights of illegal immigrants above British people”, while shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick said there is “no acceptable accommodation for illegal migrants”.

In nearby Cheshunt, Hertfordshire, a video posted on YouTube showed dozens of demonstrators behind barriers near the Delta Marriott hotel, which has also been used to house asylum seekers.Essex police said it was putting a section 60AA order in place in Epping, which gives police the power to ask anyone to remove an item such as a mask that is being used to conceal identity.The order will be in place for 24 hours, the force said.In a post on Facebook, Essex police said: “Throughout the evening, we have monitored a protest in Cheshunt and we now believe a group of people present there are planning to travel to Epping.A number of people involved in that group have been seen wearing facemasks and balaclavas.

”Deputy PM Angela Rayner should face an ethics inquiry over her tax affairs, the Conservatives said.The Telegraph newspaper claimed Rayner, who is also the housing secretary, saved £40,000 in stamp duty on a second home she bought in Hove for £800,000.This was because she removed her name from the deed to a family property in Greater Manchester, the newspaper reported.However, Rayner also previously suggested the Greater Manchester home remained her primary residence, according to the Telegraph, saving some £2,000 in council tax on her grace and favour home in central London at Admiralty House.The Conservatives have referred Rayner to the prime minister’s independent adviser on ministers’ interests as a result of the conflicting reports.

The Tories have also written to Tameside council, the authority that covers her Greater Manchester home, asking the authority to strike her from the electoral register if the property is no longer her primary residence.A Cabinet Office spokesperson said Rayner “has followed advice on the allocation of her official residence at all times”.A statement provided by the deputy prime minister’s team to the Telegraph said: “The deputy prime minister paid the relevant duty owing on the purchase of the Hove property in line with relevant requirements and entirely properly.“Any suggestion otherwise is entirely without basis.”Essex police said it was putting a section 60AA order in place in Epping, which gives police the power to ask anyone to remove an item such as a mask that is being used to conceal identity.

The order will be in place for 24 hours, the force said.In a post on Facebook, Essex police said: “Throughout the evening, we have monitored a protest in Cheshunt and we now believe a group of people present there are planning to travel to Epping.“A number of people involved in that group have been seen wearing facemasks and balaclavas.”Assistant chief constable Glen Pavelin said: “We will always seek to facilitate peaceful protest, for all groups.“But the threat of antisocial behaviour and criminality by people attempting to conceal their identity steps outside of the reasonableness of protest, and we have a duty to protect our community.

“My officers will be fair and engaging, but they will be firm in how they deal with anyone who is asked to remove a face covering and refuses.“Anyone who does not will face arrest.”In nearby Cheshunt, Hertfordshire, a video posted on YouTube showed dozens of demonstrators behind barriers near the Delta Marriott hotel, which has also been used to house asylum seekers.Police stood in front of the barriers and some roads were closed with counter-protesters from Stand Up To Racism also in attendance.At one point, protesters appeared to clash with officers.

Away from the ruling for a moment, suspended Labour MSP Colin Smyth has denied allegations that he placed a secret camera in toilets inside the Scottish Parliament.The Press Association understands that Smyth has been charged by the police in relation to the allegation, which was first reported in the Daily Record.The South Scotland MSP was arrested on 5 August and charged with a separate offence of possession of indecent images, prompting his suspension from Scottish Labour.His Holyrood pass was deactivated on Thursday.On Friday, Smyth said he was “fully co-operating” with the investigation but said the decision by the police to release further information and his home address had been “devastating”.

He said:This allegation has come as an utter shock and one I strongly refute.For legal reasons, I can’t respond to specific matters or speculation, and I appreciate there is a process to go through which I am, of course, fully co-operating with.But I sincerely hope it can be concluded quickly and fairly.The speculation, and the recent decision by the police to publicly release details of their ongoing inquiries along with my home address has been devastating and has taken a serious toll on my health.After my address was published with no warning to my family, I felt I had no choice but to move away to protect them.

That has also meant losing the local NHS critical support I had been receiving for the past few weeks, making an already difficult time even more distressing.I would therefore ask that the privacy of myself, but above all my family and friends, is respected while this matter is resolved.Having this hanging over them is especially overwhelming.Responding to the ruling, Steve Smith, chief executive of refugee charity Care4Calais, told the BBC it “made it clear that violent protest, and in many cases overt racism, is not a fast-track route for the far right to attack the rights of people seeking sanctuary in this country”.Liberal Democrat home affairs spokeswoman, Lisa Smart, told the broadcaster that Labour should be “speeding up asylum processing to bring down the backlog and end hotel use once and for all”.

And border security and asylum minister Dame Angela Eagle said the government “will stop using hotels, which aren’t a sustainable solution, by the end of this parliament”.“This judgement assists us by allowing us to do that in a planned and orderly fashion,” she said.“We all want the same thing,” she added, “which is to get out of asylum hotels”.Protesters were already gathering outside the Bell hotel by Friday evening with St George and union flags waving.This court ruling was never going to end as a quiet legal moment.

For the Home Office, the court of appeal’s decision was a practical win.If the ruling had gone the other way the government would have been forced to rehouse 138 asylum seekers in a matter of days, opening the floodgates to similar legal challenges from other councils.Since there is scant alternative accommodation available, this ruling buys the government time.Government insiders say that by the end of the year they expect at least five more hotels housing asylum seekers to close, with more to follow in the new year.If the closures proceed, the ruling means they still have time to deliver their promise of shutting all the hotels down “in a controlled and orderly way” by 2029.

But political tensions have, of course, been reignited.Nigel Farage immediately jumped on the moment, accusing the government of “using the law against the people of Epping”.He said “illegal migrants now have more rights than the people of Essex” and promised Reform UK would “put an end to this”.This is the kind of high-emotion, high-visibility moment Farage thrives on and a story that plays into his hands.Richard Tice, the deputy leader of Reform UK, also piled in, telling supporters on X: “Judges side with illegal migrants against British people.

ECHR used by judges to overrule planning law, democratic protests and the safety of Epping residents.”The government remains stuck in the same political fight – trying to stave off challenges from the right while at the same time getting on with the job of ensuring there is a functioning political project that can communicate its wins.Angela Eagle, the border security and asylum minister, said: “Nobody wants to close the Bell hotel and all other asylum hotels more than me.”She reiterated the government’s pledge to do this by 2029.Asked what her message is for those who say the fight’s not over, she responded: “I think we all want the same thing – which is to get out of asylum hotels.

”Eagle added: “We’ve said they’re not sustainable and we’ve inherited a system with huge backlogs,” the BBC reported.