Tories seek disclosure of vetting process for Mandelson’s ambassador role
Keir Starmer could be forced to disclose confidential vetting documents from Peter Mandelson’s appointment as US ambassador, with the Tories set to trigger a rare Commons vote to compel their release.Labour MPs have indicated they are not prepared to oppose the Conservative motion – known as a humble address – that would disclose the details of the vetting process and what if anything was known about Mandelson’s links to the disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein.Kemi Badenoch plans to use the arcane parliamentary procedure on Wednesday to force the release of files relating to the appointment of Mandelson as the UK’s ambassador to the US.In a dramatic move that will put pressure on Starmer’s chief of staff Morgan McSweeney, Badenoch said she would use the procedure to uncover “why the proper vetting never happened”.Badenoch is expected to say that Labour MPs have a choice to “support our efforts to reveal the truth about how and why Peter Mandelson was appointed ambassador to Washington despite his known links to the paedophile Jeffrey Epstein” or to help Starmer and McSweeney “dodge scrutiny over this sordid affair”.
A fast-moving day in Westminster concluded with the Metropolitan police launching a criminal investigation into allegations that Mandelson leaked Downing Street emails and market-sensitive information to convicted sex offender Epstein,A humble address, the same mechanism that forced the release of key Brexit papers, would require the government to release all communications related to Mandelson’s appointment including emails, WhatsApp messages and texts,The rarely used parliamentary device could lead to the release of communications from Starmer, McSweeney and senior Foreign Office official Oliver Robbins, and reveal to what extent ministers were aware of the risks of appointing Mandelson,The Conservatives will argue that McSweeney was “deeply implicated” in the scandal, having reportedly pushed hard within No 10 for his appointment,Badenoch also called on the cabinet secretary, Chris Wormald, to quiz the justice secretary, David Lammy, and the work and pensions secretary, Pat McFadden, about any information they may have had about Mandelson’s behaviour as business secretary when they were junior ministers in his department.
The humble address will demand the immediate publication of the due diligence process passed on to No 10 from the Cabinet Office, the Conflict of Interest form Mandelson provided to the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, and material given to UK security vetting including documents about Global Counsel, the advisory firm he co-founded in 2010.It would also include minutes of meetings, digital communications and all “information provided to the prime minister prior to his assurance to this house on 10 September 2025 that full due process was followed during this appointment, as it is with all ambassadors”, said a Conservative spokesperson.Starmer told a meeting of the cabinet on Tuesday morning he was appalled by the reported leaks, and Downing Street officials confirmed that ministers had handed a dossier on Mandelson to the police.By Tuesday afternoon the former business secretary had resigned from the House of Lords but the government was coming under increasing pressure to publicly examine the vetting process before Mandelson was appointed US ambassador – to determine the extent of the role that McSweeney played in the process.It is understood that the foreign affairs committee discussed whether McSweeney could be called to give evidence on the appointment but no decision was made, and it is believed that as a special adviser he could refuse to appear.
Labour MPs were privately clamouring on Tuesday for the Conservatives to use their opposition day debate on Wednesday to use the humble address to force disclosures of documents.“There’s definitely a lot of pressure and colleagues making concerns known, especially I gather around what No 10 was told when Mandelson was appointed,” one MP said.“It is clear from the letter that was made public to Mandelson asking him to disclose the times he was at Epstein’s home that there was a distinct incuriosity from No 10 about the extent of this relationship and what more could be out there,” another added.A third MP said it was “clear they just gave him the opportunity to excuse himself” and called it a “botch job”.MPs said they did not believe the Labour whips office would be able to ask them to vote against a Tory motion related to Mandelson.
“No colleague would be prepared to go through the lobbies to oppose that,” one MP said.One former minister said it was clear more was known about the potential leaking of confidential information because Gordon Brown said he had raised it with the Cabinet Office just before Mandelson was sacked as ambassador.They said: “At each step I don’t think we’re being told the full story.”Another said: “There was a casualness to the way these emails are forwarded.We should be told what contacts he had as ambassador.
”They said they were particularly concerned about Mandelson’s contact with the US tech firm Palantir, which has secured government contracts and which Starmer visited when last in Washington DC,
PM says he knew when giving Mandelson US job he had kept ties with Epstein after conviction
Keir Starmer has confirmed for the first time he knew about Peter Mandelson’s longer-term relationship with Jeffrey Epstein before appointing him US ambassador, saying the former peer had “lied repeatedly” about the extent of his contact with the child sex offender.Questioned repeatedly at prime minister’s questions, Starmer said Mandelson had “betrayed our country” in his dealings with Epstein.“He lied repeatedly to my team, when asked about his relationship with Epstein before and during his tenure as ambassador,” the prime minister said. “I regret appointing him. If I knew then what I know now, he would never been anywhere near government
Starmer orders release of files relating to Mandelson US ambassador decision
Keir Starmer will attempt to get ahead of the widening scandal over Peter Mandelson’s conduct with the expected release of files relating to his appointment as Britain’s US ambassador, in what a minister has described as “drawing a line in the sand”.The Conservatives had been preparing to force the publication of the records – including what Mandelson may have told Starmer about his relationship with the convicted child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein before being appointed to Washington – with a motion in the Commons.Rather than face a difficult vote amid anger among his own MPs, the prime minister has ordered the publication of those records – emails, documents and messages – apart from those deemed prejudicial to national security or that could damage diplomatic relations.It is understood the government’s intention is to be transparent while avoiding a situation where all the communications get published.A government amendment to the Conservatives’ motion that would compel the release of the documents is expected to pass
A whiff of familiarity in Mandelson’s 2009 collusion with the banks
Today’s advocates of a windfall tax on the UK’s highly profitable banking sector detected a whiff of familiarity in Peter Mandelson’s suggestion, back in 2009, that JP Morgan should “mildly threaten” the chancellor.Feeding a Wall Street financier market sensitive titbits was an extraordinary breach of trust – perhaps even illegal, it seems – but for Labour veterans of the financial crisis, Mandelson’s collusion with the banks against his own colleagues was the worst betrayal.The then business secretary told Jeffrey Epstein by email that he was “trying hard” to change government policy on a bankers’ bonus tax; and appeared to recommend a fresh round of lobbying, suggesting the JP Morgan boss Jamie Dimon press the then chancellor, Alistair Darling.The economic backdrop today is dramatically different from the depths of the banking crisis. But the clash between progressive policies and the powerful financial sector laid bare in the Epstein emails is still evident – and as in the case of Dimon, even some of the characters are the same
Tories seek disclosure of vetting process for Mandelson’s ambassador role
Keir Starmer could be forced to disclose confidential vetting documents from Peter Mandelson’s appointment as US ambassador, with the Tories set to trigger a rare Commons vote to compel their release.Labour MPs have indicated they are not prepared to oppose the Conservative motion – known as a humble address – that would disclose the details of the vetting process and what if anything was known about Mandelson’s links to the disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein.Kemi Badenoch plans to use the arcane parliamentary procedure on Wednesday to force the release of files relating to the appointment of Mandelson as the UK’s ambassador to the US.In a dramatic move that will put pressure on Starmer’s chief of staff Morgan McSweeney, Badenoch said she would use the procedure to uncover “why the proper vetting never happened”.Badenoch is expected to say that Labour MPs have a choice to “support our efforts to reveal the truth about how and why Peter Mandelson was appointed ambassador to Washington despite his known links to the paedophile Jeffrey Epstein” or to help Starmer and McSweeney “dodge scrutiny over this sordid affair”
Met police launch investigation into alleged Mandelson-Epstein email leaks – as it happened
A criminal investigation has been launched into allegations Peter Mandelson passed market-sensitive information to the paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein, police said on Tuesday evening.Commander Ella Marriott, from the Metropolitan Police, said: “Following the further release of millions of court documents in relation to Jeffrey Epstein by the United States Department of Justice, the Met received a number of reports into alleged misconduct in public office including a referral from the UK Government.“I can confirm that the Metropolitan Police has now launched an investigation into a 72-year-old man, a former Government Minister, for misconduct in public office offences.“The Met will continue to assess all relevant information brought to our attention as part of this investigation and won’t be commenting any further at this time.”Mandelson has previously said: “I was wrong to believe Epstein following his conviction [in 2008 for procuring a child for prostitution and of soliciting a prostitute] and to continue my association with him afterwards
What does the criminal investigation mean for Peter Mandelson?
The Met police have launched a criminal investigation into Peter Mandelson after fresh disclosures from the Jeffrey Epstein files. Which laws could he potentially be accused of breaking and on what basis?The Met has said it received a number of reports relating to possible misconduct in public office. The Scottish National party and Reform UK reported Mandelson to the police to investigate any possible offences. Emily Thornberry, the Labour chair of the foreign affairs select committee, also said she believed his apparent actions should merit a criminal inquiry.The Met confirmed on Tuesday night that it had “launched an investigation into a 72-year-old man, a former government minister, for misconduct in public office offences”
From Dorset to the world: wave of donations helps to secure Cerne giant’s home
‘We put a stink bomb in Stephen Fry’s shoe’: Vic and Bob on the inspired idiocy of Shooting Stars
Sydney Biennale 2026: Hoor Al Qasimi unveils expansive program for 25th edition
Meryl Streep is as withering as ever in first full-length trailer for Devil Wears Prada 2
Letter: Mark Fisher obituary
Wil Anderson: ‘I honestly believe being mistaken for Adam Hills is one of the great gifts of my life’