Starmer still faces more questions than answers after Olly Robbins’ quietly damning defence | John Crace

A picture


Well, what would you do? You’re a top civil servant with more than 25 years of government service,You’ve worked for Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, David Cameron and Theresa May,You went through Brexit hell as a lead negotiator,You were sacked by Boris Johnson and were then brought back by Keir Starmer,You land a plum job as permanent undersecretary in the Foreign Office and do your boss a favour by appointing his man as ambassador to the US.

You’ve already got a knighthood; that peerage is only a matter of time away.Then it all blows up in your face and the prime minister sacks you and trashes your reputation in parliament.Call it the revenge of the nerd.On Monday we had the case for the prosecution during Keir Starmer’s statement to the Commons.On Tuesday, we got Olly Robbins giving his defence before the foreign affairs select committee.

And, in its way, it was quietly damning.Mostly of the government, occasionally – if inadvertently – of himself.Throughout, Robbins presented himself as a fundamentally decent man.Someone who lived and breathed public service.The sort of man Starmer believes himself to be yet somehow isn’t.

An ingenu for whom process is everything,A man governed by ritual,You would guess his sock drawer is pristine and numbered,Someone crushed by his recent sacking,Heartbroken at losing a job he loved.

At one point, he insisted that the two books he knew by heart were the civil service manual and the Book of Common Prayer.Blessed are the geeks.For they shall inherit the Earth.Just a shame that Olly never got to the bit in the prayer book about anything to do with Peter Mandelson always ending in a vale of tears.A shadow of darkness.

And unlike previous misdemeanours, this time there shall be no resurrection for him,Possibly not even for Olly or Keir,Robbins’ testimony was all the more powerful for its quiet sense of reserve,That he was not on a seek and destroy mission,He was more subtle than that.

Some secrets would stay with him till the grave.The committee chair, Emily Thornberry, thanked him for giving up his time.“I’ve got all the time in the world now,” he said sadly.But he was going to offer up enough to allow people to fill in the gaps for themselves.It was like this, said Olly.

By the time he was appointed to the Foreign Office, No 10 had already declared that Mandelson was to be the next ambassador to the US.It had been ratified with the Americans in Washington.The king had signed it off.God knows what Charles had had to say about it.There was intense pressure from No 10 for the Foreign Office to do the right thing.

Just shut up and sign the approval forms along the dotted line.If necessary, don’t even bother with the vetting process.Dismissive.Mandelson was even allowed to view confidential documents long before his vetting was complete.MP Richard Foord got flustered.

“Just say it,” said Thornberry,But Foord was too delicate a flower,So Emily said it for him,“Morgan McSweeney told you to ‘just fucking approve it,’ This is what Downing Street wanted.

” Though who knows if it was what Starmer wanted.You got the feeling that Keir was a semi-detached prime minister.Curiously unbothered about who did what or why or when.Happy to let his team run the country for him.Keir was just happy that people called him prime minister.

Not least because it reminded him he was prime minister,He had a tendency to forget,Olly was keen, though, for the committee to understand that he had never given in to the pressure,Yes, it had been intense, but his decision to approve Mandy for Developed Vetting had been done entirely by the book,Robbins was as Robbins does, and Robbins would never act against the civil service code of impartiality.

Mind you, he couldn’t comment on the details of Mandy’s vetting because that would undermine the integrity of the process.People with interesting lives shouldn’t necessarily be excluded.There’s interesting and then there’s Peter Mandelson.Now it all became as clear as mud.Olly was certain that the sort of things that might ordinarily have precluded Mandy from being posted to Washington – you know, things like having twice being sacked for breaking the ministerial code, remaining friends with a convicted child sex offender and leaking market-sensitive information to a bank – should all have come under the heading of the government’s “due diligence”.

And since Mandy had passed the due diligence, he had assumed Downing Street was totally cool with his past misdemeanours.That just left the problem with Mandelson failing the vetting.Though Olly was at pains to point out that he hadn’t really failed the vetting.Just that the vetting agency had said there were a number of problems and that they were leaning to recommend a refusal to improve.Yet again, Robbins couldn’t tell us what those issues were – assuming they were nothing to do with due diligence – because if he did, he would have to kill everyone.

Though they were insignificant enough for him to do what the government had always wanted,Not that he had caved in to pressure,At this point, we disappeared through the looking glass,Because No 10 had insisted there were two red lights ticked on Mandelson’s vetting form, which should have been an automatic no-no for any appointment,Only, Olly had never seen any vetting form.

Certainly not Mandelson’s.Not even his own.He had never heard of the red, amber and green boxes.It was all a mystery to him.Though if he had his time again, he would still approve Mandy.

Go figure,This was the madness of King Keir,The prime minister who had no idea of what anyone in his office was doing,The man with no opinions of his own,The man with no interests.

Though it did turn out that someone inside No 10 had decided it would be a great idea to nominate Matthew Doyle, Starmer’s former head of comms, for a job in the diplomatic service.Preferably alongside Mandelson in Washington.I guess that it made sense to have two men with close links to child sex offenders in the same place.Killing two birds with one stone.Robbins had managed to head this one off at the pass.

Finally, after two-and-a-half hours of interrogation, we were done.Robbins was free to go back to his life.What was left of it after Starmer had finished with him.As for Keir, there were still way more questions than answers.And Olly was going to keep what Starmer had said to him at his dismissal to himself and his legal team.

There will be a reckoning.The blob fights back.
cultureSee all
A picture

V&A East Storehouse and Norwich Castle among finalists for museum of the year

The V&A East Storehouse, the National Gallery and an accessible castle in Norwich are among the contenders for this year’s Art Fund museum of the year award, the most prestigious UK prize in the sector.The annual prize offers the winner £120,000, with £20,000 going to each of the other finalists, who the Art Fund’s director, Jenny Waldman, said had all “innovated in different ways”.This year’s list is dominated by some of the biggest names in the cultural sector that have undergone big refurbishments or invested in significant new outposts, such as the V&A’s East Storehouse, which will be seen by many as a frontrunner.Based in the Olympic Park in Stratford, east London, the space aims to reimagine what a storeroom can be, with partitions removed so visitors can see “and breathe the same air” as the objects. Waldman said the V&A Storehouse, which opened in spring 2025 at a cost of £65m, had broken the boundaries of what a store could be

A picture

Letter: Sir Neil Cossons obituary

In 1971, Neil Cossons and I were on the staff of Liverpool Museum, and he invited me to accompany him on a visit to Ironbridge Gorge in Shropshire. We admired Blists Hill furnace, the bridge, the surrounding buildings and their setting, and shortly afterwards he became its director.The appeal it had as a monument to the industrial revolution lay in it being a complete entity. Many other site-based museums rely on translocating buildings, often into a replicated local landscape. History occurs in places, and Neil knew that raising one’s gaze from the built artefacts to the landscape enables understanding: preserving the place was crucial

A picture

‘Women want to experience pleasure’: how the female gaze caught the attention of film, TV and fiction

From passionate romantasy novels to premium television dramas, culture is bringing the agency, desires and interior lives of women to the fore. It’s proving good for business, but is this a permanent revolution?Do you voraciously read the pages of steamy romantasy bestsellers by Sarah J Maas or Rebecca Yarros? Or flood your group chat with breathless recaps of the latest goings-on in TV series such as Heated Rivalry or Bridgerton? Or even immerse yourself in the divisive and challenging cinematic worlds of Emerald Fennell? If so, you surely can’t have failed to notice that in pop culture, the female gaze – storytelling that highlights the meandering, textured, sublimely messy inner worlds and wants of women – is enjoying an explosion.On TV, you can see it everywhere, in the interior lives and desires taken up by Big Little Lies, Sirens or Reese Witherspoon and Kerry Washington’s Little Fires Everywhere. Romantasy harbours it in the shape of powerful maidens and sex in fae (fairy) realms, while Fennell’s Wuthering Heights and Promising Young Woman are marketed with the promise of converting women’s experiences into dark beauty on the big screen.A shift, a moment or a commercial juggernaut? That depends how deeply you look

A picture

Yann Martel: ‘I hate the rich people of this world – of which I’m one, because of Life of Pi’

Your novels Life of Pi, Beatrice and Virgil, and The High Mountains of Portugal all feature animals in starring roles. If you could be any animal, which would it be, and why?A sloth, because it has a peaceful, long life. Or maybe a koala. They both look like stoners. A sloth just hangs there in its tree, it sleeps 22 hours a day – or maybe it’s meditating

A picture

The Guide #239: Two successful seasons in, The Pitt has resuscitated the medical drama

After a wait more interminable than most spells in an A&E reception area, medical-drama-of-the-moment The Pitt finally made it on to UK screens last month, via the arrival of streaming service HBO Max, and just about everyone I know has spent the following weeks hoovering it up. Some, in fact, are already up to speed with its second season (the finale aired last night on US TV) and so are trying very, very hard not to blurt out major plot points at the office tea point/on public transport/in an actual hospital waiting room – we’re in a post-spoiler age, remember.I’ve been a little bit slower off the mark – mainly because it took so long to figure out if I actually had access to HBO Max as part of my bafflingly arcane Sky TV package – but I’m racing through it now, and so am ready to share the same observations that everyone else made weeks, or in the case of the US, a full year ago. The main one being: how did not one TV producer have the idea to mash together ER and 24 before? It was right there, staring you all in the face! (Jed Mercurio, whose forgotten 2015 medical drama, Critical, also had a real-time element, might have a finger raised in objection at this point.)Beyond The Pitt’s formal innovation (each season follows, to the second, a 15-hour shift at an under-resourced teaching hospital in Pittsburgh), what’s striking is how familiar it feels

A picture

Winners and judges out of pocket as £20,000 writing awards appear to have closed

A competition for new writers that promised a £20,000 prize fund appears to have shut down, leaving winners and judges, including a Booker prize-winning novelist, out of pocket.Established in 2022, the Plaza Prizes last year offered 10 awards that were judged by the “finest poets and writers in the world”.However, some of the judges for the 2025 competition say they were not paid, and a number of winners say they had their entries withdrawn after being accused of using AI to create their work – allegations they strenuously denied.One judge, the 2021 Booker prize winner Damon Galgut, described the competition as a “scam” after he did not get paid for his work judging a fiction section of the annual competition.Anthony Joseph, who won the 2022 TS Eliot poetry prize, also says he was not paid for his work