‘Labour has made me feel like a scrounger’: disabled people urge welfare cuts rethink
Ministers are facing a backlash over planned disability welfare changes, but Rachel Reeves on Thursday resisted calls to abandon the cuts,After ruling out a U-turn, pressure is building on the UK chancellor to tweak qualification rules to protect many disabled people from being stripped of their benefits,On Thursday, she said the government was “reviewing the criteria”, but ministers are yet to release details,This week, the Guardian revealed that ministers were to offer mutinous Labour MPs an olive branch to help avert a major rebellion over the plans,Under the Pip plans, which will introduce a “four-point rule”, claimants would not qualify unless they score a minimum of four points on a single daily living activity.
Assessments score the difficulty from 0 to 12 that people face in a range of living activities such as preparing and eating food, communicating, washing and getting dressed.The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) estimates the cuts could push 250,000 people into relative poverty after housing costs by 2029-30, including 50,000 children.The Guardian spoke to four households after scores of people responded to an online callout asking how people could be affected.There are some things that Neil needs extra support with: cooking meals, washing clothes, changing bedsheets, cleaning his bungalow.The 50-year-old in Gateshead was working in banking in 2019 when he suffered a bleed to the brain related to a stroke he had aged four.
Six years later, Neil says he still suffers with frequent falls, severe headaches and losing use of his dominant hand, so he relies on care, which he can afford due to the personal independence payment (Pip),But under Labour’s “four-point rule”, Neil would lose everything,“There is no chance of me being able to afford [that care],” he says,Neil gets £187,45 a week from Pip, but does not score four in any daily living category.
He is angry and worried at the risk of debt, facing dilemmas of “heat or eat”, and being unable to even go out for a coffee.“We’ve all got to have some enjoyment in life, otherwise what’s the point.”After voting Labour last summer, Neil says he has lost faith in the party.“I really didn’t think Labour would be so heartless.I had to close my membership, I just couldn’t support them any more.
“From a personal point of view, I feel like a scrounger, that’s how the Labour party has made me feel.And it’s not fair, we’re just trying to live life as best we can.”The government says its welfare changes are needed to encourage people with disabilities to work.But Jo, a 46-year-old in Cumbria who suffers from pain, fatigue and cognitive and balance issues related to spina bifida from birth, says the proposals will have the exact opposite effect and push disabled people out of the workplace.“It disgusts me really, because when this first came out, the rhetoric was [framing Pip] as an out-of-work benefit.
It’s not!” Jo says.“It keeps a lot of people able to work.” She says Pip allows her to continue working part-time for a local charity.But losing it, because she does not pass the “four-point rule”, would force her to quit the job.“Pip is a lifeline to a lot of people, and I don’t say that lightly.
They really need to think about the actual impact it’s going to have,” says Jo, who is a single mother with a 17-year-old daughter.She urged the government to delay a vote until after the government’s consultation, which ends on 30 June.“I get that cost savings are probably needed but there are better ways of doing it.”Sign up to First EditionOur morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it mattersafter newsletter promotionTim, 53, in Somerset was diagnosed in 2007 with muscular dystrophy, a degenerative disease.He gets £103.
10 a week from Pip and his wife, Ginny, 49 – with whom he has two school-age daughters – is his part-time carer, meaning she gets carer’s allowance.But Tim would fail the four-point rule.That would also mean that Ginny, because the person she cares for would no longer be eligible for Pip, would lose her £210.68 a month carer’s allowance.Tim has worked as a film-maker and more recently a casual library assistant, but for the last four years it has been difficult to find work because of his mobility and communication issues.
He also experiences regular falls.It feels “as if disabled people are lower down the pecking order in their importance to society, it seems like their only value lies in whether they can work or not”, says Ginny.Tim says the government should tax the super-rich to raise revenue rather than cut welfare spending for vulnerable people.In the voting booth last summer, Richard, a 62-year-old in Welwyn Garden City, voted Labour for the first time.But in light of the party’s planned welfare changes, he says: “Never again.
”“I will not forget this,” says Richard, who has rheumatoid arthritis.He adds that many people he has spoken to locally seem to be abandoning Labour over its welfare policies and weighing up voting for Reform UK, which has been trying to portray itself as more pro-welfare.Richard was awarded £101.35 a week last year, but would fail the four-point rule and lose Pip, which he spends on support for cleaning, transport, help with bathing and other care.He believes fluctuating conditions are not treated adequately by the DWP.
“I could push a hoover around today,” he says, whereas some weeks he cannot move to the front door without constant discomfort.“This is a party allegedly founded on welfare principles,” he says, adding: “Come on Labour MPs: find some moral backbone, and find ways to support vulnerable people.”
British Council cuts are a false economy that would erode the UK’s global influence | Letters
Soft power takes decades to build and no time to squander. As we ramp up defence spending, it would be incoherent to try to part-pay for it by hollowing out the British Council.The British Council is at the heart of Britain’s global influence – fostering education, English-language skills, cultural exchange and mutual understanding in more than 100 countries.Yet funding pressures and the burden of a £197m loan now mean that it may close its doors in as many as 60 countries (British Council ‘may have to close in 60 countries’ amid cuts to aid budget, 8 June).As the United States retreats and rival states expand their global presence, this is the moment to invest in institutions such as the British Council and the BBC World Service, not to make false economies
Labour cutting farming budget in England by £100m a year, figures shows
Labour is cutting the farming budget in England by £100m a year, spending review figures show.Despite the decrease, the budget has been cautiously welcomed by nature and farming groups, as there were fears the Treasury had wanted to reduce the funding further.Farmers have felt squeezed by the Labour government’s policies over recent months, with mass protests over the introduction of inheritance tax on farms worth more than £1m. Extreme weather and rising input prices have increased financial pressures on the sector, which has meant that a cut to the budget could have serious impacts.Ministers have also indicated that larger farms could be ineligible for the nature-friendly farming fund in future
Keir Starmer makes U-turn mid-air over grooming gangs inquiry
The news emerged in a notably low-key way: a speculative question to Keir Starmer during his Q&A with reporters on the way to the G7 summit in Canada. Yes, he said, speaking carefully while wedged in the aisle of the cramped jet, there would be a full statutory inquiry into grooming gangs.This was, it should be remembered, not just one of the most toxic debates in British politics during 2025, but one where Starmer and his ministers had continually pushed back against demands for such an action.So why now? At first sight this might seem similar to the recent U-turn over eligibility for pensioners’ winter fuel allowance – a belated acknowledgment that the original decision had been mistaken, masked by words about circumstances changing.But in this instance things are arguably more nuanced, despite the notably furious reactions from Kemi Badenoch and the shadow home secretary, Chris Philp, who were swift to accuse the prime minister of delay without reason
Government’s welfare plans must be pushed through, Starmer says
The government’s welfare plans have to be pushed through, Keir Starmer has said, indicating that there will be no further concessions in the face of a potentially significant Labour rebellion over cuts to disability benefits.Speaking to reporters on his way to the G7 summit in Canada, the prime minister set out his determination to get the plans through parliament, after ministers warned mutinous MPs about the consequences of voting against the government.Liz Kendall, the work and pensions secretary, has sought to offer some concessions before a Commons vote next month, with a large number of Labour MPs particularly worried about the tightening of eligibility rules on personal independence payments (Pips) for disabled people.“We’ve got to reform the welfare system,” Starmer said when asked about the prospect of a rebellion, with some estimates saying as many as 170 MPs could oppose the plans.“Everybody agrees with that proposition, so we’ve got to do that basic reform,” he said
‘Labour has made me feel like a scrounger’: disabled people urge welfare cuts rethink
Ministers are facing a backlash over planned disability welfare changes, but Rachel Reeves on Thursday resisted calls to abandon the cuts.After ruling out a U-turn, pressure is building on the UK chancellor to tweak qualification rules to protect many disabled people from being stripped of their benefits. On Thursday, she said the government was “reviewing the criteria”, but ministers are yet to release details.This week, the Guardian revealed that ministers were to offer mutinous Labour MPs an olive branch to help avert a major rebellion over the plans.Under the Pip plans, which will introduce a “four-point rule”, claimants would not qualify unless they score a minimum of four points on a single daily living activity
UK ‘woefully’ unprepared for Chinese and Russian undersea cable sabotage, says report
China and Russia are stepping up sabotage operations targeting undersea cables and the UK is unprepared to meet the mounting threat, according to new analysis.A report by the China Strategic Risks Institute (CSRI) analysed 12 incidents in which national authorities had investigated alleged undersea cable sabotage between January 2021 and April 2025. Of the 10 cases in which a suspect vessel was identified, eight were directly linked to China or Russia through flag-state registration or company ownership.The involvement of “shadow fleet” commercial vessels in these incidents is consistent with China and Russia’s broader “grey zone” strategy – a space between war and peace – which aims to coerce adversaries while minimising opportunities for response, the report claims.The patterns of activity – such as the involvement of Chinese vessels in suspicious incidents in the Baltic Sea, and Russian vessels near Taiwan – suggest possible coordination between Moscow and Beijing on undersea cable attacks, it says
World’s largest banks pledged $869bn to fossil fuel firms in 2024, new report finds
Metro Bank sobers up and attracts a suitor | Nils Pratley
UK government rollout of Humphrey AI tool raises fears about reliance on big tech
Hey AI! Can ChatGPT help you to manage your money?
Dan Evans reproduces form of old to beat Frances Tiafoe at Queen’s Club
Royal Ascot ready to roll with MPs worried future of racing is ‘on the line’