Lammy’s jury trial plans are ‘massive mistake’, say Labour MPs and peers
David Lammy has been accused of making a “massive mistake” by Labour MPs and peers after announcing radical plans to cut thousands of jury trials across England and Wales,Defendants will no longer have the option to choose to have their cases heard before a jury, the justice secretary told the Commons,Magistrates’ powers will be extended from dealing with maximum sentences of one year to at least 18 months, he said, and a new judge-led court will be established,The deputy prime minister has backed down on plans to remove jury trials for all cases involving a maximum jail term of five years after an outcry from MPs, lawyers and campaigners,The proposals are closely aligned with the sentencing review by the retired judge, Sir Brian Leveson, who had suggested diverting more offences to magistrates courts or to a new intermediate court called the crown court bench division.
The government has said: Jury trials will be reserved for cases in “indictable-only” offences such as murder and rape and “either-way” offences with a likely sentence of more than three years in prison,Defendants in “either-way” offences with likely sentences of three years or less will no longer be able to choose a jury trial,Magistrates court sentencing powers will be increased from one year to 18 months,The powers could also be extended to 24 months if necessary,A new tier of judge-only “swift” courts will be created to hear cases without a jury.
There were about 15,000 cases dealt with by jury trial in the year to June, according to criminal court statistics.Under the new proposals, civil servants estimate that 2,500 of those would have been heard in the new “crown court bench division” and 5,000 by magistrates.The remainder would have been heard by juries.The move means defendants accused of burglary, theft, fraud, sexual assault, stalking, sharing indecent images, drug dealing and criminal damage up to £10,000 could be denied the right to put their case to a jury.Lammy told MPs: “As Sir Brian has made clear, investment is not enough.
The caseload is projected to reach 100,000 by 2028 and without fundamental change, could keep rising, meaning justice will be denied to more victims, and trust in the system will collapse.“Mr Speaker, to avoid that disaster, I will follow Sir Brian’s bold blueprint for change.”Labour MPs said the changes would make it harder for defendants and may not reduce the backlog.Stella Creasy, the MP for Walthamstow, said jury trials only accounted for 3% of cases, asking how much difference curbing them would make.“It’s hard to see how this measure … will address that backlog,” she said.
Clive Efford, the MP for Eltham and Chislehurst and a leading member of the Tribune group, said it could penalise working-class defendants and could lead to an “us-and-them in the criminal justice system”.Richard Burgon, the left-leaning MP for Leeds East, said the policy sent “a chill through my heart”, and compared it to policies enacted by the Russian president, Vladimir Putin.“Doesn’t the justice secretary want to think again?” he said.Writing on X, Karl Turner, the Labour MP for Kingston upon Hull East, said the proposals were a “massive mistake” and would never get through parliament.Sign up to First EditionOur morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it mattersafter newsletter promotionDiane Abbott, the independent MP for Hackney North, said there would be miscarriages of justice for minority groups and women if the right to a jury trial was restricted.
“The entire house is concerned about victims including attacks on women and girls,But the entire house is also concerned about the many women who will undoubtedly suffer miscarriages of justice if the right to trial by jury is curtailed,” Abbott said,Helena Kennedy, the Labour peer and human rights barrister, said Lammy’s claim that rape victims were missing out on justice because of delays fuelled by jury trials was “shameful”,She told Times Radio that those calling for curbs on jury trials usually had a “snooty view of the general public’s ability to try a case”,“I think that we should recognise that this would be the end of jury trial,” she said.
A memo leaked last week had suggested Lammy was looking at going further, making jury trials applicable only for public interest offences with possible prison sentences of more than five years, removing the ancient right of thousands of defendants to be heard before a jury.The justice secretary suggested on Sky News that discussions in cabinet had led to the current proposals, raising the prospect there had been a backlash to such radical reforms.Lammy will face opposition from human rights organisations, barristers and some race campaigners who believe there should be no erosion of the right to a jury trial.Riel Karmy-Jones KC, the chair of the Criminal Bar Association, said the proposals bring “a wrecking ball” to a system that has been in place for generations.“Juries work – they do their job superbly, and without bias.
Juries have not caused the backlog,” she said.A review conducted by Lammy in 2017 concluded that juries remained “fit for purpose” and “act as a filter for prejudice”.Speaking in the Commons, the shadow justice secretary, Robert Jenrick, said: “His past is catching up with him, because the best opponent of the justice secretary’s plans to curb jury trials is the justice secretary himself.“In 2020 he said: ‘Criminal trials without juries are a bad idea.You do not fix the backlog with trials that are widely perceived as unfair.
’ In 2017, in his report into prejudice in the criminal justice system, he found juries, and I quote, ‘act as a filter for prejudice’,“But now he’s become justice secretary, he’s scrapping the very institution he once lauded,Which is it? Will the real David Lammy please stand up,”Jenrick also brought up previous comments made by Keir Starmer, saying: “And what about this? ‘There should be a right to trial by jury in all criminal cases,’ Any ideas, Mr Speaker? Who else but the prime minister this time.
Does this government have no shame?”
Advertising giant WPP relegated from FTSE 100 after nearly 30 years
WPP has been relegated from the FTSE 100 after nearly 30 years, as the advertising multinational struggles to stem an exodus of clients and match the artificial intelligence and data capabilities of rivals.The market valuation of WPP, once the world’s largest advertising group, has plummeted from about £24bn in 2017 to £3.1bn.The company’s share price has plunged by two-thirds this year and it has been relegated from the blue chip index after a quarterly reshuffle, confirmed when stock markets closed on Wednesday afternoon.British Land, which was the most valuable company in the FTSE 250, was promoted to the FTSE 100 to take the spot vacated by WPP
Post Office avoids fine over leak of wrongfully convicted operators’ names
The Post Office has avoided a fine over a data breach that resulted in the mistaken online publication of the names and addresses of more than 500 post office operators it had been pursuing during the Horizon IT scandal.The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has reprimanded the Post Office over the breach, in which the company’s press office accidentally published an unredacted version of a legal settlement document with the operators on its website.The ICO said the data breach in June last year involving the release of names, home addresses and operator status of 502 out of the 555 people involved in the successful litigation action against the Post Office led by Sir Alan Bates had been “entirely preventable”.“The people affected by this breach had already endured significant hardship and distress as a result of the IT scandal,” said Sally Anne Poole, the head of investigations at the ICO.“They deserved much better than this
Hundreds of Australians complain of wrongful social media account closures but ombudsman can’t help
More than 1,500 Australians in the past two-and-a-half years have complained to the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman about digital platforms, with a third complaining about wrongful account terminations.But the TIO – which is responsible for complaints about mobile phone service, land lines and internet services – has no powers to do anything about it.The TIO’s report, released on Wednesday, comes before Australia’s social media ban, which will see teenagers under 16 banned from about 12 social media platforms from 10 December. The federal government has set out that the platforms must have quick appeals processes in place for people who have been wrongly assessed as being under 16 to regain access to their accounts.In the report, the TIO referred to Karen – not her real name – whose business page on social media was linked to her personal account
Doom, gloom … and Belle Gibson? The top Google searches in Australia in 2025
We may, indeed, be living in the end of times, with natural disasters, death and politics dominating Google searches in Australia in 2025.Cyclone Alfred was the number one overall Google search term by Australians in 2024, according to the annual search results list released by the tech company on Thursday.It was followed by American political activist Charlie Kirk, who also topped Wikipedia’s list of the year’s most-read articles after being fatally shot in September, and in third place was Australian federal election 2025.When we weren’t voting or doomscrolling, we were watching television. Belle Gibson, the Australian wellness scammer and subject of the hit show Apple Cider Vinegar, made it into the overall top 10 list, as did serial killer Ed Gein from the series Monster
Australia v England: Ashes second Test, day one – live
Zak Crawley marks out his place after copping a pair in Perth when dismissed by Mitchell Starc in the first over of each innings. Ben Duckett stands at the non-striker’s end for England as the second Test begins at the Gabba. Here we go …Australia would have preferred to bat first and ideally manage the game so that Mitchell Starc might run wild under lights. The left-armer stands apart in pink-ball Tests with 81 wickets at a click of 17, but will take the ball under the blazing sun on day one of the second Ashes Test.James Wallace finds out – from batters who have dared to stare down Starc from 22 years – what makes him such a menace with the pink ball
Rory McIlroy mania hits Melbourne as fans skip school and work on ‘special day’ | Jack Snape
Organisers didn’t have to wait long to feel the full impact of Rory McIlroy’s appearance at the Australian Open on Thursday. Two thousand fans were waiting outside at Royal Melbourne at 6.30am, eager to get to the 10th tee for the Northern Irishman’s first swing at Australia’s premier tournament in a decade.Agitation was building. Time was ticking
Comedian Judi Love: ‘I’m a big girl, the boss, and you love it’
Fran Lebowitz: ‘Hiking is the most stupid thing I could ever imagine’
My cultural awakening: Thelma & Louise made me realise I was stuck in an unhappy marriage
The Guide #219: Don’t panic! Revisiting the millennium’s wildest cultural predictions
From Christy to Neil Young: your complete entertainment guide to the week ahead
Susan Loppert obituary