‘Just hysteria’: UK faces a crisis but the Denis Healey comparison is overblown

A picture


International confidence in the UK government’s economic policies had evaporated,Growth was stalling, inflation was galloping, and Labour – back in power after a reckless Conservative administration had gambled on tax cuts – was in deep trouble,It was 1976, when James Callaghan’s government was forced to go cap in hand to the International Monetary Fund for an emergency loan,Fast forward almost half a century and some economists are drawing obvious parallels,Just as Callaghan’s chancellor, Denis Healey, did before her, Rachel Reeves is facing a challenge to placate jittery global investors.

The UK’s long-term borrowing costs have risen close to their highest level since 1998, adding to pressure on the chancellor before a tough autumn budget.With a lacklustre growth outlook, sticky inflation, and Labour’s welfare U-turns hitting the public finances, most economists expect Reeves to announce a raft of tax increases to cover a shortfall of between £20bn and £40bn against her main, self-imposed, fiscal target.Last weekend the Sunday Telegraph ran an article headlined: Britain heading towards IMF bailout, featuring quotes from three experienced economists comparing the fiscal mess facing the two Labour administrations 49 years apart.However, for most economists, comparisons with Healey’s begging-bowl plea to the global lender of last resort are significantly overblown.“You can quote me as saying that is complete nonsense… something like that is just hysteria,” said Michael Saunders, a former member of the Bank of England’s monetary policy committee.

“That is not to say the UK does not have a weak fiscal position.It does.But it is somewhere well between that and an IMF bailout.”Back in the autumn of 1976, inflation was running close to 17%, having hit a postwar high of almost 25% a year earlier; it forced the Bank to drive interest rates up to 15%.Sterling was in freefall and the UK government faced a buyers’ strike among investors who would normally purchase its bonds, known as gilts.

This week the Treasury sold £5bn of three-year gilts to institutional investors in an auction that was more than three times oversubscribed,The pound has strengthened against other major currencies this year,Inflation is on track to peak at 4%, up from 3,8% currently, economic growth in the first half of 2025 was the fastest in the G7, and Threadneedle Street cut interest rates this month by a quarter-point, to 4%,Benchmarking things to the 1970s, is, though, a mainstay of British political discourse.

The IMF bailout episode became synonymous with national humiliation, and led to Labour’s 1979 defeat and long exile from government.Jagjit Chadha, a Cambridge university economist and former director of the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (Niesr), who was quoted by the Telegraph, said it could not be predicted whether an IMF loan was required.But he warned the UK’s “unsustainable path” should not be underplayed.“We need to address this risk not devalue it,” he said.At the Treasury, the most painful episode in postwar economic history remains burned into the institutional memory.

Within weeks of Labour’s return to power last year, officials briefed ministers with a 25-minute PowerPoint presentation on the importance of keeping markets onside.Liz Truss triggering a meltdown in the market for UK government debt with her September 2022 mini-budget had been a potent reminder of the fragile conditions in markets, and underscored Britain’s delicate position.Baked into the rise in government borrowing costs are several ingredients.After a succession of shocks – from the 2008 financial crisis, to Brexit and the Covid pandemic – the UK’s national debt has risen to the highest level as a share of GDP since the 1960s.The return of high inflation and the end of rock-bottom interest rates has made servicing those debts more expensive.

An ageing population and political pressure to mend battered public services has added to the strain.Sign up to Business TodayGet set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morningafter newsletter promotionThe Bank has also complicated matters further.Although it is cutting rates, the central bank is also selling UK government bonds to unwind its crisis-era quantitative easing scheme, adding to the supply of debt investors are being called on to buy.Earlier this month, Threadneedle Street admitted for the first time that this had contributed to the rise in the UK’s long-term borrowing costs.At its next policy meeting on 18 September, the Bank will decide whether to reduce its sales over the next 12 months.

Most economists believe a reduction is likely.Britain is not alone in facing challenges.Borrowing costs have risen across advanced economies, in part because of Donald Trump’s trade wars and his assault on the independence of the US Federal Reserve.Several other countries are seen as running unsustainable fiscal policies, including France, where Emmanuel Macron’s government is in crisis.Chris Scicluna, a former Treasury economist who is now head of research at the Japanese bank Daiwa Capital Markets Europe, said the UK was more reliant on overseas investors to buy its debt than some other countries were.

“Debt stocks are much higher than they used to be,Therefore governments need to be offering higher yields to attract buyers, and there’s no shortage – whether from the US, euro area or Japan – and unfortunately the UK has to compete to attract investors,”Many investors believe that Reeves has made a rod for her own back,Labour promising before the general election not to raise income tax, national insurance or VAT has left big revenue-raisers off limits,Labour’s welfare U-turns show that further spending restraint is not an option.

Neil Mehta, a hedge fund manager at RBC BlueBay Asset Management, said: “The government can’t contain spending or tax effectively without breaking manifesto rules.No one wants to make the tough political choices.If we continue like this the market will act as the enforcer, like it has done many times in the past.”The trouble for Reeves is that raising taxes to balance the books could undermine economic growth.Her previous measures also stoked inflation.

That in turn would be viewed negatively in financial markets, in what some economists refer to as an effective doom loop.Andrew Sentance, a former MPC member, said that comparisons to the 1970s were valid, but that suggesting an impending IMF bailout was hyperbole.“I do not think in the UK’s case we are heading for an IMF bailout,” he told the Guardian.“You have a cocktail of problems which is very reminiscent of the 1970s.Does that mean we have to go to the IMF? No, not necessarily.

Does it mean there is some kind of reckoning in terms of an economic crisis coming up, of some sort? Yes, that’s quite likely,”
businessSee all
A picture

P&O chief who prompted outrage by sacking nearly 800 staff is to quit

The chief executive described as “Britain’s most hated boss” after sacking almost 800 workers at P&O Ferries is to leave the company.Peter Hebblethwaite prompted outrage in 2022 after P&O Ferries dismissed 786 staff and replaced them with low-paid agency workers, who received considerably less than the UK minimum wage.At the time the cross-Channel ferry company was accused of operating like “pirates of the high sea” and during questioning at a parliamentary hearing Darren Jones, then chair of the business committee, asked: “Are you in this mess because you don’t know what you’re doing, or are you just a shameless criminal?”Hebblethwaite always said his actions were the only way of saving the ferry group from going bust. No criminal charges were brought after the sackings.A spokesperson for P&O Ferries, a subsidiary of the Dubai-based ports operator DP World, said: “Peter Hebblethwaite has communicated his intention to resign from his position as chief executive officer to dedicate more time to family matters

A picture

UK bank shares tumble after call for windfall tax on lenders in budget

UK bank shares tumbled on Friday, cutting the combined stock market value of some of the biggest companies in the sector by more than £6bn, as fresh calls for a windfall tax on large lenders in the autumn budget spooked investors.Calls for a tax grab, in a paper written by the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) thinktank, took a toll on some of the UK’s biggest high street banks.NatWest was the biggest faller on the FTSE 100 on Friday, down nearly 5%. Shares in Lloyds Banking Group fell more than 3% and Barclays was down 2%. HSBC shares fell nearly 1%

A picture

Pre-budget lift for Rachel Reeves as UK business confidence rises

Confidence among UK businesses has grown despite anxiety about the state of the economy, in a rare slice of positive news for the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, in the run-up to her autumn budget.An August poll of UK companies by Lloyds Bank showed that improved sentiment among manufacturers and retailers helped push overall optimism within UK plc up by two percentage points, with 54% of companies now feeling confident in the current environment.It marked the fourth consecutive monthly increase in overall business sentiment, according to the Lloyds business barometer, driven by a growing number of businesses – roughly 63% – feeling strong about their own trading prospects. On that measurement alone, confidence reached its highest level since 2014.About half of all businesses now expect to hire more staff in the coming year despite growing costs

A picture

Bank of England show to remember lost splendours of Sir John Soane building

A century ago the wrecking ball demolished the halls, courtyards, arches and domes of one of London’s best-loved buildings in what the architectural historian Nikolaus Pevsner would decry as “the greatest architectural crime” to befall the capital in the 20th century.The Old Lady of Threadneedle Street (as the Bank of England was nicknamed after a satirical 1797 cartoon of William Pitt the Younger, prime minister from 1783 to 1801, wooing an old lady dressed in pound notes) has been the heart of the City since 1734.Refashioned and expanded over the decades, after the 1780 Gordon riots, when rioters scaled the neighbouring church of St Christopher le Stocks to throw projectiles at the Bank, the church was demolished to allow the Bank’s expansion westwards along Threadneedle Street.In 1788 the Bank appointed Sir John Soane as architect and surveyor. His redesign, which he continued until 1833, resulted in arguably his greatest work, “the pride and boast” of his life

A picture

Fed governor Lisa Cook sues Trump over his ‘illegal attempt’ to fire her

The Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook has filed a lawsuit against Donald Trump over his “unprecedented and illegal attempt” to fire her, calling it an attempt to undermine the central bank’s independence.The lawsuit – filed by Cook in federal court in Washington on Thursday – sets the stage for a legal battle over the US president’s extraordinary push for greater control of the central bank.A federal judge scheduled a hearing for the case on Friday at 10 am ET, with the case likely to end up at the supreme court.Trump tried to dismiss Cook on Monday, announcing that he was removing her from her position on the Fed’s board of governors “effective immediately” over an unconfirmed allegation from one of his allies that she had obtained a mortgage on a second home she incorrectly described as her primary residence.But Cook stood her ground, arguing that Trump had “no authority” to fire her

A picture

Make Drax wait for its next subsidy deal. An FCA investigation is serious | Nils Pratley

There is already a scandal of bad accounting at Drax, one could say mischievously. It’s the one that maintains that transporting wood pellets from North America to burn in North Yorkshire is a “carbon neutral” activity because replacement trees absorb carbon dioxide as they grow. You don’t have to be a green lobbyist to think there’s something wrong there. As the research group Ember regularly reminds us, Drax is the UK’s biggest emitter yet qualifies for renewables subsidies.That weirdness in the methodology is one for the government to justify