‘It’s about weaponising opinion’: the power of Topjaw’s online foodie show

A picture


When the presenter Jesse Burgess goes to a restaurant, the kitchen always sends him dishes he didn’t order.One of the ironies of fame is that the more you can afford, the less you have to pay for it.Except that Burgess isn’t a celebrity, he says.“I’m just a guy who really likes food.”Burgess is the 34-year-old host of Topjaw, a small but mighty internet platform featuring chefs and foodies, whose “Best of” series, for better or worse, has changed the way Londoners – and those beyond – eat out.

The Topjaw channel has been around since 2015 but Burgess started the viral series in 2023 with his friend Will Warr, who is also Prince and Princess of Wales’s videographer (he made Kate’s cancer statement video).It has now grown to more than a million followers.The series’ premise is simple.In a snappy 90 seconds, Burgess asks influential food industry types for their favourite places to eat, drink or get drunk.Having featured a mix of influential chefs, critics and celebrities including Gordon Ramsay, Andrew Garfield and Florence Pugh, the quick-fire formula – best coffee in London? Best Sunday lunch? Best burger? – shares some DNA with the “man on the street” interview, in which someone holding a microphone stops people to ask them about their relationship, or their outfit.

Beyond his Instagram followers, Burgess is an unknown entity.But if you’re a chef who has appeared on his show or seen your restaurant recommended on it? “It’s a hugely important platform,” says Oisín Rogers, who owns the Devonshire, a central London pub famed for its food and Guinness, and who has appeared on Topjaw several times.With his Rembrandt curls, square jaw and wry sense of humour, Burgess’s appeal is obvious, and the content he makes is informative and wholesome.It’s been so successful that Burgess and Warr have taken the format beyond London, to Cornwall, Paris and New York, while Burgess has started fronting a new behind-the-pass TV series, Knife Edge: Chasing Michelin Stars, on Apple TV.But Topjaw has also become something of a target for some who find its format infantilising.

One restaurant industry insider said: “It’s lowest common denominator content, which is the stuff that absolutely slaps but what else does it do?” Another describes it as: “One dimensional but highly addictive.” As culture becomes increasingly atomised online, they argue, it’s predicated on “chasing the zeitgeist”, which has the effect of creating hype where perhaps there isn’t any, a phenomenon that the writer Gabrielle Bluestone describes as “Schrödinger’s catfish” in her book Hype.“Does Topjaw drive customers? Certainly,” says Rogers.“You know if someone’s come because of Giles Coren or Grace Dent or Topjaw because they’ll often tell you.”“It’s not just hype though,” he adds.

“There is an element of zeitgeist but asking people who are influential or good at restaurants is just a simple idea: it’s about weaponising opinion.[Topjaw has] no skin in the game so when you trust the person recommending it, and you do when it’s from the horse’s mouth, that information is invaluable.”At a time when choosing where to eat out can feel overwhelming, the power of influencers grows ever stronger.In spring, the government introduced a new law banning “fake reviews” or “concealed incentives” aimed at influencers (and other beneficiaries) attempting to conceal or omit if they’ve been paid to promote something.Just as restaurant critics usually pay for the meal they critique, Burgess says he and Topjaw “never have and never will be paid by any restaurant we feature or speak about so as to not skew the authenticity of our recommendations”.

That said, he also thinks consumers have reached a point where even though they are wise to paid content, they don’t care.Sign up to FeastRecipes from all our star cooks, seasonal eating ideas and restaurant reviews.Get our best food writing every weekafter newsletter promotion“People may respect my opinion, but I’m not a critic, and really I’m not there to criticise,” Burgess says.Rather he is one of a new breed of gatekeepers through which people in the know can impart the sort of approval that can make or break a place.“Restaurant critics are a different channel,” says Rogers.

“They are incredibly important, and they set the base for what people look for in restaurants.But you just need to look at the reach of a [Topjaw] clip to see how influential it is.”Indeed the Topjaw effect is tangible.Restaurants such as Akub, Kudu, the Seed Library and Fonda are among those that say they have experienced noticeable demand after appearing in videos.According to one restaurant PR, a positive review on Topjaw can bring several hundred new bookings.

On the other hand, one of the most popular questions is the most overrated spot, of which Mayfair’s Sexy Fish, the former tick-box It restaurant with an onyx exterior and a carb-lite menu, is one of the most namechecked.“It seems to represent a group of restaurants where diners are there to ‘be seen’ rather than for the food offering,” Burgess says.“Londoners have a general disdain for that type of establishment.”The Guardian approached Sexy Fish for comment.Surely the only real beneficiary of Topjaw’s screengrab content is consumerism? Rogers disagrees: “Asking where to get a decent pint? That’s just a really good, simple question.

”Best restaurant: Camille in Borough.Best coffee: Bar Italia.Best pub: I bounce enthusiastically between the George in Fitzrovia and the Coach & Horses in Soho.Place I’d travel for: Janda Diner in Peckham.Best of all time: Ynyshir in Wales.

Chef Gareth Ward gave me the best meal of my life.
technologySee all
A picture

Are we living in a golden age of stupidity?

From brain-rotting videos to AI creep, every technological advance seems to make it harder to work, remember, think and function independently …Step into the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Media Lab in Cambridge, US, and the future feels a little closer. Glass cabinets display prototypes of weird and wonderful creations, from tiny desktop robots to a surrealist sculpture created by an AI model prompted to design a tea set made from body parts. In the lobby, an AI waste-sorting assistant named Oscar can tell you where to put your used coffee cup. Five floors up, research scientist Nataliya Kosmyna has been working on wearable brain-computer interfaces she hopes will one day enable people who cannot speak, due to neurodegenerative diseases such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, to communicate using their minds.Kosmyna spends a lot of her time reading and analysing people’s brain states

A picture

Parents will be able to block Meta bots from talking to their children under new safeguards

Parents will be able to block their children’s interactions with Meta’s AI character chatbots, as the tech company addresses concerns over inappropriate conversations.The social media company is adding new safeguards to its “teen accounts”, which are a default setting for under-18 users, by letting parents turn off their children’s chats with AI characters. These chatbots, which are created by users, are available on Facebook, Instagram and the Meta AI app.Parents will also be able to block specific AI characters if they don’t want to stop their children from interacting with chatbots altogether. They will also get “insights” into the topics their children are chatting about with AI characters, which Meta said would allow them to have “thoughtful” conversations with their children about AI interactions

A picture

AI chatbots are hurting children, Australian education minister warns as anti-bullying plan announced

A disturbing new trend of AI chatbots bullying children and even encouraging them to take their own lives has the Australian government very concerned.Speaking to media on Saturday, the federal education minister, Jason Clare, said artificial intelligence was “supercharging” bullying.“AI chatbots are now bullying kids. It’s not kids bullying kids, it’s AI bullying kids, humiliating them, hurting them, telling them they’re losers … telling them to kill themselves. I can’t think of anything more terrifying than that,” Clare said

A picture

UK MPs warn of repeat of 2024 riots unless online misinformation is tackled

Failures to properly tackle online misinformation mean it is “only a matter of time” before viral content triggers a repeat of the 2024 summer riots, MPs have warned.Chi Onwurah, the chair of the Commons science and technology select committee, said ministers seemed complacent about the threat and this was putting the public at risk.The committee said it was disappointed in the government’s response to its recent report warning social media companies’ business models contributed to disturbances after the Southport murders.Replying to the committee’s findings, the government rejected a call for legislation tackling generative artificial intelligence platforms and said it would not intervene directly in the online advertising market, which MPs claimed helped incentivise the creation of harmful material after the attack.Onwurah said the government agreed with most of its conclusions but had stopped short of backing its recommendations for action

A picture

The teamwork behind Bletchley Park’s Colossus computer | Letter

Andrew Smith is right to applaud the work of Tommy Flowers for building Colossus, the world’s first digital programmable computer, delivered to Bletchley Park in 1944 (Move over, Alan Turing: meet the working-class hero of Bletchley Park you didn’t see in the movies, 12 October). The piece concludes with Flowers stressing: “It’s never just one person in one place” – teamwork and collaboration are key. This is even truer than the article might imply, when it says “subsequent models” of Colossus “included many new features and innovations”, as if these had been the result of Flowers working alone, just upgrading his design. Quite the contrary.It is well documented (for example, in the 2006 book Colossus by B Jack Copeland and others) that the Bletchley Park codebreakers Jack Good and Donald Michie not only utilised Colossus to help break the codes, they enhanced the computer; it was these developments that were so successfully incorporated by Flowers in subsequent machines

A picture

Olivia Williams says actors need ‘nudity rider’-type controls for AI body scans

Actors should have as much control over the data harvested from scans of their body as they do over nudity scenes, the actor Olivia Williams has said, amid heightened concern over artificial intelligence’s impact on performers.The star of Dune: Prophecy and The Crown said she and other actors were regularly pressed to have their bodies scanned by banks of cameras while on set, with few guarantees about how the data would be used or where it would end up.“A reasonable request would be to follow the precedent of the ‘nudity rider’,” she said. “This footage can only be used in the action of that scene. It cannot be used in any other context at all, and when the scene has been edited it must be deleted on all formats