The UK needs more North Sea gas; imports from the US are the real enemy | Nils Pratley

A picture


Terrific news: despite turmoil in the strait of Hormuz, the UK will have sufficient supplies of gas to meet demand this summer, said National Gas, which operates the gas transmission system, on Monday.But contain your relief.The summer months of lower usage were never likely to be a moment of stress.Gas via pipelines from the UK and Norwegian fields in the North Sea can handle virtually all UK demand when most of the 24m households with a gas connection have their heating turned off.Little liquefied natural gas, or LNG, the stuff that arrives on ships, is needed during the summer.

The real supply challenges are for the future – not just this winter, but over the next couple of decades.The appealing notion that the rapid rollout of renewables will soon eliminate the need for gas is, sadly, a delusion.Gas for electricity generation is indeed in long-term decline but represents only a quarter of the UK’s overall demand for gas.The biggest slice, at 37% in 2024, was for domestic consumption, according to government data, and replacing all those gas boilers with heat pumps is not a quick job, especially not at the UK’s current sluggish pace.Nor are wind, solar and batteries about to make gas-fired power stations obsolete: the government’s clean power 2030 plan dictates that the entire 35 gigawatts of gas generating capacity must be retained as backup.

Zoom out and the energy department’s data for 2025, released just before Easter, showed gas demand “broadly stable” for the third year in a row,It made up about half of the UK’s 75,2% dependency on fossil fuels in 2025, again about the same as in 2024,Transition to a cleaner future is essential but takes time,So one question – critical in the context of the raging debate about more North Sea drilling – is where the gas molecules should come from.

Here’s Sir Dieter Helm, Oxford University energy economist, on a recent podcast from the Chatham House thinktank: “Gas is 35% of our total energy supply.It’s big.And we are going to go on burning gas for the next decade or two at least, or probably beyond that.That’s realism.So the question is: what’s the best way of securing those supplies in the least polluting way and at the lowest cost to consumers? That is a perfectly sensible structure to think of the problem.

The first thing you’d say is: ‘we don’t want any LNG because LNG is much more polluting than pipeline gas’.”How much more polluting? According to numbers from energy analysts Wood Mackenzie, showing the carbon intensity of the UK’s gas supplies in 2024, pipeline gas from Norway’s modern North Sea platforms is the least polluting in terms of emissions from production and supply (so-called scope 1 and 2 emissions).Then comes UK North Sea pipelines.But then it’s a leap to LNG, where the process of liquefying and regasification adds emissions.And the worst of the lot is LNG from the US because much of its gas is shale gas, where some methane escapes during fracking.

Wood Mackenzie’s forecasts for UK’s gas imports out to 2045 also show that on the current trajectory, the UK looks set to max out on LNG from US if domestic supplies diminish.Why? Well, gas from the Middle East is optimised to flow to Asia, whereas US cargoes head to Europe.It’s no use wishing for more Norway gas because those supplies are not inexhaustible.On Wood Mackenzie’s forecasts, the UK will rely on US LNG for over 60% of its overall gas supplies as soon as 2035.“Recent history highlights the risks of reliance on a single country,” it comments.

Therein lies the case for more drilling for UK North Sea gas.You do it to be less dependent on the US, a country whose president seems to regard energy as a tool of foreign policy.And you do it to avoid LNG’s greater emissions.One usual objection runs along line of “ah, but North Sea output is sold on the international market so doesn’t make us more secure.” There are two obvious replies.

First, pipeline gas that goes straight into the UK gas network is plainly more secure than a cargo from across the Atlantic.Second, if the objection is price, then the UK, as Helm points out, is free to negotiate long-term fixed-price supply contracts with producers as part of new licences.It is how the North Sea operated in the early years; a similar set-up may make sense in the final ones.None of which is an argument against renewables and nuclear generation.Electrification is the long-term direction.

But gas is plainly in the mix for a couple of decades yet.Industry body Offshore Energies UK reckons reliance on LNG could be contained to 6% in 2035 under a more pragmatic approach to UK North Sea licensing.Its projections may be optimistic, but the ambition sounds better than becoming a semi-forced buyer of US LNG for a couple of decades.Once the current political agonising is over, one assumes the Jackdaw gas field, equating to 6% of current domestic production, will be approved.At that point, there should be a proper debate about North Sea gas policy that moves beyond the misleading framing of “renewables or gas” and asks what a sensible procurement policy would be during the period in which the UK is still consuming gas.

One of the lessons of the Iran war is the need for more national resilience, including “secure, homegrown energy,” argued the prime minister on these pages last week.If that’s his view, two conclusions surely follow.First, keep electrifying to reduce gas usage and make best use of renewables and nuclear.Second, while gas is still on the system, don’t make the UK an energy prisoner of the US.Quite apart from the benefits for taxes, balance of payments and jobs, the UK needs more North Sea gas.

cultureSee all
A picture

Celebrity on celebrity: are we losing the art of the big star interview?

We live in a time where ultra-rich businesspeople have accrued more wealth and power than ever, creating a growing sentiment that they ought to be held to account, no doubt exacerbated by the fact that a wealthy businessman is in his second self-enriching term in the US presidency. So naturally, CNN, Donald Trump’s supposed nemesis, has figured out the best way to use their resources to better interrogate this elevated class: by letting them interview each other about their businesses. The 1 on 1 is named not for an actual journalist going up against a major business leader; they would probably never agree to that. So instead, CEOs can “grill” each other about whatever they mutually agree are the correct things to ask fellow elites. A spokesperson says these conversations will be “refreshingly direct”

A picture

The Guide #238: The overlooked underdogs of British ​quiz​shows that are still worth a stream

The quizshow will never die. Nuclear war could rid the earth of all living creatures bar the cockroaches and still, a shiny floored half-hourer hosted by Stephen Mulhern will somehow be airing on the emergency broadcast system. Quizshows have been airing on British screens since 1938, when a televised spelling bee was broadcast on the BBC, and they have remained remarkably resilient. Today they seem a good accompaniment to an era where everyone seems to be tapping away at puzzles on their phone.Scroll down the channel guide of your TV and it won’t be long until you find a quizshow (and that one will almost certainly be The Chase)

A picture

From You, Me & Tuscany to Euphoria: your complete entertainment guide to the week ahead

Halle Bailey and Regé-Jean Page star in a slinky new romcom, while the dissolute teens of the US drama are back in their 20sYou, Me & TuscanyOut now Where would the romcom be if everyone told the truth? When impulsive cook Anna (Halle Bailey) tells a porky pie about being engaged in order to justify her presence in an abandoned Tuscan villa, a train of events leading to true love is – naturally – set in motion. Regé-Jean Page and Nia Vardalos co-star.The StrangerOut now In 1930s Algiers, a young man, Meursault, commits murder. The premise will be familiar to Albert Camus ride-or-dies, for this is indeed an adaptation of the literary giant’s debut, from François Ozon. Rising French actor Benjamin Voisin plays the unassuming antihero, with Pierre Lottin as the dodgy neighbour whose private life spells trouble

A picture

‘I got everything I dreamed of – when I had no ability to handle it’: Lena Dunham on toxic fame, broken friendships and her ‘lost decade’

Stardom came fast and hard for the wunderkind who created the hit HBO series Girls aged just 23. Now she’s written a tell-all memoir about why she was forced to retreat from the spotlight Lena Dunham on going to rehab: read an exclusive extract from FamesickIf there is something to be learned from the words people pick for their passwords and proxies, then Lena Dunham’s choice of aliases – pseudonyms that, as a public person, she has used over the years to conceal her identity when checking into rehab or ordering room service – give us a tiny glimpse into the writer and director’s self-image. Among her staples, “Lauri Reynolds” (after her mum, Laurie, with whom she is strikingly close); “Rose O’Neill” (after the American millionaire illustrator, who lost her fortune to burnout and hangers-on); and my favourite, “Renata Halpern”, an alias Dunham shares with readers of her delicious new memoir, Famesick, without explaining the name’s origin.“Has anyone else clocked the Renata Halpern reference?” I ask Dunham, who is in her apartment in New York, talking fast via video call while waiting for an egg-and-cheese bagel to be run up from the deli. On the brink of 40, she is in her dark-haired era – very Jane Russell in Gentlemen Prefer Blondes – which, this morning, is set against a bright orange shirt and the pale, glowy skin she describes as the single happy side-effect of hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, a genetic condition of the connective tissue with which Dunham was diagnosed in 2019

A picture

Kimmel on Trump: ‘He talks about war like he’s bragging about women with Billy Bush’

Jimmy Kimmel expressed frustration over Donald Trump’s confusing statements on Iran while also expressing shock over Melania Trump’s surprise statement.The ABC host spoke about the ongoing war in Iran that is happening “for reasons known only to Donald Trump” and how we remain unsure over the strait of Hormuz and whether it is or isn’t open.Kimmel joked that with all the back and forth over it, “basically after all this he got us is constipation”.Trump has been teasing a “grand reopening” as well as a possible business partnership with Iran “which makes no sense”.Kimmel joked that “he’ll put it on his vision board and will it to be true” before moving on to his threats on social media teasing the military’s “next conquest”

A picture

Jimmy Kimmel on US ceasefire negotiators: ‘We’d be better off with Alvin and the Chipmunks’

On Wednesday night, late-night hosts reacted to Donald Trump’s threat to wipe out Iran, the trio who are leading ceasefire negotiations in the region and JD Vance’s trip to Budapest in support of Viktor Orbán.Jimmy Kimmel focused on the ceasefire that resulted from Trump’s warning that “an entire civilization will die” if Iran did not meet US demands to open the strait of Hormuz.“Once again, he made a big threat and backed off like your dad threatening to pull the car over and turn it around,” Kimmel said.“What a time to be alive. A man who has the nuclear codes written on his stomach in ketchup has the power to wipe a whole country off the map