Labour is still in a muddle on North Sea oil and gas | Nils Pratley
Labour’s manifesto commitment on North Sea oil and gas production was a fudge,On one hand, it said no new licences “to explore new fields” would be granted,On the other, it said existing fields would be managed “for the entirety of their lifespan” in a way “that does not jeopardise jobs”,The formulation raised many questions,Where, exactly, would the line be drawn between a new field and an existing field? What would be the approach to protecting workers when, as now, North Sea jobs are estimated to be going at a rate of 1,000 a month according to analysis by Robert Gordon University?The thinking is only slightly easier to understand now.
The clear part is that Ed Miliband’s energy security and net zero department will create “transitional energy certificates” for “limited” oil and gas drilling in areas that are part of an existing field or adjacent to a licensed field.The idea is to keep those sites economically viable for longer by using existing rigs and pipelines.The approach sounds sensibly practical.The UK’s current reliance on imported oil and gas is doing little to reduce emissions (shipments of liquefied gas from the US and Qatar are far more polluting than domestic production) or protect jobs in a supply chain that will be needed to build renewables infrastructure.The risk in not allowing “tiebacks” is that decline in the North Sea accelerates even faster at a time when oil and gas still provides three-quarters of the UK’s energy needs and imports are running at 40%.
Miliband has proved to be more pragmatic on licensing than his industry critics made out.And, yes, his policy reads as manifesto-compliant.But here’s the rub: the chancellor didn’t budge an inch on the windfall tax, the energy profits levy (EPL) introduced during the price spikes of 2022.The Treasury intends to keep the EPL in place until its scheduled end in 2030.Oil and gas companies say the levy is the real reason they’re cutting investment: the UK is simply uncompetitive when the marginal rate of tax in the North Sea is 78% and 2022’s sky-high prices for oil and gas have reversed.
“If the levy stays in place beyond 2026, projects will stall and jobs will vanish, no matter how pragmatic licensing policy becomes,” argued the trade lobby group Offshore Energies UK,One could take the view that the industry is exaggerating and that producers in practice will leap at the chance to get their hands on tieback licences, perhaps in the expectation that the EPL will disappear early anyway when oil and gas prices fall far enough to trigger automatic cut-offs (the oil price is there already, but both have to happen for six months),Well, maybe – but that prospect is obviously highly uncertain,The position therefore is a muddle of a different type,The energy department’s looser licensing regime and the Treasury’s tight tax policy are pulling in opposite directions.
It makes it hard to understand what the government is trying to achieve.Certainly, nobody is talking about actual production targets for the North Sea, which you’d think would be a basic requirement of a “fair, managed and prosperous” strategy for transition.The thinking does not look joined-up.Sign up to Business TodayGet set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morningafter newsletter promotionMissed opportunity of the budget? Proper reform of stamp duty on shares.Rachel Reeves opted instead for the token gesture of a three-year stamp duty holiday for new listings on the London Stock Exchange.
A bolder move would have been to cut, or abolish, the 0.5% charge on all share transactions.It would have shown real commitment to reviving the London market and would have sat perfectly alongside the cut to £12,000 in cash Isa limits.The chancellor added she will “continue to evaluate” stamp taxes on shares to support “the competitiveness of our world-leading capital markets”.Come on, this dance has already gone on too long.
No other major financial centre charges 0.5% and AstraZeneca, the biggest company in town, has already found a way around it.
Europe loosens reins on AI – and US takes them off
Hello, and welcome to TechScape. I’m your host, Blake Montgomery, writing to you from an American grocery store, where I’m planning my Thanksgiving pies.In tech, the European Union is deregulating artificial intelligence; the United States is going even further. The AI bubble has not popped, thanks to Nvidia’s astronomical quarterly earnings, but fears persist. And Meta has avoided a breakup for a similar reason as Google
Macquarie Dictionary announces ‘AI slop’ as its word of the year, beating out Ozempic face
AI slop is here, it’s ubiquitous, it’s being used by the US president, Donald Trump, and now, it’s the word of the year.The Macquarie Dictionary dubbed the term the epitome of 2025 linguistics, with a committee of word experts saying the outcome embodies the word of the year’s general theme of reflecting “a major aspect of society or societal change throughout the year”.“We understand now in 2025 what we mean by slop – AI generated slop, which lacks meaningful content or use,” the committee said in a statement announcing its decision.“While in recent years we’ve learnt to become search engineers to find meaningful information, we now need to become prompt engineers in order to wade through the AI slop. Slop in this sense will be a robust addition to English for years to come
AI could replace 3m low-skilled jobs in the UK by 2035, research finds
Up to 3m low-skilled jobs could disappear in the UK by 2035 because of automation and AI, according to a report by a leading educational research charity.The jobs most at risk are those in occupations such as trades, machine operations and administrative roles, the National Foundation for Educational Research (NFER) said.Highly skilled professionals, on the other hand, were forecast to be more in demand as AI and technological advances increase workloads “at least in the short to medium term”. Overall, the report expects the UK economy to add 2.3m jobs by 2035, but unevenly distributed
‘It’s hell for us here’: Mumbai families suffer as datacentres keep the city hooked on coal
As Mumbai sees increased energy demand from new datacenters, particularly from Amazon, the filthiest neighbourhood in one of India’s largest cities must keep its major coal plantsEach day, Kiran Kasbe drives a rickshaw taxi through his home neighbourhood of Mahul on Mumbai’s eastern seafront, down streets lined with stalls selling tomatoes, bottle gourds and aubergines–and, frequently, through thick smog.Earlier this year, doctors found three tumours in his 54-year-old mother’s brain. It’s not clear exactly what caused her cancer. But people who live near coal plants are much more likely to develop the illness, studies show, and the residents of Mahul live a few hundred metres down the road from one.Mahul’s air is famously dirty
One in four unconcerned by sexual deepfakes created without consent, survey finds
One in four people think there is nothing wrong with creating and sharing sexual deepfakes, or they feel neutral about it, even when the person depicted has not consented, according to a police-commissioned survey.The findings prompted a senior police officer to warn that the use of AI is accelerating an epidemic in violence against women and girls (VAWG), and that technology companies are complicit in this abuse.The survey of 1,700 people commissioned by the office of the police chief scientific adviser found 13% felt there was nothing wrong with creating and sharing sexual or intimate deepfakes – digitally altered content made using AI without consent.A further 12% felt neutral about the moral and legal acceptability of making and sharing such deepfakes.Det Ch Supt Claire Hammond, from the national centre for VAWG and public protection, reminded the public that “sharing intimate images of someone without their consent, whether they are real images or not, is deeply violating”
Can’t tech a joke: AI does not understand puns, study finds
Comedians who rely on clever wordplay and writers of witty headlines can rest a little easier, for the moment at least, research on AI suggests.Experts from universities in the UK and Italy have been investigating whether large language models (LLMs) understand puns – and found them wanting.The team from Cardiff University, in south Wales, and Ca’ Foscari University of Venice concluded that LLMs were able to spot the structure of a pun but did not really get the joke.An example they tested was: “I used to be a comedian, but my life became a joke.” If they replaced this with: “I used to be a comedian, but my life became chaotic,” LLMs still tended to perceive the presence of a pun
Reeves: working people will pay ‘a bit more’ through income tax threshold freeze; OBR chief ‘mortified’ by leak – business live
New rules crack down on high risk loans as Australian property market heats up
Foreign interference or opportunistic grifting: why are so many pro-Trump X accounts based in Asia?
London councils enact emergency plans after three hit by cyber-attack
Molly McCann: ‘I’m a scouse female gay athlete who supports Everton – it’s like my cards are marked already’
Players warned not to sign IPL-style Hundred deals in standoff with owners