Do heatwaves, wildfires and travel costs signal the end of the holiday abroad?

A picture


It was a prediction nobody wanted to hear.On the main stage of the world’s biggest tourism fair, Stefan Gössling, a leading researcher in sustainable transport, had just calmly announced the looming death of the holiday industry.“We have already entered the beginning of the age of non-tourism,” said Gössling, to an uneasy audience of travel agencies, car rental companies, cruise operators and hoteliers.That prophecy may sound fanciful to holidaymakers in Europe and North America who have been jetting off this summer – as well as to industry executives delighted to see international tourism return to pre-pandemic highs last year – but Gössling argues that as carbon pollution stokes heatwaves, fuels wildfires and ruins harvests, the cost of foreign travel will soar, and fewer people will be able to afford it.“Eighty years ago, mass tourism started in Europe,” said Gössling, a professor at the business and economics school at Linnaeus University in Sweden, who has consulted for the UN and the World Bank.

“Eighty years from now, I’m doubtful there will be much tourism left in the world.”Gössling is not short of examples of destinations already feeling the squeeze.Warm weather is melting snow that keeps Alpine ski resorts alive.Coastal erosion is stripping sand from southern European beaches.Droughts are forcing Spanish hotels to ship in fresh water as swimming pools lie empty, while wildfires are setting scenic Greek islands ablaze.

The South Aegean islands in Greece, which include the tourist favourites Kos, Rhodes and Mykonos, are the “single most critical” hotspot on the continent, according to a study Gössling co-authored last month combining exposure to climate hazards with dependence on tourism,Next are the Ionian islands, which include Corfu,The financial strain caused by these issues, which travel companies will probably pass on to customers, will be compounded by the rising cost of food – from coffee to chocolate to olive oil – and the increasing need for insurance against extreme weather,“At the moment, it’s locally concentrated,” said Gössling, speaking to the Guardian earlier this year at the ITB Berlin, the world’s largest gathering of tourism companies,“But in the future, it will become more frequent, cover more places, and turn into something disruptive.

”Whether this rise in costs could outpace expected growth in global incomes is up for debate – some damages can be avoided through adaptation, though this, too, comes at a price – but tourists may feel the pinch even in scenarios that keep volatile weather under control.If carbon pollution does fall sharply – necessary to stop global heating – it will cost the most in sectors such as aviation, which is limited by physical constraints.Some governments hope to slap carbon taxes on flights to help finance the energy transition and compensate poor countries for damage caused by fossil fuels, and green groups are pushing for a frequent flier levy, which would increase duties for each extra flight in a year.Despite Gössling’s blunt assessment of the tourism industry’s efforts to decarbonise – “what the whole sector is doing is greenwashing” – he is seen as a crucial voice in the industry, with the conference billing his speech a “must-hear session for anyone who cares about the future of travel and our planet”.Some things are moving in the right direction, he added, such as hotels putting solar panels on their roofs and people beginning to acknowledge the problem.

“We have a huge difficulty making the step from there to action,” said Gössling.“But people have realised they are running into risks, and want to understand business risks.The message is not welcome, but it certainly makes people think.”In academic circles, Gössling is best-known for studies that put numbers on the growing carbon footprint of tourism (8.8% of planet-heating pollution) and the inequality in aviation emissions (only 2-4% of people fly abroad in a given year).

His finding that 1% of the world population are responsible for half the emissions from air transport has underlined activists’ calls for governments to make premium and business travel a priority.“If that group travelled half as much – which still is a lot, it probably would still be sufficient even for business travellers – we could cut [aviation] emissions by 25%,” he said.“Just by making a very tiny group travel a little less.”But he is also quick to counter arguments that ordinary people in rich countries can keep flying to far-flung places and justify it by pointing to even more polluting demographics.“Our headache is long-haul travel,” he said, mentioning gap years and Gen Z influencers who sell travel as an aspirational lifestyle.

“Everyone sees tourism as a system, where governments and companies are responsible,” said Gössling.“But we are the system.It’s our individual actions that accumulate to global problems.”
cultureSee all
A picture

Helen Mirren decries condescending attitudes towards couples in their 80s

It’s a sight that makes even the most hard-hearted millennial coo: an octogenarian couple expressing their affection towards one another.But Helen Mirren has railed against being so “insulting”, saying such condescension makes her want to tell people to “fuck off”.The actor said the hardest part of turning 80 last month was the “condescension” she was forced to endure when holding hands in public with her husband, Taylor Hackford.Speaking to the Times while promoting the release of her latest film, The Thursday Murder Club, she said: “It really annoys me.“If my husband and I are holding hands, someone might say: ‘Oh, look

A picture

Women’s groups hail Noel Clarke libel defeat as victory for victims and press freedom

Women’s groups have said a high court judgment dismissing a libel claim against the Guardian by actor Noel Clarke marks a victory not just for his victims, but for press freedom and public interest reporting as a whole.They said too often “wealthy and abusive men” have been able to use the courts to try to silence victims, hiding “behind injunctions, NDAs, [and] threats of defamation suits”.Clarke claimed the allegations published by the Guardian after an investigation were false and he had been the victim of an unlawful conspiracy.During the five-week civil case, 26 witnesses gave evidence against him, detailing allegations of bullying and professional and sexual misconduct.On Friday, Mrs Justice Steyn rejected Clarke’s claims, ruling the Guardian had proved both its defences: truth and public interest

A picture

‘New Noel Clarkes will surface’ without change in film and TV, say female witnesses

The culture of the television and film industries needs to change to protect women from the actions of sexual predators, women who gave evidence against Noel Clarke in his failed libel action have said.“Noel’s behaviour was an open secret, everyone knew,” said Penelope, a pseudonym for an actor who filmed a sex scene with Clarke. “He didn’t work alone. Those who enabled and protected him should be accountable.“He found a way to operate as he did because there is a culture across these industries of actors not being protected while at work and having no way of whistleblowing,” she told the Guardian after the court dismissed Clarke’s case on Friday

A picture

The Guide #205: In an age of streaming clutter, why not rediscover Britain’s rich documentary past?

The state of British TV documentary film-making is a little depressing at the moment. Open up the documentaries tab on iPlayer, Now, ITVX or Channel 4, and you’ll be assaulted by a rush of true crime docs, each with their own macabre/salacious title – Satan’s Au Pair, Catching the Frying Pan Killer, that sort of thing – and a little rectangular title card with said killer looking evil, preferably in a grainy black and white picture with a bloody thumbprint overlaid.The Guardian’s journalism is independent. We will earn a commission if you buy something through an affiliate link. Learn more

A picture

Eddington to Deftones: your complete entertainment guide to the week ahead

EddingtonOut now From Hereditary to Beau Is Afraid, Ari Aster’s films are always an event. They’re also an acquired taste, with this neo-western about a hotly contested mayoral election set during the pandemic in New Mexico dividing critics. It stars Joaquin Phoenix, Pedro Pascal, Austin Butler and Emma Stone.The Life of ChuckOut now Based on a Stephen King novella, this fantasy drama centres on Charles “Chuck” Krantz (played by different actors at different ages, including Tom Hiddleston in middle age), an accountant who loves to dance and whose image begins to appear on billboards and in adverts, as society experiences environmental and technological breakdowns.Sorry, BabyOut now Literature professor Agnes (Eva Victor, who also wrote and directed) works at a college in rural New England in this dark comedy

A picture

Notting Hill carnival came ‘very close’ to not happening, says chair in funding appeal

About 2 million people are expected to take to the streets this weekend at the annual Notting Hill carnival for its mix of music, food and Caribbean culture, but for the man who runs it, there is a sense of relief to see it taking place at all.The chair of Notting Hill Carnival Ltd, Ian Comfort, told the Guardian that the event needed to secure a sustainable future after a year of funding rows, public disagreements with the Met police, and negative press after violence last year.This year’s event was saved only a few weeks ago after almost £1m of funding was raised to provide extra safety and infrastructure measures, with Comfort admitting it came “very close” to not happening.Comfort, who usually stays in the background and rarely gives interviews, says that cannot continue. He says the whole conversation around carnival, which costs more than £11m a year to police but is worth about £400m to the local economy, needs to change