TikTok’s algorithm favored Republican content in 2024 US elections, study finds
A study published Wednesday in the journal Nature finds that TikTok’s algorithm systematically prioritized pro-Republican content in three states leading up to the 2024 US elections.Researchers created hundreds of dummy accounts and conditioned them to mimic real users’ behavior by watching a set of videos either aligned with the US Democratic or Republican parties.Then, they tracked the videos TikTok recommended on these accounts’ For You pages, TikTok’s main feed.“We found a consistent imbalance,” they wrote in Nature.About 42% of US social media users say that these platforms are important for getting involved with political and social issues, according to Pew Research, but it’s not often clear how recommendation algorithms shape what appears in feeds.
Professors Talal Rahwan and Yasir Zaki at New York University’s Abu Dhabi campus set out to study how partisan politics shows up on TikTok – a platform that has become a key source of political information, especially for some young adults,Their study notes that this demographic – ages 18 to 29 – shifted by 10 percentage points towards Donald Trump between the 2020 and 2024 elections,A statement from TikTok read: “This artificial experiment with fake accounts does not reflect how people actually use TikTok,In reality, people discover and watch a wide variety of content on our platform which they continuously shape and can control through more than a dozen tools the authors seem unaware of,”Bots that were trained on pro-Republican content viewed about 11.
5% more content that agreed with their views compared to their pro-Democrat counterparts.That imbalance held for exposure to opposing views, too.Bots trained on pro-Democratic content were about 7.5% more likely to be viewing pro-Republican content on their For You page, the study found.The researchers used 323 dummy accounts in the study, setting their locations to New York state, Texas and Georgia.
For 27 weeks of the 2024 presidential campaign, the researchers sifted through more than 280,000 recommended videos using a combination of human and AI review,“Our finding isn’t just about reinforcement; Democratic accounts were shown significantly more anti-Democratic content than Republican accounts were shown anti-Republican content,” said Rahwan, one of the study’s authors,“The algorithm wasn’t just giving people what they want; it was giving one side more of what the other side says about them,”The types of issues that surfaced in videos differed, too – as pro-Democrat accounts in the study were fed disproportionately more cross-partisan content on immigration and crime, and pro-Republican accounts saw more cross-partisan content on abortion,“This suggests the algorithm may amplify content designed to attack the opposing side on its weakest ground, which is a more targeted and arguably more concerning pattern than a uniform ideological drift,” added Hazem Ibrahim, a PhD student at NYU Abu Dhabi who worked on the study.
The bots in the study were located through “mock” GPS and virtual private network (VPN) routing in strongly Democratic New York, strongly Republican Texas and Georgia, a battleground state.The researchers caution that their findings shouldn’t be generalized beyond these states.The study authors acknowledge that many users self-select and curate the content they see on various social media platforms.However, they say that TikTok’s For You page gives users less control than the main interfaces of other social media platforms, being “almost entirely driven by the platform’s algorithm”, the paper notes.A TikTok spokesperson disputed the claim that users have few customization options.
On TikTok, “users don’t need to follow anyone; the system decides based on behavioral signals like watch time.That makes it a uniquely clean setting for studying algorithmic influence, because user self-selection is minimized,” Ibrahim says.“Skews here are harder to attribute to users’ choices.”The authors note that while their study unpacked the kind of political content users are exposed to, it doesn’t analyze the influence of these videos on political beliefs and behavior, or the reason why this imbalance exists.They also note that the bots only captured the early states of a user’s experience on the platform, and analyzed English-language video transcripts, which wouldn’t capture political cues conveyed through visuals or other languages.
A TikTok spokesperson said these limitations demonstrate that the study was not representative of real users’ consumption.Still, they stress that studying the extent to which political content can be skewed on TikTok feeds are relevant to ongoing debates about platform transparency and algorithmic accountability.The Nature article pointed out: “Under the EU Digital Services Act, large platforms are required to assess and mitigate systemic risks to electoral processes, whereas in the USA, First Amendment protections grant platforms far greater editorial discretion.”Zaki added: “In an environment where margins are thin, systematic differences in the kind of political information recommended to tens of millions of young voters are worth taking seriously.”
Oil and gas prices fall sharply, driven by hopes of strait of Hormuz reopening – as it happened
Brent crude keeps falling amid hopes that the strait of Hormuz could soon be open again. The global benchmark has slid to $97.48 a barrel, down $12 a barrel – a near-11% drop, the lowest since 22 April.US West Texas intermediate crude fell 11.3% to $90
Up to 150 former WH Smith stores face closure, putting thousands of jobs at risk
Up to 150 former WH Smith stores are likely to close, putting thousands of jobs at risk under a radical restructuring plan by their new owner, which had rebranded the shops as TG Jones.The investment company Modella Capital, which bought WH Smith’s chain of 480 high street stores for £76m last year, blamed “weak consumer spending” as it set out the plan to landlords on Wednesday.Eight of the chain’s remaining 450 stores will close immediately, while Modella is demanding 100% rent holidays on about 100 more, as first reported by the Telegraph.The company also wants 75% rent reductions on hundreds more stores for a year, with cuts of between 15% and 75% beyond that period, according to a document seen by the Guardian. If landlords refuse the rent holidays and cuts, the stores could shut
Airlines among companies using fuel surcharges to cover surge in costs, UK survey shows
Airlines and other companies are increasingly using fuel surcharges to cover soaring costs, a survey has found, in a further sign of Iran war-linked inflation hitting the economy.A poll of companies in the services sector, which includes airlines, found rising fuel prices had contributed to businesses raising prices at the fastest pace in more than three years in April.Nearly six in 10 firms surveyed by S&P Global said average costs rose last month, mostly driven by fuel and higher wages, but also in part by metals and plastics getting more expensive.IAG, the conglomerate that owns British Airways, Iberia, Aer Lingus and Vueling, said last month it would make “some pricing adjustments to reflect these higher fuel costs”, although it stopped short of labelling the move as a surcharge.Meanwhile, Virgin Atlantic has added a charge of £360 to business class tickets, falling to £50 for economy
JD Wetherspoon issues third profit warning this year as costs climb
The boss of JD Wetherspoon has said the pub chain could miss profit expectations because of rising costs, in the latest sign the UK hospitality industry is buckling under the pressure of higher energy, food, labour and tax bills.The company’s chair, Tim Martin, told investors on Wednesday: “As many hospitality operators, including Wetherspoon, have reported, there have been substantial increases in costs.”It is the third profit warning this year from the company, which operates about 800 pubs across the UK and Ireland. Investors had already been expecting a drop in pre-tax profit to £73m, compared with £81m last year.Pubs, restaurants and hotels have said rising costs are making it harder to make a profit
UK regulator launches review of ‘aggressive’ claims management firms amid compensation concerns
The City regulator has launched a review of claims management companies amid concerns that firms are misleading victims of financial scandals, such as car finance, about their compensation.The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) said some companies were pursuing “aggressive marketing, misleading advertising and unfair exit fees”.Some consumers were being signed up without their permission or by multiple companies, the FCA said, which could delay any compensation owed.Claims management companies (CMCs) have targeted victims of the car finance scandal, where they can charge fees worth up to 33% of the final payouts. The FCA and lenders have advised consumers not to use these firms as the regulator’s scheme is free to use
‘Our competitors are everyone’: Joybuy leads ‘China’s Amazon’ into the UK
“We’re here to shake up the UK e-commerce market,” says Matthew Nobbs, the UK boss of Joybuy which is spearheading a European charge by China’s version of Amazon.“I see our competitors as everyone,” he adds, reflecting the scale of ambition of the online retailer that sells home appliances, groceries, makeup and more.Joybuy is owned by China’s JD.com, the giant online and high street retail group which is taking on its US rival Amazon in Britain in a clash that is expected to lead to “collateral damage” for UK retailers caught up in the tussle for shoppers.JD
Fertiliser shortages will have ‘dramatic’ effect on global food prices, warns farming boss
Trainline says Middle East tensions hitting European rail bookings
Shivon Zilis, mother of four of Elon Musk’s children, testifies in OpenAI trial
No flattery please, Claude: I’m British | Brief letters
Runner dies after medical emergency during 253-mile ultramarathon in Arizona
A UConn reunion and Caitlin Clark’s return: WNBA storylines to follow in season 30 | Jordan Robinson