Small changes to ‘for you’ feed on X can rapidly increase political polarisation
Small changes to the tone of posts fed to users of X can increase feelings of political polarisation as much in a week as would have historically taken at least three years, research has found.A groundbreaking experiment to gauge the potency of Elon Musk’s social platform to increase political division found that when posts expressing anti-democratic attitudes and partisan animosity were boosted, even barely perceptibly, in the feeds of Democrat and Republican supporters there was a large change in their unfavourable feelings towards the other side.The degree of increased division – known as “affective polarisation” – achieved in one week by the changes the academics made to X users’ feeds was as great as would have on average taken three years between 1978 and 2020.Most of the more than 1,000 users who took part in the experiment during the 2024 US presidential election did not notice that the tone of their feed had been changed.The campaign was marked by divisive viral posts on X, including a fake image of Kamala Harris cosying up to Jeffrey Epstein at a gala and an AI-generated image posted by Musk of Kamala Harris dressed as a communist dictator that had 84m views.
Repeated exposure to posts expressing antidemocratic attitudes and partisan animosity “significantly influences” users’ feelings of polarisation and boosts sadness and anger, they found.Musk bought Twitter in 2022, rebranded it X and introduced the “for you” feed, which instead of only showing posts relating to accounts users actively follow, uprates content calculated to maximise engagement.The extent to which more antidemocratic posts make users feel greater animosity towards political opponents “demonstrates the power of the algorithm”, said Martin Saveski, assistant professor at the University of Washington information school, who, with colleagues at the universities of Stanford, Johns Hopkins, and Northeastern, produced the study published in the journal Science.“The change in their feed was barely perceptible, yet they reported a significant difference in how they felt about other people,” added Tiziano Piccardi, assistant professor at the Johns Hopkins University computer science department and co-author of the research.“Based on US trends, that shift corresponds to roughly three years of polarisation.
”The study also found that relatively subtle changes to the content of users’ feeds can significantly reduce political animosity among Republicans and Democrats, suggesting X had the power to increase political harmony if Musk chose to use it in that way,Sign up to TechScapeA weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our livesafter newsletter promotion“What’s exciting about these results is that there is something that the platforms can do to reduce polarisation,” said Saveski,“It’s a new approach they could take in designing their algorithms,”X was approached for comment,Eight in 10 American adults say that not only can Republicans and Democrats not agree on policies and plans, but they cannot agree on basic facts, according to Pew research.
More than half of people in the UK believe the differences in people’s political views are so divisive it is dangerous for society, recent polling by Ipsos found.The changes in political polarisation resulting from exposure to X posts were measured using a novel approach.First, the academics used AI to analyse posts in X’s “for you” feed in real time.Then the system showed more divisive posts to one cohort and fewer divisive posts to another, a power normally the sole preserve of X.Divisive posts included those that showed support for undemocratic practices, partisan violence, opposition to bipartisan consensus and biased evaluations of politicised facts.
After a week of reading these subtly altered feeds, the researchers asked users to rank how warm or cold, favourable or unfavourable they felt towards their political opponents,The changes in “affective polarisation” were ranked at more than two degrees on a 0 to 100 degree “feeling thermometer”,This was the same amount of increased polarisation that typically occurred in the US in the four decades to 2020,Feeding users fewer posts with antidemocratic attitudes and partisan animosity decreased political division by a similar amount,Social media platforms have long been accused of encouraging divisive content to boost user engagement and therefore advertising revenues.
But the research found that while there was a slight reduction in overall engagement in terms of time spent on the platform and numbers of posts viewed when divisive content was down-ranked, those users tended to “like” or repost more often.“The success of this method shows that it can be integrated into social media AI to mitigate harmful personal and societal consequences,” the authors wrote.“At the same time, our engagement analyses indicate a practical trade-off: interventions that down-rank [antidemocratic and partisan content] may reduce short-term engagement volume, posing challenges for engagement-driven business models and supporting the hypothesis that content that provokes strong reactions generates more engagement.”The best public interest journalism relies on first-hand accounts from people in the know.If you have something to share on this subject, you can contact us confidentially using the following methods.
Secure Messaging in the Guardian appThe Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories,Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs,This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said,If you don't already have the Guardian app, download it (iOS/Android) and go to the menu,Select ‘Secure Messaging’.
SecureDrop, instant messengers, email, telephone and postIf you can safely use the Tor network without being observed or monitored, you can send messages and documents to the Guardian via our SecureDrop platform.Finally, our guide at theguardian.com/tips lists several ways to contact us securely, and discusses the pros and cons of each.
‘We had six MPs and four factions’: inside Your Party’s toxic power struggles
At an early meeting to set the path for what would become Your Party, participants quickly agreed on one thing: given the cliches about leftwingers forever falling out, at all costs they must avoid a descent into factionalism.Six months on and the Liverpool venue hosting this weekend’s inaugural Your Party conference has been warned to expect potential disruption, including stage invasions by disgruntled members representing particular wings. Extra security guards have been hired.How did an idea with so much potential traction and reach – hundreds of thousands of people signed up to support the idea of a movement spearheaded by Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana before it even existed – become so quickly and comprehensively bogged down in power struggles and infighting?The slightly simplified answer, one agreed on at least in private by people from all sides, is rooted in escalating tensions between Corbyn, portrayed as indecisive and at times ambivalent about yet another political venture at the age of 76, and Sultana, the combative former Labour MP who has enraged colleagues by making major decisions unilaterally.The ground zero for a split so comprehensive that, insiders say, Sultana has for the past three months mainly communicated with her supposed colleagues through lawyers, came on 3 July, or “terrible Thursday” as one calls it
Peter Mandelson’s lobbying firm hired by company linked to Chinese military
Global Counsel, the lobbying firm co-founded by Peter Mandelson, was brought in to advise the Chinese pharmaceutical company WuXi AppTec in Europe months after it was targeted in a US national security crackdown.WuXi AppTec signed a $3m contract with Global Counsel last year to deal with the international fallout from claims that it had links with the Chinese military and was implicated in human rights abuses in Xinjiang.Global Counsel offered to help WuXi AppTec on “geopolitical risk mitigation” in May 2024, soon after the company was singled out in a US biosecurity bill over its alleged links to the Chinese government.WuXi AppTec agreed to a contract with Global Counsel to soften the impact of the US crackdown on its global reputation, scrutiny of its operations and controls on its suppliers.The lobbying firm said it only worked with Wuxi AppTec on European policy issues, not US ones, and had declared this on the EU’s transparency register
Starmer says budget did not break manifesto tax pledge – as it happened
In an interview Keir Starmer also rejected suggestions Labour broke its manifesto promise on tax.When this was put to him, he told Sky News:We kept to our manifesto in terms of what we’ve promised. But I accept the challenge that we’ve asked everybody to contribute.But he also defended the need to raise taxes. Explaining why, he told the BBC:I tell your viewers precisely why that is: to make sure that we can protect our NHS, which needs to be there for them and their families when they need it
‘Unelected power’ of ultra-rich is reshaping British politics, report claims
Structural corruption and the rise of “conduits for unelected power” are reshaping British politics, according to a stark report from the Equality Trust.Unelected influence has increased over the past two decades, the report claims, driven by the growing political clout of the ultra-rich and the institutions that enable it.Priya Sahni-Nicholas, the co-executive director of the trust, said: “Our new Concentration of Power Index shows that wealth concentration aligns with power. Our index rises almost exactly in step with increases in the top 1% share of wealth. This correlation is strong and statistically significant
Keir Starmer says Labour ‘kept to our manifesto’ over budget tax rises
Keir Starmer has conceded that the budget “asked everybody to contribute” but argued that it had “done it in a fair way” as he sought to rebuff claims that Labour had broken its tax promises.The prime minister said the Labour government had “kept to our manifesto” despite raising taxes by £26bn, including by freezing income tax and national insurance thresholds for an extra three years.Labour had promised during the election campaign not to raise taxes on working people. Asked whether he would apologise for breaking that promise, Starmer said: “I accept the challenge that we’ve asked everybody to contribute. I want to be really clear on why we’ve done that,” he told Sky News
Is Farage right to claim that racism allegations are response to a dislike of his politics?
Nigel Farage has again denied allegations of racism as a schoolboy and repeated his claim that some had been concocted because people disliked his politics.During a press conference, he snapped at one reporter who asked about the issue, saying: “I think we’ve gone quite a long way towards answering all this, don’t you?”Farage, who prides himself on answering numerous questions at press conferences, took 10 this time, but did not include any from the Guardian.So what did he say – and is it true?The claim: Farage said the director Peter Ettedgui is the “one person that said I directly abused him”.He added: “One person says they were hurt, and if they feel they were hurt, then I’m genuinely sorry. But I never, ever, ever would have said or done anything like that directly to a human being
Analysts back British gambling firm stocks despite tax rises for sector
Severe asthma can be controlled by a monthly injection, trial finds
Peers are just doing their job in scrutinising the assisted dying bill | Letters
Shortfall in return on investment in health | Brief letters
‘I didn’t even know this type of attack existed’: more than 200 women allege drugging by senior French civil servant
Horrific death of Kardell Lomas sparks urgent calls for new independent oversight of police