Masterclass on Anzac Day encapsulates why unflappable Scott Pendlebury is so good

A picture


The week in football was characterised in many ways by the absence of competence.There wasn’t much competence over at Kayo, which had more crashes than Leslie Nielsen.There wasn’t much competence in the umpiring on Friday night.There wasn’t much competence at the AFL tribunal, with its barking dogs and house inspections.There wasn’t much competence, or basic decency, at its appeals board.

“Competence porn” is a term we hear a lot these days, mainly in relation to television and film.In a world run by people who temperamentally and intellectually aren’t far from the sandpit, it’s the craving for content that showcases craft and care.It’s there in shows like The Pitt where doctors and nurses under incredible strain maintain both their excellence and (mostly) their sanity.The AFL should poach primary charge nurse Dana Evans from Pittsburgh to run their score review system, or their tribunal, or the whole competition.She’d ship it into shape in half a shift.

Running with that, there’s something reassuring about watching a sportsperson in full command of their emotions and their actions.Early in the Anzac Day clash between Collingwood and Essendon at the MCG, Scott Pendlebury dinked a nine iron straight out on the full.Maybe this was one of those signs that he was at the end of the road.We see those every now and then.We see him get run down from behind.

We see him playing for free kicks more than he used to.We saw it on preliminary final day last year, when he was zipping up his tracksuit top five minutes into the game.On Saturday however, he made his mistake, he shook his head (his version of a tantrum, or self-flagellation) and he went to work.It wasn’t the best game he’s ever played.The quality of the opposition precluded that.

But it was a game that encapsulated why he is so good, and how he is still going.Every one of his 43 touches had its own purpose, its own thought process behind them.Most of them were damaging.Nineteen of them led to scores.As Bombers coach Brad Scott reminded us, Pendlebury has played more games than three quarters of the Essendon team combined.

Instead of chasing backsides all afternoon, they would have been better served getting out their writing pads and taking notes.They were out of sync, out of position and, after half-time, totally out of gas.He was constantly alert and present, like a soldier patrolling on point.He’s so good at reading the opposition’s minds, at anticipating what they do well and – as was invariably the case in Saturday’s 77-point mauling – what they don’t.At centre square stoppages, an Essendon player would be standing in the wrong spot and Pendlebury would point a finger or raise an eyebrow and shift the geometry of the set up.

He spent the afternoon picking pockets, reorientating his team, and tessellating square metres of space,The Bombers were playing checkers, and Pendles was playing about 10 games of chess simultaneously,This was a frantic game early, and Essendon quickly fatigued,They lost their dare, their composure and yes, their competence,Pendlebury’s game was so orderly in comparison.

He was never rushed, never caught, never fazed and never beaten.He was everything Essendon wasn’t.There were other examples of excellence and competence across the Anzac round – from locomotives Kysaiah Pickett and Jason Horne-Francis, to the privates and lance corporals performing the New Zealand national anthem at the various venues.But it was soured by the events of the week, and the findings of the appeals board in particular.Will Houghton KC was swiftly removed from his duties.

But the damage had been done.It had been insulting on so many levels.It was insulting to the broader gay and lesbian community.But it was insulting to the majority of the 1,300 listed players across the men and women’s leagues.It assumed that they were living and playing with the same mindset as footballers in the 1980s.

And it was insulting to the AFL itself,They’ve been pilloried for their inconsistency and their shilly-shallying, especially with the Izak Rankine slur,They were criticised for the way they initially dealt with Lance Collard,But they’ve been desperate to be seen as leaders on this issue,And now so much of their work has come unglued.

The existence of an independent appeals board is a good thing.But it relies on them living in the 21st century.And it relies on basic competence, a quality that’s still absent in key aspects of the sport.
politicsSee all
A picture

Dozens of MPs oppose Streeting’s new power to say what NHS pays for drugs

Dozens of MPs are opposing Wes Streeting’s decision to award himself power to dictate what the NHS pays for drugs amid growing concern the move may be illegal.Thirty-one MPs have signed a House of Commons motion voicing their disapproval of the health secretary being handed the power to override the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence’s (Nice) judgment on how much the NHS should spend on individual medicines.They fear that the change is a “power grab” that undermines the role Nice has played since its creation in 1999 as the arbiter of which medicines constitute value for money for the NHS to buy – and thus which patients can receive – in England and Wales. Nice is widely viewed internationally as a model of how to protect against drug companies charging excessive prices.Labour, Green, Liberal Democrat, Independent, Scottish Nationalist and Plaid Cymru MPs have backed a “prayer”, tabled by the Labour ex-shadow chancellor John McDonnell

A picture

Key figure in Mandelson vetting scandal will not give evidence before MPs

A key figure in the row over Peter Mandelson’s appointment as UK ambassador to Washington will not appear before a parliamentary committee of MPs to give evidence.Emily Thornberry had requested that Ian Collard speak to the foreign affairs committee (FAC) on Tuesday, but confirmed on Saturday that he would submit written answers instead.The committee has already heard from Olly Robbins, the Foreign Office’s top civil servant who was forced out of his post last week after the decision to fail Mandelson during his security vetting was overruled by his department, and the Cabinet Office permanent secretary, Cat Little. Keir Starmer’s former chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, is due to appear on Tuesday.Collard, who has given evidence to the select committee previously, is a former ambassador to Lebanon and Panama and was appointed the Foreign Office’s chief property and security officer in March 2023

A picture

Security vetting stepped up after MP is given bodyguard with far-right links

The security company that provides bodyguards for MPs has tightened its vetting processes after it sent a bodyguard with far-right links to protect a politician who was under threat from extremists.Mitie, which has a £31m contract for the work, is updating its CPO (Close Protection Operative) vetting processes to include regular social media checks. There will also be random checks on the social media activity of those already taken on.Concerns about the threat to MPs from extremists – including Islamists and the far right – have risen, with elected representatives facing a level of threat not seen since the campaign mounted by Irish republican terrorists in the 1980s and 70s.Mitie’s contract followed the assassination of the Conservative MP David Amess by an Islamist terrorist in 2021

A picture

Partygate v Mandelson: Keir Starmer faces attack from his own playbook

The lexicon of a British parliamentary scandal is arcane.As Keir Starmer fights to remain prime minister, he has had to respond to a “humble address”, had his judgment picked over during an “emergency opposition day debate” and now faces the ignominy of a “privilege motion”.Close observers of UK politics will, however, recognise these terms as familiar: they are all parliamentary tools used by Labour in opposition as they tried to hold the Conservatives accountable at various points – not least during the Partygate affair that helped bring down Boris Johnson.At first sight, the two controversies are very different.Johnson was ousted in the wake of allegations that he had attended parties in Downing Street during a pandemic lockdown he presided over

A picture

Unlucky chancellor? Iran shock hits Reeves just as UK seemed to turn corner

Donald Trump’s war on Iran is “folly”; shadow chancellor Mel Stride should be “lined up for the sack”; and the Liberal Democrat Daisy Cooper’s plan for managing fuel shortages is “fundamentally economically illiterate”.Rachel Reeves has always relished a political fight, but in recent days she has been swinging at her opponents with what looks very much like enjoyment.Her team say the chancellor’s righteous anger is calculated. The consequences of the conflict may still be being felt in many months and she wants to hammer home two claims: that “we did not start this war and we did not join this war”, as Reeves told MPs this week; and that before the bombs started falling, the UK economy was on the up.“We have got to win the argument that the economy was turning the corner before the war and there was momentum behind it

A picture

‘Nigel is mad to accept his money’: who is Christopher Harborne, the mystery billionaire bankrolling Reform?

A crypto tycoon is giving record-breaking amounts to Farage’s party. But little is known about his motivesShortly before Christmas 2022, Chakrit Sakunkrit, owner of the Kamalaya Wellness Sanctuary on the Thai island of Koh Samui, invited 200 guests to spend a few days celebrating his 60th birthday. One sultry afternoon, Sakunkrit and a small group gathered around a table near the shore, surrounded by the burgundy foliage of Good Luck plants. To his right, dressed down in a polo shirt, sat Nigel Farage.Since Brexit marked the achievement of his life’s work three years earlier, Farage had fizzled