Tiger Woods’ latest brush with the law leaves questions why golf remains so beholden to him | Ewan Murray

A picture


It is a scene that has become more extraordinary with the passing of time.Plenty of sportspeople have been guilty of or admitted to extramarital capers.Only Tiger Woods appeared live on television, in front of a hand‑picked audience, to deliver a 14‑minute mea culpa on his transgressions.American golf executives in their perfectly ironed slacks stood in sombre mood as Woods laid bare his “personal sins”.The venue, hilariously, was the home of the PGA Tour.

Woods had no need to go into tawdry detail about his antics; the tabloid media had done that for him,“I convinced myself that normal rules didn’t apply,” Woods said,Sixteen years since that speech, it is worth pondering whether much has changed,Two episodes over the past week have exposed the new, grim normal for Woods,TGL has been a welcome and fun addition to Woods’s sport as an indoor simulator experience that the world’s leading players seem to enjoy.

As Woods appeared – sweating, face bloated – on Tuesday night’s staging of the golf league, it was billed astonishingly as a Masters test run,One of the greatest golfers of all time, who would have disregarded indoor golf as a pointless gimmick when in his pomp, was supposedly preparing for the rigours of Augusta National by whacking balls into a giant screen,The coverage was absurd,Woods was typically vague when asked whether teeing up at the Masters on Thursday week was a viable option,The 50‑year‑old has always had a weird fascination with keeping everyone guessing even when, at this point, it appears little more than a game to keep sponsors of a mind to write cheques.

Woods will never formally retire; rather he will fade towards competitive irrelevance.July 2024 marks the last time he teed up in serious competition.You cannot drop in and out of elite golf.By Friday evening, matters had turned more serious for Woods.He spent eight hours in jail after his arrest on suspicion of driving under the influence.

Woods refused to give a urine sample to police officers who believed he was impaired when rolling his Land Rover on to its side.The poor driver of a pressure cleaner truck, merely trying to go about his daily business on sleepy Jupiter Island, was clipped by Woods as he tried to overtake.The local sheriff said Woods was travelling at “high speed” before the crash.Woods is yet to comment on the situation.The 15-time major winner’s latest brush with the law should leave us questioning why golf remains so beholden to him.

The PGA of America, for a second time, is desperate for Woods to captain the United States Ryder Cup team,The PGA Tour has placed Woods front and centre not only of its board but as the chairman of a committee given the specific remit of reshaping its schedule,Woods’s desire to remain relevant in his sport is understandable – bluntly, he has little else to do – but a glance at his behavioural pattern raises questions about the validity of that,In November 2009, as his personal life collapsed around him, Woods careered into a fire hydrant outside his home in Florida,Eight years later police found him slumped over the steering wheel of his car, again in Florida.

A toxicology report revealed he had five different medications in his system.He completed a clinic course to handle his use of tablets and a sleep disorder.In February 2021, Woods cheated death after a serious crash in Los Angeles.“That’s all been answered, it’s in the police report,” Woods said when pressed on what precisely happened.Gone was the expansive, remorseful Woods of 2010.

He was never charged but nor was there any adequate explanation.Woods risked not only his own health but that of others.Woods drew eyeballs to, and interest in, golf, which fuelled a boom, including in prize funds.The post‑Tiger world scares the sport’s office bearers.Connecting the Woods bailed by the Martin county sheriff’s office with one supposedly knee-deep in the minutiae of the PGA Tour is impossible.

Woods has no credentials whatsoever to captain the US in the Ryder Cup – a ferociously individual sportsman, he toiled in the event when a player – and his dithering over the role is embarrassing.Simply because he is Tiger Woods, once unmatchable with club in hand, he is given licence to call the shots.Normal rules once again do not apply.Sportspeople who adopt this approach will always find themselves on shaky ground.Woods believed he was invisible and infallible when meeting waitresses for a touch of extracurricular.

He presumably did again when flying along Beach Road on Friday afternoon.It has taken the long arm of the law to expose Woods’s flaws.Roger Federer would never find himself in this scenario.Neither would Lionel Messi.Applying Ryder Cup captaincy context, it is fair to assert that Paul McGinley, Pádraig Harrington, Jim Furyk, Davis Love or Steve Stricker wouldn’t be the subject of Floridian mugshots after crawling out of an overturned car in a residential area, either.

It should be possible to feel sympathy for Woods’s plight while pointing out there is no need for an athlete of this standing to find himself in such a pickle.It says little for those around him – yes-men and umbrella holders – that Woods’s status is fading in such a depressing manner.They are not the only ones who should be reassessing their relationship with a troubled idol.
technologySee all
A picture

Sony to hike PS5 prices by $100 as AI and Iran war push up memory chip costs

Sony is raising global prices of its PlayStation 5 consoles, including a $100 increase in the US, marking its second hike in less than a year as the entertainment giant grapples with rising costs of key components such as memory chips.The tech industry’s race to build out artificial intelligence infrastructure has pushed memory makers to favor higher-margin datacenter chips, tightening supply for consumer devices like the ones Sony sells.The updated US prices, effective 2 April, will put the standard PS5 at $649.99, up from $549.99

A picture

Wikipedia bans AI-generated content in its online encyclopedia

Wikipedia has banned the use of artificial intelligence in the generation or rewriting of content for its voluminous online encyclopedia.In a recent policy change, Wikipedia said that the use of large language models (or LLMs) “often violates” its core principles and will not be allowed. The English language version of Wikipedia has more than 7.1m articles.The use of AI has been a contentious issue among Wikipedia’s community of volunteer editors but a vote among the site’s editors supported the ban, according to 404 Media

A picture

Number of AI chatbots ignoring human instructions increasing, study says

AI models that lie and cheat appear to be growing in number with reports of deceptive scheming surging in the last six months, a study into the technology has found.AI chatbots and agents disregarded direct instructions, evaded safeguards and deceived humans and other AI, according to research funded by the UK government-funded AI Security Institute (AISI). The study, shared with the Guardian, identified nearly 700 real-world cases of AI scheming and charted a five-fold rise in misbehaviour between October and March, with some AI models destroying emails and other files without permission.The snapshot of scheming by AI agents “in the wild”, as opposed to in laboratory conditions, has sparked fresh calls for international monitoring of the increasingly capable models and come as Silicon Valley companies aggressively promote the technology as a economically transformative. Last week the UK chancellor also launched a drive to get millions more Britons using AI

A picture

‘Accountability has arrived’: dual US court losses show shifting tide against Meta and co

In the span of just two days, the most powerful social media company in the world faced a more severe public reckoning than it has in years.Jurors in California and New Mexico gave back-to-back verdicts this week that for the first time ever found Meta liable for products that inflict harm on young people. For years, lawmakers, parents and advocates have raised red flags over how social media can hurt children, but now the tech firms are being held to account via court rulings that could set long-lasting precedents.A jury in New Mexico ordered Meta to pay $375m in damages on Tuesday over claims that its products led to child sexual exploitation, among other harms. The following day, a jury in California ordered Meta and YouTube to pay $6m over claims that both companies deliberately designed addictive products to hook young users

A picture

New York City hospitals drop Palantir as controversial AI firm expands in UK

New York City’s public hospital system announced that it would not be renewing its contract with Palantir as controversy mounts in the UK over the data analytics and AI firm’s government contract.The president of the US’s largest municipal public healthcare system, Dr Mitchell Katz, testified last week before the New York city council that the agreement with Palantir would expire in October.He said at the hearing that the contract, which focused on recovering money for insurance claims, was always meant to be short-term, and that there was an “absolute firewall” preventing Palantir from sharing information with US Immigration and Customs Enforcement. He said that the agency had “not had any incidents”.The contract and related payment documents shared with the Guardian by the American Friends Service Committee and first reported by the Intercept, show that NYC Health + Hospitals has paid Palantir nearly $4m since November 2023

A picture

Human rights groups cheer ‘watershed’ verdict in social media addiction trial

The verdict in a landmark social media trial that Meta and YouTube deliberately designed addictive products has sparked calls for reform across borders. International human rights and tech freedom groups issued statements after the decision, praising jurors for holding social media companies accountable for harms to children and urging tech giants to change their design features to ensure children are safe.Amnesty International said in a statement on Thursday that “this court decision is clear: these platforms are unsafe by design and meaningful change is urgently needed”.The day prior, a Los Angeles jury found both Meta and YouTube liable for intentionally creating platforms that hooked a young user and led to her being harmed. The six-week trial was one of more than 20 “bellwether” trials that are expected to go to court in the next few years