From the Pocket: Andrew Dillon needs authenticity and nuance, not AFL talking points
In 2023, the late Sam Landsberger wrote a piece in the Herald Sun recalling how Andrew Dillon came to work at the AFL.Dillon was driving down Punt Road in the early 2000s after playing a game for amateur club Old Xaverians.Senior AFL administrator Ben Buckley, who was recruiting for an in-house counsel, was in the next lane and spotted his former Xavs teammate.“Hey Dills,” he shouted across traffic, “you’re a lawyer, aren’t you?”A quarter of a century later, a line from North Melbourne coach Alastair Clarkson in an interview with Jay Clark jumped off the page on Sunday.“I spoke to Gil [McLachlan] on Tuesday night and he says: ‘This will all be resolved by the end of next week,’” Clarkson said.
“This was the grand final week of 2022.Just talk to ‘Dills’ and this will all be resolved.”Both say so much about how the AFL does business.And in the second instance, about how so many people involved in the Hawthorn racism scandal were in over their heads.Clarkson’s comments give a snapshot of what sort of operator Dillon was for more than two decades.
Whether you wanted to sort out a minor quibble or douse a major inferno, he was the man you called,Given the backroom roles he played in some of the biggest issues the sport was confronted with, he could easily have been a more divisive figure,But he was the sort of man who would penalise you, fine you or charge you, and leave you liking and respecting him when you put the phone down,The question mark was always whether he would excel at being the frontman, at being the face of the league and the sport,On the weekend, Dillon did the rounds of the major radio stations.
Here’s a few of his answers.On the unevenness of the competition: “Look, I think it’s something you keep an eye on.”On the cost-of-living pressures which are dissuading fans from going to games: “It’s a really good question and it’s something we are acutely aware of.”On a mandatory five weeks suspension for homophobic slurs: “I would not be expecting that we’d be dealing with that again – sometimes there’s mitigating circumstances and sometimes there’s aggravating.”On his preference for a day or twilight grand final: “Tradition is really important, but so is progression.
”And finally, on the controversy over Sydney’s tribute to the victims of the Bondi terror attack: “I don’t know the ins and outs of scripts and the like.”None of those responses fell under the train wreck category, though a few came close.But all were typical of his communication style – wooden, scripted, equivocal and often just plain unsatisfactory.In this regard, he will always be compared with Gillon McLachlan.The former AFL chief executive was a master charmer, disarmer and deflector.
He was a born frontman, and he would have made a fine politician or the head of a wagering company,Dillon will never be that type of leader,He’ll never be someone who can go on a show like The Front Bar and banter with comedians, or flick questions from experienced journalists down to fine leg,And that’s not a bad thing,After all, we should be wary of leaders who have mastered the art of speaking supposedly off the cuff with lines that are often heavily workshopped.
But there are issues in and around the game that require decisive leadership, nuanced conversations and proper words.Some are the usual football related issues – day or night grand finals, equalisation, fixturing.Others are broader societal concerns – terrorism, homophobia, cost of living – the kind of issues the AFL has always considered itself worthy of commenting and leading on.Dillon often responds to questions and criticism by pointing to crowds, ratings, memberships and finances.Indeed, anyone running a business would look at the AFL’s numbers and concede that it’s doing a good job.
But much of the angst that surrounds the way this sport is run could be assuaged by a CEO who wasn’t so tethered to his suggested talking points,Running the AFL demands a lot,You have to be commercially savvy, be well respected by your inner circle, be a good delegator and have a genuine love for your sport – all areas where Dillon cannot be questioned,In the modern media landscape, however, the ability to sit in front of a microphone and speak authentically and persuasively has never been more critical,And it’s an area where Dillon is failing badly.
This is an extract from Guardian Australia’s free weekly AFL email, From the Pocket.To get the full version, just visit this page and follow the instructions
Teenage girls sue Musk’s xAI, accusing Grok tool of creating child sexual abuse material
A group of three teenage girls, two of whom are minors, filed a lawsuit on Monday against Elon Musk’s xAI artificial intelligence company alleging that its Grok image generator used photos of them to produce and distribute child sexual abuse material. The class-action lawsuit is the first filed by minors following Grok’s rampant generation of nonconsensual nude images earlier this year.“xAI chose to profit off the sexual predation of real people, including children, despite knowing full well the consequences of creating such a dangerous product,” Vanessa Baehr-Jones, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, said in a statement.The suit, which was brought by three Tennessee teenagers but filed in California, where xAI is headquartered, details how the girls discovered that nude, AI-altered images of them were uploaded to a Discord server and shared online without their knowledge.After they alerted law enforcement to the images, according to the complaint, police arrested a suspect later that month and found child sexual abuse material (CSAM) on his phone that was allegedly produced using xAI’s image and video generation technology
Google scraps AI search feature that crowdsourced amateur medical advice
Google has dropped a new artificial intelligence search feature that gave users crowdsourced health advice from amateurs around the world.The company had said its launch of “What People Suggest”, which provided tips from strangers, showed “the potential of AI to transform health outcomes across the globe”.But Google has since quietly removed the feature, according to three people familiar with the decision.A Google spokesperson confirmed “What People Suggest” had been scrapped. The move came as part of a “broader simplification” of its search page and had nothing to do with the quality or safety of the new feature, the spokesperson said
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra review: its huge screen blocks shoulder surfers from spying on you
Samsung’s latest Ultra superphone promises to keep shoulder surfers out of your business with a first-of-its-kind privacy display built into its huge 6.9in screen.The Guardian’s journalism is independent. We will earn a commission if you buy something through an affiliate link. Learn more
AI has exposed age-old problems with university coursework | Letter
The frustration many academics are expressing about artificial intelligence and critical thinking is understandable (‘I wish I could push ChatGPT off a cliff’: professors scramble to save critical thinking in an age of AI, 10 March). But from my experience working with students on academic writing, blaming AI risks masking a problem that universities have lived with for years.In my work with students, I have long seen the ways in which thinking can be outsourced when assessment allows it: essay mills, shared past papers, model essays passed between cohorts, or heavy reliance on tutors and friends to structure assignments. Artificial intelligence did not invent this behaviour. It has simply industrialised a shortcut that already existed
Trump administration reportedly set to be paid $10bn for brokering TikTok deal
Donald Trump’s administration is reportedly poised to be paid $10bn by investors as part of a deal to create a US-controlled version of TikTok.The $10bn, considered by the US government as a sort of transaction fee, will be paid by the administration-friendly investors who took control of TikTok’s US operations from its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, according to reporting that first appeared in the Wall Street Journal.The investors in the popular social media app include software company Oracle; MGX, an investment firm based in the United Arab Emirates; and private equity business Silver Lake. These entities, along with other backers, paid $2.5bn to the US treasury when the deal closed in January and are set to make further payments in the unusual arrangement until the total hits $10bn
Meta and Google trial: are infinite scroll and autoplay creating addicts?
It was as “easy as ABC”, claimed the lawyer prosecuting a landmark social media harm case against Meta and Google which heard closing arguments this week. The defendants were guilty, said Mark Lanier, of “addicting the brains of children”. Not true, replied the tech companies. Meta insisted providing young people with a “safer, healthier experience has always been core to our work”.Features such as autoplay videos, infinite scrolling and constantly chirruping alerts woven into the fabric of online platforms were central to the six-week trial in Los Angeles, which has been compared to the cases against tobacco companies in the 1990s
Markets rise as investors welcome Iraq’s deal to resume oil exports via Turkey – business live
HelloFresh hit by sales slump as people lose appetite for meal kits
Instagram to remove end-to-end encryption for private messages in May
Subnautica 2 publisher’s CEO used ChatGPT in failed bid to avoid paying US$250m bonus to own studio head, court hears
The Spin | ‘It was a crazy time’: why big auction paychecks don’t always equal superstardom
Are unbeaten superteams like the UConn Huskies bad for basketball?