Reform insiders fear links to extreme figures such as Andrew Tate will scare off voters

A picture


Reform insiders are becoming increasingly irritated by the party’s association with Andrew Tate and other extreme online celebrities whose views are too toxic for the mainstream voters Nigel Farage needs to win over,Insiders have revealed that as Reform prepare for power they are trying to end their association with more controversial figures on the right such as Tate, whose extreme and misogynistic content could taint the party’s credibility,While courting online popularity before the party’s boom in the polls, their leader, Farage, appeared loth to criticise the online “manosphere” influencer,Tate is facing 21 charges for crimes including human trafficking should he ever return to the UK,In 2024, Farage said in online interviews that Tate was an “important voice” for the “emasculated” and giving boys “perhaps a bit of confidence at school”.

Tate is becoming better known among mainstream voters as his conduct is reported in programmes such as Louis Theroux’s recent Netflix documentary Inside the Manosphere.Public revulsion at Tate and his followers has caused some in Reform to warn that associating themselves with these kinds of figures could weaken the party’s appeal to female voters and the broader electorate.One source said: “Yes, I have advised Nigel and others to be more careful about who we associate with – if we are to win over a broader section of British society, we cannot be linked to unpopular characters or people who have made unsavoury comments about women.”Another senior Reform source said of Tate: “I am quite familiar with him and what he’s like, I look at his social media.He is nothing to do with Reform.

We can’t help it if people that we don’t particularly want around us endorse us,There have been a few cases of that,”Reform has also struggled to shake its association with the rightwing agitator and convicted criminal Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, otherwise known as Tommy Robinson,Though the party has made it clear that he is not welcome as a member, Robinson recently endorsed Reform’s candidate Matthew Goodwin for the Gorton and Denton byelection,Goodwin did not disavow Robinson, though a Reform UK spokesperson said: “We have consistently been clear on this issue.

He isn’t welcome in the party.”Luke Tryl, who runs the polling company More in Common, said their research backs up the theory that associations with extreme online personalities could put new voters off Reform.He said: “We looked at the difference between Reform’s 2024 voters, hardcore ones, and their newer voters.And there is a big difference on approval of Robinson and [Elon] Musk, and even Tate.There is a big distinction between 2024 voters and their newer voters and even more so for new women.

”Tryl’s research found Tommy Robinson has an approval rating of +15 with 2024 Reform voters, but new Reform voters give him a -11 approval rating, which sinks to -15 among women.Andrew Tate has a -34 negative approval rating among 2024 Reform voters, which reduces to -46 among new voters and -51 among women.“The risk then to Reform is their association with online right figures alienates the wavering female voter who ultimately will decide whether Reform gets into government,” he said.“The sort of voter who is tempted to roll the dice as the status quo feels so miserable, but is also worried Reform may be too extreme.”Tate and Robinson form just one part of a wider host of controversial figures who have associated themselves with the party’s views – not always in ways that are helpful to the party.

Another figure who has been increasingly seen at Reform events is Lady Victoria Hervey.The socialite was in the audience at the Veterans for Reform event earlier this year at which Suella Braverman defected from the Conservatives.She has been a strident campaigner for the party and was recently photographed with Farage at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida.A former flame of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, she has described Jeffrey Epstein’s victims as liars and prostitutes and called anyone who was not in the Epstein files a “loser”.She recently said: “So if you were on the scene and you were powerful – like to be honest, if you’re not in those files, it would be an insult.

Because it just means that you were a bit of a loser,” Hervey, who dated Andrew in 1999, is mentioned in the Epstein files 23 times,Another Mar-a-Lago guest, Holly Valance, has also been a vocal supporter of Reform,She recently split with entrepreneur Nick Candy, who financed the party,The former soap actor and pop star has gained attention recently for provocative comments such as referring to the climate campaigner Greta Thunberg as a “demonic little gremlin”.

She is also an associate of Robinson, attending his Unite the Kingdom march in London.Posing in a Mega (Make England Great Again) hat, she said: “I’m very proud and pleased of Tommy – this is his redemption.”Few mainstream celebrities have vocally supported the party, but Reform UK has managed to attract support from the former model Caprice Bourret, who has become an enthusiastic backer, even joining the campaign for Laila Cunningham to be the party’s candidate for London mayor.Bourret has left heart emojis on her Instagram posts, and written an enthusiastic “you will win!”.
technologySee all
A picture

Sony to hike PS5 prices by $100 as AI and Iran war push up memory chip costs

Sony is raising global prices of its PlayStation 5 consoles, including a $100 increase in the US, marking its second hike in less than a year as the entertainment giant grapples with rising costs of key components such as memory chips.The tech industry’s race to build out artificial intelligence infrastructure has pushed memory makers to favor higher-margin datacenter chips, tightening supply for consumer devices like the ones Sony sells.The updated US prices, effective 2 April, will put the standard PS5 at $649.99, up from $549.99

A picture

Wikipedia bans AI-generated content in its online encyclopedia

Wikipedia has banned the use of artificial intelligence in the generation or rewriting of content for its voluminous online encyclopedia.In a recent policy change, Wikipedia said that the use of large language models (or LLMs) “often violates” its core principles and will not be allowed. The English language version of Wikipedia has more than 7.1m articles.The use of AI has been a contentious issue among Wikipedia’s community of volunteer editors but a vote among the site’s editors supported the ban, according to 404 Media

A picture

Number of AI chatbots ignoring human instructions increasing, study says

AI models that lie and cheat appear to be growing in number with reports of deceptive scheming surging in the last six months, a study into the technology has found.AI chatbots and agents disregarded direct instructions, evaded safeguards and deceived humans and other AI, according to research funded by the UK government-funded AI Security Institute (AISI). The study, shared with the Guardian, identified nearly 700 real-world cases of AI scheming and charted a five-fold rise in misbehaviour between October and March, with some AI models destroying emails and other files without permission.The snapshot of scheming by AI agents “in the wild”, as opposed to in laboratory conditions, has sparked fresh calls for international monitoring of the increasingly capable models and come as Silicon Valley companies aggressively promote the technology as a economically transformative. Last week the UK chancellor also launched a drive to get millions more Britons using AI

A picture

‘Accountability has arrived’: dual US court losses show shifting tide against Meta and co

In the span of just two days, the most powerful social media company in the world faced a more severe public reckoning than it has in years.Jurors in California and New Mexico gave back-to-back verdicts this week that for the first time ever found Meta liable for products that inflict harm on young people. For years, lawmakers, parents and advocates have raised red flags over how social media can hurt children, but now the tech firms are being held to account via court rulings that could set long-lasting precedents.A jury in New Mexico ordered Meta to pay $375m in damages on Tuesday over claims that its products led to child sexual exploitation, among other harms. The following day, a jury in California ordered Meta and YouTube to pay $6m over claims that both companies deliberately designed addictive products to hook young users

A picture

New York City hospitals drop Palantir as controversial AI firm expands in UK

New York City’s public hospital system announced that it would not be renewing its contract with Palantir as controversy mounts in the UK over the data analytics and AI firm’s government contract.The president of the US’s largest municipal public healthcare system, Dr Mitchell Katz, testified last week before the New York city council that the agreement with Palantir would expire in October.He said at the hearing that the contract, which focused on recovering money for insurance claims, was always meant to be short-term, and that there was an “absolute firewall” preventing Palantir from sharing information with US Immigration and Customs Enforcement. He said that the agency had “not had any incidents”.The contract and related payment documents shared with the Guardian by the American Friends Service Committee and first reported by the Intercept, show that NYC Health + Hospitals has paid Palantir nearly $4m since November 2023

A picture

Human rights groups cheer ‘watershed’ verdict in social media addiction trial

The verdict in a landmark social media trial that Meta and YouTube deliberately designed addictive products has sparked calls for reform across borders. International human rights and tech freedom groups issued statements after the decision, praising jurors for holding social media companies accountable for harms to children and urging tech giants to change their design features to ensure children are safe.Amnesty International said in a statement on Thursday that “this court decision is clear: these platforms are unsafe by design and meaningful change is urgently needed”.The day prior, a Los Angeles jury found both Meta and YouTube liable for intentionally creating platforms that hooked a young user and led to her being harmed. The six-week trial was one of more than 20 “bellwether” trials that are expected to go to court in the next few years