UK junk food ad ban so diluted it may be largely ineffective, experts say

A picture


The junk food ad ban intended to curb childhood obesity will affect only 1% of the £2.4bn spent annually on advertising food and drink, and may prove a “paper tiger”, ministers have been told.The government has hailed the ban on advertising foods high in fat, salt and sugar before 9pm on TV and completely online, which came into force on 5 January, as a decisive and world-leading move that will remove 7.2bn calories from UK children’s diets every year.But it has been delayed, watered down and narrowed in scope so much after food industry lobbying that it will be “mostly ineffective”, research by the innovation agency Nesta has found.

The policy has been weakened by so many gaps and loopholes that it will have much less impact than expected, it claims.It estimates that the new advertising regulations cover only £190m, or 8%, of the £2.4bn annual spend.As firms respond to the TV and online ban, this is likely to fall to just £20m – barely 1% of overall advertising spend.In particular, food producers will switch much of their advertising spend from pre-watershed TV and online, which are covered by the ban, to outdoor sites and advertisers’ own social media accounts, which are not.

The director of Nesta’s healthy life mission, John Barber, said: “This policy was first announced eight years ago and in that time there have been eight consultations and four delays,“Partly due to pressure from the industry, these delays and adjustments mean that the restrictions intended to keep us healthy are operating at a fraction of their potential,This policy is at risk of being a paper tiger,”Governments need to balance public health requirements with those of business, but the much-amended version of the restrictions “appear to strongly favour the latter”, he said,Nesta said loopholes in the ban include it covering too few types of unhealthy food, ministers agreeing with the industry’s demand that brand advertising should still be allowed, and it not covering outdoor advertising such as billboards.

Exemptions ministers granted mean that foods generally considered unhealthy, such as chocolate spread and toffee-covered nuts, can still be advertised,More than 60% of consumer spending on products high in fat, salt or sugar are not covered by the ban,Dr Kawther Hashem, a nutritionist and head of research and impact at Action on Sugar, said: “It is shocking that after nearly a decade of promises, eight consultations, four delays and constant lobbying, the UK could be left with unhealthy food advertising rules that affect as little as 1% of ad spend,“While 1% of total ad spend is still a substantial amount in absolute terms, it falls far short of the bold action needed, and originally promised, to truly protect children from relentless unhealthy food marketing,”Nesta’s findings follow a warning last week by Prof Chris Whitty, the chief medical officer for England, that certain industries – including food – have used “very strong lobbyists” to persuade successive UK governments not to adopt policies that would improve the population’s health.

Tactics such as portraying policies in the media as “nanny state” help to deter ministers from pushing through measures that are cheap, popular with the public and likely to prove effective, Whitty said in the Medical Journalists Association annual lecture.He said this helped to explain why “we are so slow” in the UK to boost public health.The claim on a newspaper front page that a proposed new approach by ministers is “nanny state … kills off a lot of the things that we can move forward on”, he said.The chief executive of the food campaign group Bite Back, D’Arcy Williams, said: “Junk food companies are as incredibly adept as they are sinister at finding loopholes [and] shifting their marketing into places where the rules don’t apply, while young people continue to be surrounded by unhealthy food advertising every day.”A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: “We’re delivering on our pledge to restrict junk food advertising and are already seeing change – with up to 7.

2bn calories set to be removed from UK children’s diets each year as a result.“These restrictions are part of a wider package of action under our 10-year health plan, including limiting volume price promotions on less healthy foods and introducing mandatory reporting on healthy food sales.“We’re committed to monitoring the impact of these measures and expect industry to continue to adapt.”
recentSee all
A picture

Aramco warns of oil market ‘catastrophe’ unless strait of Hormuz reopens soon

Saudi Arabia’s state oil company has warned of “catastrophic consequences” for the world’s oil markets if the US-Israeli war with Iran continues to block shipping in the strait of Hormuz.The world’s biggest oil exporter expects to be able to supply the market with about 70% of its usual crude output despite the stranglehold on the vital trade artery, but its chief executive warned that there would still be “drastic” consequences for the world economy if the disruption continued.Oil shipments from the Middle East have been blocked from passing through the narrow waterway since the US strikes on Iran 11 days ago, erasing about 20m barrels of oil from the global market every day.Despite the warning, oil prices fell on Tuesday after Donald Trump suggested the war could end “very soon”.The price of a barrel of Brent crude, the international benchmark, was down 14% on Tuesday evening, at about $85

A picture

Time for UK regulators to act against Saba Capital’s siege tactics | Nils Pratley

A year ago, the sometimes sleepy world of UK investment trusts – companies that invest in other companies – had a moment of genuine drama. A loud New York raider, Boaz Weinstein of hedge fund Saba Capital, bought significant stakes in seven trusts and lobbed insults at their boards, generally about poor investment performance or a failure to close the gap between the value of the assets and the share price.For all the fireworks, the campaign was a flop. Saba filed a variety of shake-’em-up motions at what it called the “Miserable Seven” and lost the lot. A 7-0 defeat, you’d think, would prompt Weinstein to slink away in embarrassment but, as quickly became clear, that’s not his style

A picture

Musk’s xAI wins permit for datacenter’s makeshift power plant despite backlash

Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence company xAI won approval on Tuesday to run 41 methane gas turbines at its “Colossus 2” datacenter in northern Mississippi. That’s nearly double the amount it has been operating.The turbines will help power xAI’s massive datacenters, which house the company’s “AI supercomputers”, or giant arrays of advanced chips, which in turn power the controversial AI tool Grok, the company’s most recognizable product.The decision, made by the Mississippi department of environmental quality, MDEQ, comes amid major public opposition to the datacenter, which demands enormous amounts of electricity. Community members and environmental advocates say the cluster of gas generators will contribute to hazardous air pollution in Southaven, Mississippi

A picture

UK Society of Authors launches logo to identify books written by humans not AI

The Society of Authors (SoA) has launched a scheme to help identify works written by humans in a market increasingly flooded by AI-generated books.The scheme is the first of its kind launched by a UK trade association, and allows authors to register their books and download a “Human Authored” logo to display on their back cover.The SoA said the absence of any government measure to compel tech companies to label AI-generated output meant readers were struggling to distinguish between books written by a human, and machine-generated work based on AI models trained on copyrighted work without permission or payment.It mirrors a similar scheme launched by the Authors Guild in the US at the beginning of 2025.Mary Beard, the classicist, is one of several high-profile authors who have backed the scheme and plan to register their works on the Human Authored website

A picture

Michael Johnson accused of taking $500,000 from debt-ridden track league

Michael Johnson has been accused of paying himself $500,000 (£372,000) eight days before his Grand Slam Track project collapsed before the final event in Los Angeles, leaving athletes and creditors owed millions. The claim is made by vendors in a legal filing in which they have also sought permission to sue individual leaders of GST, including Johnson and the main investor, Winners Alliance.When GST was launched Johnson promised it would “bring fantasy to life” and transform athletics – with track’s biggest stars facing off regularly against each other for huge prize money. But the writing was on the wall after the first event in Jamaica last April was sparsely attended, and it collapsed shortly after its third event in Philadelphia on 1 June.The filing, at the US bankruptcy court for the district of Delaware, also shows that Johnson was owed $2

A picture

‘Stupid money’ well spent: Lossiemouth saunters to Champion Hurdle win

There was a definite tremor in the voice of Rich Ricci, belying the image of the hard-nosed former banker, after his grey mare, Lossiemouth, had galloped to an authoritative success in the Champion Hurdle here on Tuesday. “It’s a privilege to have a horse like this,” Ricci said. “This game continues to excite me, to entice me and to make me spend stupid money.”The accountant in Ricci had probably been telling him to stick to a tried-and-trusted path at the festival as he and Willie Mullins, Lossiemouth’s trainer, were deciding last week whether to attempt a third straight win in the Mares’ Hurdle on Thursday, or roll the dice in the main event two days earlier.The gambler prevailed, however, putting a hugely popular seal on the festival’s opening day as Lossiemouth, the 7-5 favourite came home six and a half lengths clear of Brighterdaysahead (7-2), with The New Lion, at 3-1, another half-length away in third