Hannah Spencer riles fellow MPs with attack on parliament’s drinking culture
When Hannah Spencer spoke of her shock that in Westminster “you can smell the alcohol when people are in between votes”, she may not have expected such a lively response.The Green party MP, who won the Gorton and Denton byelection in February, made the comments in an interview with the Joe website, saying she was “really uneasy” about the drinking culture in parliament.She added that there had been cases of “questionable and dangerous behaviour” by staff and potentially some MPs because of the “unprofessional” culture of drinking.After Spencer’s interview was published, a social media storm in a pint glass ensued, with some other parliamentarians quick to criticise her comments.Nigel Farage, who is often seen with a pint in his hand, was one of the first to jump in.
The Reform UK leader said: “The Greens are happy to legalise heroin and crack, but now we learn they think an afternoon pint is a step too far,”The Green party leader, Zack Polanski, defended his colleague, writing on X: “Of course Farage misrepresents what Hannah is saying,An afternoon pint is different to drinking on a work day and then going to vote on decisions for millions of people,”Others noted that Spencer did not appear to be suggesting that MPs should start taking heroin in the Commons,Spencer told the Guardian: “I don’t think it’s much to ask for an MP to be sober when they vote on decisions that affect everyone else.
I’d have been sacked at work if I did this, same goes for almost every profession, but especially working-class jobs.MPs defending this and lecturing me are the exact reason I’ve been saying this place is full of people who are out of touch.”The drinking culture in Westminster has been much-criticised and parliament’s Strangers bar closed temporarily last year after an alleged spiking incident.Security measures were tightened and visitors and parliamentary staff can visit only with an MP present.Strangers is one of several subsidised bars where MPs can often be found between votes.
Natalie Fleet, Labour MP for Bolsover, said that while “working in a palace is mad”, the smell of “fags and beer” was one of the things “that make it seem [a] tiny bit normal”.Luke Charters, Labour’s MP for York Outer, said: “Breaking news: MPs are human and sometimes have a drink.MPs work long days for constituents, and yes, sometimes share a drink in the evening with colleagues.”There was some sympathy for Spencer’s comments.Emily Thornberry, MP for Islington South and Finsbury, said she understood the Green MP’s view: “I remember being surprised at the drinking culture when I first arrived.
It’s actually much better than it used to be.”However, she added that for some of her colleagues, drinking was a way to cope with the pressure of the job.“I think it’s sad to see some members who are obviously finding it difficult to be away from home for such long periods and who start to develop a habit of drinking to help with their loneliness,” she said.“Hannah should think about that.It’s a great honour being an MP, but the hours are long and those who can’t get home each night can find it difficult.
”One 2024 intake Labour MP said she had also been surprised by the attitude to drinking in parliament.“I’ve been asked whether I am pregnant when I choose orange juice instead of wine at events,” she said.“Drinking is so normalised.”She said the working set-up in parliament was unhealthy and she was often waiting for hours between votes, adding: “I don’t really drink, but I send emails until 10pm, and that’s not healthy either is it? Some people go and drink, maybe they go to the tea room and eat too much, I send too many emails! We need to talk about that.”She suggested that electronic voting for late votes might help.
Labour MP Alex Sobel agreed, saying: “I also think late votes and how we vote are the issue.I’ve never actually seen anyone smell of booze in the lobby so I don’t recognise what Hannah is saying about that.”Other opposition MPs have leapt to Spencer’s defence.Alliance party MP Sorcha Eastwood said: “Can’t get my head around this, I worked in Tesco, manufacturing, the health service and construction – guess what? We all worked long hours, mostly on low pay and we had considerable levels of pressure.MPs drinking during work in parliament? The place we make laws for all the other workers? And it’s OK for us to drink during work?”Tim Farron, the Liberal Democrat environment spokesperson, said he occasionally had pints on the parliamentary estate after voting.
“I try not to judge people,” he added,“When the house sits late I tend to go to the library – it’s a useful time to get things done,Having said that, I will go for a pint with an old school friend after votes tomorrow,”The Independent Complaints and Grievance Scheme, a parliamentary watchdog, has said the drinking culture in Westminster was a “frequent factor” fuelling inappropriate behaviour,It said a theme in its investigations were parliament’s numerous bars, where alcohol consumption was “leading to intimidating behaviour like shouting and swearing”.
The Woolsack, another bar frequented by parliamentary staff, had a rebrand after becoming notorious for brawls and misconduct scandals.There is also a bar in the House of Lords cafeteria as well as several dining rooms that serve alcohol.
No 10 publishes previously confidential memo to refute claim that Starmer misled MPs over Mandelson appointment – as it happened
Lindsay Hoyle, the Commons speaker, is telling MPs about the privileges committee debate.He says he received letters from various MPs, including the opposition leader.He says issues like this should be taken to the privileges committee sparingly.He is a gatekeeper, he says. He says he is there to stop frivolous complaints being taken forward
MPs to vote on whether to hold inquiry into Starmer over Mandelson
Keir Starmer will face a vote on whether to launch a standards investigation into his decision to appoint Peter Mandelson as ambassador to Washington, prompting senior party figures to call for restraint from Labour MPs.The speaker, Lindsay Hoyle, has granted a debate on Tuesday after which MPs could vote to refer the prime minister to the privileges committee over claims he misled parliament over his decision.The vote would be the latest test of Starmer’s authority, which has been damaged by the Guardian’s revelation Mandelson was installed as ambassador despite the advice of vetting officials that he be denied security clearance.Government whips are considering whether to instruct Labour MPs to oppose any attempt to refer the prime minister to the committee – with senior figures accusing the Conservatives of political point scoring.The former prime minister Gordon Brown said: “At challenging times both for our country and the world, the Labour party has always sought to put the needs of the country first
Support Starmer and move on from Mandelson vetting row | Letters
Regarding Gaby Hinsliff’s article (Two men made mistakes over Mandelson – only one has lost his job. That should haunt Starmer, 24 April), most would concur that the prime minister has the most important job in the country. It is also one of the most demanding jobs, if it is to be done well. So would it not be better to help Keir Starmer instead of trying to hound him out of office for an error made in December 2024 that has been corrected?Would it not be better to support him in the job we elected him to do instead of him having to spend time and energy defending himself against his implacable adversaries? Would that not be preferable to replacing him with someone chosen by a small contingent of the elected party? Can we not learn from the chaos caused by the last government in switching prime ministers?Michael GoodhartGrantchester, Cambridge “An atmosphere of pressure”, Sir Olly Robbins (Report, 21 April)? Isn’t that what you’re paid to work in? All you had to do was go to your boss, the cabinet secretary, and get him to go to the prime minister to call them off. Tell a police officer, an A&E nurse or a children’s social worker about your “atmosphere of pressure”
Match the children’s game to the profession | Brief letters
I was interested to read that Peter Mandelson was seen going to the park to walk his dog “like a weekending solicitor on his way to an egg and spoon race” (Walking the dog and braving the paps, 25 April). Are there other professions known for their love of children’s games? Maybe a retired GP going to play musical chairs, or a pair of award-winning architects en route to a three-legged race?Lesley WarnerIlford, London Re Graham Head’s point about Nigel Farage (Letters, 23 April), if the job of the US ambassador is to be an obsequious boot-licker at the court of King Donald, Farage was eminently qualified. If he’d been appointed, he wouldn’t be where he is now. And we wouldn’t be where we are now either.James WilkinsonShrewsbury, Shropshire Regarding EV charging, how many households with no off-street parking can guarantee a parking spot outside their door (Shake-up will help UK motorists without driveways to charge EVs, 21 April)? Very few
What the parties promise Welsh voters on the NHS, schools, childcare and tax
The parties most likely to win the Senedd election next month offer radically different futures for Wales, but all six are facing criticism for not being “upfront” in their manifestos about the fiscal challenges the next Welsh government will face.Labour, Plaid Cymru, Reform UK, the Green party, the Conservative party, and the Liberal Democrats are standing for the Senedd, which is expanding from 60 to 96 seats under a more proportional voting system.Polls suggest Plaid Cymru or Reform will be the biggest party, with Welsh Labour, which has led the country for nearly 30 years, in a distant third. Coalition mathematics means Plaid is the only party likely to be able to form a government, possibly in coalition with the Greens or Labour.This week, the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) thinktank said that its analysis of the party manifestos showed “virtually no detail” on spending commitments; big public investment plans are beyond Wales’s current budgets, and will require expensive upfront private funding, or increased borrowing powers
Police assess evidence on £40,000 donation to Robert Jenrick’s campaign
Police are assessing evidence about donations to Robert Jenrick’s campaign to become Conservative leader in 2024 after a referral from the elections watchdog, the Guardian can reveal.The information was passed on by the Electoral Commission, which the Guardian understands has been investigating allegations that almost £40,000 of donations to Jenrick’s leadership campaign before he defected to Reform UK, were from a foreign source in breach of electoral rules.The Met said: “On Tuesday, 6 January we received a referral from the Electoral Commission concerning donations connected to a leadership campaign. This referral is under review and until it has been completed, we’re not in a position to comment further.”The Electoral Commission confirmed that it had sent evidence about a leadership campaign to the Met after conducting its own investigation, with its inquiries now paused while the police review the material
Drug use in England spikes during heatwaves and big sports events, research finds
People in UK spend fewer years in good health than a decade ago, study finds
Britain is undermining the care workers it depends on | Heather Stewart
Suicide-related callouts to fire services triple in England in a decade
Baby died after NHS trust failed to warn mother of ‘unsafe’ home birth, coroner finds
Three men guilty of repeatedly raping woman on Brighton beach in ‘predatory, callous’ attack