H
trending
H
HOYONEWS
HomeBusinessTechnologySportPolitics
Others
  • Food
  • Culture
  • Society
Contact
Home
Business
Technology
Sport
Politics

Food

Culture

Society

Contact
Facebook page
H
HOYONEWS

Company

business
technology
sport
politics
food
culture
society

© 2025 Hoyonews™. All Rights Reserved.
Facebook page

Lords rules and culture make it easy for peers to abuse privileged position

about 4 hours ago
A picture


Richard Dannatt, the former head of the British army; and David Evans (Lord Evans of Watford), a so-called high-level facilitator, have been found to have broken the House of Lords rules and are facing hefty suspensions as a result.The punishments follow official inquiries into their conduct after undercover investigations by the Guardian revealed how the two peers separately offered to make introductions to ministers for a potential commercial client.The conduct was ruled by a parliamentary watchdog to have been lobbying for personal profit – behaviour that breaks the fundamental principle that peers should always act solely for the public good.Lord Dannatt bragged to the undercover reporters that he would “make a point of getting to know” the best-placed minister, and make the relevant introduction, while Evans said how it was “great being a Labour peer at the moment because we’ve got our mates who now have senior jobs”.Both thought they were speaking to property developers offering a potentially lucrative deal.

The Guardian later revealed how Dannatt had previously lobbied for several paying clients in actions described by the conduct committee as “improper interactions”.Dannatt said: “I deeply regret the commissioner’s findings regarding my personal honour.”He added: “I also understand that acting in the national interest in good faith, which was my motivation […] is not an excuse or justification for breaching the code of conduct.”Both men are steeped in the culture of the Lords; Dannatt has been a member since 2011, and Evans since 1998.It might be difficult to see how they could plead ignorance for their breaches.

And the two peers have broken both the letter and the spirit of the rules.They were found to have failed to act on their “personal honour”, a nebulous term that is meant to reflect “the sense and culture” of the House of Lords.Both insisted they had not broken the rules.It is notable that in their conversations with the undercover reporters, neither man ever referenced “lobbying”, which peers are strictly banned from doing for a commercial interest.Instead, they had a series of euphemisms.

Dannatt would “generate an introduction”, “facilitate a conversation”, and spoke of “putting you forward”,Evans was “very, very happy to support you”, and to “give you the opportunity” to make points,But the House of Lords is a second chamber designed for second jobs,And both men have had portfolio careers with second, third, and fourth jobs since they became peers,They are not outliers: the former chancellor Philip Hammond has a “diverse portfolio” of 30 roles.

At issue is that the rules and culture provide easy opportunities for some peers to use their privileged positions for private gain.Is it any wonder that Evans and Dannatt insisted their conduct was appropriate – or at least not brazenly in breach – when the Guardian’s wider Lords debate project found one in 10 peers were paid for political advice.The official position of the House of Lords is that peers are not paid a salary (but can claim a generous, tax-free daily allowance of £371 for showing up, plus their travel expenses), and so must be able to supplant their income with outside roles.These outside roles then allow peers to bring in expertise from industry, academia, the arts, the legal profession, to better improve the quality of debate and scrutiny of the government.But the reality is that the majority of legislative legwork is done by a minority of peers: 10% of peers made more than half of the contributions to debates in the 2019-24 parliament.

The number of peers has steadily grown since the cull of hereditary peers in 1999,The main check on two and a half decades of political patronage, with prime ministers and party leaders making appointments not for lawmaking prowess but as a reward and a retirement home, has been the grim reaper,The lack of participation requirements has meant peers can get the title, and use it to profit, by taking outside roles based on insider knowledge and access,There is no check on their contributions, or lack of; no democratic accountability to boot them out for poor performance,In the chamber, Lord Evans has spoken twice, briefly, since 2019.

Before that was a stony silence kept since 2000.The Lords has slowly tightened the rules in response to public outcry at earlier stings and newspaper revelations of lobbying scandals.But the chamber remains fundamentally unreformed.In opposition, Keir Starmer promised to abolish the “indefensible” House of Lords.Then it became a pledge to reform.

The only proposal to be debated as draft legislation is to evict the remaining hereditary peers, set to go through later this year.The other changes – a retirement age of 80, participation requirements, stronger powers to boot out disgraced peers, overhauling the appointments process and making the chamber more representative – have all gone into the long grass of a select committee to consider in the future.The House of Lords has not been the only subject of newspaper stings and lobbying scandals.Down the corridor, across the Tudor Rose at the heart of parliament’s central lobby, MPs have cracked down on second jobs in an attempt to improve much damaged public confidence.These restrictions have not been expanded to the Lords.

Until they are, it seems unlikely that “personal honour” alone will stop peers from repeating the mistakes of Dannatt and Evans.
sportSee all
A picture

England plot route to Ashes recovery as Mark Wood admits they were ‘hit hard in round one’

Mark Wood has considered driving straight from Perth to Brisbane – a 2,500 mile (4,000 km) journey over four days – just to fill the extra time created by the chastening start to England’s much-hyped Ashes moonshot.The fast bowler was among a side left “shellshocked” by the galling batting collapse on the second day at Perth Stadium that allowed Australia to power to a 1-0 series lead through Travis Head’s remarkable 69-ball century.A nervous flyer, and with the two-day finish having opened up an 12-day gap before the day-night second Test starts at the Gabba on 4 December, Wood went as far as to look into how long it would take to make the journey by road – only to realise the scale of the logistics involved.“If I could drive across the country, I would,” said the 35-year-old, speaking to former teammate Stuart Broad on the For The Love Of Cricket podcast. “I did speak to a local who said if you go across the country, that’s a big danger

about 13 hours ago
A picture

Does Travis Head’s knock deserve to be among the greatest ever Ashes innings? | Martin Pegan

Cometh the hour, cometh Travis Head. The always swashbuckling but recently out-of-sorts middle-order batter put his hand up and said “I’ll do it,” as Australia were again left scrambling to find an opener to step in for Usman Khawaja in the first Test. The last-minute decision for Head to partner debutant Jake Weatherald at the top of the order and begin the fourth-innings run chase with England in command is the sort of after-the-fact masterstroke that fills the pages of Ashes history. But even with a backstory of heroic and match-defining knocks, few could have expected Head to flip the script in a Test that had seen just 468 runs scored as 30 wickets fell, with an onslaught that immediately etched its place in Ashes folklore as one of the great innings.Head rocketed to his 10th Test century from 69 balls – the second fastest in Ashes history, the third quickest by an Australian in Tests, and the most rapid in a fourth innings – and celebrated with a few casual twirls of his bat and a half-hearted fist pump

about 15 hours ago
A picture

NFL Week 12: Chiefs hit back to beat Colts in overtime, Lions tame Giants and Packers crush Vikings

What a finish. Double overtime madness. The final scores and records now the dust has settled.(6-5) Baltimore Ravens 23-10 New York Jets (2-9)(8-3) Chicago Bears 31-28 Pittsburgh Steelers (6-5)(3-8) Cincinnati Bengals 20-26 New England Patriots (10-2)(7-4) Detroit Lions 34-27 New York Giants (2-10)(7-3-1) Green Bay Packers 23-6 Minnesota Vikings (4-7)(6-5) Kansas City Chiefs 23-20 Indianapolis Colts (8-3)(1-10) Tennessee Titans 24-30 Seattle Seahawks (8-3)That was an incredible comeback from Kansas City. The defense just completely shut the Colts out in the second half

about 22 hours ago
A picture

Contepomi accuses ‘bully’ Curry of reckless tackle and shoving Argentina coach

Tom Curry found himself at the centre of a storm after England’s win against Argentina, as Felipe Contepomi accused the flanker not only of a “reckless” tackle on Juan Cruz Mallía but of shoving him, the Pumas’ coach, in the tunnel afterwards. Mallía, the full-back, was forced off late on with what is thought to be an anterior cruciate ligament injury, which meant Argentina, who had used all their replacements, had to finish the match with 14 men.“How old is he?” said Contepomi of Curry. “Twenty-seven? And strong. And I am 48 and he comes and just [shoves me]

about 23 hours ago
A picture

Ukrainian refugee Danylo Yavhusishyn wows Japan to win his country’s first elite sumo title

Danylo Yavhusishyn has become the first Ukrainian to win a sumo tournament in Japan.The 21-year-old, who fled the war in Ukraine three years ago, won the Kyushu tournament after a tie-breaking victory over grand champion Hoshoryu from Mongolia.Yavhusishyn, whose ring name is Aonishiki Arata, addressed fans in fluent Japanese after his victory. He told fans at Fukuoka Kokusai Center that he was glad that he was able to compete to the best of his abilities.“I am happy that I am able to achieve a goal of mine,” he said of his victory, which was also televised

about 23 hours ago
A picture

Max Ojomoh delivers champagne moment for England to signify arrival on big stage | Gerard Meagher

It is a quirk of England’s November clean sweep that there were no debutants throughout an autumn campaign for the first time in 25 years but Max Ojomoh’s performance against Argentina when winning his second cap certainly felt like the arrival of the next big thing.For Ojomoh was the star turn of England’s least convincing performance of the autumn, finishing off the first try before teeing up the other two. His assist for Immanuel Feyi-Waboso, a delightful cross-field kick, was the champagne moment of the first half and his popped pass to Henry Slade for England’s third was equally eye-catching, rounding off a fine first outing at Twickenham for the 25-year-old.It is just eight days since Steve Borthwick might have felt that he had finally unearthed his centre partnership for the future after Fraser Dingwall and Ollie Lawrence dovetailed superbly in the victory against the All Blacks. The best compliment that can be paid to Ojomoh is that Borthwick may have to think again

1 day ago
businessSee all
A picture

Trump touts cheap groceries ahead of Thanksgiving. The reality is a mixed plate

about 9 hours ago
A picture

Mining giant BHP drops latest bid to buy rival Anglo American

about 11 hours ago
A picture

Minister indicates sympathy for artists in debate over AI and copyright

1 day ago
A picture

Americans are feeling the pain of the affordability crisis: ‘There’s not any wiggle room’

1 day ago
A picture

Rachel Reeves, please, let’s make budgets boring again | Heather Stewart

1 day ago
A picture

Bad season of bird flu in UK hits supply of Christmas turkeys

2 days ago