Rachel Reeves, please, let’s make budgets boring again | Heather Stewart
Rachel Reeves should put us all out of our misery this Wednesday with a tax-and-spend statement bold enough to make future budgets boring again,Ask any economist or policy wonk and they’ll tell you the buildup to this year’s budget has been among the most drawn-out and chaotic they can remember,Treasury insiders are adamant they have maintained the same “Labour values” throughout and that Reeves first scribbled down her top three priorities – the NHS, the cost of living and the public debt – as long ago as July,But the combination of volatile bond markets, pass-or-fail fiscal rules, and Reeves’s decision to leave herself with less than £10bn of headroom against them, has led to months of uncertainty and indecision,It is not meant to be like this: aside from the agenda-setting first budget that follows a general election victory, and outside economic crises (though goodness knows we have had plenty), budgets should be reassuringly dull.
Chancellors whose principles are clearly understood by the public and the markets ideally keep a steady hand on the tiller of tax-and-spend policy.A memorable budget tends to be a bad budget: Gordon Brown’s too-clever-by-half abolition of the 10p starting rate of income tax in 2008; George Osborne’s “omnishambles” in 2012; Anthony Barber’s “dash for growth” in 1972, subsequently blamed for uncorking an unsustainable boom.Reeves had not intended to be an exciting chancellor.Indeed, she and Keir Starmer hoped that by being the cautious and sensible successors to the five-leaders-in a-decade Tories, they would reap economic benefits.Investors glad to see the back of Conservative chaos would return to the UK; a more stable relationship with the EU would help to reduce trade barriers; growth would follow.
But the hoped-for stability has not materialised.Part of the explanation is the shaky global backdrop.But the problem also lies in the miasma of gloom and uncertainty that has surrounded an administration often unable to give a clear account of itself, even to its own MPs.Reeves needs to do at least three things on Wednesday to cut through the fog and buy herself the time and space to deliver another, much less exciting budget in a year’s time.First, she should be brave enough to increase her headroom significantly.
Markets appear to be expecting a doubling, to £20bn.There are trade-offs here, as the chancellor has repeatedly made clear.Stonking tax rises threaten economic growth, which is already anaemic.But she needs to give herself enough room for manoeuvre to avoid every spit and cough of economic data fuelling a market reappraisal of whether she can meet her rules.Executed with force and clarity, this approach could pay dividends in lower government borrowing costs.
It should also make space for the Bank of England to deliver much-needed rate cuts,Second, Reeves seems to be minded to downgrade the status of the OBR’s spring forecast, so that its chair, Richard Hughes, and his number crunchers will opine on the state of the economy but not mark her against her fiscal targets,This change, recommended by the International Monetary Fund, seems sensible: the UK is an outlier in having what have in effect become two big fiscal events a year,Sign up to Business TodayGet set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morningafter newsletter promotionIt was the evaporation of Reeves’s headroom in the OBR’s March forecast that prompted the botched welfare changes in the spring,The less drama is provoked by the OBR’s next set of forecasts, the better.
Third, and perhaps most challengingly, Reeves needs to set a clear and compelling direction of travel.How is it that Labour intends to “change” the UK, as its manifesto pledged? And how can the costs of that transformation be met fairly?The “one and done” framing of last year’s budget, with Reeves telling the CBI she would not have to come back for more after raising taxes by a historic £40bn, left few clues as to how she would handle this year’s main roadblock, of the OBR revisiting its productivity forecasts (something Labour wonks always knew was a possibility, incidentally).When Labour came to power, she didn’t kick off a review into how to tax wealth better, or to reform the crazily regressive council tax, or to look again at the pensions triple lock – offering clues to her principles.Instead, the straitjacket of the manifesto tax promises resulted in the £25bn employer national insurance contributions increase that many observers, including at the Bank of England, believe has put the brakes on hiring and boosted inflation.Some of her clearest language in last year’s budget was reserved for the idea of freezing income tax thresholds, which would, she said, “hurt working people”.
She is now expected to do exactly that on Wednesday.Raising income tax, in clear contravention of the manifesto promises, was an alternative way through this week’s budget, as part of a “go big” package that would have jacked up Reeves’s headroom significantly.The argument, tested by the chancellor in her “scene setter speech”, would have been that “if we are to build the future of Britain together, we will all have to contribute to that effort”.If, as expected, she has reverted to a pick’n’mix of tax changes, she will need a different argument to tie them together.They may well, in fact, all be progressive – hitting higher earners and the wealthy harder – but she will need to say that loud and clear to make the budget feel coherent.
Everyone – from the bond vigilantes who could sink the budget, to fed-up voters at home – would benefit from a much clearer sense of this Labour chancellor’s principles and purpose.That would make next year’s budget reassuringly boring – if she is still around to deliver it.
European defence company shares fall amid Ukraine peace talk hopes; Novo Nordisk reports Ozempic fails to help with Alzheimer’s – business live
European defence company stocks have dropped at the start of trading, and wholesale gas price are down too, after officials from Washington and Kyiv held weekend talks in Geneva over how to end the Ukraine-Russia war.Last night, the US and Ukraine said they had created an “updated and refined peace framework” to end the war with Russia, after a row over an original US-backed document that included many of Moscow’s demands.The US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, said he was “very optimistic” about the progress of the talks in Switzerland.Rubio told reporters:“I think we made a tremendous amount of progress.We’ve really moved forward, so I feel very optimistic that we’re going to get there in a very reasonable period of time, very soon
Labour will listen to bosses’ concerns on workers’ rights, says business secretary
The business secretary, Peter Kyle, has opened the door to bosses to influence Labour’s landmark changes to workers’ rights, amid boardroom fears over jobs and growth.In a signal the government could consider watering down the overhaul of employment rights, Kyle told business leaders at the CBI conference in London that he would hold a series of 26 consultations with companies after the bill became law.“When we launch these consultations, please engage with it,” he said. “Make your voice heard and engage with me and my department to make sure we get it right.”With Labour under pressure to reboot the economy before the autumn budget on Wednesday, Kyle committed to ensure that businesses would not “lose” as a result of the changes, which include a ban on zero-hour contracts and day-one protections for workers against unfair dismissal
One in four unconcerned by sexual deepfakes created without consent, survey finds
One in four people think there is nothing wrong with creating and sharing sexual deepfakes, or they feel neutral about it, even when the person depicted has not consented, according to a police-commissioned survey.The findings prompted a senior police officer to warn that the use of AI is accelerating an epidemic in violence against women and girls (VAWG), and that technology companies are complicit in this abuse.The survey of 1,700 people commissioned by the office of the police chief scientific adviser found 13% felt there was nothing wrong with creating and sharing sexual or intimate deepfakes – digitally altered content made using AI without consent.A further 12% felt neutral about the moral and legal acceptability of making and sharing such deepfakes.Det Ch Supt Claire Hammond, from the national centre for VAWG and public protection, reminded the public that “sharing intimate images of someone without their consent, whether they are real images or not, is deeply violating”
Can’t tech a joke: AI does not understand puns, study finds
Comedians who rely on clever wordplay and writers of witty headlines can rest a little easier, for the moment at least, research on AI suggests.Experts from universities in the UK and Italy have been investigating whether large language models (LLMs) understand puns – and found them wanting.The team from Cardiff University, in south Wales, and Ca’ Foscari University of Venice concluded that LLMs were able to spot the structure of a pun but did not really get the joke.An example they tested was: “I used to be a comedian, but my life became a joke.” If they replaced this with: “I used to be a comedian, but my life became chaotic,” LLMs still tended to perceive the presence of a pun
Argentina lodge complaint and urge investigation into Tom Curry over alleged tunnel scuffle
Argentina have lodged a complaint and called for an investigation into the alleged tunnel scuffle involving the England flanker Tom Curry and their head coach, Felipe Contepomi, after Sunday’s game at Twickenham.In an extraordinary press conference after England’s 27-23 victory, Contepomi described Curry as a “bully” and accused the flanker of shoving him in the tunnel and telling him to “fuck off”. Contepomi also claimed Curry had “broken” the knee of the Argentina full-back Juan Cruz Mallía with a “reckless” tackle – an incident that seemed to spark the bad blood after the final whistle.Argentina have confirmed that Mallía has a torn anterior cruciate ligament in his right knee after Curry’s tackle. There is a 24-hour citing window for Six Nations Rugby – organiser of the Autumn Nations Series – to bring action against the England back-row for the tackle, while it can also begin disciplinary proceedings into the incident in the tunnel
How did McLaren get it so wrong with their cars in Las Vegas? | Giles Richards
As misjudgments go, McLaren’s error in calculations that led to the disqualification of Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri from the Las Vegas Grand Prix on Sunday could barely have been more cataclysmic nor more poorly timed. Quite how they got it wrong just when they wanted to close out the drivers’ championship with as little fuss as possible will take no little explanation.Norris and Piastri, second and fourth respectively to Max Verstappen’s win in Nevada, had been solid enough results until the FIA discovered the skid blocks on their cars had been worn beyond the 9mm limit. In one fell swoop, Verstappen was right back in the fight, alongside Piastri, 24 points back from Norris.It is exactly the sort of proximity to set nerves jangling unnecessarily with two meetings remaining and 58 points up for grabs
Kristen Bell and Brian Cox among actors shocked they’re attached to Fox News podcast
The Guide #218: For gen Zers like me, YouTube isn’t an app or a website – it’s the backdrop to our waking lives
Stephen Colbert on Trump v Epstein files: ‘Fighting tooth and cankle’
After 10 years talking to knights, squires and wizards, I understand why ren fairs are booming
Seth Meyers on Epstein files: ‘It’s obvious why Trump fought so hard to stop this bill from passing’
My cultural awakening: I moved across the world after watching a Billy Connolly documentary