‘Stole a charity’: Elon Musk accuses Sam Altman of betrayal in courtroom showdown
The trial pitting Elon Musk against Sam Altman and OpenAI began in dramatic fashion on Tuesday with opening arguments and the richest man in the world taking the stand to testify,Attorneys for the two tech moguls presented a California jury with two wildly different versions of the AI company’s history, while Musk accused his billionaire rival of endangering humanity through corporate deception,Musk’s suit argues that Altman, OpenAI and its president, Greg Brockman, broke a foundational agreement to better humanity when the non-profit pivoted towards a for-profit structure,In his opening statement, Musk’s attorney said Altman and Brockman “stole a charity”,Musk, who left OpenAI in 2018 after co-founding it with Altman and Brockman three years earlier, also alleges that his co-founders unjustly enriched themselves as the company raised billions of dollars and grew into the AI behemoth it is today.
OpenAI rejects all of Musk’s claims, stating his case is “motivated by jealousy” and characterizing him as an embittered co-founder seeking revenge after failing to take total control,OpenAI and its lawyers have also pointed out that Musk started his own rival AI company, xAI, casting his lawsuit as a vengeful attack by a competitor,The attorneys also claimed that Musk was well aware of his co-founders’ plans for the business,Following the opening statements from OpenAI and Musk’s lead counsels – as well as from Microsoft, which is named in the suit as OpenAI’s primary business partner – Musk’s lawyer called his client to testify,After Musk was sworn in, his lead attorney, Steven Molo, started his questioning by asking the billionaire why he brought this lawsuit.
“They’re gonna make this lawsuit very complicated, but it’s actually quite simple,” Musk said.“Which is, it’s not OK to steal a charity.That’s my view.”As he testified, Musk spoke directly to both the jury and his lawyer.Molo had Musk detail his career, starting from growing up in South Africa to founding SpaceX, Tesla, Neuralink and the Boring Company.
Musk said he typically works 80 to 100 hours a week and that he doesn’t own vacation homes or yachts.Molo asked Musk to describe AI.He said it’s software that gets “smarter and smarter” and that artificial general intelligence is technology that can become as smart as any human.“I think we are getting close to that point,” Musk said.“As soon as next year”.
When asked about his concerns around AI, Musk gave a well-known backstory about spending time with Larry Page, the co-founder of Google.Musk said he asked Page, “What if AI wipes out all humans?” and Page responded: “That’ll be fine as long as artificial intelligence survives.”Musk said he thought it was critical to have a counterpoint to Page and Google’s work on AI.He said he was very vocal about this among Silicon Valley circles and publicly.Musk said that after this Altman approached him about starting a venture to make safe AI to counter Page.
Musk testified he played a direct role in getting OpenAI off the ground.He said he drafted the initial press release announcing the formation of OpenAI and was instrumental in recruiting the world’s top AI engineers to join the company.Musk also said he connected OpenAI to the most influential people in the tech world, including Microsoft’s CEO, Satya Nadella, and Jensen Huang, the Nvidia co-founder.From the beginning, Musk said, he was not against a for-profit branch of OpenAI acting as a “small adjunct” to the non-profit.“I was not opposed to there being sort of a small for-profit to provide funding to the non-profit,” Musk testified, “as long as it was not the tail wagging the dog”.
Musk’s testimony is set to continue on Wednesday, along with cross-examination from OpenAI’s attorneys,William Savitt, the lead attorney representing Altman and Brockman, had started his opening statement by flipping Musk’s narrative about the founding of OpenAI on its head,“Mr,Musk comes to this court saying promises were made to him … that’s not why we’re here,” Savitt said,“We’re here because Mr.
Musk didn’t get his way at OpenAI.” Musk believed OpenAI should be a for-profit company since its early days, Savitt claimed.He said evidence will show that Musk promised $1bn in investments in OpenAI and came nowhere near reaching that pledge because he didn’t get “full control” of the company.“Musk never cared about whether OpenAI was a non-profit … what he cared about was Elon Musk being on top,” Savitt said.“Since he couldn’t control OpenAI, he left it, he left it for dead.
” Savitt alleged that when Altman and Brockman succeeded after they “stuck it out” and developed ChatGPT, Musk became furious.The attorney additionally claimed that Musk “didn’t really understand artificial intelligence very well”.“Because he’s a competitor”, Savitt said.“Mr Musk will do anything to attack OpenAI.”Microsoft’s counsel, Howard Ullman, meanwhile said in opening statements that the company has solely supported OpenAI in its work and that Musk’s claim that it aided and abetted OpenAI in a breach of charitable trust is completely false.
“Microsoft has been a responsible partner every step of the way,” Ullman said,The trial is a culmination of a years-long feud between Musk and Altman that has become increasingly vicious,As the trial started jury selection on Monday, Musk posted a stream of insults against Altman on X, the social media platform Musk owns, including repeatedly calling him “Scam Altman”,Musk also used his power over the platform to boost a post to followers that featured the New Yorker magazine’s unflattering investigation of Altman from earlier this month,The outcome of the case carries potentially enormous stakes for OpenAI, which is seeking to go public later this year at a valuation of about $1tn.
Musk is seeking to undo its corporate restructuring and force the removal of Altman as CEO and Brockman as president.He is also seeking about $134bn in damages, which he wants redistributed to OpenAI’s non-profit, which still oversees the company.On Monday, nine jurors were seated after a day-long selection process that included a questionnaire about their feelings towards AI and Musk.Many prospective jurors stated they had negative feelings about the Tesla CEO and thoughts about AI, while Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers assured the court that the case would not focus on technical details.“This is just a case about promises and breaches of promises, it won’t get technical at all,” Gonzalez Rogers said.
In the early hours of Tuesday morning, long lines snaked outside the Oakland federal courthouse as reporters, legal teams and court watchers waited to get inside,Musk and Altman passed through security around 15 minutes apart before the trial began,The trial is expected to last about three weeks,Other tech industry bigwigs who may testify include Nadella and Neuralink executive Shivon Zilis, who is also the mother of four of Musk’s children,
From the Pocket: The AFL’s deference to technology only creates more doubt and uncertainty
When Greg Swann was appointed executive general manager of football performance at the AFL, many saw him as the man to cure all the sport’s ills. He was one of those footy people known primarily by his nickname, a man who projected an air of knockabout affability, a man renowned for getting things done. He would apply “the pub test” to many of football’s most pressing issues: the draft, the rules, the umpiring, the AFL review centre (ARC). “Swanny”, we were assured, was the man who would make footy’s trains run on time.One of the first things Swann’s predecessor, Laura Kane, did in the role was embark on an overseas study tour
Ultramarathon swimmer sets record pace over 55km in crocodile-filled Australian river
Andy Donaldson and his team were aware of the dangers that lay ahead, but just in case a reminder was needed, a huge 2.5-metre freshwater crocodile waiting at the start ramp ahead of his longest-ever solo swim put the challenge into stark focus.Donaldson, a British-Australian ultramarathon swimmer, was about to embark on the 55km Dam to Dam Challenge from Lake Argyle to Kununurra in the East Kimberley, hoping to become the first man to complete the gruelling endurance swim.Adding to the difficulty was the fact the Ord River in remote Western Australia is well known for its reptilian inhabitants; the freshwater crocodile population numbers 5,500 – one croc for every 10 metres of his swim.Fortunately for the 35-year-old, freshwater crocodiles are smaller and more timid than their saltwater counterparts – the world’s largest reptiles – and unlikely to approach humans
Cardinals ‘heartbroken’ after former defensive end Josh Mauro dies at age of 35
Former Arizona Cardinals and New York Giants defensive end Josh Mauro has died at the age of 35.Mauro’s father, Greg, confirmed the news in a post on Facebook.“With many tears and broken hearts, yet anchored in the unshakable certainty that our precious Josh Mauro is now healed and made new — living in the presence of the Lord — we humbly covet your prayers as our family walks through the devastating loss of our amazing son, brother, uncle, grandson and friend,” Greg Mauro wrote. “On Thursday, April 23rd, Josh breathed his last breath on this earth and his first breath in heaven.”Two of Mauro’s former teams, the Cardinals and Raiders, paid tribute to the player
West Ham urged to show ‘heart and soul’ over London 2029 World Athletics bid
The head of the London Marathon has urged West Ham to show more “heart and soul” amid fears they could scupper Britain’s chances of hosting the 2029 World Athletics Championships.While London’s bid is seen as the favourite, it has hit a major stumbling block with West Ham refusing to give up their stadium for around two weeks in September 2029 because the football season will be under way.Hugh Brasher, who is part of the London 2029 bid team, admitted that the situation was further complicated by the Hammers facing relegation and the departure of the club’s vice-chair, Karren Brady.“Football is an interesting, very tribal, sport,” said Brasher. “Money talks
‘It’s a gamechanger’: Lewis Hamilton’s groundbreaking Mission 44 recruits working in F1
Sports people can be more than the sum of their athletic achievements. Lewis Hamilton stands unquestionably as one of the greatest drivers in the history of Formula One having delivered records and outstanding performances that will be hard to surpass. Yet it is indicative of his character that the seven-time world champion rates them all as sitting only alongside what might ultimately be his most significant and long-lasting legacy. His Mission 44 foundation is making an indelible impact on the makeup of motorsport.“Talent is everywhere, opportunity isn’t and that’s what we’re here to change
‘Like cutting the head off a hydra’: how Mary Cain exposed Nike’s disgraced coaching team
“As someone who has lost touch with reality, I like to hold a firm grasp on it now,” Mary Cain says while we walk through a palm-tree spotted campus in California.She’s telling me why she insisted she write her own memoir, This Is Not About Running, without ceding the narrative to a ghostwriter, as happens with many athletes. “My story is so complicated … there are so many bad actors that I think it forces the reader to embrace nuance, and I don’t think you see that very often.”At 29, Mary Cain is a decade removed from her experience as the United States’ highest hope for a middle-distance track star since Mary Decker smashed women’s world records up and down the stat sheet in the 1970s and 80s.Cain set four different national high school records as a teen, and as a 17-year old made the world championships in the 1500m, finishing 10th in a field of pros
Farage’s attempt to get ahead of £5m gift story only raises more questions
Lib Dems push for ban on MPs taking money from X, citing Maga threat
The bridesmaid ban: how the Home Office tarnished a British citizen’s big day – and cost them £2,000
Exclusive: Nigel Farage was given undisclosed £5m by crypto billionaire in 2024
Reform’s Scottish leader called ‘tone deaf’ after boasting about his houses, cars and yachts
Starmer sees off major Labour rebellion over call for Mandelson inquiry