Cricket nerds love precedent so maybe England can channel spirit of Lord’s 2005

A picture


The parallels are imperfect but, as with Michael Vaughan’s Ashes winners, hyper-aggressive cricket with a tweaked approach in the second Test is the 2025 cohort’s only chance of winningTwenty years on, a montage of the 2005 Ashes still tingles the spine.Close your eyes and you can probably make your own, with an Embrace soundtrack if you want to be right on the nose.Chances are you’ll see Kevin Pietersen and Andrew Flintoff belting sixes with lusty abandon; Geraint Jones wheeling away after winning the epic Edgbaston Test; Ashley Giles calmly patting the winning runs at Trent Bridge; Flintoff’s messianic dismissal of Ricky Ponting at Edgbaston; Simon Jones detonating Michael Clarke’s off stump at Old Trafford.All those moments came in England victories or winning draws.But no 2005 montage is complete without images of Ponting being cut below the eye or Justin Langer’s right elbow ballooning in real time.

Both wounds were inflicted by Steve Harmison on the first morning at Lord’s, a game that Australia won emphatically by 239 runs.When the story of the series was written, those blows – and the way England duffed Australia up in the first innings – were an essential chapter.The hope for England fans is that any montages of the 2025-26 Ashes will include similar moments from Perth: Steve Smith being hit twice on the elbow and once on the hand, Cameron Green wobbling like a drunken sailor after wearing a beauty from Mark Wood on the side of the head.On Saturday, as two nations tried to make sense of the first two-day Ashes Test in more than a century, dozens of emails were sent to the Guardian’s over-by-over coverage.One, from Tom Van der Gucht, countered the prevailing view among England fans that the apocalypse was due before sundown.

“I have a feeling this is our Lord’s 2005 moment and we’ll come back and win the series from here,” he wrote.“Our bowlers, for at least one innings, went toe to toe while our batters effectively blew it with a rush of blood to the head.Australia are there for the taking.You mark my words …”Cricket nerds love a precedent.In this case, England fans will cling to anything that doesn’t involve a wearingly familiar story: England lose the first Test in Australia, then the second, then the third …The parallels with Lord’s 2005 are compelling if imperfect.

Some of the details have been twisted, like dreams in a David Lynch film.In that game, for example, it was Australia who batted first and drowned in testosterone, bowled out for 190 in 40.2 overs.An immense bowling performance on the first evening – in this case by Glenn McGrath rather than the entire England attack – gave them a first-innings lead.This is where the stories diverge: Australia batted England out of the game in the third innings, with Clarke strumming 91 from 106 balls.

They won handsomely in the end, but like Perth the victory was built on individual greatness (for Mitchell Starc and Travis Head, read McGrath and to an extent Clarke in 2005) rather than a complete team performance.In both Tests, a much-hyped England pace attack showed they could unsettle and unseat the Australian batters.Smith hasn’t struggled as much in a Test innings since he was a leg-spinner who batted a bit.In 2005 England didn’t really wound the Australian batters after Lord’s – partly because that was the liveliest pitch, mainly because the physical threat, unprecedented for an England attack against Australia, had been established.There was also, hiding in plain sight, a detail that would define the series.

In an otherwise poor individual performance – “I bottled it” – Flintoff dismissed Adam Gilchrist twice.For the rest of the series, Flintoff was the bogeyman’s bogeyman.There are no obvious parallels at Perth but then we didn’t appreciate the significance of Flintoff’s wickets at the time.Harry Brook’s first-innings fifty also had echoes of Kevin Pietersen’s outrageous batting (57 and 64 not out in totals of 155 and 180), including a gobsmacking six off Australia’s postage-stamp seamer.Most of all, on both occasions there were industrial quantities of opprobrium.

England – who went into the 2005 series on a run of 14 wins in 18 Tests, all achieved playing ultra-aggressive cricket – were savaged after Lord’s.They were just another English Ashes shower: “a bunch of drips” according the Mirror, “Vaughan Again Losers” in the Sun.Between Tests, the captain, Michael Vaughan, bowled twice at Lord’s, met the coach, Duncan Fletcher, to do some technical work in the nets.They kept talking about how submissive, Pietersen aside, England’s batting had been at Lord’s.“The loss in the first Test actually was the switch,” said Fletcher later.

“We said: ‘Enough is enough now.If we carry on like this we will get drilled again.’”With McGrath absent – another twisted detail, given Pat Cummins may return at Brisbane – England skedaddled to 132 for one from 27 overs on the first morning at Edgbaston.They eventually belted 407 from 79.2 overs, an unprecedented onslaught at the time; their approach veered from calculated risk to giddy recklessness.

“The manner in which we played on that first day was the turning point of the entire series,” said Vaughan.Stokes’s team crave a similar turning point, but they are not for turning.At Perth last week they were ultimately beaten by an all-time-great innings from Head, the platonic ideal of Bazball.He just had a much smarter gameplan.First Test, Lord'sAustralia 190 (Harmison 5-43) and 384 (Clarke 90, Katich 67, Martyn 65)England 155 (Pietersen 57, McGrath 5-53) and 180 (Pietersen 64*, McGrath 4-29)Australia won by 239 runsSecond Test, EdgbastonEngland 407 (Trescothick 90, Pietersen 71, Flintoff 68) and 182 (Flintoff 73, Warne 6-46)Australia 308 (Langer 82, Ponting 61) and 279 (Lee 43*, Flintoff 4-79)England won by two runsFletcher’s quote from 2005 can be adapted to suit this team’s wants and needs.

Hyper-aggressive cricket is their only chance of winning in Australia, but they also need to tweak their approach,If, at Brisbane, they continue driving on the up well wide of off stump, they will get drilled again,And if that happens, the montages of the 2025-26 Ashes will be full of English batters getting out, not their bowlers landing symbolic blows on day one of the series,
businessSee all
A picture

Energy minister says UK must ‘do whatever it takes’ to avoid gas supply crisis

The UK energy minister has said the country must “do whatever it takes” to avoid a gas supply crisis after advisers warned of the risk of a shortage hitting homes and businesses by the end of the decade.Michael Shanks promised the government would “redouble our efforts to decarbonise” the economy and make sure the UK had enough gas storage and import capacity, saying the previous government had failed to plan for shortages.The minister offered assurances after the official energy system advisers warned that Britain could face a gas supply crisis by 2030 and the government should draw up plans to guard against the looming threat.The National Energy System Operator (Neso) warned ministers to address an “emerging risk to gas supply security” that could mean homes and businesses going without gas during a prolonged period of cold weather.“Such scenarios are unlikely,” Shanks said

A picture

Economists warn budget built on ‘shaky foundations’; December UK interest rate cut looks more likely – as it happened

Some UK bond yields are now moving a little higher, as the City continues to analyse the budget.The yield (or interest rate) on 10-year gilts has gained four basis points to 4.46% today, which erodes around half of the recovery in yields yesterday.Investors will have noted that while the spending increases in the budget happen quite soon, the tax rises are more back-loaded.As City firm TS Lombard put it:Tightening is mostly kicked into the back-end of the forecast period, with policy actually adding to borrowing in the next few years

A picture

Daily Mail’s parent company on ‘credit watch’ over Telegraph takeover

The Daily Mail’s parent company has been warned it could face a credit downgrade if it loads up with debt to fund its £500m takeover of the Telegraph titles.The US credit ratings agency S&P Global Ratings said Rothermere Continuation Holdings Ltd (RCHL) – the Jersey-based parent company of Lord Rothermere’s assets including the Daily Mail, Mail on Sunday, Metro and the i Paper – had been put on “credit watch” as it seeks to put a funding package in place to table a formal deal in the coming weeks.“The detail and funding of the transaction remain unclear but, in our view RCHL has limited headroom under our BB- long-term issuer credit rating to accommodate any additional financial debt, considering its limited size and the fact that Telegraph Media Group (TMG) operates in structurally challenged newsprint and advertising markets,” S&P analysts said in the note.The note said that given the significant valuation of TMG at £500m, compared with RCHL’s “modest size and scale”, S&P believed the transaction might “materially increase its adjusted leverage beyond our threshold”.On Saturday, Rothermere’s Daily Mail and General Trust (DMGT) announced a £500m deal with RedBird IMI to buy the Telegraph titles

A picture

Debenhams boss could receive almost £150m if he turns around struggling retailer

The boss of Boohoo and Debenhams could collect almost £150m in shares if he significantly boosts the value of the struggling fashion group, which is battling to turnaround sliding sales.Debenhams Group said on Thursday that Dan Finley, the chief executive, is in line to receive £148.1m in stock in five years’ time, as part of an incentive scheme for top bosses worth more than £200m.The scheme emerged as Debenhams Group said sales slumped 23% to £297m in the six months to 31 August, dragged down by a 41% dive in sales at its “youth brands”, which include Boohoo and Pretty Little Thing. Sales at its Karen Millen brand fell by 31%

A picture

Soup firm Campbell’s dismisses executive over alleged ‘poor people’ comments

Campbell’s has dismissed an executive who allegedly referred to the soup company’s products as being made for “poor people” and denigrated its Indian employees.Martin Bally, who was the vice-president of Campbell’s information technology department, was recorded making the alleged comments by another employee.Campbell’s – which started producing canned condensed soup in 1897, and whose cans feature in some of Andy Warhol’s best-known 1960s pop artworks – said it had reviewed the recording and believed the voice to belong to Bally.Campbell’s made “highly processed food” and “shit for fucking poor people”, Bally reportedly told a former employee, Robert Garza, according to a wrongful termination lawsuit filed by Garza.In an hour-long rant, broadcast by a Michigan TV station, Bally goes on to say: “Who buys our shit? I don’t buy Campbell’s products barely any more

A picture

‘The customers are still there’: Welsh mussel farmers hope post-Brexit reset can revive business

Rising out of the water, nets bulge with thousands of blue mussels. Pulled back to the dredging boat, they are emptied into a hopper and rinsed with water.They have just been harvested fresh from the bottom of the Menai Strait, the channel that separates the north Wales mainland from the island of Anglesey.On a blustery, damp morning, skipper Alan Owen guides the 43-metre Valente out of Port Penrhyn, close to the city of Bangor, towards the mussel grounds around the pier.“It’s windy today but we’re not jumping up and down as there aren’t big waves