When women fight: Taylor v Serrano and the meaning of choice in the ring

A picture


There are two salient pictures of the Katie Taylor–Amanda Serrano trilogy: Taylor walking to the ring on Friday night under the green, orange and white bars of light, her neck like a tree trunk, eyes fixed ahead with stoic grandeur as Even Though I Walk played overhead – and the image, hours earlier, of Yulihan Luna bloodied and bruised, standing beside a ring girl whose hoisted breasts had been shellacked in oil, smiling rigidly at a camera that wasn’t looking at the fighter.That’s boxing.That’s also being a woman.At Madison Square Garden – half cathedral, half Thunderdome – Katie Taylor approached the ring like a martyr.Her arms stayed low and still, her expression stony, the moment at once subdued and transcendent.

I am not religious,I was personally rooting for Serrano,But when I heard that worship music and saw Taylor ascend and bow between the ropes, I seemed to see stars as tears blurred the lights of the Garden’s lofted ceiling into a constellation: The Fighter,A spectacle like this ought to be mawkish,But it isn’t.

Because when the song ends, two women risk their legacies, their health, their lives – however unlikely – to feel something like greatness.And unlike most sports, in boxing, the risk is not metaphorical.The danger is useless.It protects no country.No one is conscripted.

But it underwrites everything that feels noble about this violent, anachronistic art.And when women, historically deemed too fragile to fight, headline an iconic arena that has never before granted them that right, the danger takes on a new meaning.They say styles make fights.They also make stories.Taylor, the pride of Ireland, is all monkish discipline and point-winning speed.

Serrano, the southpaw from Puerto Rico by way of Brooklyn, combines firepower with grit.One boxed her way through 15 years of amateur pedigree, the other turned pro at 19 and never looked back.Both are in their mid-30s, both single, both quiet.Sainted recluses with 17 world titles between them and a lifetime of sacrifice.If Taylor is the tactician, Serrano is the flamethrower.

This polarization is what produced lightning in the first two fights,But by Friday night, their plans of attack had changed,Serrano, seeking alternatives after two contentious decisions that didn’t go her way, tried to outbox the boxer,Taylor, burned before in brawls, circled and struck, then slipped away,From round one, it was clear: this was no longer a firestorm.

The fight bore more resemblance to Mayweather-Pacquiao than Ali-Frazier I.Smart.Tactical.Controlled.For some, disappointing.

But why do we need chaos to believe in a woman’s greatness?In other sports, I root for my team to win, ugly or not.But in women’s boxing, I confess to a double standard: I want glory and a good show.I want drama, blood, something irrefutable.That fear – that if women don’t entertain, the sport will vanish – lingers like smoke above the ring.But Taylor and Serrano were not performing for our approval.

They were fighting to win.This, in itself, is progress.True equality in boxing is not the right to inspire.It’s the right to be boring.To clinch and move.

To fight safe.To win ugly.Taylor-Serrano III wasn’t transcendent because it was thrilling.It was transcendent because it didn’t have to be.And yet boxing remains a sport of contradictions.

To protect yourself, you must risk everything.To gain glory, you court death.And still – some would deny women the choice to do so.When Amanda Serrano and more than a dozen elite fighters issued a joint call last year for 12 three-minute rounds – the same as men – they framed it not as a demand, but as a right: “We have earned the CHOICE,” they said.The irony is that boxing is one of the only spaces in Western society where a woman can risk her life and be compensated.

But even then, OnlyFans logos hover over ring posts and girls in bikinis parade cards while bloodied fighters wait for judgment.Fans call the athletes they flew across oceans to support “autistic lesbians”.Serrano gets seven figures.Some women on the undercard get $1,500 and no health insurance – turning, more ironic still, to OnlyFans for financial security.What do we mean when we talk about choice?We fight for a woman’s right to have a child – or not.

But what about the right to bleed for nothing more than self-belief? What about the right to hurt for glory, not survival? Women are told their bodies are sacred, but only in service of others – children, husbands, God,In boxing, they reclaim them,Not for nurture, but for risk,Not for life, but for something more defiant,Not Madonna.

Not whore.Something else.Katie Taylor and Amanda Serrano did not ask for sainthood.They asked for a trilogy.They made history, then made it again, then closed the book.

Now, whether Friday night becomes a watershed or a footnote is not up to them.But for those of us watching, feeling the hush before the bell, the flutter of green, orange, red and blue fabric, the rush when Taylor’s glove was raised and an Irish flag drifted gently down from the upper seats – whether Catholic or atheist, Irish or Puerto Rican, man, woman, or something in between – these two ensured one thing:Watching them time after time after finally time again will do something more than impress you.It will resolve contradictions – between styles, between images of a fight, between even life and death – into a single indelible reckoning.
technologySee all
A picture

Teach First job applicants will get in-person interviews after more apply using AI

One of the UK’s biggest recruiters is accelerating a plan to switch towards more frequent face-to-face assessments as university graduates become increasingly reliant on using artificial intelligence to apply for jobs.Teach First, a charity which fast-tracks graduates into teaching jobs, said it planned to bring forward a move away from predominantly written assignments – where AI could give applicants hidden help – to setting more assessments where candidates carry out tasks such as giving “micro lessons” to assessors.The move comes as the number of people using AI for job applications has risen from 38% last year, to 50% this year, according to a study by the graduate employment specialist Bright Network.Patrick Dempsey, the executive director for programme talent at Teach First, said there had been a near-30% increase in applications so far this year on the same period last year, with AI playing a significant role.Dempsey said the surge in demand for jobs was partly due to a softening in the labour market, but the use of automation for applications was allowing graduates to more easily apply for multiple jobs simultaneously

A picture

‘Workforce crisis’: key takeaways for graduates battling AI in the jobs market

ChatGPT can certainly write your university essay – but will it take your job soon after? Rapid advances in artificial intelligence have given rise to fears that the technology will make swathes of the workforce redundant.Graduates are seen as particularly vulnerable because entry-level jobs such as form-filling and basic data entry are strongly associated with the “drudge work” that AI systems – which perform tasks that typically have required human intelligence – could do instead.Over the past two and a half years the availability of such positions has dropped by a third, and last month it was reported that graduates are facing the toughest UK job market since 2018.The Guardian spoke to some of the UK’s biggest recruitment agencies and employment experts for their views on the impact of AI on current and future opportunities for those entering the jobs market. Here are six key takeaways from what they said:A shifting graduate labour market is not unusual, said Kirsten Barnes, head of digital platform at Bright Network, which connects graduates and young professionals to employers

A picture

Louis Vuitton says UK customer data stolen in cyber-attack

Louis Vuitton has said the data of some UK customers has been stolen, as it became the latest retailer targeted by cyber hackers.The retailer, the leading brand of the French luxury group LVMH, said an unauthorised third party had accessed its UK operation’s systems and obtained information such as names, contact details and purchase history.The brand, which last week said its Korean operation had suffered a similar cyber-attack, told customers that no financial data such as bank details had been compromised.“While we have no evidence that your data has been misused to date, phishing attempts, fraud attempts, or unauthorised use of your information may occur,” the email said.The company said it had notified the relevant authorities, including the Information Commissioner’s Office

A picture

The CEO who never was: how Linda Yaccarino was set up to fail at Elon Musk’s X

In May 2023, when Linda Yaccarino, an NBC advertising executive, joined what was then still known as Twitter, she was given a tall order: repair the company’s relationship with advertisers after a chaotic year of being owned by Elon Musk. But just weeks after she became CEO, Musk posted an antisemitic tweet that drove away major brands such as Disney, Paramount, NBCUniversal, Comcast, Lionsgate and Warner Bros Discovery to pause their advertising on the platform. Musk delivered an apology for the tweet later at a conference – which he called the worst post he’s ever done – but it came with a message to advertisers, specifically the Disney CEO Bob Iger: “Go fuck yourselves.” Yaccarino was in the audience of the conference.“I don’t want them to advertise,” he said

A picture

AI-generated child sexual abuse videos surging online, watchdog says

The number of videos online of child sexual abuse generated by artificial intelligence has surged as paedophiles have pounced on developments in the technology.The Internet Watch Foundation said AI videos of abuse had “crossed the threshold” of being near-indistinguishable from “real imagery” and had sharply increased in prevalence online this year.In the first six months of 2025, the UK-based internet safety watchdog verified 1,286 AI-made videos with child sexual abuse material (CSAM) that broke the law, compared with two in the same period last year.The IWF said just over 1,000 of the videos featured category A abuse, the classification for the most severe type of material.The organisation said the multibillion-dollar investment spree in AI was producing widely available video-generation models that were being manipulated by paedophiles

A picture

Children limiting own smartphone use to manage mental health, survey finds

Children are increasingly taking breaks from their smartphones to better manage their mental health, personal safety and concentration spans, research has revealed.They are reacting to growing concerns that spending too much time online can be harmful by taking control of their own social media and smartphone use rather than relying on parents to enforce limits, according to experts.The number of 12- to 15-year-olds who take breaks from smartphones, computers and iPads rose by 18% to 40% since 2022, according to the audience research company GWI, drawing on a survey of 20,000 young people and their parents across 18 countries.Prof Sonia Livingstone, the director of the LSE’s Digital Futures for Children centre, said these findings were echoed in soon to be published research, which has found that children and young people are trying various options to manage how their online lives affect their wellbeing, including taking a break from social media, distracting themselves from negativity online, seeking more positive experiences on the internet and in some cases quitting social media altogether.Livingstone said: “Children have got the message – from their parents, the media, their own experiences – that too much social media isn’t always good for them