Lando Norris rules out asking McLaren for team orders to help F1 title bid

A picture


Lando Norris would not want McLaren to have to use team orders to aid him in winning his first world championship at the season finale in Abu Dhabi this weekend,Both he and his teammate, Oscar Piastri, insisted they had not yet discussed the potential use of orders for the decisive grand prix,Norris goes into the 24th and final race of the season as favourite but still in a close, high-pressure fight with Red Bull’s Max Verstappen and Piastri, enjoying a 12-point lead on Verstappen and 16 on Piastri,Norris will take his first title if he finishes in front of both his rivals or claims third place or better,Verstappen would need to win and hope Norris finishes outside the podium places while Piastri would need to win and have Norris finish sixth or lower.

The question of team orders and McLaren’s attempts to be scrupulously fair to both drivers by allowing them to race has been a major point of debate all season.However, when asked about the possibility of team orders being implemented for Piastri to cede to Norris should Verstappen otherwise be able to win, the British driver insisted he believed it would not be fair to ask his teammate to do so.“No, not been discussed,” he said.“Honestly, I would love it.But I don’t think I would ask it.

It’s up to Oscar if he would allow it.I don’t think it’s necessarily down to me.It’s the same if it’s the other way around.“Would I be willing to or not? Personally, I think I would, just because I feel like I’m always like that and that’s just how I am.But it’s not really up to me and I’m not going to ask it.

I don’t want to ask it because I don’t think it’s necessarily a fair question.If that’s how it ends and Max wins, then, well, that’s it.Congrats to him and I look forward to next year.”The team’s position has always been that they would let their driver’s race freely while both were still in the title fight.However, they have intervened in order to maintain pre-agreed arrangements.

At Monza, McLaren had Piastri cede a place to Norris, which the British driver lost through a slow pit stop.After the last round in Qatar the McLaren team principal, Andrea Stella, said the team would discuss relevant scenarios so all parties were clear going into the final round.There is no doubt McLaren want to secure their first world championship since 2008, when Lewis Hamilton won.The most likely scenario where Piastri might be required to give way to his teammate would be if Verstappen was leading with Piastri third and Norris fourth and the pair switching would ensure the British driver secured the title.With the three title protagonists lined up together in the press conference at the Yas Marina circuit on Thursday, sat beside the trophy one of them will win on Sunday night, Piastri added that he had yet to be apprised of the team’s expected position.

“It’s not something we’ve discussed,” he said.“Until I know what’s expected, I don’t really have an answer.”Aware of the importance of the weekend, McLaren cancelled Norris’s usual session of speaking to the British media, which takes place on the Thursday before every race, with the 26-year-old doubtless happy to not have to answer more questions about his title chances.However, in the official press conference he did address what it would mean to him to win it.“This has been my whole life, it’s everything I’ve worked towards my whole life, so it would mean the world to me, it would mean the world to everyone that’s supported and pushed me for the 16 years of my life,” he said.

“It would mean everything,It would mean my life until now has been a success and I’ve accomplished that dream I had when I was a kid,”Mercedes’ George Russell, meanwhile, said it would be “unacceptable” to ask Piastri to move aside and sacrifice his own title ambitions even if that meant Verstappen won the title,“I don’t think it’s acceptable or reasonable to ask a driver who’s also in a shot of a championship in the very last race to move over for your teammate,” Russell said,“They both need to be given a shot and if they lose out because of it, you just need to say the other guy did a better job and that’s racing.

politicsSee all
A picture

No 10 to delay four England mayoral elections amid accusations of ‘cancelling democracy’

Ministers are to postpone elections for new mayors in four parts of England, prompting accusations from opposition parties that Downing Street is “cancelling democracy”.Newly created mayoralties in Greater Essex, Norfolk and Suffolk, Hampshire and the Solent, and Sussex and Brighton will be first contested in 2028 under the plans, ministers confirmed on Thursday.The government argued that the areas needed more time to complete their local government reorganisation, but faced criticism from opposition parties and the Labour former local government minister.Jim McMahon, who was removed as a minister in September, said his party needed “to be better than this” and had “a moral and a legal obligation to honour its side of the bargain”.Criticising the postponement in the Commons, he said: “All involved had a reasonable expectation that these elections would go ahead, and the government knows that trust is hard won but is easily squandered

A picture

Nigel Farage denies saying anything racist ‘with malice’ as he attacks BBC

Nigel Farage has denied saying anything racist “with malice” in his latest attempt to address allegations of abuse made by numerous of his contemporaries at school.The Reform leader declined to call his accusers liars, but lost his cool as he turned his fire on the BBC for questioning him about alleged antisemitic comments.He became increasingly angry as was asked by the BBC about his deputy leader, Richard Tice, saying the testimony of his former classmates was “made-up twaddle” and lies.Tice had earlier been questioned by the BBC’s Emma Barnett, who pressed the politician on Farage’s “relationship with Hitler”, in relation to allegations from a Jewish former classmate that Farage had said to him: “Hitler was right,” or “Gas them.”In response, Farage launched a tirade against the BBC and said he would no longer speak to the broadcaster, calling it “despicable” and “beyond belief”

A picture

Nigel Farage urged to sack Reform council leader accused of racism

Nigel Farage has been urged to sack a Reform UK council leader accused of racism over social media posts including one saying a black British lawyer should have “F’d off back to Nigeria”.Ian Cooper, the leader of Staffordshire county council, allegedly called Sadiq Khan, the London mayor, a “narcissistic Pakistani” and said migrants were “intent on colonising the UK, destroying all that has gone before”.In a post attacking the justice secretary, David Lammy, this year, Cooper allegedly wrote: “No foreign national or first generation migrant should be allowed to sit in parliament.”Reform UK said on Wednesday it had launched an urgent internal investigation into the council leader’s “non-disclosure of social media accounts”.Cooper, who has not responded to the allegations, was Reform’s parliamentary candidate for Tamworth in a byelection in 2023 and again in last year’s general election

A picture

Crypto investor gives £9m to Reform UK as donations exceed those to Tories

Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party has received a £9m donation from Christopher Harborne, a leading cryptocurrency investor, as well as £50,000 from the wife of the owner of the Daily Mail.Harborne, who also has interests in defence and aviation fuel, gave the record donation to Reform over the summer in a boost to the party’s finances before its autumn conference.This year Reform became the first political party to accept donations in crypto but the £9m was made in cash rather than digital currency.The size of Harborne’s gift to Reform prompted campaign groups including Spotlight on Corruption and Transparency International to renew calls for a cap on political donations.The donation was revealed in new figures from the Electoral Commission, which showed Reform bringing in millions more than either the Conservatives or Labour

A picture

Peer suspended from House of Lords was allegedly paid $1m in ‘corrupt’ deal

A peer suspended by the House of Lords for breaking lobbying rules is now facing claims that he received at least $1m (£760,000) from an allegedly corrupt deal.Lord Evans of Watford, a longtime Labour peer, was found last week by the House of Lords watchdog to have broken its rules four times after undercover reporting by the Guardian, and will be suspended for five months.The peer was caught in a cash-for-access venture offering to introduce undercover reporters to fellow parliamentarians.Now it can be revealed that he is separately facing legal action over payments that he and others received as directors of a UK investment firm that managed assets based in Kazakhstan.Court documents show that Evans and the other directors have been accused by a former executive of “personally enriching themselves” by pocketing millions in alleged illicit payments

A picture

Reform deputy leader dismisses claims of Farage’s past racism as new witnesses come forward

Reform UK’s deputy leader has described a celebrated film director and a large and growing group of corroborating witnesses as liars over their allegations of Nigel Farage’s teenage antisemitism and racism.With the bigotry row continuing to dog Reform, whose lead in the national polls has slipped in recent weeks, Richard Tice turned on those who claimed to have been abused and those who say they saw it.In an outspoken intervention, Tice described the testimony of about two dozen people who have spoken to the Guardian about Farage’s racism at Dulwich College as “made-up twaddle”.Among those who have made allegations are Peter Ettedgui, a Bafta- and Emmy-winning director, who is Jewish, and who has said that a teenage Farage would sidle up to him and say “Hitler was right” and “gas them”, sometimes adding a long hiss to simulate the sound of the gas chambers.The Guardian has spoken to eight school contemporaries who have corroborated Ettedgui’s account