More than 100 Labour MPs call on PM to stop assisted dying bill being blocked
More than 100 Labour MPs have called on Keir Starmer to stop the House of Lords from blocking the assisted dying bill and give it more time to return to the Commons, with the legislation now certain to fall owing to lack of time.The private member’s bill, sponsored by Labour’s Kim Leadbeater, seeks to give terminally ill people in England and Wales with less than six months to live the right to an assisted death.It will fall when the parliamentary session comes to an end in May because peers have used multiple amendments and lengthy debates to prevent it from being put to a vote.A number of ministerial aides – parliamentary private secretaries – are also believed to have written to the prime minister separately.Ministers have told the Guardian they have also made the case to Starmer, saying it would be a moment to show some leadership on an issue popular with the public as well as a way to demonstrate he will not allow the Lords to block the will of the elected House of Commons.
Opponents of the bill, who have submitted more than 1,200 amendments, say they are not deliberately filibustering and that it is unfit for purpose,In a private letter to Starmer, the Labour MPs wrote that he should ensure it returns to the Commons in the next session after the king’s speech,If it passes the Commons again, it would mean supporters could use the Parliament Act to bypass any further blocking by the Lords,It would be the first time the 1911 Parliament Act has been invoked for a private member’s bill,The letter said Starmer would not need to sacrifice government neutrality on the issue itself and said it was a fundamental democratic principle that the Lords should not block the will of the Commons.
The bill was passed by MPs in June last year with a majority of 23.To use the Parliament Act, supporters would either need to win the ballot for a new private member’s bill or Starmer could agree to give the bill government time to allow it to be voted on again in the Commons.The Lords has had more than 100 hours of debate but only half of the amendments have been covered after 11 days.There are only three more days allocated to the bill before the end of the session, where it would need to complete the report stage and third reading, as well as any amendments returned back from the Commons.Supporters of the bill said this was “effectively impossible”.
Starmer is also understood to have received letters urging him to give time to the bill from Conservative, Liberal Democrat, Green, Plaid Cymru and Reform MPs, bringing the total number to about 150.They argue that only a small number of peers opposed to the bill have laid the vast majority of amendments, which are being debated at a glacial pace.Lord Falconer, the bill’s sponsor in the second chamber, said there was “absolutely no hope” that it would make it on to the statute book in this session without a “fundamental change” in the tactics being employed by its opponents.The letter was coordinated by Peter Prinsley, a consultant doctor and the MP for Bury St Edmunds and Stowmarket.“A small number of peers have been using procedural tactics to block the bill in the House of Lords and it now appears very likely that they will prevent it returning to the Commons before the end of this session,” he wrote in the covering letter to the prime minister.
“While we fully respect the government’s neutrality on the principle of assisted dying, we are confident that you would agree with us that we cannot be neutral on the fundamental democratic principle that it is for the elected House of Commons to decide on this matter.“Our constituents, in every part of the country, strongly support a change in the law and it is clear to us that the issue must be resolved sooner rather than later.Our ask is simple.That, whether or not the bill returns through the private member’s bill ballot after the king’s speech, time will be found for parliament to come to a decision in the next session.It would remain a conscience issue for MPs, the government’s neutrality would be maintained and it need not take up time reserved for government business.
”MPs opposed to the bill said bringing it back would entrench its flaws.Labour MP Jess Asato said: “The sponsor of the bill has rejected 99% of suggested improvements and amendments in the House of Lords and so it still contains all the same faults and issues.We know this is true because the experts, such as the Royal Colleges and professionals, have told the Lords this.“Any MP that voted to push this Bill through would do so knowing that it is unsafe and would harm vulnerable people.”Starmer, who is a supporter of assisted dying, has thus far seemed disinclined to interfere to help the bill’s progress.
The Lib Dem MP Vikki Slade said it would be a “travesty for democracy and, more importantly, a tragedy for all those who are relying on the legislation and have waited so long, not least my own dad”.Starmer said he would not interfere further in the parliamentary process.“It is a matter of conscience,” the prime minister said last week.“It is for parliament to decide the passage of the legislation and any changes.Scrutiny is a matter for the other place.
We have a responsibility to make sure any legislation is workable, effective and enforceable.”
Jimmy Kimmel on Trump being gifted an Olympic medal: ‘Yet another award he didn’t win’
On Thursday night, late-night hosts discussed an odd White House women’s history month event, the fallout of the war on Iran and why Melania Trump is starting to sound an awful lot like her husband.Jimmy Kimmel spent a chunk of his Thursday night monologue on a White House women’s history month fundraiser hosted by Donald Trump. As part of the event, Melania Trump gave an extended introduction to the president.“You know how some couples as they get older start to sound alike?” asked Kimmel. “Well, while introducing her husband, Melania had an awful lot of nice things to say about herself
Seth Meyers on Pete Hegseth: ‘The face of a man war-fighting with his colon’
Late-night hosts dug into the Trump administration’s vague intentions for the war in Iran, the conflict’s oil-price effect and a Maga rally in Kentucky with Jake Paul.On Late Night, Seth Meyers checked in on Donald Trump’s now two-week-old war in Iran. “The president is maybe sort of threatening/teasing that he might put boots on the ground in Iran? But Republicans can’t seem to agree on whether they support that idea, or for how long, or why,” he explained.The confusion comes from the top: Pete Hegseth, the “defense secretary/morning show host/fifth-year senior who just found out that yeah, he’s gonna need to do a sixth year” who made a big deal about turning the defense department into “the department of war” and “refocusing on the core mission: war fighting”.“And before we go any further: was there a problem with the term ‘warfare’?” Meyers wondered
Sydney Biennale 2026: politics is everywhere – but with nuance, beauty and heart
According to its critics, this year’s Biennale of Sydney, under the leadership of Emirati artistic director Hoor Al Qasimi (the first Arab appointed to the role in the festival’s 53-year history) was destined to be a “hate Israel jamboree” at worst; a hotbed of pro-Palestinian politics at best. These fears – which appear to have originated from pro-Palestine statements Al Qasimi and her parents made in the past – are not borne out by the festival itself, which opens this weekend across five key venues, spanning from the inner city out to Penrith and Campbelltown.In an unusual move for the biennale, Al Qasimi wasn’t present at the vernissage – but with or without her, the resulting festival, the event’s 25th, is complex and nuanced. It’s light on spectacle and slogans; not a political chant but rather a polyphony of voices – more than 80 artists from 37 countries – singing their own songs. The theme, “Rememory” – taken from Toni Morrison’s novel Beloved – is reflected in works that look to the past to find answers to present dilemmas and envision better futures
Naples museum to allow visually impaired visitors to experience art through touch
The Sansevero Chapel Museum in Naples will allow dozens of visually impaired visitors to take part in a rare tactile experience, letting them touch celebrated works of art including the Veiled Christ, which is widely regarded as one of the most striking masterpieces in the history of sculpture.On 17 March, the museum will host an initiative called La meraviglia a portata di mano – Wonder within reach – organised in partnership with the Italian Union of the Blind and Visually Impaired of Naples, offering about 80 blind and partially sighted visitors a chance to encounter the marble masterpieces.Visitors will be guided through the chapel by guides who are also visually impaired in a programme designed to place accessibility at the centre of the museum experience.The protective barrier surrounding the sculptures will be removed, allowing participants, wearing latex gloves, to explore by touch the intricate marble surface of the sculptures including Giuseppe Sanmartino’s Veiled Christ, which depicts Jesus covered by a transparent shroud made from the same block as the statue. The tactile route will also extend to the reliefs at the feet of the sculptures La Pudicizia and Il Disinganno
Jimmy Kimmel on Pentagon splurging on doughnuts: ‘Is this My 600lb Defense Department?’
On late-night shows, hosts poked fun at the Trump administration’s inconsistent messaging on the Iran war, Pete Hegseth splurging on high-end food at the Pentagon and New York’s John F Kennedy Jr lookalike contest.On what Jimmy Kimmel called “day 11 of Jabba the Hutt’s war on Iran”, the host focused on Trump’s mixed messages over the Middle East conflict.“Trump said yesterday that the war could end very soon, which would be encouraging, had be not also told us he’d end the war in Ukraine in 24 hours,” said Kimmel.“He’s going to make a huge mess and walk away like it’s the new toilet in the Lincoln bathroom.”Kimmel then turned to reports that Pete Hegseth, the US defense secretary, spent $93bn of US taxpayer money last year, including millions of dollars in September on luxury food items: “$2m on Alaskan king crab, $6
Stephen Colbert on US war in Iran: ‘We’re still no closer to learning what the goal is’
Late-night hosts looked into the murky goals, economic impact and disrespect for military protocol of Donald Trump’s war in Iran.“We’re on day 10 of the Iran war,” said Stephen Colbert on Monday evening, “and we’re still no closer to learning what the goal is. Is it regime change? Is it ending a nuclear program? Is it changing the name to Donald Trump’s Iran-a-Lago?”“But we are learning more about the cost,” he noted, as the first week of the war alone is estimated to have cost about $6bn. “Do you know what you could buy with $6bn? Twenty-seven Kristi Noem horsey commercials!” he joked before clips of the very expensive, controversial ad campaign that likely ended Noem’s tenure as secretary of homeland security.Despite the exorbitant cost, Trump said over the weekend that this new surprise war would stop only after Iran’s “unconditional surrender”, to which Iran replied: “That’s a dream that they should take to their grave
Iowa State’s Audi Crooks is a velveteen unicorn – and March’s biggest matchup problem
Sydney Swans admit to altering Bondi attack tribute to omit mention of Jewish community
Cheltenham raised a cheer – but fatalities and fallouts tainted bounce-back festival
Still crazy: chaotic Six Nations showed the timeless appeal of great sporting drama | Robert Kitson
USA 2-1 Dominican Republic: World Baseball Classic semi-final – as it happened
Father and son amateur cricketers combine for mammoth partnership of 590