Anti-trafficking campaigner welcomes UK ban on strangulation in pornography

A picture


An anti-trafficking campaigner has welcomed the ban on pornography featuring strangulation, known as “choking”, saying it will help stop young people thinking it is a normal and safe practice.Samantha Browne, who suffered exploitation as a teenager in the adult industry, said the ban would help prevent children mimicking violent sex they have seen onscreen, and she hoped it would open the door to ending other forms of abusive pornography.The amendment to the crime and policing bill will make it a criminal offence to possess or publish porn featuring strangulation or suffocation.Platforms will have to take action to ensure it is not available to people in the UK.While critics said it would be difficult to police given that most porn consumed in the UK is produced overseas, Browne, a former adult performer who now delivers workshops in schools about consent and exploitation, said it would help children understand they did not need to carry out or tolerate abusive sex acts.

“The reality is that this industry is pushing abuse, it’s normalising abuse, and it’s now infiltrating our young people to the point of possible no return,” she said.Browne described being shocked when she visited a school and a child under 16 asked his teacher how to “choke a girl so that she doesn’t pass out”.“Kids are turning into abusers because this is what they’re seeing,” she said.“When’s it going to stop?”Though strangulation has become a mainstream act in porn, research shows it is fundamentally unsafe, as brain injuries can occur even when there is no loss of consciousness or visible sign of harm.Studies carried out specifically on women who have been repeatedly “choked” during sex show markers for brain damage and disruptions in brain hemispheres linked to depression and anxiety.

It is something Browne herself has suffered, after she was trafficked into the adult industry from the age of 16 and became a high-end performer, filming scenes all over the world.She featured on Babestation at the age of 17, despite it being illegal for children to act in pornography, and a few days after her 18th birthday was contacted by an agency that offered to sell her “first” videos, which are highly prized in the industry and usually feature the first time they film a particular sexual act.At the age of 18, she was strangled to the point of unconsciousness by a man who said he was doing it to help her manage the extreme pain she was suffering in a scene.Like most female performers, she was high on drugs and needed to take painkillers to tolerate filming certain scenes.“There’s a part of you I think internally, mentally and spiritually, that you have to cut off to be able to put your body through that,” she said.

Now 36, after leaving the industry at the age of 21, she has been responsible for convicting a man who groomed her,She also became a campaigner and runs a social enterprise, Diamond You Projects, which works with children to prevent exploitation,She believes the popularity of “choking”, and other abusive acts such as hitting and spitting, was due to porn becoming more extreme every year as users become desensitised to what they are seeing,“Do people really want to face the facts of where this is going and how dark it really is?”In researching the effects of porn, Browne has come across studies showing compulsive watchers being driven to “more hardcore” content,Men were frequently suffering erectile dysfunction as a result of their porn use and it was common for people to find they could no longer get aroused by their partner.

“That is part of the adult industry, it’s a weapon of mass destruction in my eyes,” she said.Though the porn industry is well known to be rife with exploitation, slavery and child sexual abuse, Browne has been criticised for campaigning against trafficking and extreme acts.She said: “I think it’s the one industry where human rights abuses are allowed and people are clapping for it at the same time.It’s wild.”
technologySee all
A picture

LOL: is this the ultimate texting faux pas (and what should you use instead)?

From abbreviations to happy poos, gen Z has strong opinions on appropriate texting behaviour. But can anyone keep up with the ever-changing rules?Name: “LOL”.Age: The Oxford English Dictionary first included LOL in 1997.Not to be confused with: Loll, which is what dogs sometimes do.So as in “laugh out loud”? Or laughing out loud, though David Cameron thought it stood for “lots of love” and used to sign off to Rebekah Brooks, the former Sun and News of the World editor, with a LOL

A picture

Elon Musk’s $1tn Tesla pay deal to be rejected by huge Norway wealth fund

Norway’s sovereign wealth fund has said it will vote against a $1tn (£765bn) pay package for the Tesla chief executive, Elon Musk.The fund, which is the biggest national wealth fund in the world, said that while it appreciated the “the significant value created under Mr Musk’s visionary role” it would vote against his performance award.“We are concerned about the total size of the award, dilution and lack of mitigation of key person risk – consistent with our views on executive compensation,” it said. “We will continue to seek constructive dialogue with Tesla on this and other topics.”The warning from Norges Bank, which is the seventh biggest single shareholder in Tesla with a stake worth $17bn, comes two days before the carmaker hosts its annual shareholder meeting

A picture

Apple Watch SE 3 review: the bargain smartwatch for iPhone

Apple’s entry level Watch SE has been updated with almost everything from its excellent mid-range Series 11 but costs about 40% less, making it the bargain of iPhone smartwatches.The Guardian’s journalism is independent. We will earn a commission if you buy something through an affiliate link. Learn more.The new Watch SE 3 costs from £219 (€269/$249/A$399), making it one of the cheapest brand-new fully fledged smartwatches available for the iPhone and undercutting the £369 Series 11 and the top-of-the-line £749 Apple Watch Ultra 3

A picture

Experts find flaws in hundreds of tests that check AI safety and effectiveness

Experts have found weaknesses, some serious, in hundreds of tests used to check the safety and effectiveness of new artificial intelligence models being released into the world.Computer scientists from the British government’s AI Security Institute, and experts at universities including Stanford, Berkeley and Oxford, examined more than 440 benchmarks that provide an important safety net.They found flaws that “undermine the validity of the resulting claims”, that “almost all … have weaknesses in at least one area”, and resulting scores might be “irrelevant or even misleading”.Many of the benchmarks are used to evaluate the latest AI models released by the big technology companies, said the study’s lead author, Andrew Bean, a researcher at the Oxford Internet Institute.In the absence of nationwide AI regulation in the UK and US, benchmarks are used to check if new AIs are safe, align to human interests and achieve their claimed capabilities in reasoning, maths and coding

A picture

OpenAI signs $38bn cloud computing deal with Amazon

OpenAI has signed a $38bn (£29bn) deal to use Amazon infrastructure to operate its artificial intelligence products, as part of a more than $1tn spending spree on computing power.The agreement with Amazon Web Services means OpenAI will be able to use AWS datacentres, and the Nvidia chips inside them, immediately.Last week, OpenAI’s chief executive, Sam Altman, said his company had committed to spending $1.4tn on AI infrastructure, amid concerns over the sustainability of the boom in using and building datacentres. These are the central nervous systems of AI tools such as ChatGPT

A picture

Oakley Meta Vanguard review: fantastic AI running glasses linked to Garmin

The Oakley Meta Vanguard are new displayless AI glasses designed for running, cycling and action sports with deep Garmin and Strava integration, which may make them the first smart glasses for sport that actually work.The Guardian’s journalism is independent. We will earn a commission if you buy something through an affiliate link. Learn more.They are a replacement for running glasses, open-ear headphones and a head-mounted action cam all in one, and are the latest product of Meta’s partnership with the sunglasses conglomerate EssilorLuxottica, the owner of Ray-Ban, Oakley and many other top brands