Pornography depicting strangulation to become criminal offence in the UK
Porn featuring strangulation or suffocation – often referred to as “choking” – is due to be criminalised, with a legal requirement placed on tech platforms to prevent UK users from seeing such material,Possessing or publishing porn featuring choking will become a criminal offence under amendments to the Crime and Policing bill tabled in parliament on Monday,In a separate amendment, victims of intimate image abuse will also have longer to come forward, with the time limit to prosecute extended from six months to three years,The government said this would help break down unnecessary barriers victims face when reporting a crime, “improving access to justice for those who need it the most”,The choking ban comes after a recommendation from a government review into pornography which found it has contributed to establishing strangulation as a “sexual norm”.
The independent porn review, conducted by Baroness Gabby Bertin, which was commissioned by former prime minister Rishi Sunak and published in February this year, recommended a ban on porn featuring strangulation.Research shows strangulation is never a safe practice, despite a widespread belief it can be performed safely.Though it often leaves no visible injury, oxygen deprivation, even for very short moments, causes changes to the fragile structures of the brain.Multiple studies have specifically shown brain changes in women who have been repeatedly “choked” during sex, including markers for brain damage and disruptions in brain hemispheres linked to depression and anxiety.Due to these dangers, non-fatal strangulation and non-fatal suffocation were made a criminal offence as part of the Domestic Abuse Act 2021, after concerns that perpetrators would often avoid punishment because they leave no visible marks.
Under the new amendment, platforms will be required to take proactive steps to prevent users from seeing illegal strangulation and suffocation content.The choking ban is set to become a priority offence, meaning porn sites and tech platforms will have a legal requirement to ensure UK users do not see this material.The Ministry of Justice said this could include companies using automated systems to pre-emptively detect and hide images, moderation tools or stricter content policies to prevent abusive content from circulating.Those who fail to take action will be subject to fines of up to £18m from Ofcom.Bernie Ryan, chief executive of the Institute For Addressing Strangulation, said the organisation welcomed the ban.
“While consenting adults have the right to explore their sexuality safely and freely, we must recognise the serious risks posed by unregulated online content, especially to children and young people.“Strangulation is a serious form of violence, often used in domestic abuse to control, silence, or terrify.When it’s portrayed in pornography, particularly without context, it can send confusing and harmful messages to young people about what is normal or acceptable in intimate relationships.Our research shows there is no safe way to strangle.”Minister for Victims and Tackling Violence Against Women and Girls, Alex Davies-Jones said online misogyny had “devastating real-life consequences for all of us”.
Every day, women and girls have their lives turned upside down by cowards who hide behind screens to abuse and exploit them.“This government will not stand by whilst women are violated online and victimised by violent pornography which is allowed to normalise harm.“We are sending a strong message that dangerous and sexist behaviour will not be tolerated.”It follows a UK government-commissioned review in 2020 that highlighted “substantial evidence of an association between the use of pornography and harmful sexual attitudes and behaviours towards women”.A separate survey of children the same year found that most of them had come across violent or aggressive pornography that they found upsetting or disturbing, with some of them copying the behaviour they had seen online.
Children who watched porn were between three and six times more likely to have “potentially dangerous behaviour” around consent, the research by the British Board of Film Classification found.
HMRC likely to have breached privacy laws in stopping child benefit – experts
Ministers may have breached privacy laws when they suspended the child benefit of thousands of families on the basis of flawed Home Office information, legal experts have said.At the same time, the UK’s data watchdog, the Information Commissioner’s Office, has contacted the national tax authority, HMRC, over the issues raised.Pressure on the government to reveal the reason incomplete Home Office travel data was used by HMRC as part of a benefit crackdown has mounted as the Liberal Democrat spokesperson for work and pensions, Steve Darling, said what had happened was “unacceptable”.“After the carers allowance repayments scandal, this news raises fresh concerns that things are seriously wrong within our welfare system, with people paying the price through no fault of their own.“Ministers must come clean on how exactly this error was allowed to happen in the first place, support affected families, and ensure that action will be taken to stop such mistakes from ever happening again
Zarah Sultana sets sights on replacing Labour and gaining power
The MP Zarah Sultana has said she hopes her new political party will ultimately replace Labour as she revealed she was committed to winning power.Sultana left the Labour party in July to form the new group, operating under the temporary name Your Party.Asked by Nick Robinson on his BBC podcast Political Thinking if she aimed with her new party to replace Labour, she said: “That’s the vision. We are the party of the left, and we have to build. And we’re starting from very humble beginnings
Tory patience wears thin as Badenoch’s critics count down to May elections
At an opulent speakeasy-style event at the Raffles hotel on Whitehall this week, the great and the good of what is left of the Conservative party marked the Spectator’s parliamentarian of the year awards.With the magazine’s editorial line still just about backing the Tories, despite the party facing an existential crisis from Reform UK, it was unsurprising that much of the gossip at the champagne-fuelled event was about whether Kemi Badenoch’s job was at risk.James Cleverly, who unsuccessfully ran against her for the leadership, couldn’t resist a dig from the stage at the naked ambition of his shadow cabinet colleague, Robert Jenrick – who is Badenoch’s biggest threat.“Am I after her job? Am I going to stick the knife between her shoulder blades and steal the crown? No, of course I’m not,” the veteran Tory cabinet minister told the laughing audience as he opened the awards ceremony.“You know that I’m not
Rachel Reeves considers 20% tax on assets of people deciding to leave UK
Rich people quitting the UK could be required to pay a 20% tax on their business assets as part of plans reportedly being considered by the chancellor, Rachel Reeves.The Treasury has drawn up plans for a “settling-up charge” on assets; a move that would bring the UK into line with most other G7 nations and raise a predicted £2bn for the public coffers, according to the Times.While expat status does not provide an exemption from 20% capital gains tax on the sale of UK property and land valued at £6,000 or more, it does on the sale of some other assets, such as shares in many companies.Under the new plans, the 20% charge would be levied on the value of these assets when exiting the country.A government source said the settling-up charge was one of several tax options being modelled by the Treasury before the budget – but stressed that no decisions had been taken
Ex-Tory member sues party over suspension for criticising Israel
A former Conservative member, whose grandfather was the archbishop of Jerusalem, is suing the party after he was suspended for making critical remarks about the state of Israel.Bruce MacInnes was told by Tory party officials that his “repeated allegation that Israel is committing genocide in Palestine” constituted “allegedly antisemitic”, “discriminatory” and “insensitive and highly offensive” language, which resulted in his suspension from the party last year.MacInnes, who says he did not initially know about the disciplinary proceedings despite the party claiming they had emailed him, is bringing legal action against the party for £30,000 in the high court for breach of contract and discrimination based on belief.The row has raised questions over freedom of speech within the party and has drawn criticism from former foreign minister Sir Alan Duncan who described the party’s treatment of MacInnes as “McCarthysim built on ignorance”.A member since 2018, MacInnes had often shared his views on the political situation in the Middle East on a WhatsApp group with other members
Keir Starmer keeps Trumps’ silver necklace gift – for a price
Keir Starmer has paid to keep a personalised silver necklace given to him by Donald and Melania Trump, transparency records show.The necklace was the only gift Starmer chose to keep after he hosted the US president for a historic second state visit in September.The Trumps also gave the prime minister a golf club and a set of silver cufflinks, both personalised, but these were retained by the Cabinet Office. A pair of cowboy boots, given to Starmer’s wife, Victoria, by the Trumps has also been held by the department.Under government rules, ministers cannot keep official gifts worth more than £140 unless they pay the difference between £140 and the gift’s value
Jimmy Kimmel on government shutdown: ‘There is no Republican plan for healthcare’
Steve Coogan says Richard III film was ‘story I wanted to tell’ as he agrees to libel settlement
From White Teeth to Swing Time: Zadie Smith’s best books - ranked!
Nobody Wants This to Lily Allen: the week in rave reviews
Stephen Colbert on ex-prince Andrew: ‘Pervert formerly known as prince’
A third of people in England believe in ghosts, survey finds