H
recent
H
HOYONEWS
HomeBusinessTechnologySportPolitics
Others
  • Food
  • Culture
  • Society
Contact
Home
Business
Technology
Sport
Politics

Food

Culture

Society

Contact
Facebook page
H
HOYONEWS

Company

business
technology
sport
politics
food
culture
society

CONTACT

EMAILmukum.sherma@gmail.com
© 2025 Hoyonews™. All Rights Reserved.
Facebook page

Could Trump really move World Cup games? The facts behind his threats

about 5 hours ago
A picture


Which time? Tuesday was the second time Trump has threatened to take away World Cup games from US host cities on the basis of their political leadership or opposition to his policies.However, it’s important to note that this suggestion of moving games is not something Trump has suggested organically, of his own volition.In both cases, the US president was responding to leading questions centered around the idea of moving games.On 25 September in an Oval Office event, a member of the White House press corps asked Trump about cities that have demonstrated against Trump’s use of federal agencies for immigration and crime crackdowns.The reporter mentioned Seattle and San Francisco as two cities that have seen demonstrations, and pointed out that both cities are World Cup hosts (though San Francisco is not a host city, but part of the San Francisco Bay Area that will host games at Levi’s Stadium in Santa Clara).

The reporter then asked Trump if the demonstrations could result in the loss of World Cup games from those host venues,“I guess, but we’re going to make sure they’re safe,” Trump said,“They’re run by radical left lunatics and that don’t know what they’re doing,” Later Trump said that Chicago would be safe for the World Cup after he sends in federal agencies in a similar manner as Washington DC,Chicago is not a 2026 World Cup host city.

“If any city we think is going to be even a little bit dangerous for the World Cup … we won’t allow it to go to it,We’ll move it around a little bit,” Trump said,Three weeks later, on 14 October, Trump was asked about another host city, Boston, even though the games themselves will be held in suburban Foxborough, Massachusetts,Towards the end of that day’s press event, a reporter asked Trump about a recent “street takeover” in Boston that saw police officers attacked and a police car set aflame, and if the concerns raised by the incident could result in the revocation of hosting duties for next year’s expanded 48-team soccer tournament,The reporter also asked if Trump would work with Michelle Wu, the Democratic mayor of Boston, to address the issue.

“We could take them away,” Trump said of the World Cup games.“Their mayor is not good … She’s radical left, and they’re taking over parts of Boston.That’s a pretty big statement, right?”Street takeovers, a social media-driven phenomenon that sees large crowds of people gather on city streets late at night to perform stunts in cars, have been a repeated nuisance in American cities since the Covid-19 pandemic shutdowns.Recent such gatherings have turned violent in Massachusetts, including in Boston.However, the gatherings are generally not seen as being tied to any particular political ideology, nor have they been touted as a large-scale safety concern for World Cup attendees.

“If someone is doing a bad job, and I feel there’s unsafe conditions, I would call Gianni [Infantino], the head of Fifa, who is phenomenal, and say let’s move it to another location,” Trump said on Tuesday,“And he would do that,He wouldn’t love to do it, but he’d do it,Very easily, he’d do it,”Later in that same event, Trump for the first time broached the possibility of moving the 2028 Olympics from Los Angeles as well.

“If I thought LA was not going to be prepared properly, I would move it to another location if I had to,” he said.“On that one I’d probably have to get a different kind of a permission, but we would do that.”In short: No.At least not unilaterally.In the World Cup’s case, the host city agreements are signed between Fifa, soccer’s global governing body, and the local municipalities.

Though the deal involves a public government, it is essentially a private business deal, and the US president does not have authority to cancel it on his own,That said, Trump can apply pressure to the various parties to back out of the deal if he is truly committed to removing games from the cities in question,That could include withholding federal funding from the cities as he has for various other aspects of American life,It could also include an appeal to Fifa president Gianni Infantino, who has carefully cultivated a close relationship with Trump since the US president’s return to office,Theoretically, yes.

We can say this with relative surety thanks to Seattle, which released the host city agreement it signed with Fifa.Within that agreement there is a clause (4.5, to be exact) that addresses the possible revocation of host city selection.The clause essentially states that by agreeing to be a World Cup host city, Seattle also agrees to do a number of different (and often expensive) things to increase public safety, including the deployment of additional security measures and transportation methods, plus the assumption of various financial liabilities.Fifa could in theory point to that clause as reasoning for revoking Seattle’s status as a World Cup host city if it feels like safety standards are woefully behind.

It’s hard to imagine it being all that likely, though.Any World Cup is a gigantic logistical affair, let alone one spread across three countries and 16 host cities featuring more teams than ever before.It’s hard enough for Fifa to create the match schedule and oversee teams’ travel.Introducing a reduction in venues, or a change in venues, or multiple of them, would be a gargantuan undertaking so close to the actual event.It’s easy to assume it would be the subject of legal action on behalf of the host city as well.

So far, it has been mostly promotional and/or threatening in nature,Trump convened a World Cup task force earlier this year headed by Andrew Giuliani, with a stated mission of “facilitat[ing] comprehensive planning, organization, and execution of the largest sporting events in the history of mankind,”The federal government also has a role in approving visas for visitors from other countries, but processing times for those have ballooned to such a level that many fear that they won’t have visas approved in time for the games themselves,There is also the public safety aspect,One can presume that FBI agents and potentially those from Homeland Security and US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) will be dispatched to World Cup host cities with the stated intention of providing an additional layer of security on top of local police.

So far, Fifa president Gianni Infantino has said nothing publicly about Trump’s threat.He did, however, find time to travel to Egypt to be alongside Trump at the Gaza summit – a curious move for someone whose role in the world is nominally about sports.Fifa vice-president Victor Montagliani, a Canadian, was far more direct speaking at a London conference in early October, responding to Trump’s comments about Seattle and San Francisco.“It’s Fifa’s tournament, Fifa’s jurisdiction, Fifa makes those decisions,” Montagliani said.“With all due respect to current world leaders, football is bigger than them and football will survive their regime and their government and their slogans.

That’s the beauty of our game, that it is bigger than any individual and bigger than any country.”A Fifa spokesperson told Politico “Safety and security are of the utmost importance at all FIFA events worldwide and it is ultimately the government’s responsibility to decide what’s in the best interest of public safety.We hope every one of our 16 host cities will be ready to fulfill all necessary requirements for a successful 2026 World Cup.”Outside of Fifa, Wu responded to Trump’s threat by pointing out that much of Fifa’s host city agreements are “locked down by contract so that no single person, even if they live in the White House currently, can undo it.“We’re in a world where for drama, for control, for pushing the boundaries … ongoing threats … are issued to individuals and communities who refuse to back down and comply or be obedient to a hateful agenda.

”Only in cases of extreme and/or unexpected health and safety concerns, war, or other political disturbance,The 2003 Women’s World Cup was the last senior-level tournament with that name to be moved – it was originally due to be held in China but was shifted to the US due to that year’s Sars outbreak,Fifa also pulled the 2023 Under-20 World Cup from Indonesia after several members of that country’s government and large sections of the populace opposed the inclusion of Israel in the tournament,Indonesia does not maintain formal diplomatic relations with Israel and has broadly supported Palestine,Indonesia later hosted that year’s U-17 World Cup after Peru pulled out of hosting.

The Olympics have been canceled due to wars or postponed a year in the case of Covid-19 and the 2020 Tokyo Olympics, but they have not changed host cities since 1908, when the eruption of Mount Vesuvius forced the Rome games to decamp to London,Likely because he has made that topic a feature of his administration,It is the guise under which he has deployed the national guard, Ice, and other federal agencies to Washington DC, Chicago and other cities,The fact that safety is a genuine and justified concern at any major gathering of people – especially one as vast as the World Cup – makes it an easy line to fall back on for his administration,That’ll be the real test, won’t it? When Washington has intervened in many other aspects of American life, the targeted institutions have often complied or tried to negotiate.

It remains to be seen if Fifa or the IOC will take that path – if indeed Trump decides to pursue this at all.
politicsSee all
A picture

Nature groups rebuke Reeves for ‘cynical’ 11th-hour planning bill changes

Last-minute changes to the government’s planning bill have sparked a furious backlash from nature groups who have mounted an attack on the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, over her plans to remove environmental protections.The changes to the legislation come as it enters its final stages before being signed into law.Promoted by Reeves, they are designed to make it easier for developers to side-step environmental laws in order to build major projects such as AI datacentres.They include new powers for the government to overrule local democracy if councils refuse developments based on environmental grounds, or on issues such as water shortages.But in outspoken attacks on the chancellor, charities including household names such as the RSPB and Wildlife Trusts say Reeves is seeking to grab short-term growth headlines to save her budget, rather than well-thought-out reforms to planning

about 13 hours ago
A picture

Pressure on Downing Street to release evidence in collapsed China spy case

Downing Street is under pressure to publish its evidence in the collapsed China spy case after the Crown Prosecution Service denied having blocked its release.Keir Starmer is likely to come under scrutiny at prime minister’s questions on Wednesday after the CPS said it was up to the government to release the evidence.The government has faced mounting pressure over its handling of the collapsed trial of Christopher Cash, a former parliamentary researcher, and Christopher Berry, a teacher. Both men, who deny wrongdoing, had been accused of passing secrets to China, but charges against them were dropped last month.The latest row came after sources within No 10 claimed Chris Wormald, the cabinet secretary, had gone to the CPS to discuss the publication of a witness statement central to the withdrawal of espionage charges against the two British men

about 15 hours ago
A picture

Digital ID: Danes and Estonians find it ‘pretty uncontroversial’

For Danish teenagers, getting enrolled for MitID (my ID) has become somewhat of a rite of passage.From the age of 13, Danes can enrol for the national digital ID system, which can be used for everything from logging into online banking to signing documents electronically and booking a doctor’s appointment.But when they hit 15, all children and their parents receive a letter from the government advising them that from now on, the teenagers will receive their own official communications from authorities which will be sent to them via “digital post”, and they will need digital ID to access it.While there is the option to opt out and instead receive physical mail, few do. Today, 97% of the Danish population aged 15 and over is enrolled in MitID and only 5% of Danes have opted out of digital post

about 19 hours ago
A picture

Keir Starmer back on familiar ground after walk-on part in the Trump show in Egypt | John Crace

Keir Starmer has always known that Monday’s visit to Egypt was going to be the Donald Trump Show. After all, almost every day is the Donald Trump Show and there was no way the US president was going to share the limelight on this of all days. The day when the living Israeli hostages were freed, 1,900 Palestinian detainees were freed and the first aid trucks entered Gaza.This was The Donald’s peace deal. A narcissist is going to narcissise

1 day ago
A picture

Starmer says he expects debate about ‘full horror’ of what happened in Gaza when media allowed in – as it happened

Ed Davey, the Lib Dem leader, asks for more detail of what the UK is doing to help ensure more aid gets into Gaza.He says all the bodies of dead hostages need to be returned.And he asks what the UK is doing to ensure that the expansion of illegal Israeli settlements on the West Bank stops.Starmer thanks Davey for the “content and tone” of his response. (He is making a contrast with Badenoch’s

1 day ago
A picture

Farage, not Marxism, risks ‘poisoning our kids’ | Letters

I am one of those proud teachers that Nigel Farage has in mind (Nigel Farage accuses teachers of ‘poisoning our kids’ on race issues, 9 October). For many years, as part of teaching media, film and journalism, I sought to educate students about basic political terms and concepts. Marxism was, and is, nothing resembling the totalitarian bogeyman that the USSR so conveniently became. Marxism is a doctrine espousing fairness, equal opportunity, redistribution of wealth and emancipation. It aims to be fully democratic

1 day ago
foodSee all
A picture

Cauliflower risotto and sausages with squash and beans: Sophie Wyburd’s recipes for autumn warmers

3 days ago
A picture

How to make cinnamon buns – recipe | Felicity Cloake's Masterclass

3 days ago
A picture

Punk Royale, London W1: ‘Someone shoved mystery slop in my mouth’ – restaurant review | Grace Dent on restaurants

4 days ago
A picture

Enjoying my meat that’s low on miles | Letter

5 days ago
A picture

‘It’s really good for the staff’: how restaurants adapt to customers drinking less

5 days ago
A picture

Helen Goh’s recipe for pumpkin cheesecake with maple pecan brittle | The sweet spot

6 days ago