The Guide #234: Five big questions before the 2026 Oscars
Happy Oscars Eve eve to you all,The film industry’s glitziest night takes place on Sunday, at an ungodly hour for those of us covering it from the other side of the Atlantic,Coffee will be essential for anyone staying up, as will the Guardian’s annual liveblog, covering every last minute of the ceremony as well as its red carpet run-up,Head over to the homepage on Sunday evening for that, plus news and commentary on the night’s events,There’s plenty to read before that too: our annual Oscar hustings, making the case for each of this year’s best picture nominees (I sided with Sentimental Value); an interview with Academy top dog Bill Kramer; a piece on the increasingly toxic discourse around many of this year’s nominees; and Guardian film editor Catherine Shoard’s reader Q&A on this year’s race and the state of film in general.
There will be plenty more to come over the weekend too,Meanwhile, as is tradition, in this week’s Guide we look at the pressing questions around this year’s ceremony …Is the Sinners surge real?For a long time, this year’s best picture race seemed a saunter for One Battle After Another,Its director, Paul Thomas Anderson, had reached Scorsese levels of being considered overdue an Oscar, and the film was a timely and terrific comment on the heavily militarised, anti-immigrant enforcement organisations at the heart of Trump 2,0,But in the last month there have been vague stirrings of a Sinners surge, especially in the wake of strong showings at the Baftas and the Actor awards presented by Sag-Aftra (previously the much catchier Screen Actors Guild awards).
How seriously should we take it? Well, it’s easy to see why Oscar voters might be vibing with a highly lucrative, well-crafted original movie celebrating Black America, a community so often overlooked by the Academy.Still, a Sinners win would count as a shock: One Battle has hoovered up pretty much every precursor award going.Has Chalamet blown best actor?It’s hard to remember a stranger race than this year’s one for best actor.For months Timothée Chalamet had seemed an inevitable winner for his wild swing of a performance in Marty Supreme, coupled with a truly global awards campaign that saw him mix the usual Academy glad-handing with kitchen performances alongside mysterious masked scouse rapper EsDeeKid.But in recent weeks the shine seems to have chipped off Chalamet’s presumptive Oscar: even before his poorly received drive-by on ballet and opera, there was a growing sense that maybe the actor is too divisive a figure to clean up in a preferential-ballot voting system that tends to punish Marmite-types.
Sinners’ Michael B Jordan, who triumphed at the Actor awards, would be best placed to capitalise on any Chalamet slip-up, though don’t rule out Wagner Moura, well-liked by the Academy’s international voting bloc for his magical performance in The Secret Agent,Is Netflix’s award-chasing era coming to an end?Bar a vanishingly unlikely victory for either Frankenstein or Train Dreams, another year will have gone by without Netflix winning the best picture gong it has long coveted,This failure comes despite a very obvious Oscars push that saw them deliver five auteur-driven films last autumn, three of which – Noah Baumbach’s Jay Kelly, Edward Berger’s Ballad of a Small Player and Kathryn Bigelow’s A House of Dynamite – basically fizzled from view the second they were released,Given all this, you might wonder whether Netflix might decide that all this Oscar-chasing is a bit pointless when you’re a planet-straddling streaming giant, and instead just stick to the flashy, trashy thrillers and clunking Mark Wahlberg action movies that have increasingly become the main chunk of their movie division,And yet, a best picture win would buy instant credibility with an industry that still views Netflix as a disruptive upstart, so perhaps a complete awards season abandonment is unlikely.
To that end they have the Quentin Tarantino-penned and David Fincher-directed Once Upon a Time in Hollywood sequel The Adventures of Cliff Booth on the way later this year.Who will win the newest Oscar category?Quite how the Academy has overlooked casting, an essential component of any good movie, for so long is anyone’s guess.But in 2026 casting directors will finally receive their own category at the Oscars.Granted, a category that will probably be whizzed past in a blink-and-you’ll-miss-it moment to make more room for skits and the like, but still, it’s progress of sorts.Francine Maisler, a casting veteran who has worked on everything from Reality Bites to 12 Years a Slave, is heavily fancied to claim the inaugural award for Sinners, though it would be great to see Nina Gold, arguably one of the most important behind-the-scenes figures in the history of British film, take the gong home for Hamnet.
Next year, meanwhile, another overdue category is added: stunts!What will the Oscars look like in a time of war?When the 2003 Oscars took place, three days after the start of the Iraq war, the result was a ceremony mired in uncertainty, with presenters pulling out and Michael Moore delivering a now-notorious speech decrying the invasion while boos rained down on him from the audience,Two decades later, another ceremony is happening in the shadow of a US-led war in the Middle East,But how will that conflict be marked? The most obvious way would be through wins for the two Iranian films nominated this year – Jafar Panahi’s brilliant It Was Just an Accident (for best international film and best original screenplay) and Mohammadreza Eyni and Sara Khaki’s dynamic Cutting Through Rocks (for best documentary) – though neither film is fancied to triumph in their respective categories,Failing that, will another winner pluck up the courage to speak out, Moore-style? There’s been an increased unwillingness among celebs for political broadsides in the second Trump era (with the exception of a few nods towards Palestine), but perhaps this unpopular war might put an end to such reticence,To read the complete version of this newsletter please subscribe to receive The Guide in your inbox every Friday
Thames Water lenders float new £10bn rescue plan
Thames Water’s lenders have put forward a £10bn rescue plan that would involve paying off the troubled water company’s hundreds of millions of pounds-worth of fines for leaks and pollution, as part of an effort to stave off financial collapse.A group of private equity firms and investment groups said they would inject about £3.35bn of cash into Thames Water and raise £6.65bn in debt, in exchange for the company not falling into a government-handled administration, in effect a temporary nationalisation.Bills for Thames Water’s 16 million customers in south-east England are already due to rise steeply until 2030 but the rescue plan would, at least, hold them at that level rather than pushing them even higher
Taxpayer bill for saving Scunthorpe steel furnaces could top £1.5bn by 2028, auditor says
The cost of keeping the UK’s last remaining blast furnaces going at British Steel’s Scunthorpe plant could exceed £1.5bn by 2028 if it continues at its current rate, according to the government’s spending watchdog.Ministers took the plant into public control in April last year, after its Chinese owner – industrial firm Jingye – threatened to shut down the loss-making site.The National Audit Office (NAO), which monitors state spending, said the intervention saved thousands of jobs at Scunthorpe and prevented a “serious impact” on UK industry, including Network Rail, which buys steel for the railways from the plant.Shutting the plant would also have ended Britain’s “primary” steel-making ability because blast furnaces allow steel to be made from scratch, rather than relying on scrap metal
AI has exposed age-old problems with university coursework | Letter
The frustration many academics are expressing about artificial intelligence and critical thinking is understandable (‘I wish I could push ChatGPT off a cliff’: professors scramble to save critical thinking in an age of AI, 10 March). But from my experience working with students on academic writing, blaming AI risks masking a problem that universities have lived with for years.In my work with students, I have long seen the ways in which thinking can be outsourced when assessment allows it: essay mills, shared past papers, model essays passed between cohorts, or heavy reliance on tutors and friends to structure assignments. Artificial intelligence did not invent this behaviour. It has simply industrialised a shortcut that already existed
Trump administration reportedly set to be paid $10bn for brokering TikTok deal
Donald Trump’s administration is reportedly poised to be paid $10bn by investors as part of a deal to create a US-controlled version of TikTok.The $10bn, considered by the US government as a sort of transaction fee, will be paid by the administration-friendly investors who took control of TikTok’s US operations from its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, according to reporting that first appeared in the Wall Street Journal.The investors in the popular social media app include software company Oracle; MGX, an investment firm based in the United Arab Emirates; and private equity business Silver Lake. These entities, along with other backers, paid $2.5bn to the US treasury when the deal closed in January and are set to make further payments in the unusual arrangement until the total hits $10bn
Sydney Swans admit to altering Bondi attack tribute to omit mention of Jewish community
The Sydney Swans have again apologised for the club’s “error of judgment” that resulted in the Jewish community not being mentioned in the AFL’s opening round pre-match tribute to victims of the Bondi terror attack.In a statement on Monday, the club attempted to absolve the AFL of any blame after the league was referred to the royal commission on antisemitism and social cohesion by Liberal senator James Paterson.Before the Swans’ season-opening game against Carlton at the SCG, Sydney’s chief executive, Matthew Pavlich, led a tribute to victims of the Bondi attack and first responders, some of whom joined the teams on the field.The club has now apologised multiple times, after journalist and former player Gerard Healy revealed Pavlich’s speech had been edited to remove references to the Jewish community.“There was no directive or instruction from the AFL to remove or change the reference to the Jewish Community in the script,” the club said in a statement
Cheltenham raised a cheer – but fatalities and fallouts tainted bounce-back festival
Attendance: up. British winners: up. Bookies’ profits: through the roof. Punters will wince at the last of those after a ferociously difficult four days at Cheltenham, with winners at 66-1, 50-1, 40-1 and 33-1 among the biggest skinners for the books. The Paddy Power client in Ireland who was paid €558,000 (£484,000) after putting Friday’s first six winners into a 50 cent each-way Lucky 63 would be a very worthy inductee into the Cheltenham Hall of Fame
Sydney Biennale 2026: politics is everywhere – but with nuance, beauty and heart
Naples museum to allow visually impaired visitors to experience art through touch
Jimmy Kimmel on Pentagon splurging on doughnuts: ‘Is this My 600lb Defense Department?’
Rapper Lil’ Kim to headline both Vivid Sydney and Melbourne’s 2026 Rising festival
Stephen Colbert on US war in Iran: ‘We’re still no closer to learning what the goal is’
Leap Year is patently ridiculous and widely panned. It’s also the perfect romcom