Labour’s clean energy plan needs a revamp: get real on costs and ignore the artificial deadline | Nils Pratley
“I know my job is to get bills down by £300,” said Ed Miliband, the energy security secretary, in his BBC interview at the weekend, acknowledging that the government is on the hook for its pre-election promise to reduce energy bills by 2030,The problem, though, is that the bill-cutting task also seems to be falling by default to Rachel Reeves, the chancellor,It is beginning to look as if the only sure way to make energy bills fall by £300 by 2030 is to shuffle a chunk of the expense into general taxation,Miliband hinted the 5% VAT charge on bills could be removed in next month’s budget, which would cost the government £2,5bn.
To put it mildly, Reeves is unlikely to be delighted by this prospect but she, like everyone else, will have heard the high-powered crew of retail energy bosses set out the arithmetic on bills in stark terms to a Commons select committee last week.Many of us have been pointing out for ages that clean energy is not a free lunch (certainly not by 2030), but the experts’ numbers were revealing in their precision.“If we continue on the path we are on, in all likelihood electricity prices are going to be 20% higher even if wholesale prices halve,” said Rachel Fletcher of Octopus Energy.“Non-commodity costs are adding about £300 [a year] of pressure,” she added, referring to everything from the costs of maintaining and upgrading the gas and electricity transmission networks to funding the rollout of renewable and nuclear generating capacity.Chris Norbury, the chief executive of E.
On UK, and Simone Rossi, the chief executive of EDF UK’s energy business, said much the same.Far from being “speculation” – as Miliband’s department dismissed it – the bosses’ analysis flows from granular details.One can see, for example, the subsidies for wind and solar capacity under construction or likely to be commissioned; the multiyear charge for the Sizewell C nuclear power station; and the rates of return that the regulator Ofgem will allow the three big electricity transmission companies to earn as they build the £80bn new grid.Note that the criticisms are not coming from opponents of the ambition of switching to cleaner energy, or from net zero sceptics.All that is really being asked is an examination of tradeoffs, sequencing, who should pay and what options exist for doing things more cheaply.
“There is no budgetary control of this,” Fletcher said,Rossi noted that electricity demand is 9% lower today than in 2019,Norbury said policymakers should look at the extent to which “incentives being offered to build infrastructure are necessary”,Miliband can argue, as he did in a speech last week, that his job is harder because of “the legacy of decades of underinvestment in energy in this country”,Absolutely true.
The grid is old, as are most of the nuclear and gas-fired plants.Even if the UK were not decarbonising and electrifying, there would be a large catchup bill.New gas stations, the Tories’ preferred short-term option, aren’t free either.Equally, though, Miliband’s claim that the “sprint” to clean energy by 2030 will – of itself – cut £300 from household bills now seems fanciful.Sir Dieter Helm, a leading energy economist, put it bluntly in a recent Bloomberg podcast: “We have hit the reality wall.
It isn’t going to be £300 cheaper – unless the gas price falls very sharply … The problem for the government, I think, is that half the government understands that and half the government doesn’t,”What should be done? Step one would be to recognise that the 2030 deadline for clean power, defined as 95% low-carbon generation, was always arbitrary and that trying to hit it almost certainly adds expense because speed is being prioritised over cost,Would the UK’s long-term decarbonisation and electrification strategy really be imperilled if, say, only 80% was achieved by 2032? Hardly,Once that mental hurdle is cleared, options open up,One of the energy suppliers’ complaints, in essence, is that grid capacity is being commissioned to arrive before it is needed (and customers will have to pay for it) and that smarter energy-using solutions may be more effective.
They may have a point.So concentrate above all else on minimising “constraint” costs, the maddening payments to windfarms (usually in Scotland) to turn off when it’s too windy, plus incentives to other generators (usually gas-fired plants in the south of England) to fire up on the other side of a bottleneck.Such payments are still projected to hit £4bn by the end of decade, and threaten to become an electoral liability in 2029.Sign up to Business TodayGet set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morningafter newsletter promotionOr slow the rollout of renewables, especially offshore wind, where the big cost variable is developers’ borrowing costs.If there is a reasonable expectation that interest rates will be lower in future (not impossible), why not wait for cheaper “strike” prices in future auction rounds? As things stand today, the government has said it will pay up to £113 a megawatt hour for offshore wind capacity in this year’s auction, AR7, far above the gas-dictated wholesale price of £83 MWh over the past 12 months.
“We won’t buy at any price and if specific technologies aren’t competitive, we will look elsewhere,” Miliband also said last week about AR7.If he means it, he could show seriousness by ordering, say, only 4 gigawatts of offshore wind this year, rather than 8-plus the industry is expecting.In Reeves’s shoes, you’d be insisting on such cost-cutting thinking.Last week’s warning from suppliers on bills ought to mark a turning point: the clean energy plan needs an injection of cold-headed pragmatism.
Low participation in medical trials puts millions of young people at risk
Millions of young people risk missing out on new treatments for health conditions and having to use medicines that are unsafe, ineffective or inappropriate because so few take part in medical research, experts have warned.Data analysis by the Guardian reveals that members of gen Z – those born between the late 1990s and the early 2000s – are significantly underrepresented in clinical trials and health studies.People aged 18 to 24 make up 8% of England’s population, but only 4.4% of those taking part in medical research.Though less affected by life-threatening conditions such as cancer and heart disease, young adults still experience a significant burden of disease
‘I wish I had taken part sooner’: how a medical trial transformed a young person’s life
Millions of young people risk missing out on new treatments for health conditions and having to use medicines that are unsafe, ineffective or inappropriate because so few take part in medical research. One of those bucking the trend explains why he signed up to a study and how it transformed his life.Gulliver Waite was diagnosed with clinical depression at 19. For years, he struggled with extremely low mood, anxiety, frequent panic attacks and occasional paranoia.“I put everything I could into working because it was basically all I could do,” he says
Millions exploited by ‘menopause gold rush’ amid lack of reliable information, say UK experts
Millions of women are being exploited by a “menopause gold rush” as companies, celebrities and influencers take advantage of a “dearth” of reliable information on the issue, experts have said.Healthcare companies and content creators saw menopause as a “lucrative market” and were trying to profit from gaps in public knowledge, women’s health academics at University College London (UCL) said.Researchers called for the rollout of a national education programme after finding a significant number of women do not feel well-informed about menopause.Writing in the medical journal Post Reproductive Health, they said: “There has been a rapid expansion in unregulated private companies and individuals providing menopause information and support for profit; this has been termed the ‘menopause gold rush’.“This fragmented landscape of menopause support and education leaves people vulnerable to financial exploitation, may propagate misinformation and is likely to amplify existing menopause-related health inequities
Don’t cut London’s affordable housing quotas, Labour MPs urge ministers and mayor
Labour MPs are urging ministers and the London mayor to drop controversial plans to reduce affordable housing quotas in the capital in order to boost homebuilding.MPs have said they are concerned about the proposals being drawn up by the housing secretary, Steve Reed, and the mayor, Sadiq Khan, in response to a sudden drop in new development in the capital.Reed and Khan are considering allowing builders to qualify for fast-track planning approval while promising to build 20% affordable homes, rather than the current minimum of 35%. Labour MPs hope to use the next few weeks before the package is formally announced to persuade them not to do so.Florence Eshalomi, the Labour chair of the housing select committee, said: “Solving the housing crisis relies not just on how many new homes we build, but also on their affordability
Will affordable housing be the casualty as London tackles its building emergency?
Sadiq Khan has known for a while that he has a problem with housebuilding in London. But last week a consultancy published figures about the scale of the problem, which prompted full-scale alarm in City Hall and Whitehall.The analysis from Molior showed that new housebuilding in the capital had collapsed. Only 40,000 homes are under construction – two-thirds the normal rate – and in the first three months of the year builders started work on just 3,248 private sector units.“It is a perfect storm of economic conditions impacting housebuilding,” said one City Hall source
Dr Jill Tattersall obituary
My mother, Jill Tattersall, who has died aged 95, helped to change the face of healthcare by co-founding a clinic providing contraception for unmarried women and underage girls in the 1960s.She qualified as a doctor in Sheffield in 1956 and started out by training in obstetrics and gynaecology, quickly moving into the new field of family planning. During the 60s, birth control supplied by the NHS was only for married women and there was still a great deal of stigma attached to premarital sex and underage relationships.Seeing this gap in the service Jill, along with some other concerned professionals, bought a terrace house in 1966 and set up the 408 Young People’s Consultation Centre on Ecclesall Road in Sheffield. It was converted into a clinic to provide psychological and counselling services to young women, and also contraception, unavailable to unmarried women and underage girls within the mainstream health service until 1974
Rashid and Salt star as England thrash New Zealand in second men’s T20 – as it happened
Salt marvels at Brook after England thrash New Zealand in second men’s T20I
Sumo wrestling at the Royal Albert Hall – picture essay
With his top weapon sidelined, Sean McVay proves the ultimate chameleon
Ex-NFL star Doug Martin dies aged 36 after reported struggle with police
‘For sure, the chance is there’: Max Verstappen hopeful he can retain F1 title