Harrods faces legal action over £1-a-head dining charge not going to staff

A picture


Harrods is facing legal action over its addition of a £1-a-head cover charge to diners’ bills that does not go to workers, in a test case that could lead to changes at a string of upmarket restaurants.Legislation, which came into force in October 2024, requires business owners to hand over all tips and service charges to staff.Some restaurants, including those at Harrods, add a mandatory cover charge as well as an optional service charge and only pass on the latter to their workers.An employment tribunal case involving 29 Harrods restaurant workers backed by the United Voices of the World (UVW) union is to be heard in September.Workers argue that the cover charge functions in practice as a service charge and so should be distributed to them and not kept by Harrods.

It is the first legal challenge in the UK to test what qualifies as a tip under the Employment (Allocation of Tips) Act 2023,Under the legislation, restaurants, cafes and hotels must ensure all tips, gratuities and service charges paid by customers are allocated fairly to workers in that place of work,Harrods, which employs more than 330 people in its dining establishments, hands the 12,5% optional service charge to workers but not the compulsory £1-a-head cover charge, which was introduced at all the luxury department store’s restaurants and cafes in London before the law changed,Other restaurants to levy a cover charge include the Ivy, the Delaunay and the Wolseley in central London.

Workers say Harrods’ restaurant managers have discretion to remove the cover charge on request, so that it functions like a tip,Harrods denies this,Alice Howick, a former Harrods waiter and one of the claimants, said: “Harrods introduced this cover charge out of nowhere and without any transparency as to its purpose,“Whilst the cover charge still exists, it should be going towards the staff who prepare and serve the food and drinks, the quality of which guarantees that customers walk through the door and Harrods makes as much money as it does,”Petros Elia, the general secretary of UVW, said: “If Harrods has introduced a new charge that walks and talks like a service charge, then it should be treated like one, and paid fairly and transparently to waiters and chefs.

Instead, we are once again seeing what can only be described as Scrooge behaviour from a company that can more than afford to do the right thing.”The case is the latest dispute over pay and conditions at Harrods eateries, which included a strike in 2024.Harrods said its compulsory cover charge was “in line with other high-demand luxury dining destinations” and “entirely separate to the discretionary 12.5% service charge”.It added that it had paid all of the service charge directly to staff since January 2022, more than two years before the Employment (Allocation of Tips) Act came into force.

The service charge is calculated on the bill including the cover charge, so staff receive a 12.5% share of the cover charge.A spokesperson said: “Harrods’ approach to pay within our restaurant division is informed by ongoing, collaborative and direct dialogue with colleagues.”The company provides details of the cover charge and service charge in policy documents and said UVW was not a recognised union by Harrods and had not played a direct role in the development of its policies.“We will continue to engage directly with our colleagues on all issues related to pay and benefits, to ensure they remain industry-leading and guided by our values and colleague commitments,” the Harrods spokesperson said.

The issue emerged as Harrods faced claims from 180 survivors of alleged abuse by its former owner Mohamed Al Fayed via its compensation scheme,The department store set up the scheme after dozens of women came forward with allegations of abuse by the late entrepreneur going back as far as 1977,Harrods said this month it had already paid out compensation to more than 50 women,The scheme, which was opened last March, will close to new submissions on 31 March,The best public interest journalism relies on first-hand accounts from people in the know.

If you have something to share on this subject you can contact the Business team confidentially using the following methods:The Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories,Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs,This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said,If you don't already have the Guardian app, download it (iOS/Android) and go to the menu,Scroll down and click on Secure Messaging.

When asked who you wish to contact please select the ‘Business (UK & Global)’ team.Our guide at theguardian.com/tips lists several ways to contact us securely, and discusses the pros and cons of each.
politicsSee all
A picture

PM vows to ‘keep fighting’ after Greens sweep past Labour and Reform to win byelection – as it happened

Keir Starmer has vowed to “keep on fighting” despite Labour’s humiliating defeat in the Gorton and Denton by-election. Speaking to reporters, he acknowledged it was a “disappointing” result and that voters were “frustrated”, but insisted he would carry on. Asked if he had considered resigning, Starmer said: “I came into politics late in life to fight for change for those people who need it. I will keep on fighting for those people for as long as I’ve got breath in my body.”Starmer doubled down on the anti-Green party language he was using during the byelection campaign

A picture

Labour MPs demand Starmer change course after humiliating byelection loss

Keir Starmer is facing an ultimatum from his own party to change direction or risk a leadership challenge within months after the Greens humiliated Labour with a historic byelection victory in Gorton and Denton.Overturning a 13,000 Labour majority from the general election, Hannah Spencer, a local plumber and Green councillor, became the party’s fifth MP on Friday. Reform UK’s Matt Goodwin was second, just ahead of the Labour candidate, Angeliki Stogia.The scale of defeat in an area that had returned Labour MPs for nearly a century, and where Starmer’s party still believed it could win even on polling day, plunged his ministers and MPs into renewed despair just weeks after he saw off a challenge to his position.While only a handful of backbenchers called openly for Starmer to depart after the result, even loyal ministers said the surge in the Greens’ fortunes under the leadership of Zack Polanski meant the prime minister had to address an exodus of Labour voters from its left flank

A picture

Labour leadership truce holds for now but clock is ticking for Starmer

When Labour’s Scottish leader, Anas Sarwar, urged Keir Starmer to stand down two weeks ago, the prime minister’s closest advisers presented him with a choice: fight, flight or hand over his destiny to his party by calling a leadership contest.The prime minister chose the first option and his Downing Street team sprung into action to contain the threat. At the moment of greatest peril for Starmer, MPs peered over the precipice and didn’t like what they saw.In the fortnight since, not much has changed. Even with Labour’s humiliating defeat in the Gorton and Denton byelection, where it was pushed into third place behind the Greens and Reform UK, the uneasy truce has persisted

A picture

Spencer’s victory speech an object lesson in grace while Reform’s man rages | John Crace

It could have been a flash of arrogance. Hubris for the ages. On Thursday morning, when most pundits were still calling the Gorton and Denton byelection a three-way fight that was impossible to call, the Green party sent a note to journalists. Come to the first press conference of Hannah Spencer MP tomorrow. And while you’re about it, stay on to join her for her first constituency surgery

A picture

Welsh elections a choice between culture and ignorance, Plaid leader says

The leader of Plaid Cymru has claimed the Welsh parliament elections in May will be a straight fight between his party and Reform UK, which he billed as a choice between “culture or ignorance, humanity or indifference”.Speaking at the party’s biggest ever conference, Rhun ap Iorwerth, the clear favourite to be the next Welsh first minister, said the Gorton and Denton byelection showed Labour and the Tories were “slipping away”, and he promised Plaid had a radical plan to improve Wales’s fortunes.He said that while the Greens had done well to win in Greater Manchester, he was confident voters in Wales looking for a progressive alternative would turn to Plaid.During the leader’s speech in Newport, south-east Wales, ap Iorwerth highlighted plans such as setting up 10 surgical hubs to tackle NHS waiting lists, and making sure every school has a library.He said the party, which is comfortably leading the polls, would reveal a blueprint on Saturday for its first 100 days in power after the Senedd elections

A picture

Reform and Tories report ‘family voting’ allegations to watchdog

Reform UK and the Conservatives have asked the elections watchdog to investigate allegations of corrupt voting in the Gorton and Denton byelection as Nigel Farage claimed there had been “cheating”, despite limited evidence of wrongdoing.The reports to the Electoral Commission come after an election observers group, Democracy Volunteers, said they had witnessed “concerningly high levels” of so-called family voting, where one family member dictates how others cast their ballot.One previous election observer for the group said it would be important to know the methodology behind the group’s claim that 12% of observed voters were involved in family voting, given that there was a “grey line” as to what precisely that meant.The group’s report, published as soon as the polls closed on Thursday night, has given impetus to claims by defeated parties of wrongdoing, with Farage part-echoing Donald Trump’s complaints about stolen elections by saying his party was the victim of “sectarian voting and cheating”.Reform’s chair, David Bull, said later this did not mean the outcome of the election had been changed