How to balance the UK books: six options open to Rachel Reeves
Rachel Reeves is under pressure to tackle a multibillion-pound shortfall in the government finances.Labour’s high-stakes welfare U-turn and a spike in bond markets prompted by speculation over the chancellor’s position has dragged the government’s tax and spending plans into the spotlight.Ministers have warned of “financial consequences” after the backtracking on disability benefits and winter fuel payments for pensioners, which have a price tag north of £6bn.Alongside a sluggish economic outlook and possible downgrade in productivity forecasts from the Office for Budget Responsibility at the autumn budget, economists at Deutsche Bank predict that Reeves could face a £30bn shortfall against her self-imposed fiscal rules.This has raised questions over how the chancellor responds.
Reeves has several options:Likelihood: 1/5Reeves has said her fiscal rules are “iron-clad” and “non-negotiable,” despite mounting economic headwinds that have made them tougher to meet.Her primary target rule requires revenue to meet day-to-day spending by 2029-30.From next year, there is a little extra wriggle room: the rule will shift to a rolling three-year target, and will require the day-to-day budget to be in surplus or deficit by no more than 0.5% of GDP.Several leading economists argue the fiscal rules are not fit for purpose and ought to be replaced, with pressure growing from within Labour ranks, too.
Many economists, however, predict that financial markets would balk at higher borrowing.Part of the issue is that Britain’s fiscal rules have been repeatedly changed before, testing patience in financial markets.Aiming to hit the rules by a fine margin, weak economic growth, higher interest rates and already elevated debt levels also make conditions challenging.Likelihood: 2/5After the U-turns on the welfare bill and pensioners’ winter fuel payments, the government’s ability to find politically feasible budget savings has taken a heavy blow.Labour outlined its priorities up to the next general election at last month’s high-profile spending review, which makes it challenging for the chancellor to find further savings.
Reopening talks with her cabinet colleagues from a weakened position, so soon after the spending review, would be a tough ask.To make way for bigger cash injections for health and defence the spending review settlements for some departments already entailed cuts in real terms, with the Home Office among the biggest losers.All departments were also tasked with finding savings of at least 5% by the end of the decade.However, some economists say the size of the British state is increasing at an unsustainable rate.Spending as a share of GDP is forecast to remain permanently higher than pre-pandemic levels, at about 44%.
A fresh round of cuts would imperil Labour’s promises to fix Britain’s battered public services and for “no return to austerity”.They could come with severe political costs if voters saw little progress before the next election.“Recent events have confirmed one thing: spending cuts have likely reached their political limits,” said Sanjay Raja, senior economist at Deutsche Bank.Likelihood: 3/5Labour made a manifesto promise not to increase income tax, VAT and employee national insurance contributions (NICs).While party strategists felt this was vital to win the general election, most economists think it was a serious mistake.
Several leading experts argue the chancellor should reconsider.Raising the basic rate of income tax by 1p would yield an extra £8bn a year, while a 2p increase in employee NICs would result in about £10bn.The consultancy Capital Economics said one option could be to introduce a new variant of income tax, for example through a new health and social care or defence levy – similar to the plan made by Boris Johnson and scrapped by Liz Truss.Some economists highlight the £20bn of cuts to employee national insurance contributions made in the final months of the last Tory government.Viewed by many as a post-election trap for Labour Reeves did not oppose them.
Reversing this now would be tougher, but could be done by blaming the Tories for an irresponsible and unsustainable decision,A more palatable option could be to extend a freeze on personal tax thresholds,Introduced by the Tories in 2021, the “stealth” tax-raising measure drags people into paying the higher rate of income tax,Due to end in 2028, a two-year extension would raise £8bn a year extra by 2029-30,Sign up to Business TodayGet set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morningafter newsletter promotionReeves has previously vowed not to repeat anything on the scale of her £40bn tax-raising autumn budget, and has said Britain’s tax levels as a share of the economy are already at record levels.
While the UK tax bill is historically high, at about 35%, it remains below many comparable advanced economies; including France, Germany, and the high-tax and spend Nordic states,Likelihood: 4/5Reeves could dust off a memo from Angela Rayner sent to her before the March spring statement, in which the deputy prime minister urged the chancellor to consider a series of wealth taxes to raise up to £4bn a year,Suggestions included ending inheritance tax relief on shares listed on the smaller Aim stock market, scrapping the £500 dividend tax-free allowance, and freezing the threshold at which the 45p additional income tax rate applies,With voters broadly supporting higher taxes on wealth, and Reeves facing mounting pressure from her own backbenchers, such measures would be politically astute,One option could be to target the pension tax-free lump sum.
At present, individuals can withdraw 25% of a pension pot up to £268,000 as a tax-free lump sum,Restricting this to £100,000 could raise about £2bn a year,Likelihood: 3/5Reeves has tried to court business leaders and promised not to raise the headline rate of corporation tax,However, businesses bore the brunt of her October budget through a £25bn increase in employer NICs, and are loudly saying that further tax rises would hit jobs and growth,Rayner’s memo suggested raising corporation tax rate for banks.
Reeves has prioritised supporting the City of London,However, banks have benefited from higher interest rates, as well as a windfall on reserves held at the Bank of England under its quantitative easing programme, which is losing the Treasury money,Reversing a Tory-era cut to a levy on bank balance sheets, from 8% to 3%, could raise about £1,5bn,Other options could include higher taxes on the gambling industry, raising about £3bn.
Breaking the manifesto promise on headline corporation tax could raise about £4bn through a one percentage-point increase,Likelihood: 2/5Economic conditions have turned against Reeves since the autumn, but the chancellor could get lucky,Britain’s economy grew at the fastest rate in the G7 in the first quarter and the Bank has cut interest rates twice in 2025,City investors are betting on at least two more reductions,Despite Wednesday’s bond market wobble, the UK’s borrowing costs are still lower than earlier this year.
If sustained, this could lead to improved forecasts for the government’s debt servicing costs from the OBR.Monthly borrowing figures coming in below predicted levels would also help.The chancellor will be hoping efforts on deregulation, infrastructure investment, and labour market support could improve the economic outlook.Trade deals with the US, India, and closer ties with the EU could also help.However, economists predict a rapid turnaround is unlikely.
Labour’s tax increases introduced in April have weighed down activity, while geopolitical tensions and Donald Trump’s trade wars cloud the global outlook.
Jeremy Corbyn says ‘discussions are ongoing’ after Zarah Sultana claimed she would ‘co-lead new party’ with him – as it happened
Jeremy Corbyn has said that “discussions are ongoing” after former Labour MP Zarah Sultana said that she would “co-lead the founding of a new party” with the ex-Labour leader.In a post on social media, the independent MP and former Labour leader said:Real change is coming.One year on from the election, this Labour government has refused to deliver the change people expected and deserved. Poverty, inequality and war are not inevitable. Our country needs to change direction, now
Labour’s first year: from voter opinion to market reaction – in charts
It is a year since Labour’s landslide victory on 4 July 2024, when Keir Starmer promised “to end the politics of performance and return to politics as public service … it is now time for us to deliver”. After a rollercoaster week in which the prime minister suffered a large Commons rebellion and caused bond markets to spike when he appeared not to back the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, we consider his government’s record in Westminster, Whitehall and across the country.In the first year since the general election, Labour’s stock with the electorate, as measured by opinion polls, has fallen considerably. After a honeymoon period, during which few polls were conducted, the party’s polling has steadily declined. Then came a very strong Reform performance in the 1 May elections, in which Nigel Farage’s party took more than 600 council seats, and won a mayoralty and a byelection
Crying in the Commons: why are women’s workplace tears a source of shame?
Rachel Reeves’s tears this week triggered a fall in the pound and attracted widespread derision from political columnists, mostly male. “What is wrong with Rachel Reeves?” the Telegraph asked. In an article headlined “The meaning of the chancellor’s tears”, a New Statesman columnist told readers that Reeves’s authority was “beginning to melt away”. The Daily Mail spoke disdainfully of her “waterworks”.But in the longer term the chancellor’s display of distress may prove to have an unexpectedly positive legacy, helpfully normalising a still hugely stigmatised phenomenon: women’s tears in the workplace
Keir Starmer says good relationship with Donald Trump based on shared family values
Keir Starmer has spoken about his good relationship with the US president, Donald Trump, and their shared family values.To mark the first anniversary of the Labour government coming to power on Friday, the prime minister spoke to the BBC podcast Political Thinking and said it was “in the national interest” for the two men to connect.“We are different people and we’ve got different political backgrounds and leanings, but we do have a good relationship and that comes from a number of places,” he said.“I think I do understand what anchors the president, what he really cares about. For both of us, we really care about family and there’s a point of connection there
Critics of UK role in Gaza war consider setting up independent tribunal
Critics of the UK’s role in the Gaza war are considering setting up an independent tribunal if, as expected, Labour blocks a bill tabled by Jeremy Corbyn backing an official inquiry.Government whips are expected to object to the former Labour party leader’s bill in the Commons on Friday, leaving him with few practical options for his legislation to pass.The Middle East minister, Hamish Falconer, said the government saw no need for an inquiry, but 22 NGOs working on issues in the region are supporting Corbyn’s call.The Islington North MP is arguing that a host of issues regarding the UK’s involvement in what he regards as a genocide by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have not been properly aired in Westminster, except through brief replies by ministers in written or oral questions.The NGOs led by Action Aid said: “In light of reports of atrocities committed by the Israeli government in Gaza and reports of the UK’s collaboration with Israeli military operations, it is increasingly urgent to confirm whether the UK has contributed to any violations of international humanitarian law through economic or political cooperation with the Israeli government since October 2023, including the sale, supply or use of weapons, surveillance aircraft and Royal Air Force bases
MP Zarah Sultana says she will ‘co-lead’ new party as she quits Labour for Corbyn group
MP Zarah Sultana, suspended from Labour, has announced she is resigning from the party to join Jeremy Corbyn’s Independent Alliance.Sultana declared she will “co-lead the founding of a new party” – even though, while there was an agreement in principle to form one, the timing and leadership had not been settled, the Guardian understands.Sultana, 31, who represents Coventry South, posted a statement on Thursday evening describing Westminster as “broken” and claiming the two main parties offer “nothing but managed decline and broken promises”.She urged supporters to “join us” in creating what she presented as a new party.Her declaration took some in the alliance by surprise and has exposed divisions over strategy
Young Europeans losing faith in democracy, poll finds
Labour’s 10-year health plan for the NHS is bold, radical – and familiar
Twelve key takeaways from Labour’s 10-year NHS plan
Starmer outlines 10-year plan to change NHS ‘from sickness service to health service’
‘Am I just an asshole?’ Time blindness can explain chronic lateness - some of the time
Wes Streeting: ‘half my colleagues’ in Commons using weight loss drugs