Minister commissioned investigation of journalists looking into Labour thinktank
A Labour minister commissioned and reviewed a report in 2023 on journalists investigating the thinktank that would help propel Keir Starmer to power, the Guardian has learned.The research was paid for and subsequently reviewed by Josh Simons, now a minister in the Cabinet Office, when he was director of Labour Together, according to sources and documents seen by the Guardian.Simons is close to the prime minister’s chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, who had previously run Labour Together and whose own role in the operation to gather material on journalists is under scrutiny.In an agreement addressed to Simons, drawn up by the PR firm APCO Worldwide, the firm agreed to “investigate the sourcing, funding and origins” of a November 2023 Sunday Times report about the thinktank, in addition to other journalistic investigations into the group.The agreement noted APCO would “establish who and what are behind the coordinated attacks on Labour Together”.
Work subsequently carried out by APCO in December contained reports on journalists at outlets including the Guardian and the Sunday Times who had reported on irregularities in the thinktank’s funding.APCO also sought to identify the journalists’ sources.Simons received a briefing from APCO on its final report, sources said, which included findings drawn from examination of the journalists who had investigated Labour Together.The disclosures about Simons’ personal knowledge of the private investigation present another major challenge to Starmer and McSweeney, his most senior aide, after a week in which both have faced calls for their resignation over Peter Mandelson’s links to Jeffrey Epstein.Under McSweeney, Labour Together played a key role in Starmer’s victory in the battle to succeed Jeremy Corbyn and remained closely allied to the Labour leader after Simons took charge.
APCO’s work to investigate the journalists was first reported by the Substack publication Democracy for Sale,Downing Street has refused to say whether McSweeney also knew about the hiring of APCO,Two sources said he was intimately involved with the strategy of the organisation even after leaving,One said: “There was never any distance between Labour Together and Morgan, even after he left,”Earlier on Friday, there were calls from Labour MPs for an investigation and a “clear-out” in Downing Street after news of the thinktank’s relationship with APCO emerged.
The former shadow chancellor John McDonnell called the investigation into journalists “truly shocking” in a letter to Hollie Ridley, the Labour party’s general secretary.He added: “If the reports of [Labour Together’s] activities in surveilling journalists are accurate it is clear that this organisation and its operators and controllers are bringing our party into disrepute.”Ridley, who is close to McSweeney, has refused to launch an investigation, telling McDonnell in reply: “As there is no contractual or governance relationship between Labour Together and the party, any allegations regarding the activity of Labour Together as an entity fall outside our remit.”McDonnell called the refusal to investigate “appallingly complacent and ill-judged”.He added in a response to Ridley: “Given the seriousness of this matter and the report of the alleged direct involvement of Labour party members in this activity I would have expected you to have taken this matter more seriously.
”The Labour MP Kim Johnson said that “what’s been exposed shows McSweeney’s operation is rotten to the core”,She added: “We’re told the adults are in the room,If this is their idea of leadership, No 10 needs gutting from top to bottom,”Questions over Labour Together’s funding first emerged in February 2021 after its interim leadership reported itself to the Electoral Commission for the late reporting of £740,000 in donations,The thinktank was later fined £14,250 in September 2021.
In November 2023, the Sunday Times published an investigation that alleged it was McSweeney who had failed to declare the donations between 2017 and 2020.The undeclared money is said to have paid for polling and campaigning that supported Starmer’s rise to the Labour leadership.McSweeney did not comment on the allegation.McSweeney formally left Labour Together in April 2020 when he became Starmer’s chief of staff upon his election as party leader.Sources close to McSweeney said he had not taken the decision to hire APCO and it was a matter for Labour Together.
By the time of the Sunday Times investigation, Labour Together was being led by Simons,APCO was commissioned following concerns at the thinktank that the information published had been derived from a potential data breach, a source told the Guardian,Internal reports prepared by APCO for Labour Together named the Sunday Times journalists Gabriel Pogrund and Harry Yorke, as well as the Guardian’s Henry Dyer, Declassified UK’s John McEvoy and journalists from other outlets as “significant persons of interest”,It sought to “identify the source of the information and to ascertain what additional information could be published” by journalists about Labour Together,APCO’s research included an examination of stories and social media posts written by the journalists.
The work was led at APCO by Tom Harper, a former journalist at the Sunday Times.Harper provided briefings to Simons, sources have told the Guardian.Democracy for Sale has alleged Labour Together paid the PR firm at least £30,000 to identify the source of stories about its funding.The briefings supplied to the thinktank by APCO claim that one possible source of the Sunday Times story was a Russian or Chinese hack of the Electoral Commission.The contract shows that Simons asked for information specifically on the sources for a book by Paul Holden about McSweeney’s role in Starmer’s rise, as well as related articles by the American journalist Matt Taibbi.
Those close to the group said they were concerned that the information accessed by Holden and Taibbi originated from a hack of the Electoral Commission itself,They added that they did not intend for the probe to look into other journalists, even though the contract itself specifically mentioned the article by Pogrund and Yorke,Simons’ receipt of APCO’s research – which focused on the work of journalists carrying out public interest investigations into the finances of the thinktank that he led – has raised questions about his role as a Cabinet Office minister,Labour Together did not comment,One person who has previously worked with the group called the decision to hire investigators “bizarre”, adding: “I’ve never come across anything like it in my political life.
” Another said it was “weird”.One Labour MP said: “If the prime minister wants to regain the support of the parliamentary Labour party, he has got to get Morgan the hell out of the party.Otherwise he will end up bringing it into disrepute.”Simons claimed on X on Friday night that the intention of the APCO project was to look into a suspected illegal hack “which had nothing to do with UK journalists at Sunday Times, Guardian or any other brilliant UK newspaper”.He added: “APCO’s investigation never fully got to the bottom of this.
Those who know me know I think the work of journalists is vital to our democracy,”Simons and Harper did not respond to a formal request for comment,The best public interest journalism relies on first-hand accounts from people in the know,If you have something to share on this subject, you can contact us confidentially using the following methods,Secure Messaging in the Guardian appThe Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories.
Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs.This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said.If you don't already have the Guardian app, download it (iOS/Android) and go to the menu.Select ‘Secure Messaging’.SecureDrop, instant messengers, email, telephone and postIf you can safely use the Tor network without being observed or monitored, you can send messages and documents to the Guardian via our SecureDrop platform.
Finally, our guide at theguardian.com/tips lists several ways to contact us securely, and discusses the pros and cons of each.
TikTok could be forced to change app’s ‘addictive design’ by European Commission
TikTok could be forced into changes to make the app less addictive to users after the EU indicated the platform had breached the bloc’s digital safety rules.The EU’s executive arm said in a preliminary ruling that the popular app had infringed the Digital Services Act (DSA) due to its “addictive design”.The European Commission said TikTok, which has more than 1 billion users worldwide, had not adequately assessed how its design could harm the physical and mental wellbeing of users including children and vulnerable adults.By constantly “rewarding” users with new content, the Chinese-owned platform fuelled constant scrolling and shifted the brains of users into “autopilot mode”, the commission added, which could lead to compulsive behaviour and reduce users’ self-control.The preliminary ruling accused TikTok of ignoring indicators of compulsive use, such as the amount of time children spend on the app at night
Deepfake fraud taking place on an industrial scale, study finds
Deepfake fraud has gone “industrial”, an analysis published by AI experts has said.Tools to create tailored, even personalised, scams – leveraging, for example, deepfake videos of Swedish journalists or the president of Cyprus – are no longer niche, but inexpensive and easy to deploy at scale, said the analysis from the AI Incident Database.It catalogued more than a dozen recent examples of “impersonation for profit”, including a deepfake video of Western Australia’s premier, Robert Cook, hawking an investment scheme, and deepfake doctors promoting skin creams.These examples are part of a trend in which scammers are using widely available AI tools to perpetuate increasingly targeted heists. Last year, a finance officer at a Singaporean multinational paid out nearly $500,000 to scammers during what he believed was a video call with company leadership
Amazon reveals plans to spend $200bn in one year the day after Bezos guts Washington Post
Amazon announced plans to spend $200bn on artificial intelligence and robotics this year, the latest tech giant to vow fresh enormous investments in the artificial intelligence arms race.The news of the investment comes one day after the Washington Post, owned by Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, announced it was cutting approximately a third of employees.Amazon also reported $213bn in revenue on Thursday. The fourth-quarter earnings of the e-commerce and cloud-computing giant came in slightly below Wall Street estimates even as sales and growth surged.Amazon will increase capital spending to $200bn this year from $125bn, CEO Andy Jassy said in a press release
Bitcoin loses half its value in three months amid crypto crunch
Bitcoin’s price sank to $63,000 on Thursday, its lowest level in more than a year, and half its all-time peak of $126,000, reached in October 2025. A months-long dip in cryptocurrency prices has tanked shares of companies that have increasingly invested in bitcoin, exacerbating broader stock market jitters.Bitcoin rode a high during Donald Trump’s ascent to the presidency in 2024 and throughout 2025; its price steadily increased as the president made one industry-friendly move after another. Crypto’s largest currency hit $100,000 for the first time in December 2024 and even rose to a record high of $126,210.50 on 6 October, according to Coinbase
‘Orwellian’: Sainsbury’s staff using facial recognition tech eject innocent shopper
A man was ordered to leave a supermarket in London after staff misidentified him using controversial new facial recognition technology.Warren Rajah was told to abandon his shopping and leave the local store he has been using for a number of years after an “Orwellian” error in a Sainsbury’s in Elephant and Castle, London.He said supermarket staff were unable to explain why he was being told to leave, and would only direct him to a QR code leading to the website of the firm Facewatch, which the retailer has hired to run facial recognition in some of its stores. He said when he contacted Facewatch, he was told to send in a picture of himself and a photograph of his passport before the firm confirmed it had no record of him on its database.“One of the reasons I was angry was because I shouldn’t have to prove I am innocent,” Rajah said
How cryptocurrency’s second largest coin missed out on the industry’s boom
US crypto developer Danny Ryan submitted a proposal in November 2024 to Vitalik Buterin, the founder and symbolic leader of Ethereum, a prominent blockchain powering the world’s second-largest cryptocurrency. Ryan, who had worked for seven years at the Ethereum Foundation (EF), Ethereum’s de facto governing body, suggested that Ethereum could be on the cusp of an era-defining shift.Since its founding in 2014, the foundation had prioritized technical upgrades and had avoided centralizing power while its user base was growing, but Ethereum had now grown up, and the cryptocurrency world around it had grown up, too. The EF could now “exercise a stronger voice” without compromising its ethos of decentralization, Ryan said – and he was open to leading that charge if appointed as the foundation’s new executive director.Ryan told the Guardian that he could see how political tides were changing “overnight”, which informed his proposal
Stellantis takes €22bn hit after ‘overestimating’ pace of shift to EVs
Price of average UK home passes £300,000 for first time, Halifax says
Tell us: how have you been affected by falling cryptocurrency prices?
Hail our new robot overlords! Amazon warehouse tour offers glimpse of future
England v Wales: Six Nations 2026 rugby union – live
Haiti Couleurs highlights Gold Cup credentials with Denman Chase victory