Nandy breached code over appointment of donor to lead football regulator

2 days ago

Lisa Nandy, the culture secretary, has apologised to Keir Starmer after an inquiry found she failed to say that her choice of nominee to lead a new football regulator had donated to her and to Labour before she nominated him for the role,Nandy said she regretted the errors highlighted in a report by William Shawcross, the commissioner for public appointments,Her apology comes a week after the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, made her own written apology to the prime minister for failing to obtain a licence before renting out her family home,In a letter to Nandy, Starmer said he accepted the apology, but noted that the process to appoint the media executive David Kogan “was not entirely up to the standard expected” and said her department could learn lessons from it,The reprimand does not affect the role of Kogan, whose long career in sport and media has included negotiating TV rights deals for the Premier League and the English Football League.

He was confirmed last month as the head of the Independent Football Regulator (IFR), a fan-friendly watchdog proposed by the Conservative government after plans for the briefly mooted European Super League collapsed, and brought into existence under Labour.After the conflict of interest emerged, Nandy stood aside from any role in deciding whether Kogan would be given the role.It is nonetheless another embarrassment for Starmer’s government, particularly so soon after it emerged that Reeves had not obtained the council licence needed to let her family home after she moved into Downing Street following the election.In his 18-page report, Shawcross said Nandy or her department had breached the governance code on public appointments in three ways: Nandy by not immediately declaring that Kogan had donated twice to her unsuccessful 2020 campaign to succeed Jeremy Corbyn as Labour leader; and the culture department by not discussing this when she interviewed him for the role and not declaring Kogan’s larger donations to Labour, including to Starmer’s leadership campaign.Nandy said she did not know at the time that Kogan had even donated to hers.

However, Shawcross said in the report that given Kogan’s known links to Labour, Nandy “ought to have considered and ascertained whether he had made donations to her”.The report said Nandy and other ministers should be “reminded of their duties to declare and resolve any interests and relationships which they have with a candidate participating in a campaign regulated by the governance code”, recommending that the Cabinet Office and Shawcross work together to avoid a similar situation happening again.Nandy, in her letter to Starmer, said she had taken “robust steps” to check her register of donations before the process of nominating Kogan began, but accepted the report’s findings, saying: “I deeply regret this error.I appreciate the perception it could create, but it was not deliberate and I apologise for it.”In response, Starmer said he accepted an error was inadvertent, adding: “I know you to be a person of integrity and on the basis of your letter, it is clear you have acted in good faith.

The commissioner acknowledges that you acted swiftly to step back from the appointment when you became aware of the perception of a conflict of interest,“Nonetheless, the process followed was not entirely up to the standard expected and I welcome your department’s willingness to cooperate with the commissioner and the Cabinet Office to learn lessons and to improve the guidance on handling conflicts of interests,”Sign up to First EditionOur morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it mattersafter newsletter promotionKogan said he had never been “aware of any deviation from best practice” in the appointment process,Responding to the findings of the commissioner for public appointments, he said: “I have cooperated fully throughout the investigation and can now draw a line under the process,“As the commissioner states, my suitability for the role has never been in question and at no point was I aware of any deviation from best practice.

“It is now time to move on and get on with the business of setting up the IFR so we can tackle the critical and urgent issues facing football.”The best public interest journalism relies on first-hand accounts from people in the know.If you have something to share on this subject, you can contact us confidentially using the following methods.Secure Messaging in the Guardian appThe Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories.Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs.

This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said.If you don't already have the Guardian app, download it (iOS/Android) and go to the menu.Select ‘Secure Messaging’.SecureDrop, instant messengers, email, telephone and postIf you can safely use the Tor network without being observed or monitored, you can send messages and documents to the Guardian via our SecureDrop platform.Finally, our guide at theguardian.

com/tips lists several ways to contact us securely, and discusses the pros and cons of each.

technologySee all

Tesla shareholders approve $1tn pay package for Elon Musk

Tesla shareholders approved a $1tn compensation plan for CEO Elon Musk on Thursday, awarding the world’s richest person what would be the largest corporate payout in history if he meets the goals necessary to receive it.The pay package, which several high-profile investors opposed, demonstrates that shareholders still believe Musk can lead the automaker in an era dominated by robotics and artificial intelligence.The result of the vote was announced at the annual shareholder event in Austin, Texas, with more than 75% of investors voting in favor of the plan. Chants of “Elon” erupted in the room at the news of its approval.“Thanks, guys,” Musk said, after briefly dancing on stage alongside the company’s Optimus robots

2 days ago

Amazon sues AI startup over browser’s automated shopping and buying feature

Amazon sued a prominent artificial intelligence startup on Tuesday over a shopping feature in the company’s browser, which can automate placing orders for users. Amazon accused Perplexity AI of covertly accessing customer accounts and disguising AI activity as human browsing.“Perplexity’s misconduct must end,” Amazon’s lawyers wrote. “Perplexity is not allowed to go where it has been expressly told it cannot; that Perplexity’s trespass involves code rather than a lockpick makes it no less unlawful.”Perplexity, which has grown rapidly amid the boom in AI assistants, has previously rejected the US shopping company’s claims, accusing Amazon of using its market dominance to stifle competition

3 days ago

Google plans to put datacentres in space to meet demand for AI

Google is hatching plans to put artificial intelligence datacentres into space, with its first trial equipment sent into orbit in early 2027.Its scientists and engineers believe tightly packed constellations of about 80 solar-powered satellites could be arranged in orbit about 400 miles above the Earth’s surface equipped with the powerful processors required to meet rising demand for AI.Prices of space launches are falling so quickly that by the middle of the 2030s the running costs of a space-based datacentre could be comparable to one on Earth, according to Google research released on Tuesday.Using satellites could also minimise the impact on the land and water resources needed to cool existing datacentres.Once in orbit, the datacentres would be powered by solar panels that can be up to eight times more productive than those on Earth

4 days ago

LOL: is this the ultimate texting faux pas (and what should you use instead)?

From abbreviations to happy poos, gen Z has strong opinions on appropriate texting behaviour. But can anyone keep up with the ever-changing rules?Name: “LOL”.Age: The Oxford English Dictionary first included LOL in 1997.Not to be confused with: Loll, which is what dogs sometimes do.So as in “laugh out loud”? Or laughing out loud, though David Cameron thought it stood for “lots of love” and used to sign off to Rebekah Brooks, the former Sun and News of the World editor, with a LOL

4 days ago

Apple Watch SE 3 review: the bargain smartwatch for iPhone

Apple’s entry level Watch SE has been updated with almost everything from its excellent mid-range Series 11 but costs about 40% less, making it the bargain of iPhone smartwatches.The Guardian’s journalism is independent. We will earn a commission if you buy something through an affiliate link. Learn more.The new Watch SE 3 costs from £219 (€269/$249/A$399), making it one of the cheapest brand-new fully fledged smartwatches available for the iPhone and undercutting the £369 Series 11 and the top-of-the-line £749 Apple Watch Ultra 3

5 days ago

Experts find flaws in hundreds of tests that check AI safety and effectiveness

Experts have found weaknesses, some serious, in hundreds of tests used to check the safety and effectiveness of new artificial intelligence models being released into the world.Computer scientists from the British government’s AI Security Institute, and experts at universities including Stanford, Berkeley and Oxford, examined more than 440 benchmarks that provide an important safety net.They found flaws that “undermine the validity of the resulting claims”, that “almost all … have weaknesses in at least one area”, and resulting scores might be “irrelevant or even misleading”.Many of the benchmarks are used to evaluate the latest AI models released by the big technology companies, said the study’s lead author, Andrew Bean, a researcher at the Oxford Internet Institute.In the absence of nationwide AI regulation in the UK and US, benchmarks are used to check if new AIs are safe, align to human interests and achieve their claimed capabilities in reasoning, maths and coding

5 days ago

sportSee all