Labour cancels its women’s conference after supreme court gender ruling
Labour has cancelled its national women’s conference and restricted all-women shortlists as it awaits full guidance from the equalities watchdog, drawing criticism from transgender rights and gender-critical campaigners.The party’s governing body, the national executive committee (NEC), met on Tuesday to sign off plans to cancel the women’s conference, which was due to take place before the party’s annual conference in Liverpool in September.The Equality and Human Rights Commission’s interim advice, published after the supreme court decision that the term “woman” in the Equality Act refers only to a biological woman, has suggested that voluntary organisations should apply that rule.The NEC had been told the party was at risk of a legal challenge if it went ahead with the conference, according to LabourList, and could face protests and direct action if the conference proceeded as usual on the basis of self-identification.Guidance to the NEC also advised that “all positive action measures relating to women in the party’s rules and procedures shall be interpreted on the basis of biological sex at birth.
Guidance shall be issued to all party units and relevant stakeholders to this effect.“The party will work with individuals and local parties affected by the judgment to resolve specific cases with sensitivity and compassion, acknowledging the significant effect the judgment will have had on many people.”The gender-critical group Labour Women’s Declaration said it was wrong to cancel the conference, calling it a “kneejerk reaction” and “incendiary action”.The conference acts as a policymaking body on particular issues affecting women.The group said: “It would be exceptionally disappointing if our party, which strives to be a grownup and serious political force, and a strong government, could not find the courage to run this conference as planned and run it in accordance with law which was introduced under a Labour government.
Women deserve better.”Cancellation of the conference is likely to be costly and the NEC document notes there are “impending contractual commitments for services in connection with the event that involve significant expenditure”.Labour for Trans Rights and Pride in Labour issued a joint statement, also signed by the trans officer for LGBT+ Labour, condemning the changes and urging NEC members to vote against them.The statement said: “The Labour party must set an example and stand on the right side of history.” It added that the proposals were “not effective ways to ‘clarify’ anything”.
It continued: “We would also question whether the exclusion of trans women from women’s conference is a proportionate means to achieve a legitimate aim, as trans issues have come up time and time again during the conference.This seems to completely remove trans people from that debate.It is a blatant attack on trans rights and is seemingly an attempt to isolate trans people even further within the Labour party and the labour movement more widely.”LGBT+ Labour’s trans officer, Georgia Meadows, said: “Trans people are already greatly underrepresented in British politics, and if passed, this decision by the NEC will further harm trans people’s ability to engage with the democratic process and make them feel unwelcome at a time when the trans community is increasingly under attack.”A Labour source said the party would respect the supreme court judgment and comply with statutory guidance once published.
Ministers will consider the EHRC code of practice when a draft is submitted.MPs at the parliamentary Labour party meeting with Keir Starmer on Monday night raised concerns about LGBTQ+ rights and the interim advice issued by the EHRC, saying it went significantly beyond the supreme court ruling.At a Westminster Hall debate on gender self-identification on Monday, a number of Labour MPs said they had been approached by worried constituents.The chair of the Treasury select committee, Meg Hillier, said a transgender constituent who used women’s changing facilities without any issue would be forced to disclose her transgender status at work if she was forced to use men’s facilities.“This legal ruling creates a real mess that needs sorting out,” Hillier said.
The MP for East Thanet, Polly Billington, said: “This situation, in which interim guidance from the EHRC is causing more stress and anxiety than the initial ruling, is not acceptable for anyone.Anybody who thinks that the supreme court ruling is drawing a line or making things clear is greatly mistaken.”The EHRC confirmed on Tuesday it would allow more time to consider its formal guidance on the supreme court ruling after the Guardian reported there had been a backlash from staff and stakeholders.The cross-party women and equalities committee asked the commission to extend its consultation timetable.The chair of the committee, Sarah Owen, said many transgender people were “anxious and unsure about where this ruling leaves them”.
The consultation will now take six weeks instead of two, closing at the end of June,The extended timeframe means that uncertainty for businesses, organisations and trans people is likely to persist over the summer because there is not enough time to lay the revised statutory code of practice before parliament for the required 40 days before recess begins,The Good Law Project and a number of trans and intersex individuals have begun a legal challenge to the EHRC’s interim update, which they say “authorises and approves unlawful discrimination”,The update, published nine days after the supreme court decision, set out that transgender people should not be allowed to use toilets of the gender they live as, and that in some cases they also cannot use toilets of their birth sex,A Labour party spokesperson said: “Like all other organisations, the Labour party must ensure all party procedures comply with the supreme court’s clear ruling.
“Labour is clear that everyone in our society deserves to be treated with dignity and respect,The party will work closely with individuals and local parties to implement the necessary changes with sensitivity and care,”
Jump in UK borrowing shows Rachel Reeves needs to relax her strict budget rules
There is mounting pressure on Rachel Reeves to relax her budget rules and to prepare the ground by telling voters in the next few weeks.The latest public borrowing figures for April, which show a rise above most City forecasts, indicate that the chancellor will struggle to stay within the constraints she imposed on herself at last year’s budget.Reeves gambled that the Treasury could brazen out a difficult year with nearly £10bn of headroom – a cushion that would protect the government against all eventualities.Donald Trump’s tariffs war and the subsequent global slowdown have been enough to derail that tactic.Economic growth is expected to slow over the next year despite a spate of trade deals
Will cyber-attack threaten M&S’s hard-won return to fashion relevance?
In September 2019, as Marks & Spencer fell out of the FTSE 100 for the first time, its then chief executive, Steve Rowe, described the retailer as having a “reputation for frumpiness”. Just six years later, thanks to clever campaigns, unexpected collaborations and a focus on catwalk-influenced pieces, the retailer has transformed itself into the go-to fashion destination for high street shoppers.Annual results, released on Wednesday, showed a 22% rise in pre-tax profits in the year to 30 March. Overall sales were up 6% to £13.9bn with fashion and homeware increasing 3
UK borrowing rises to £20.2bn, putting pressure on Rachel Reeves
The UK government borrowed more than expected in April, underscoring the challenge for Rachel Reeves to fix public services and grow the economy while meeting her fiscal rules.With the chancellor under pressure on Labour’s tax plans, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) said public sector net borrowing rose to £20.2bn in April, £1bn more than the same month a year earlier. City economists had forecast borrowing of £17.9bn
WeightWatchers scraps business model to team up with anti-obesity drugs provider
WeightWatchers is teaming up with a provider of weight-loss drugs such as Wegovy and Mounjaro, in a seismic shift for the brand away from a focus on dieting as it tries to turn around its struggling business.WeightWatchers, which has promoted a non-medical, points-based approach to food intake since its creation in the 1960s, has announced a strategic partnership in the UK with CheqUp, a provider of GLP-1 weight-loss medication and accompanying clinical support and health coaching.The partnership comes weeks after WeightWatchers filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the US, as it tries to cut its debt after the popularity of anti-obesity injections upended its model.All CheqUp members will be able to access a WeightWatchers app, which has been specifically designed for people on weight-loss injections, with guidance from experts on food recommendations to minimise the side effects of the medication, such as nausea, while supporting healthy weight loss.The two companies said the tie-up would help patients who are “seeking sustainable weight loss through GLP-1 medication and behavioural support”, with their “complementary offerings” allowing patients to achieve better results than with medication alone
HSBC high street bank staff face bonus cuts over remote working
HSBC has told staff in its UK high street banks that it may cut their bonuses if they do not work in the office frequently enough.The bank told employees at its HSBC UK division, which includes its retail and domestic commercial banking businesses, that anyone who did not spend at least 60% of their time in the office could end up being paid less, according to a report by Bloomberg.It is the latest bank to harden its stance on remote working. In January, the rival bank Barclays ordered all staff to work from the office for at least three days a week, up from a previous requirement of two days. Last year Santander told employees they must be in the office for at least three days a week
Liberty Steel has not produced anything at two key plants since July 2024
Liberty Steel has produced nothing at two of its key UK plants since July, in a sign of the deep financial difficulties for Britain’s third-biggest steelmaker as it looks for rescue funding.The plants at Rotherham in South Yorkshire and Motherwell in Scotland have not produced any steel for about nine months because of a lack of funds to buy vital materials, with staff on furlough on 85% of their salaries for the duration, according to workers who spoke to the Guardian.Steel companies have been struggling for several years. UK steel production fell in 2024 to its lowest since the 1930s, and in the last month the government in effect took over the British Steel blast furnaces at Scunthorpe, amid fears of more than 2,700 job losses and the end of primary steel-making in the UK.Liberty Steel is ultimately owned by Sanjeev Gupta, whose GFG Alliance metals empire is under severe financial pressure across the world after a debt-fuelled expansion spree
Athletes warn against potential health risks of ‘dangerous, unethical’ Enhanced Games
Jim Irsay, longtime owner of NFL’s Indianapolis Colts, dies aged 65
Sophia Dunkley launches England into new era with win over West Indies in first T20
England beat West Indies by eight wickets: first women’s T20 cricket international – as it happened
Oklahoma City Thunder’s Shai Gilgeous-Alexander named NBA MVP
Pro-doping Enhanced Games to debut in Las Vegas with Trump Jr backing