UK government putting pressure on nature groups to drop opposition to planning bill
The government is putting pressure on wildlife organisations to drop their opposition to its planning bill, the Guardian has learned,Some of Britain’s biggest nature charities including the RSPB, Wildlife Trusts and the National Trust say the legislation risks widespread destruction of nature,The charities want a key section of the legislation, part 3, scrapped entirely because they say it is a “licence to kill nature”,Leading figures from the organisations were summoned by the government to a meeting last Friday where officials put forward nine amendments to the language of the bill, which they say offer greater environmental protections,In return for accepting these, ministers want the nature groups to stop their campaign, the Guardian has established from several sources.
Angela Rayner, the secretary of state for housing, communities and local government, has had a statement supporting the bill prepared for the charities to sign, which says: “These amendments will provide confidence that our reforms will truly deliver for nature and help us recover our most precious sites and species as we work to get Britain building.”Peers will debate scrapping part 3 when the bill goes before them on Thursday in the House of Lords.One participant in the meeting said their organisation “will take some persuading”.Another source from a charity said: “There is a lot of pressure.There is this deal trying to be struck by Angela Rayner’s department, essentially so that we go quiet, or even better that we back the bill.
But at the moment what’s been offered in the meetings is not enough for us; we are not convinced,”The environmental charities summoned to the meetings – the RSPB, National Trust, Wildlife Trusts, and Wildlife and Countryside Link – have 8 million members between them,Some members are concerned at the nature of the proposed deal and the methods being used,One source said: “They cannot make deals in backrooms like this, [the NGOs] have to come to us with this,There is a great deal of unease around this.
We are not going to stop campaigning against this bill.”As yet there has been no agreement from the NGOs to either sign the statement or stop their campaigns.Richard Benwell, the CEO of Wildlife and Countryside Link, confirmed that the groups were talking to the government.He said: “As it stands, the bill skews the scales much too far away from the crucial safeguards nature needs.We hope ministers make the significant and wide-ranging amendments needed to reset the balance for nature and ensure that the planning system gives strong protection to vulnerable habitats and species and contributes to nature recovery.
”The bill has been deemed a “regression” of environmental law by the chair of the government’s own watchdog, the Office for Environmental Protection, and two independent legal opinions.It would allow developers to sidestep current environmental law and build without assessing the damage to protected wildlife and habitats, as long as they pay a levy into a central nature recovery fund.The Guardian has revealed that more than 5,000 of England’s most precious protected sites are at high risk of being destroyed by development as a result, according to legal analysis.Sign up to Down to EarthThe planet's most important stories.Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essentialafter newsletter promotionThe planning bill is central to the government’s promise to build 1.
5m homes and 150 major infrastructure projects in this parliament.Rhetoric from Keir Starmer, Rachel Reeves and Rayner has pitted nature as a blocker to development.But the government’s own impact assessment states there is almost no evidence for this claim.More than 100,000 people have signed a petition against the bill and thousands have contacted their MPs over the threat to nature.On Thursday, peers will begin line by line consideration of the legislation.
Amendments being considered include one from Lord Roborough, Conservative shadow Defra minister in the Lords, to scrap part 3.Alexa Culver, an environmental lawyer with RSK Wilding, said major problems with the bill had not been addressed by the suggested changes.“Back-room bargains are being made about our natural environment and our economy, which are leading to the ‘worst of all worlds’ amendments,” she said.A government spokesperson said: “We’ve inherited a system that has blocked homes, infrastructure and economic growth while doing nothing for nature’s recovery, and we are determined to fix this.We have committed to only act in legislation where we can confirm to parliament that the steps we are taking will deliver positive environmental outcomes.
“We note the support of the Office for Environmental Protection for the intentions behind our reforms and continue to carefully consider their advice.Our planning and infrastructure bill will mean a win-win for both nature and the economy, and we are always listening to views about how we make sure our reforms are as effective as possible so we can leave a lasting legacy of environmental improvement.”
Trump privately indicates he may soon fire Fed chair Jerome Powell
Donald Trump has privately indicated he is on the verge of firing the Federal Reserve chair, Jerome Powell, rattling Wall Street and renewing questions over the US central bank’s independence.The US president insisted on Wednesday that it was “highly unlikely” he would dismiss the Fed chair, after reports he had suggested he would and shown a draft letter dismissing Powell to political allies.“I don’t rule out anything, but I think it’s highly unlikely. Unless he has to leave for fraud,” said Trump. The president has recently criticized Powell for a $2
Rachel Reeves warned by City grandees not to weaken banking safeguards
Rachel Reeves has been warned by City grandees that her plan to slash financial red tape could have little benefit for British households while increasing risks in the banking industry.The chancellor used a speech to City bosses attending the annual Mansion House dinner on Tuesday to argue that in too many areas regulation was acting as a “boot on the neck of business”, as she pledged sweeping changes to help revive the economy.However, leading figures involved in Britain’s post-2008 drive to prevent a repeat of the financial crisis warned Labour against unpicking bank ringfencing – a key measure introduced after the collapse.Sir John Vickers, the architect of the UK’s ringfencing rules, deployed after the financial crisis to separate high street banking from riskier investment banking, said a wholesale retreat from the reform would be a “very bad idea”.Lord Turner, who took over as chair of the Financial Services Authority during the 2008 crash and played a leading role in the post-crisis redesign of the banking system, also warned the chancellor to proceed with caution
Internet-safe iPhone for children goes on sale for £99 a month
A neutered iPhone, stripped of web browsers and social media apps, is going on sale to parents worried about their children’s phone use, but the “peace and freedom” its creators promise will come at a steep price.The pared-back version of the top-selling handset, which will not allow internet searches, gaming or downloads of Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat and other social media, is being offered in the UK for £99 a month by a US company that wants children to “reconnect with real life, not just reduce screen time”.At more than double the price of a typical two-year iPhone contract, Sage Mobile, an iPhone 16 handset loaded with custom software, will be a pricey way to avoid online harms. But it reflects growing parental dilemmas over the best way to start their children’s digital lives.Research has shown children with problematic smartphone use are twice as likely to experience anxiety and almost three times as likely to experience depression compared with those whose use did not resemble addiction
WeTransfer says user content will not be used to train AI after backlash
The popular filesharing service WeTransfer has said user content will not be used to train artificial intelligence after a change in its service terms had triggered a public backlash.The company, which is regularly used by creative professionals to transfer their work online, had suggested in new terms that uploaded files could be used to “improve machine learning models”.The clause had previously said the service had a right to “reproduce, modify, distribute and publicly display” content, and the updated version caused confusion among users.A WeTransfer spokesperson said user content had never been used, even internally, to test or develop AI models and that “no specific kind of AI” was being considered for use by the Dutch company.The firm said: “There’s no change in how WeTransfer handles your content in practice
India beat England by four wickets: first women’s cricket ODI – as it happened
That’s it from me, Raf’s report from the ground should be along any moment. Thanks for tuning in, goodnight!England Captain Nat Sciver-Brunt speaks:Sophia Dunkley and Alice Davidson-Richards played really, really well. To get to that total from 90-4 was brilliant, but ultimately we didn’t have enough runs.The outfield really dried out through our innings and the second innings, with it being a big field we knew we’d be running quite a lot. 280 would have been a good score
The Itoje legacy: Nigerian roots shaped the Lions captain who has inspired a new generation
It is 2017 and Maro Itoje has just been selected as the youngest member of the British & Irish Lions squad. He is asked for his favourite Lions memory and his response is illuminating. “Ugo Monye scoring his try in the third Test [against South Africa in 2009]. When you’re young and growing up, you look at players that look like you. And, by that, I don’t mean eyes, ears, nose, I mean who have the same skin colour, who you can identify with
Apple inks $500m deal for rare earth magnets with US mining firm
Nothing Phone 3 review: a quirky, slick Android alternative
Elon Musk’s Grok chatbot melts down – and then wins a military contract
AI chatbot ‘MechaHitler’ could be making content considered violent extremism, expert witness tells X v eSafety case
Elmo’s X account posts racist and antisemitic messages after being hacked
Musk’s giant Tesla factory casts shadow on lives in a quiet corner of Germany