Abstract verbs in, long descriptors out: How do you name a political party?
What’s in a name? Potentially a lot, if you are launching a movement with ambitions “to shape something truly transformative” in British politics.That’s the challenge facing Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana, the former Labour MPs who announced plans last month, if not in the most coordinated fashion, to launch a leftwing political party.More than 600,000 people have already signed up for updates on the new group, which will be called … what?“The members will get to choose,” Sultana said earlier this week, as a consultation on the subject closed.It will not be called Your Party, however, despite having launched on a website with precisely that name.Her own preference is the Left Party, “because that’s what it says on the tin … We’ll obviously put that to the members and we’ll see what we get”.
The fact that so many have already signed up to a nameless project might suggest that what it is eventually called matters less than the involvement of Corbyn, the still totemic (to some) former Labour leader, and Sultana, an effective and savvy digital communicator.But, say political insiders, history shows how parties’ fortunes can be shaped by the names they adopt, both good and bad.For every En Marche! (Forward!), the French centrist movement that propelled Emmanuel Macron to his country’s presidency, there is a Canadian Conservative Reform Alliance party, launched in 2015 and inevitably known as CCRAP until its name was hastily re-jumbled.Or take the short-lived alliance of disaffected centrist Labour MPs and Tories that in 2019 called itself the Independent Group, then TIG, then Change UK before being forced by a branding dispute to settle on the Independent Group for Change.With even their own candidates dismissing their “terrible name”, they made little electoral impact and quickly folded.
On the other hand, the body once known as the Brexit party now claims 29% opinion poll support, after rebranding in 2020 as Reform UK.In the party-naming fashion stakes, indeed, long strings of descriptors are out of vogue these days, while dynamic slogans or abstract verbs (Forza Italia! Propel! Aspire!) are very much in.“I think what you call yourself is really important, it’s one of the most profound calling cards of what you offer,” says Rohan McWilliam, a professor of modern history at Anglia Ruskin University and director of its Labour History Research Unit.He cites the example of Tony Blair’s mid-90s rebrand of “New” Labour, which he says the defeated Conservative party came to see as the single most important reason for the party’s huge victory in 1997.“Their conclusion was they had been defeated because Labour used one word and one word alone, and that was ‘New’.
Just that word alone spoke volumes.”John McTernan, formerly a member of Blair’s core Downing Street team and now a political strategist, agrees about the name’s impact.“The important thing was that calling yourself New Labour created a category called old Labour.It created what you were against – and that’s a very important thing in politics.That gave us the ability to have a clean break with the past, so we could say: ‘No, no, that’s old Labour.
’”Sign up to First EditionOur morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it mattersafter newsletter promotionThe Liberal Democrats had been through their own naming dilemmas almost a decade earlier, when the merger of the Liberal and Social Democratic parties in 1988 prompted a heated debate that was also settled by a vote by party members,“At one period, election materials from us were appearing with Liberal Alliance, Social and Liberal Democrats and Liberal Democrats, all on different posters within a very short period of time,” says the Lib Dem peer and former communications director Olly Grender,“It was very vexed at the time,”Ultimately, however, “Liberal Democrats feels a very comfortable fit,” she says,“Liberalism is the absolute bedrock of our history and firmly underpins our current beliefs.
”So where should Corbyn and Sultana land? Gareth Morgan, an executive director overseeing government relations at the brand consultancy Cavendish, urges clarity above all,“I think it’s always useful to have a name which conveys the purpose to people who check in with politics for 10 minutes each week, max,The best name is one where, just by reading it, I understand what you’re for and what you’re about,”Chris Bruni-Lowe, a campaigns strategist whose book Eight Words That Changed the World examines which political words resonate, says: “A party name or slogan should be emotionally intelligible to everyday people, not just to political insiders,Words that sound elitist or academic are the least likely to work.
New political parties often fail unless they define themselves clearly and simply.”Bruni-Lowe has advised parties across the political spectrum.“The most successful parties have a name and slogan that succeeded because it was immediately clear what it stood for,” he says.Over to you, Corbyn, Sultana – and your many thousands of supporters.
UK food inflation: why your barbecue meat is becoming more expensive
The weather is not the only thing putting a dampener on impromptu barbecues as consumers balk at the soaring cost of burgers, sausages and chicken to put on the grill.At nearly £4, a four-pack of supermarket own-label beef quarter-pounders costs 53%, or £1.37, more than this time last year, according to the price analysts Assosia. With steak and kebabs also off the menu because they are too pricey, Britons are switching to poultry.However, this extra demand is pushing up the price of chicken
Openreach engineers trial panic alarms as incidents of abuse and assault soar
From scissors being brandished as weapons to verbal abuse and being trapped during a home visit, the number of reported incidents of abuse and assault on telecoms engineers is on the rise.Openreach, the BT subsidiary that maintains the vast majority of the broadband network serving UK homes and businesses, recorded 450 reports of abuse and assault in the year to the end of March.The number of incidents involving Openreach employees was up 8% year-on-year, a 40% increase on 2022-23 and seven times the volume reported almost a decade ago.Abuse and assault has for the first time become the largest cause of injury to Openreach office staff and its 22,000 field engineers. Managers believe the number of incidents is even higher, as many cases are not reported by staff
UK Online Safety Act risks ‘seriously infringing’ free speech, says X
Elon Musk’s X platform has said the UK’s Online Safety Act (OSA) is at risk of “seriously infringing” free speech as a row deepens over measures for protecting children from harmful content.The social media company said the act’s “laudable” intentions were being overshadowed by its aggressive implementation by the communications watchdog, Ofcom.In a statement posted on the platform, X said: “Many are now concerned that a plan ostensibly intended to keep children safe is at risk of seriously infringing on the public’s right to free expression.”The UK government hit back, saying it was “demonstrably false” to claim the act compromised free speech, and pointing to its provisions on protecting freedom of expression.X added in its statement that the freedom of speech risk would not be a surprise to the UK government because by passing the OSA, lawmakers had made a “conscientious decision” to increase censorship in the name of “online safety”
Apple quietens Wall Street’s fears of China struggles and slow AI progress
Apple has been under pressure this year. It’s playing catch-up to its fellow tech giants on artificial intelligence, it’s seen its stock fall by double digits since the year began, it closed a store in China for the first time ever this week, and looming US tariffs on Beijing threaten its supply chain. On Thursday, the company released its third-quarter earnings of the fiscal year as investors scrutinize how the iPhone maker might turn things around.Despite the gloomy outlook, the company is still worth more than $3tn, and it beat Wall Street’s expectations for profit and revenue this quarter. Apple reported a huge 10% year-over-year increase in revenue to $94
England v India: fifth men’s cricket Test, day three – live
43rd over: India 181-3 (Jaiswal 84, Gill 4) Gill shakes gloves and exchanges grins, with Akash Deep as the two pass – Akash Deep to huge applause. Gill gets off the mark with a waft of the wand at a short wide ball from Overton – four. Next ball, Overton follows through almost to Gills’ boots, giving him a stern look. Gill smiles boyishly back.At last! A leading edge which balloons up and Atkinson gulps it down at backward point
‘He was angry’: India admit wind-up strategy to disrupt Joe Root’s batting
At the end of another day of backchat and occasionally fraying tempers, in which the former England captain Michael Vaughan suggested of the two sets of players that “it’s almost like they’ve had enough of each other”, India admitted Joe Root had been the target of a deliberate plan to wind him up and put him off his game.Alastair Cook, another former England captain, had suggested as much after Root reacted to a comment from Prasidh Krishna. “He was angry, he wasn’t in much control, but why wouldn’t you try to upset Joe Root?” Cook said. “I don’t know if it was a plan but you can say that it did work. I just hope what he said was within the line
Amazon fails to calm tariff worries with worse-than-expected financial outlook
How will Australia’s under-16s social media ban be enforced, and which platforms will be exempt?
Met police to more than double use of live facial recognition
Zuckerberg claims ‘superintelligence is now in sight’ as Meta lavishes billions on AI
Wall Street delighted with Microsoft as it spends $100bn on AI
YouTube to gauge US users’ ages with AI after UK and Australia add age checks