South East Water fined £22.5m for ‘repeated supply failures’ in Kent and Sussex
South East Water has been fined £22,5m by Ofwat for repeated supply failures in Kent and Sussex between 2020 and 2023 that affected more than 280,000 people,While the root cause of the water shortages was extreme weather, the water regulator for England and Wales found that they were “in part attributable to and/or exacerbated by failures by South East Water itself to develop and maintain an efficient water supply system”,This has affected 286,645 customers since 2020, with some customers being affected repeatedly, Ofwat said in its enforcement order proposal,In January, Ofwat began a separate investigation into a series of outages before Christmas that left tens of thousands of residents in Kent and Sussex without water for up to a week, many of them in Tunbridge Wells.
This prompted the environment secretary, Emma Reynolds, to call for the regulator to review the company’s operating licence.Chris Walters, Ofwat’s interim chief executive, told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “The investigation reveals that South East Water did not take sufficient steps to plan, to learn from previous events.For example, the big freeze event we had in 2018.“We all remember the “beast from the east”, and it didn’t proactively maintain its network.All the things it needs to do to prevent a lack of supply resilience, so tankering and storage tanks and storage reservoirs.
”Walters said the fine would be paid by the company and “won’t show up on customers’ bills”.A spokesperson for South East Water said: “We recently filed for judicial review of an Ofwat draft decision and sought an injunction.Following a hearing, the court did not grant the interim injunction.We respect the court’s decision on this.“We are now considering Ofwat’s draft decision and will respond via the appropriate channels, ahead of its final decision.
”Asked why the process took three years, Walters said that investigations took time, saying supply interruptions for customers were “a totemic issue” and it was important to get things right.He added that South East Water “needs to step up and take more ownership of the problem”.Prominent water campaigner Feargal Sharkey said: “Let’s be clear about this, as has been proven time and time again, fining these companies is nothing but a charade.“These fines rarely if ever get paid, shareholders rarely if ever take money out of their pockets to pay them and invariably water companies negotiate some sort of deal so that ultimately it doesn’t cost them a penny.“Ofwat needs to start revoking operating licences and government needs to order them to start that process today.
”Jonathan Hawker, chair of local community group Dry Wells Action: “This £22m fine, yet again, highlights the shortcomings of the organisations that are supposed to be representing consumers’ interests.“Given that South East Water has £1.3bn in debt on a turnover of less than £300m, from which it made a loss of almost £20m last year, it should be obvious to Ofwat that consumers will end up paying this fine either through increases in water bills or through the additional cost of debt at the company.“We are extremely disappointed that there is no action to impose leadership on this company, or to force upon it a remedial action plan for urgent improvements and expansion of the infrastructure serving Tunbridge Wells.”The latest penalty comes a day after another supplier, South West Water, admitted supplying water unfit for human consumption after a parasite outbreak in Devon made almost 150 people sick.
Last May, Thames Water, Britain’s biggest water company, received a record £104m fine from Ofwat over environmental breaches involving sewage spills, after failing to operate and manage its treatment works and wastewater networks effectively,The environment secretary, Emma Reynolds, said: “Water supply disruptions … are thoroughly unacceptable,It is entirely right South East Water is held to account,“Our water reforms will make companies put their customers first,”
Asylum seekers waiting over a year for claim in UK may be allowed to work under new measures
Up to 21,000 asylum seekers who have waited for a year for their claims to be processed could be allowed to enter the jobs market so they can support themselves, the Home Office has said, as part of a package of measures to be announced on Thursday.As the government seeks to empty asylum hotels, claimants who break the law, work illegally or are found to have enough assets to live without support will from June be ejected and lose their support payments.The developments have been questioned by the Refugee Council for risking an increase in rough sleeping among those escaping war and famine.They come as Shabana Mahmood has hit back in a column for the Guardian at demands from senior labour movement figures for ministers to stop focusing on migration and to soften their attacks on the Green party.The home secretary wrote: “Restoring order at our border is not just an embodiment of Labour values, it is the necessary condition for a Labour government to do anything at all
Badenoch gives a borderline disgraceful performance at PMQs on Iran | John Crace
On another day it might even have been quite funny. The mismatch between Kemi Badenoch’s self-belief and her performance. But Wednesday’s prime minister’s questions was far too serious for that, with Donald Trump’s Awfully Big Iranian Adventure threatening to escalate into all-out war in the Middle East.It was also a day when you could think the unthinkable. Might Kemi actually be even weaker than Chris Philp? Certainly she’s the worst leader of the Tory party in living memory
‘He’s no Winston Churchill’: why Starmer can shrug off Trump’s insults over Iran
It was perhaps the most attention-grabbing moment of prime minister’s questions. Responding to yet another Conservative salvo about his approach to Iran and how it might affect ties with America, Keir Starmer was direct.“American planes are operating out of British bases – that is the special relationship in action,” he said. “Sharing intelligence every day to keep our people safe – that is the special relationship in action. Hanging on to President Trump’s latest words is not the special relationship in action
Andy Burnham criticises ‘bankruptcy’ of Labour approach to campaigning
Andy Burnham has reignited hostilities with Keir Starmer’s Labour leadership, criticising what he described as the “bankruptcy” of the party’s approach to campaigning, a week after it lost the previously safe seat of Gorton and Denton.The mayor of Greater Manchester and former MP, regarded as a rival to Starmer, said Labour’s campaigning style prevented it from connecting with non-Labour voters and other progressive parties, as he evoked the system of clipboard-wielding canvassers going door to door with records of previous Labour supporters.“What I want to say today is that the time has most definitely come for a serious conversation about our political system and its pervading culture, particularly so in the aftermath of the Gorton and Denton byelection,” Burnham said in a speech at the British Library in London that reignited speculation he has not given up on replacing Starmer.“It revealed the full depth of the chasm between people and Westminster politics. I don’t think anybody can seriously dispute that statement
Labour MP says she had no reason to suspect her husband may have broken law after his arrest on suspicion of spying for China – as it happened
One of the three men arrested on suspicion of spying for China is David Taylor, the husband of a Labour MP.Joani Reid, MP for East Kilbride and Strathaven, told Sky News in a statement:double quotation markI have never seen anything to make me suspect my husband has broken any law.I am not part of my husband’s business activities, and neither I nor my children are part of this investigation, and we should not be treated by media organisations as though we are.Above all I expect media organisations to respect my children’s privacy.That’s all from me, Tom Ambrose, and indeed the UK politics live blog for today
Ex-Nato commander defends Starmer after Trump’s ‘no Winston Churchill’ jibe
Britain cannot become embroiled in a war “without a clear end point”, a former senior Nato commander has said, as he defended Keir Starmer after Donald Trump’s jibes that he was “not Winston Churchill”.Trump was “another American president who had launched a war of choice,” said Gen Sir Richard Shirreff, as a minister insisted that the UK prime minister had acted “with a cool head” by not allowing British bases to be used for initial strikes.The US president launched a deeply personal attack on Starmer over his refusal to let Washington launch initial strikes on Iran from British bases, telling reporters on Tuesday in the White House: “This is not Winston Churchill that we’re dealing with.”In his latest extraordinary salvo, Trump said he was not happy with the UK even though Starmer eventually agreed the US could use the Diego Garcia military base in the Chagos Islands for strikes on Iranian missile facilities.Asked in a series of interviews on Wednesday morning about Trump’s comments, the chief secretary to the Treasury, James Murray, said: “The prime minister took the decision he did in the national interest
It’s crunch time! Gala apples and nashi pears among Australia’s best-value fruit and veg for March
How to turn limp rhubarb into tasty jam – recipe
£25 for a cookie? What the baffling luxury bakery boom tells us about Britain
Stuffed peppers and aubergine dip: Sami Tamimi’s recipes for savoury Palestinian snacks
Australian supermarket muesli bars taste test: the worst is ‘both dry and moist’
Why do my potatoes go black after cooking? | Kitchen aide