US raised concerns about Chinese boss of chipmaker before Dutch takeover

A picture


US authorities had raised concerns about the boss of a China-owned chipmaker before it was taken over by the Dutch government this week, according to court papers,The documents show US officials warned the Netherlands in June that Nexperia may not be able to export to the US if its Chinese chief executive, Zhang Xuezheng, remained in post,Late on Sunday the Dutch government said it had invoked a cold war-era law to effectively take control of the company, citing “major shortcomings that could jeopardise security of supply” of chips to European factories,By that point Zhang had been suspended from Nexperia, which is controlled by the Chinese company Wingtech,It has now emerged that the US had raised concerns about Nexperia’s management as far back as June.

A preliminary court ruling released on Tuesday included minutes of a meeting from 12 June in which the US Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation told the Dutch foreign ministry: “The fact that the company’s CEO is still the same Chinese owner is problematic … It is almost certain that the CEO will have to be replaced,”Washington put Wingtech on its “entity list” of companies seen as a threat to national security last year, for its alleged role in “aiding China’s government’s efforts to acquire entities with sensitive semiconductor manufacturing capacity”,Wingtech, which is 30% owned by Chinese national and regional governments and affiliated investment funds, bought the Dutch chipmaker in 2018 from the Dutch consumer electronics company Philips,On 30 September, that entity list was expanded to include company subsidiaries, which meant Nexperia would be hit by its restrictions by the end of November,In an extraordinary move, the Dutch government revealed on Sunday that it had taken control of the Nijmegen-headquartered chipmaker, citing worries about the possible transfer of technology to Wingtech.

That has heightened tensions with Beijing, with Nexperia saying it is now in negotiations with the US to remove barriers to exports.On Tuesday, China also prohibited Nexperia and its subcontractors from exporting components assembled in China as tensions with the US escalated.The People’s Daily, the official newspaper of the central committee of the Chinese Communist party, described the takeover as “robbery in legal disguise”, warning that the west was using “national security” as an excuse for its failures to keep up with the Chinese.“China’s scientific and technological progress has profoundly shaken the nerves of western hegemony,” it said.The Dutch intervention comes 18 months after the UK government ordered Wingtech to sell its 86% stake in a silicon chip plant in Newport in Wales, the largest chip plant in the country, amid security concerns.

Wingtech called the Dutch government’s intervention in Nexperia “excessive interference driven by geopolitical bias”,Sign up to Business TodayGet set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morningafter newsletter promotionWingtech also alleged that non-Chinese Nexperia executives had tried to forcibly alter the company’s equity structure through legal proceedings in a “cloaked power grab” on the company,The Dutch economy minister Vincent Karremans told the Dutch broadcaster NOS: “I recently received serious and urgent signals that the company has major shortcomings that could jeopardise security of supply,“This would have major consequences for the European and Dutch economies,”The Dutch invoked never-before-used powers under a Dutch law known as the “Availability of Goods Act”, which does not give it ownership but gives it the power to reverse or block management decisions it considers harmful.

It also points out that it has several subsidiaries in Europe, including wafer production facilities in Manchester and Hamburg.The Amsterdam commercial court ruling in a “preliminary opinion” that there were “well-founded reasons to doubt the correct policy and correct conduct of affairs” were being pursued by the company.It appointed the Dutch businessman Guido Dierick to take Zhang’s position with a “deciding vote”, and transferred control of almost all of Nexperia’s shares to a Dutch lawyer for management.The Dutch state and the company’s labour council had supported the moves, the document showed.
politicsSee all
A picture

Keir Starmer back on familiar ground after walk-on part in the Trump show in Egypt | John Crace

Keir Starmer has always known that Monday’s visit to Egypt was going to be the Donald Trump Show. After all, almost every day is the Donald Trump Show and there was no way the US president was going to share the limelight on this of all days. The day when the living Israeli hostages were freed, 1,900 Palestinian detainees were freed and the first aid trucks entered Gaza.This was The Donald’s peace deal. A narcissist is going to narcissise

A picture

Starmer says he expects debate about ‘full horror’ of what happened in Gaza when media allowed in – as it happened

Ed Davey, the Lib Dem leader, asks for more detail of what the UK is doing to help ensure more aid gets into Gaza.He says all the bodies of dead hostages need to be returned.And he asks what the UK is doing to ensure that the expansion of illegal Israeli settlements on the West Bank stops.Starmer thanks Davey for the “content and tone” of his response. (He is making a contrast with Badenoch’s

A picture

Farage, not Marxism, risks ‘poisoning our kids’ | Letters

I am one of those proud teachers that Nigel Farage has in mind (Nigel Farage accuses teachers of ‘poisoning our kids’ on race issues, 9 October). For many years, as part of teaching media, film and journalism, I sought to educate students about basic political terms and concepts. Marxism was, and is, nothing resembling the totalitarian bogeyman that the USSR so conveniently became. Marxism is a doctrine espousing fairness, equal opportunity, redistribution of wealth and emancipation. It aims to be fully democratic

A picture

National grooming gangs inquiry stalls over remit wrangles and lack of chair

Keir Starmer’s national grooming gangs inquiry has stalled amid wrangles over its remit and difficulties in finding a senior legal figure willing to become its chair, the Guardian has been told.Terms of the statutory investigation are still being discussed by a panel of stakeholders including survivors of abuse rings, four months after the prime minister bowed to pressure and set it up.The search for a chair of the panel is still to be completed, the Home Office has confirmed. Judges and lawyers appear to be reluctant to head the inquiry, a source said.Officials are said to be working to appoint a chair who will then play a central role in shaping the terms and scope of the inquiry and identify a first area for review

A picture

Vote for a party’s policies and actions, not its name or history | Letters

Polly Hudson (Some people have a choice about whether or not to vote Labour. I wish I did too, 5 October) seems to be confusing her father’s devotion to his political and ethical principles with devotion to a party. He sounds like a dedicated and hard-working MP who sacrificed a lot for his principles and to serve his country and community.But it’s only in dictatorships that devotion to “the party” starts to supersede commitment to moral and ethical principles. As citizens of a democratic country, it is imperative that we vote according to our principles and our ideas of what we want this country to be

A picture

Former lord speaker faces suspension for ‘improper influence’ over speeding offence

Former lord speaker Frances D’Souza is facing suspension from the Lords after writing to the Metropolitan police commissioner to try to “influence a police investigation into alleged speeding offences”.Lady D’Souza wrote to Mark Rowley saying she feared she would have to give up attending parliament if she were banned from driving for exceeding the limit in a 20mph zone.The Met police said it had considered launching a criminal investigation into the apparent attempt to influence the commissioner but decided against it. It then passed the letter to the House of Lords conduct committee to investigate whether it breached the code of conduct.D’Souza did not dispute the case but appealed against the sanction – a recommended eight-week ban from the Lords for seeking “to influence a live police investigation”