Jack Draper shakes off errors to thwart Popyrin and keep Queen’s Club quest alive
In the final throes of a tense, uneasy tussle with one of the bigger servers in his sport, Jack Draper was fading.The British No 1, and second seed, had started poorly: he had struggled to find his range on his groundstrokes for much of the occasion and then two match points passed him by.Deep in the third-set tie break, he trailed 2-4.Over the past year, though, a period during which he has established himself as one of the best players in the world, Draper has continually shown his ability to find a path to victory no matter what.In the first week of his grass-court homecoming, the 23-year-old offered a forceful demonstration of his supreme competitive spirit as he recovered to defeat Australia’s Alexei Popyrin, the world No 21, 3-6, 6-2, 7-6 (5) to reach the quarter-finals at Queen’s Club.
“I have always been a really good competitor,” Draper said.“That’s something I pride myself on: trying my absolute best for every point whenever I play.I think that comes from when I was younger.I think I have an older brother that helps with that.I was lucky enough to have coaches who made me very competitive as well.
“I played up as well, so I was always quite small, and I had to fight hard for every point if I wanted to make any headway in the match.I think I have always had that, and I think that’s one of my biggest strengths, to be honest.Especially on a day like today where I wasn’t my best, wasn’t feeling my best, but I came through and I gave myself another chance.”Having started last year’s grass-court season ranked No 40, Draper returned to London, his home city, at a career-high ranking of No 4.An underdog for so long, he is now a title contender in every tournament he enters.
The next four weeks mark another significant moment in his career as he takes a step into the unknown and tries to navigate the pressure that will continue to grow as Wimbledon approaches.That extra tension was evident early on as Draper was punished for a sloppy service game at 3-4 and quickly found himself down a set.He gradually found his range, building rhythm on his serve and returning with greater depth and consistency as he forced a final set.Although his forehand was erratic and he was tentative behind his backhand, Draper served well in set three and it seemed as if he might be rewarded for his patience when he generated two match points on Popyrin’s serve.Instead, the Australian saved both before forcing a tiebreak.
In the most tense moment of the match, in that tiebreak, Draper gave a full demonstration of his toughness.From 2-4, Draper won five of the six points with a flurry of clutch winners, including a winning forehand down the line, an ace, a searing backhand down-the-line winner and then another ace on match point.He took the match into his own hands with courage and character, producing his best level when he most needed it.It was the mark of a player who continues to grow into a champion.In addition to remaining in the equation for his first Queen’s Club title and potentially securing a top-four seeding at Wimbledon, which he would acquire with one more win, perhaps the most important part of this victory is that Draper will have another match on grass before Wimbledon.
He will face Brandon Nakashima in the quarter-finals on Friday after the American defeated Britain’s Dan Evans 7-5, 7-6 (4),Sign up to The RecapThe best of our sports journalism from the past seven days and a heads-up on the weekend’s actionafter newsletter promotionElsewhere, Mika Stojsavljevic, Hannah Klugman and Mimi Xu, Great Britain’s trio of talented teenagers, will make their Wimbledon main-draw debuts this year after being handed wildcards,Stojsavljevic, the US Open girls’ champion, and Klugman, who reached the French Open girls final this month, are both 16 and Xu is 17,They will be joined in the women’s draw by Heather Watson, Harriet Dart, Jodie Burrage and Fran Jones,Petra Kvitova, the two-time Wimbledon champion, was also granted a wildcard as she continues her return from maternity leave.
In the men’s draw, Evans, Jack Pinnington Jones, Johannus Munday, Henry Searle, Jay Clarke, Oliver Crawford and George Loffhagen have all received wildcards.
Up to 70% of streams of AI-generated music on Deezer are fraudulent, says report
Up to seven out of 10 streams of artificial intelligence-generated music on the Deezer platform are fraudulent, according to the French streaming platform.The company said AI-made music accounts for just 0.5% of streams on the music streaming platform but its analysis shows that fraudsters are behind up to 70% of those streams.AI-generated music is a growing problem on streaming platforms. Fraudsters typically generate revenue on platforms such as Deezer by using bots to “listen” to AI-generated songs – and take the subsequent royalty payments, which become sizeable once spread across multiple tracks
Elon Musk’s X sues New York over hate speech and disinformation law
Elon Musk’s X Corp filed a lawsuit on Tuesday against the state of New York, arguing a recently passed law compelling large social media companies to divulge how they address hate speech is unconstitutional.The complaint alleges that bill S895B, known as the Stop Hiding Hate Act, violates free speech rights under the first amendment. The act, which the governor, Kathy Hochul, signed into law last December, requires companies to publish their terms of service and submit reports detailing the steps they take to moderate extremism, foreign influence, disinformation, hate speech and other forms of harmful content.Musk’s lawyers argue that the law, which goes into effect this week, would require X to submit “highly sensitive information” and compel non-commercial speech, which is subject to greater first amendment protections. The complaint also opposes the possible penalty of $15,000 per violation per day for failing to comply with the law
How AI pales in the face of human intelligence and ingenuity | Letters
Gary Marcus is right to point out – as many of us have for years – that just scaling up compute size is not going to solve the problems of generative artificial intelligence (When billion-dollar AIs break down over puzzles a child can do, it’s time to rethink the hype, 10 June). But he doesn’t address the real reason why a child of seven can solve the Tower of Hanoi puzzle that broke the computers: we’re embodied animals and we live in the world.All living things are born to explore, and we do so with all our senses, from birth. That gives us a model of the world and everything in it. We can infer general truths from a few instances, which no computer can do
Universities face a reckoning on ChatGPT cheats | Letters
I commend your reporting of the AI scandal in UK universities (Revealed: Thousands of UK university students caught cheating using AI, 15 June), but “tip of the iceberg” is an understatement. While freedom of information requests inform about the universities that are catching AI cheating, the universities that are not doing so are the real problem.In 2023, a widely used assessment platform, Turnitin, released an AI indicator, reporting high reliability from huge-sample tests. However, many universities opted out of this indicator, without testing it. Noise about high “false positives” circulated, but independent research has debunked these concerns (Weber-Wulff et al 2023; Walters 2023; Perkins et al, 2024)
Bar Council is wise to the risk of AI misuse | Letters
In your report (High court tells UK lawyers to stop misuse of AI after fake case-law citations, 6 June), you quote Dame Victoria Sharp’s call that we, the Bar Council, and our solicitor colleagues at the Law Society address this matter urgently.We couldn’t agree more. This high court judgment emphasises the dangers of the misuse by lawyers of artificial intelligence, particularly large language models, and in particular its serious implications for the administration of justice and public confidence in the justice system.The public is entitled to expect from legal professionals the highest standards of integrity and competence in appropriate understanding and use of new technologies, as well as in all other respects.The Bar Council has already issued guidance on the opportunities and risks surrounding the use of generative AI, which is quoted by the court, and is in the process of setting up a joint working group with the Bar Standards Board to identify how best we can support barristers to uphold those standards with appropriate further training and supervision
Watch out, hallucinating Humphrey’s about in Whitehall | Brief letters
I doubt that government officials consulted their AI tool, Humphrey, on what it should be called (UK government rollout of Humphrey AI tool raises fears about reliance on big tech, 15 June). It could have advised that in the 1970s the name was used for a milk marketing campaign: “Watch out, there’s a Humphrey about.” That line will now have a whole new meaning. Having spent the last few weeks voting in the Lords to try, in vain, to achieve protections for the creative industries from AI abuse, that meaning might be prophetic. On a personal level, my husband is angry that his name is being stolen again
Eric Cantona and Ella Toone help meld football and art for Manchester festival
At a festival, are you Elinor or Marianne? | Brief letters
‘A giant parenting group’: how online comedians are making a living by laughing about the chaos of kids
Speaking out on Gaza: Australian creatives and arts organisations struggle to reconcile competing pressures
Adam Hills: ‘I knew I should have gone to the King’s birthday but I really wanted to go to rugby training’
Andrew Lloyd Webber is ‘hot again’ –with help from new kids on musicals block