Carlos Alcaraz shakes off Tarvet from his back without inhibitions or regrets | Jonathan Liew

A picture


There were negatives, of course,Shall we focus on the negatives? Shall we dwell on the frailties a little? The uncharacteristic errors, the double faults, an occasional scruffiness at the net, the frequent slumps in intensity? Shall we marvel at the fact that the lowest-ranked player in the tournament earned more break points (11) than one of the greatest players of his generation (10)? Shall we warn, in a tone of affected sternness, that the defending champion will have to raise his game on this evidence?Of course we shall, because this is Carlos Alcaraz, and because there is an entire cottage industry built around maintaining the idea that Alcaraz is in a state of crisis at all times, a state of crisis so acute that it is necessary to feign round-the-clock concern for him,We just want to see all that rich talent fulfilled,That’s all it is,Sincerely and genuinely.

And definitely not a weirdly prurient interest in his holidays to Ibiza, or whether him and Emma Raducanu are, you know.Just the talent.Thinking of the talent here.And of course the illicit pleasure and enduring appeal of Alcaraz is that he so readily indulges these desires.He emotes.

He misses a lot.He pulls off spectacular acrobatic winners immediately after missing a lot.He lives without inhibitions or regrets.Alcaraz is essentially a magic-eye puzzle you can read in whatever way you want, and after the sweat-drenched psychodrama of Fabio Fognini on Monday night there were more danger signs in his 6-1, 6-4, 6-4 win over Britain’s Oliver Tarvet; if you really, really wanted to see them.The more prosaic truth is that Alcaraz was playing himself as much as he was playing the world No 733 from St Albans.

Tarvet is one of those classic British folk heroes the early rounds of Wimbledon always seem to throw up, complete with shaggy-dog backstory and tabloid headline-friendly name.And if Alcaraz was expecting an easy afternoon of Tarvet practice, he quickly discovered that it would be anything but easy shaking off this particular Tarvet from his back.Certainly Tarvet seemed to get an early read on the Alcaraz serve, used his speed and coverage to trade happily from the baseline, rode the early waves of noise from the home crowd.Some of his passes were sublime.Above all he looked untroubled, unfazed, hyper- confident, like a crypto-billionaire who had won a game against Carlos Alcaraz in a charity auction.

“Good serve,” he called out at one point as his opponent pinned him with a vicious delivery to the body.Alcaraz shot him a look as if to say: yeah.Obviously it’s a good serve.I’m Carlos Alcaraz.Who are you again?But of course no read on Alcaraz’s serve is ever going to rival the read he has on yours.

And though both men kept swinging, while Tarvet created break points and saved others, the only real jeopardy here was of the confected variety.Tarvet probably played the best match of his life, and in the end it was like bringing a sword to a sword fight when your opponent has about six far superior swords.There was a sadistic relish to the way Alcaraz kept teasing him with the drop shot, occasionally missing, mostly succeeding.But of course the drop shot, such a staple of the Alcaraz game, is also a stick to beat him with.Missing it costs one point, exactly the same as putting a forehand an inch long.

And yet some misses are clearly more moral than others.For his detractors Alcaraz’s missed drop shots will always be taken in evidence against him, proof of his essential flimsiness.So, once again, we must deal with the principal charge.Alcaraz is inconsistent.It’s true, because everyone says so, to the point where it has basically passed into objective fact.

Like the objective fact that Alcaraz has a win percentage of 90% so far this year, has won five of his six finals, is slowly putting together one of the greatest seasons in the modern era.His grass-court record stands comparison with the all-timers.This is the sort of inconsistency all but one of his rivals would dream of.But of course this is a stylistic as much as it is an empirical judgment.It is true that there is a big gulf between his highest and lowest levels.

That he occasionally loses to people like Botic van de Zandschulp.That towards the end of last season and for a small portion of this he has looked a little unmoored, a little rattled.And yet how much of this reaction stems from a desire to see crisis, to armchair-analyse, to draw a straight line from his personal choices to his tennis as a way of justifying our interest in his personal choices?In a way, Alcaraz’s entire game serves as a kind of rejoinder to all this.This is, remember, still a player with just 34 tour games on grass, still adding levels and tones to his game, still learning how to master the mental side, still trying to work out exactly how famous he wants to be.In the meantime he’s going to keep going for the lines, keep going to Ibiza, keep trying the drop shot, keep embracing the chaos, because that’s the only way he knows.

What if he misses, you scream.Fine.But what if he doesn’t?
technologySee all
A picture

AI companies start winning the copyright fight

Hello, and welcome to TechScape. If you need me after this newsletter publishes, I will be busy poring over photos from Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez’s wedding, the gaudiest and most star-studded affair to disrupt technology news this year. I found it a tacky and spectacular affair. Everyone who was anyone was there, except for Charlize Theron, who, unprompted, said on Monday: “I think we might be the only people who did not get an invite to the Bezos wedding. But that’s OK, because they suck and we’re cool

A picture

China hosts first fully autonomous AI robot football match

They think it’s all over … for human footballers at least.The pitch wasn’t the only artificial element on display at a football match in China on Saturday. Four teams of humanoid robots took on each other in Beijing, in games of three-a-side powered by artificial intelligence.While the modern game has faced accusations of becoming near-robotic in its obsession with tactical perfection, the games in China showed that AI won’t be taking Kylian Mbappé’s job just yet.Footage of the humanoid kickabout showed the robots struggling to kick the ball or stay upright, performing pratfalls that would have earned their flesh-and-blood counterparts a yellow card for diving

A picture

Whitehall’s ambition to cut costs using AI is fraught with risk

A Dragons’ Den-style event this week, where tech companies will have 20 minutes to pitch ideas for increasing automation in the British justice system, is one of numerous examples of how the cash-strapped Labour government hopes artificial intelligence and data science can save money and improve public services.Amid warnings from critics that Downing Street has been “drinking the Kool-Aid” on AI, the Department of Health and Social Care this week announced an AI early warning system to detect dangerous maternity services after a series of scandals, and Wes Streeting, the health secretary, said he wants one in eight operations to be conducted by a robot within a decade.AI is being used to prioritise actions on the 25,000 pieces of correspondence the Department for Work and Pensions receives each day and to detect potential fraud and error in benefit claims. Ministers even have access to an AI tool that is supposed to provide a “vibe check” on parliamentary opinion to help them weigh the political risks of policy proposals.Again and again, ministers are turning to technology to tackle acute crises that in the past might have been dealt with by employing more staff or investing more money

A picture

Musk vows to unseat lawmakers who support Trump’s sweeping spending bill

Elon Musk has vowed to unseat lawmakers who support Donald Trump’s sweeping budget bill, which he has criticized because it would increase the country’s deficit by $3.3tn.“Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame! And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth,” he wrote on his social media platform, X.A few hours later he added that if the “insane spending bill passes, the America Party will be formed the next day”.With these threats, lobbed at lawmakers over social media, the tech billionaire has launched himself back into a rift with the US president he helped prop up

A picture

Gov.uk smartphone app to launch with limited functionality

A government app intended to “cut life admin” will be free to download by millions of UK citizens from Tuesday, but its functions will be limited and the cabinet minister in charge has admitted: “The design is not as we would like it to be.”The gov.uk app will be accessible on smartphones for people aged 16 and over and is intended to be the main mobile hub for many citizen interactions with the government, although not the NHS or HM Revenue and Customs.Peter Kyle, the secretary of state for science and technology, said the version launched this week would only steer users to existing government webpages, with more functionality to be added by the end of the year.A generative artificial intelligence chatbot trained on 700,000 pages of the gov

A picture

Microsoft says AI system better than doctors at diagnosing complex health conditions

Microsoft has revealed details of an artificial intelligence system that performs better than human doctors at complex health diagnoses, creating a “path to medical superintelligence”.The company’s AI unit, which is led by the British tech pioneer Mustafa Suleyman, has developed a system that imitates a panel of expert physicians tackling “diagnostically complex and intellectually demanding” cases.Microsoft said that when paired with OpenAI’s advanced o3 AI model, its approach “solved” more than eight of 10 case studies specially chosen for the diagnostic challenge. When those case studies were tried on practising physicians – who had no access to colleagues, textbooks or chatbots – the accuracy rate was two out of 10.Microsoft said it was also a cheaper option than using human doctors because it was more efficient at ordering tests