Nearly half of sexually active young people in UK have experienced strangulation, study shows
More than two in five sexually active under-18s in the UK have either been strangled or strangled someone during sex, research has found, despite the serious dangers of the practice,“Choking”, as it is commonly known, has become normalised in young people’s sexual habits, the study by the Institute for Addressing Strangulation (Ifas) showed, with 43% of sexually active 16- and 17-year-olds having experienced it,More than half of people under the age of 35 have experienced it, with nearly a third wrongly believing there are safe ways to strangle someone,The survey also revealed a crisis of distress among those on the receiving end, with 36% saying they felt scared during the experience and 21% suffering dangerous physical symptoms, including dizziness and even loss of consciousness,It also showed a consent gap, with more perpetrators of strangulation believing their partner had consented to it in advance than those who had experienced it, with 1% saying they had explicitly not agreed to it the last time it happened.
Though both genders were fairly equal in having been on the receiving end, at 47% men and 52% women, men were considerably more likely to have carried it out.Of those who had strangled someone else, 5% said they had done it more than 50 times.In recent years, “choking” has become part of a dangerous drift towards increased violence in mainstream pornography, which was cited as the biggest source of information about the practice among the respondents.Pornography featuring strangulation and suffocation is to be outlawed in the UK at the end of this year, with a legal requirement placed on tech platforms to prevent users from seeing such material.Clare McGlynn, a professor of law at Durham University and the author of Exposed: The Rise of Extreme Porn and How We Fight Back, said strangulation in pornography was a recent phenomenon.
“Depictions of strangulation and suffocation are brutal and graphic, often involving belts tied around necks, plastic bags over women’s heads, and two hands gripping the neck.”She called for a national campaign to raise awareness of the real risks and harms of the practice, which could occur even when there was no visible injury.More than a fifth of respondents to the survey by Ifas, part of the Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine of the Royal College of Physicians, said they had suffered physical effects, including pain in the neck, dizziness and coughing.One in 50 people said they had lost consciousness and the same number experienced incontinence of the bladder during or after the strangulation, with one in 100 respondents saying they lost bowel control.Most respondents who experienced physical symptoms did not get medical help afterwards because they were unaware of how serious the problems could be.
Numerous studies have shown brain changes in women who have been repeatedly “choked” during sex, including markers for brain damage and disruptions in brain hemispheres linked to depression and anxiety,Nearly half (47%) of the survey respondents said they had experienced anxiety during or after being strangled,Prof Cath White, a medical director at Ifas, said even a “fleeting moment” of strangulation could lead to lifelong health problems,She added: “Respondents in the survey often linked strangulation during sex to ‘enhanced orgasms’ or ‘pleasure’, but in reality that sensation may be the result of brain cells being deprived of oxygen – and once those cells die they cannot regenerate … The truth is that strangulation – and especially repeated strangulation – increases the risk of nerve damage, damage to the brain, stroke and even death,What might feel like a fleeting moment can have consequences that last a lifetime.
”Among those who had engaged in strangulation only 38% said they had done it because they enjoyed it, with the most common reason being their partner’s enjoyment, at 46%.Sexual partners were the greatest source of encouragement for the practice among those surveyed.Harriet Smailes, the author of the report and research manager at Ifas, said the research should “raise questions around influences and feelings of choice in practising strangulation during sex”.She added: “There are still many individuals who believe strangulation to be a ‘normal’ part of sex, worry about what their partner or friends will say if they don’t engage in it, are strangled during sex without prior agreement and are physically or psychologically harmed during the practice.”Non-fatal strangulation was introduced as a stand-alone criminal offence in 2021 and the law recognises that someone cannot consent to the infliction of a serious level of harm or to their own death for the purposes of sexual gratification.
This was in response to a rise in the use of the “rough sex” defence among men who murdered women during sex or rape to escape justice or receive a lesser sentence.Strangulation was the cause of death in 27% of cases where women were killed, according to the Ifas femicide census.A total of 550 women in the UK have been strangled to death since 2014.
Amazon vs Perplexity: the AI agent war has arrived
Hello, and welcome to TechScape. I’m your host, Blake Montgomery.A tech titan and a startup are fighting over who controls the next phase of artificial intelligence.Amazon has sued Perplexity AI, a prominent artificial intelligence startup, over a shopping feature in that company’s browser that allows it to automate placing orders for users. Amazon accused Perplexity AI of covertly accessing customer accounts and disguising AI activity as human browsing
Crypto market sheds more than $1tn in six weeks amid fears of tech bubble
More than $1tn (£760bn) has been wiped off the value of the cryptocurrency market in the past six weeks amid fears of a tech bubble and fading expectations for a US rate cut next month.Tracking more than 18,500 coins, the value of the crypto market has fallen by a quarter since a high in early October, according to the data company CoinGecko.Bitcoin has fallen by 27% over the same period to $91,212, its lowest level since April.Investors around the world are on edge as fears mount over an artificial intelligence bubble in the stock market, with even the boss of Google’s parent company warning that “no company” will be immune if the bubble bursts.The UK’s blue-chip FTSE 100 index fell 1
‘Fear really drives him’: is Alex Karp of Palantir the world’s scariest CEO?
His company is potentially creating the ultimate state surveillance tool, and Karp has recently been on a striking political and philosophical journey. His biographer reveals what makes him tickIn a recent interview, Alex Karp said that his company Palantir was “the most important software company in America and therefore in the world”. He may well be right. To some, Palantir is also the scariest company in the world, what with its involvement in the Trump administration’s authoritarian agenda. The potential end point of Palantir’s tech is an all-powerful government system amalgamating citizens’ tax records, biometric data and other personal information – the ultimate state surveillance tool
Don’t blindly trust everything AI tools say, warns Alphabet boss
The head of Google’s parent company has said people should not “blindly trust” everything artificial intelligence tools tell them.In an interview with the BBC, Sundar Pichai, the chief executive of Alphabet, said AI models were “prone to errors” and urged people to use them alongside other tools.In the same interview, Pichai warned that no company would be immune if the AI bubble burst.Since May, Google has introduced an “AI Mode” into its search using its Gemini chatbot, which aims to give users the experience of talking to an expert.Google’s consumer AI model, Gemini 3
UK consumers warned over AI chatbots giving inaccurate financial advice
Artificial intelligence chatbots are giving inaccurate money tips, offering British consumers misleading tax advice and suggesting they buy unnecessary travel insurance, research has revealed.Tests on the most popular chatbots found Microsoft’s Copilot and ChatGPT advised breaking HMRC investment limits on Isas; ChatGPT wrongly said it was mandatory to have travel insurance to visit most EU countries; and Meta’s AI gave incorrect information about how to claim compensation for delayed flights.Google’s Gemini advised withholding money from a builder if a job went wrong, a move that the consumer organisation Which? said risked exposing the consumer to a claim of breach of contract.Which? said its research, conducted by putting 40 questions to the rival AI tools, “uncovered far too many inaccuracies and misleading statements for comfort, especially when leaning on AI for important issues like financial or legal queries”.Meta’s AI received the worst score, followed by ChatGPT; Copilot and Gemini scored slightly higher
Jeff Bezos reportedly launches new AI startup with himself as CEO
After stepping down as Amazon’s CEO four years ago, Jeff Bezos, the billionaire founder and former chief executive of the online shopping company, is going to be a CEO again. This time, Bezos has appointed himself co-CEO of an AI startup called Project Prometheus, the New York Times reported, citing anonymous sources.The startup, which will focus on developing AI for engineering and manufacturing in various fields, has already received $6.2bn in funding – more than many companies are able to raise in their lifetimes. Leading the company alongside Bezos is his co-founder and co-CEO Vik Bajaj, a celebrity tech executive in his own right
Ben Stokes the thunder god primed for Ashes series that may change his Australian legacy
‘This wasn’t about money, this was a life at stake’: the world of a sports lawyer
Why Australia will win v why England can win: two Guardian cricket writers make their Ashes cases
A trooper’s shove showed stardom doesn’t protect Black athletes from police | Etan Thomas
The Breakdown | Could new Nations Championship transform Test rugby? The jury is out
Mark Wood declared fit for first Ashes Test as England seamers ‘lick their lips’ at surface