HMRC trial of child benefit crackdown wrongly suspected fraud in 46% of cases

about 22 hours ago

Home Office travel records used in a trial of a controversial anti-fraud crackdown under which thousands of parents lost their child benefit were so flawed that almost half of the families initially flagged as having emigrated were still living in the UK, it has emerged.The benefit is not payable if the claimant is abroad for more than eight weeks unless there are exceptional circumstances.The pilot scheme saved HMRC £17m but left 46% of the families targeted incorrectly suspected of fraud, a margin of error far in excess of the 1% to 5% scientifically acceptable.In Northern Ireland, 78% were incorrectly identified as not having returned from trips abroad and 129 families were flagged during the pilot as having left the countrywhen only 28 had actually done so.Kim Johnson, the Labour MP for Liverpool Riverside, called for an urgent investigation after being contacted by several constituents who had their benefits stopped.

The results of the pilot raise fundamental questions about using Home Office data to infer fraud, experts have said.“Relying on Home Office data for punitive purposes is always going to be problematic,” said Colin Yeo, an immigration barrister at Garden Court Chambers.The detailed background to the anti-fraud initiative is not yet known, but Yeo said it was “quite alarming” to see Home Office data used “when the data so obviously doesn’t bear the weight that they are placing on it.”The data has emerged two weeks after an investigation by the Guardian and the investigative website the Detail revealed that thousands of families had had their benefits stopped as part of a government crackdown on benefit fraud.Cases including one woman who had her benefits stopped after booking a flight to Italy that she never boarded because one of her children had an epileptic seizure at the departure gate.

Another told of losing benefits despite not taking a flight she had booked because a wedding she was going to attend had been cancelled.The Liberal Democrats and the Green party have raised concerns in parliament.The Lib Dem peer Tim Clement–Jones has asked the government in a written parliamentary question to explain why it had “not published the business case and data protection impact assessments”.The Green peer Natalie Bennett has asked which internal assessment of procedures had been put in place since the child benefit freezes came to light.The Guardian and the Detail first reported last month that hundreds of families in Northern Ireland had had their benefits stopped after they returned to the UK via Dublin airport.

It then emerged that about 23,500 letters cutting child benefit had been sent to parents across the country including in Rochdale, Liverpool, London, Brighton and Glasgow.HMRC has said it will no longer use data on travel through Dublin airport to infer fraud because it is part of the common travel area, and that it not stop benefits without cross-checking with PAYE records and the person concerned first.Parents said they felt they had been treated like criminals after receiving the letters.Some said they were still arriving this week, more than a week after HMRC apologised for the distress it had caused.Sign up to First EditionOur morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it mattersafter newsletter promotionSome parents have reported swift and courteous responses from the dedicated team HMRC has put in place to deal with incorrect child benefit suspensions.

Others, however, have said they are unable to get through to the helpline, and some foreign nationals report that customer service staff are still insisting they submit extensive evidence to prove they are not fraudsters,Angela, who called the HMRC helpline nine times in an hour on Wednesday and more than 20 times on Friday to no avail said: “I have spent the whole day requesting letters from schools, nursery, the GP, while my partner finds bank statements, and we both try to dig out our travel information,Ryanair cannot provide us with a confirmation of travel letter because we flew in and out of Spain in April 2022, longer ago than their three-year cut-off,“I was only out of the country for three days, and my partner and child for one week,“I have found it quite upsetting to be so accused, when I am diligent about fulfilling HMRC requirements as an individual, a company director and a charity trustee.

”A spokesperson for HMRC said: “We’re very sorry to those whose payments have been suspended incorrectly.We have taken immediate action to update the process, giving customers one month to respond before payments are suspended.“We remain committed to protecting taxpayers’ money and are confident that the majority of suspensions are accurate.”If you have been affected by this and want to share your story, email: lisa.ocarroll@theguardian.

com

technologySee all

Tesla shareholders approve $1tn pay package for Elon Musk

Tesla shareholders approved a $1tn compensation plan for CEO Elon Musk on Thursday, awarding the world’s richest person what would be the largest corporate payout in history if he meets the goals necessary to receive it.The pay package, which several high-profile investors opposed, demonstrates that shareholders still believe Musk can lead the automaker in an era dominated by robotics and artificial intelligence.The result of the vote was announced at the annual shareholder event in Austin, Texas, with more than 75% of investors voting in favor of the plan. Chants of “Elon” erupted in the room at the news of its approval.“Thanks, guys,” Musk said, after briefly dancing on stage alongside the company’s Optimus robots

3 days ago

Amazon sues AI startup over browser’s automated shopping and buying feature

Amazon sued a prominent artificial intelligence startup on Tuesday over a shopping feature in the company’s browser, which can automate placing orders for users. Amazon accused Perplexity AI of covertly accessing customer accounts and disguising AI activity as human browsing.“Perplexity’s misconduct must end,” Amazon’s lawyers wrote. “Perplexity is not allowed to go where it has been expressly told it cannot; that Perplexity’s trespass involves code rather than a lockpick makes it no less unlawful.”Perplexity, which has grown rapidly amid the boom in AI assistants, has previously rejected the US shopping company’s claims, accusing Amazon of using its market dominance to stifle competition

5 days ago

Google plans to put datacentres in space to meet demand for AI

Google is hatching plans to put artificial intelligence datacentres into space, with its first trial equipment sent into orbit in early 2027.Its scientists and engineers believe tightly packed constellations of about 80 solar-powered satellites could be arranged in orbit about 400 miles above the Earth’s surface equipped with the powerful processors required to meet rising demand for AI.Prices of space launches are falling so quickly that by the middle of the 2030s the running costs of a space-based datacentre could be comparable to one on Earth, according to Google research released on Tuesday.Using satellites could also minimise the impact on the land and water resources needed to cool existing datacentres.Once in orbit, the datacentres would be powered by solar panels that can be up to eight times more productive than those on Earth

6 days ago

LOL: is this the ultimate texting faux pas (and what should you use instead)?

From abbreviations to happy poos, gen Z has strong opinions on appropriate texting behaviour. But can anyone keep up with the ever-changing rules?Name: “LOL”.Age: The Oxford English Dictionary first included LOL in 1997.Not to be confused with: Loll, which is what dogs sometimes do.So as in “laugh out loud”? Or laughing out loud, though David Cameron thought it stood for “lots of love” and used to sign off to Rebekah Brooks, the former Sun and News of the World editor, with a LOL

6 days ago

Elon Musk’s $1tn Tesla pay deal to be rejected by huge Norway wealth fund

Norway’s sovereign wealth fund has said it will vote against a $1tn (£765bn) pay package for the Tesla chief executive, Elon Musk.The fund, which is the biggest national wealth fund in the world, said that while it appreciated the “the significant value created under Mr Musk’s visionary role” it would vote against his performance award.“We are concerned about the total size of the award, dilution and lack of mitigation of key person risk – consistent with our views on executive compensation,” it said. “We will continue to seek constructive dialogue with Tesla on this and other topics.”The warning from Norges Bank, which is the seventh biggest single shareholder in Tesla with a stake worth $17bn, comes two days before the carmaker hosts its annual shareholder meeting

6 days ago

Apple Watch SE 3 review: the bargain smartwatch for iPhone

Apple’s entry level Watch SE has been updated with almost everything from its excellent mid-range Series 11 but costs about 40% less, making it the bargain of iPhone smartwatches.The Guardian’s journalism is independent. We will earn a commission if you buy something through an affiliate link. Learn more.The new Watch SE 3 costs from £219 (€269/$249/A$399), making it one of the cheapest brand-new fully fledged smartwatches available for the iPhone and undercutting the £369 Series 11 and the top-of-the-line £749 Apple Watch Ultra 3

6 days ago

sportSee all