Equity threatens mass direct action over use of actors’ images in AI content
The performing arts union Equity has threatened mass direct action over tech and entertainment companies’ use of its members’ likenesses, images and voices in AI content without permission.The warning came as the union said growing numbers of its members had made complaints about infringements of their copyright and misuse of their personal data in AI material.Its general secretary, Paul W Fleming, said it planned to coordinate data requests en masse to companies to force them to disclose whether they used members’ data in AI-generated material without consent.Last week the union confirmed its was supporting a Scottish actor who believes her image was used in the creation of the “AI actor” Tilly Norwood, which has been widely condemned by the film industry.Briony Monroe, 28, from East Renfrewshire, said she believed that an image of her face had been used to make the digital character, created by the AI “talent studio” Xicoia, which has denied her claims.
Most of the complaints Equity has received from members concerned AI-generated voice replicas.Fleming said the union has already helped members make subject access requests to producers and tech companies which failed to provide satisfactory explanations about where the data they used to create AI content came from.He said: “The companies actually became very willing to start discussing compensation and usage.So the industry needs to be more careful because it’s not going to stop there.“AI companies need to know that we will be putting in these subject access requests en masse.
They have a statutory obligation to respond,If an individual member reasonably believes that their data is being used without their consent, we want to find out,”Fleming said he hoped the tactic would push tech companies and producers resistant to being transparent about the sources of their AI content to strike an agreement on performers’ rights,“What we’re trying to do is use people’s individual rights to make it so hard for tech companies and producers to not enter into collective rights,” said Fleming,As the union has 50,000 members, significant numbers of them making subject access requests would create a “hassle” for firms unwilling to negotiate, he added.
Under data protection law, individuals have the right to ask for all the information an organisation holds about them,Organisations normally have one month to reply to a subject access request,“It’s not a silver bullet,” Fleming added,“It’s not easy to do because they may well have got data from somewhere else,A lot of people are behaving very recklessly and immorally.
”Monroe said she believed that Norwood had copied both her image and her mannerisms.Monroe said: “I move my head quite a lot when I’m acting.I noticed in the last few seconds of Tilly’s show reel, that is exactly what she did.Other people have also said, ‘Those are your mannerisms.That’s how you act.
’”Liam Budd, industrial official for recorded media at Equity UK, said the union was taking Monroe’s concerns seriously.The AI production company Particle6, which launched Xicoia earlier this month, confirmed it was working with the union “to address any concerns”.A spokesperson for Particle6 added: “Briony Monroe’s likeness, image, voice or personal data have not been used in any way to create Tilly Norwood.“Tilly was developed entirely from scratch using original creative design.We do not and will not use any performer’s likeness without explicit consent and fair compensation.
”Although he would not comment on Monroe’s complaint, Budd said: “We’ve had increasing numbers of members getting in touch about specific infringements where they believe that their image or voice has been used without their consent to then create an output which can identify them or resembles them in some way.“It’s been a lot more common in the audio space because the technology is much easier.You don’t need many recordings to create a digital replica of a voice.”But Norwood represented a new challenge for the industry, said Budd, because “we haven’t really seen the launch of a wholly synthetic actor” before.Equity UK has been in negotiations with the UK production trade body Pact (Producers Alliance for Cinema and Television) about AI, copyright and data protection for more than a year.
Fleming said: “The bosses are not asking questions about where this data has come from.Privately, they will admit that it is impossible to ethically use AI because it has been scraped and trained on data where the provenance is at best unclear.“But nine times out of 10, we know it’s been used completely outside of the existing copyright and data protection framework.”Max Rumney, the deputy chief executive of Pact, said its members needed to use AI technology in production or they would be at a commercial disadvantage to those firms with no collective agreements with unions, who did not remunerate actors, writers and other creatives.But he added that there was no transparency from tech companies on what content or data had been used to train foundation models, the technology that underpins AI tools such as image generators.
“The foundational models have been trained without permission on the films and programmes of our members,” said Rumney.“Our members want human creative expression in their films and programmes.They value this and consider that this is what makes UK productions so compelling and innovative.”
The Guide #212: The Taylor Swift backlash has me asking: how much good music can one artist really produce?
Amid the flood of discourse around Taylor Swift’s The Life of a Showgirl, one recurring sentiment jumped out: that the album – which many critics have declared a misstep in Swift’s otherwise consistently solid discography – felt hurried, hasty, rushed. “The Life of a Showgirl Is 40 Minutes of Elevator Music Rushed Out to Break a Beatles Record”, read the particularly savage headline of a piece on Collider. In the Guardian music desk’s excellent round table on the album, just about every panellist expressed a wish that Swift would take a break from the constant churn of releasing records, in order to recapture a lost spark.And it has been quite the churn. Since 2019 Swift has on average released an album a year, and that’s not counting the Taylor’s Version re-records of her older albums
Seth Meyers on Trump: ‘deeply unhinged, detached from reality’
Late-night hosts have questioned Donald Trump’s cognitive abilities as he makes further blunders during his second term.On Late Night, Seth Meyers replayed clips of various rightwingers talking about Joe Biden’s cognitive decline when he was president and then told viewers that the same people should be more aware of Trump having similar issues.Recently, he repeated the debunked claim that he predicted Osama bin Laden would engage in mass terrorist activity one year before 9/11. Meyers played footage of him slurring a catalogue of errors to a crowd. “Finding the dementia in that clip is like finding Waldo in a book called Oops! All Waldos,” he said
Spitting Image comics decry lawsuit over depiction of Paddington Bear
A decision to sue the makers of Spitting Image over a depiction of Paddington Bear as a foul-mouthed drug addict is an attack on comedy and freedom of expression, the comedians behind the reinvention have said.StudioCanal, the production company that made the recent Paddington movies, is taking legal action against the team behind Spitting Image over the character’s reimagining as the co-host of a satirical podcast, The Rest is Bulls*!t.In a new YouTube video responding to the lawsuit, however, a dishevelled Paddington is again seen snorting cocaine and using StudioCanal’s legal letter as toilet paper. The video calls on viewers to “remember to like and subscribe before Paddington gets cancelled”.The online show featuring Paddington’s makeover is produced by Avalon, the makers of Spitting Image – the satirical TV puppet show that angered numerous politicians when it ran throughout the 1980s
Jimmy Kimmel on Trump’s national guard deployments: ‘Incredibly dangerous and unnecessary’
Late-night hosts assessed Donald Trump’s deployment of the national guard for nonexistent crises and government dysfunction amid the ongoing shutdown.Jimmy Kimmel took a moment to acknowledge his home base of Los Angeles on Wednesday. “We are safe, we are sound, thanks to our president who saved us from ourselves by calling in the national guard to stop a conflict that never started – but could have! Had he not acted to prevent an entirely fabricated crisis from spilling out of his imagination and on to our streets,” he said, referring to Trump’s deployment of the national guard in LA to prevent a nonexistent insurrection.“Thank you, Mr President,” he continued. “Thank you for sending troops to occupy all of these Democrat-run cities, whether we want them or not
Bill Burr calls critics of Riyadh comedy festival ‘sanctimonious’ and ‘phoney’
Bill Burr has defended his appearance at the controversial Riyadh comedy festival, calling his critics “sanctimonious cunts”.The comedian has been under fire, alongside Kevin Hart, Louis CK, Aziz Ansari and Dave Chappelle, for being on the lineup for what was billed as “the world’s largest comedy festival”. The Human Rights Watch called out the event as a distraction, aiming to focus on something light rather than the “soaring number of executions” taking place while comedians such as Marc Maron and Shane Gillis expressed disappointment. David Cross wrote that he was “disgusted” in a statement.Burr spoke to Conan O’Brien as part of a live podcast, and said he felt “wonderful” about his appearance and doesn’t “give a fuck what all these phoney fucking people are saying”
Jimmy Kimmel on Trump: ‘Why does he always sound like the dumbest member of the crime family?’
Late-night hosts discuss Donald Trump’s unhelpful comments on the ongoing government shutdown, Ghislaine Maxwell and Fox News being too “politically correct”.Jimmy Kimmel continued to keep tabs on the government shutdown on Tuesday evening, as essential workers such as air traffic controllers were still required to work without pay. “Meanwhile Congress, the people who actually shut the government down, are getting paid in full,” he said. “Don’t even try to make sense of it. The logic doesn’t fly, and I would recommend that you don’t either, at least for quite awhile
Post-ministerial jobs watchdog closes as part of UK government ethics shake-up
Jonathan Powell had no role in dropping of China spy case, senior minister says
Green party reaches 100,000 members for first time after Polanski becomes leader
Looking for signs of life in centre-right politics in Britain | Letters
Lucy Powell calls on Labour not to ‘write off’ May local elections
Tories and Reform battle to be heirs to Thatcher’s legacy on her centenary